OSCR

Six weeks of isometric resistance training led to evidence of corticospinal but not reticulospinal adaptation in previously untrained adult males.

Overview

  1. NeuroMuscular Research Center, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
  2. Institute of Biosciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  3. School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
  4. Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
  5. Monash Exercise Neuroplasticity Research Unit, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Institutions: University of Jyväskylä (Finland); Newcastle University (United Kingdom); Loughborough University (United Kingdom); Imperial College London (United Kingdom); Monash University (Australia)
Journal: Experimental brain research, volume 244, issue 10, article 191
Dates: received 31 March 2026; accepted 22 August 2026; published online 3 September 2026; in print 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1007/s00221-026-07391-x · PMID 42690424 · PMCID PMC13541792 · OpenAlex W7207586712
Open access: hybrid, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: data only
Categories: other (modality), human (organism)
Methods: Statistics, Preprocessing, Evoked potentials, Physiology & signal measures
Keywords: Strength training, Rate of force development, Startle, Transcranial magnetic stimulation
MeSH: Adaptation, Physiological*, Evoked Potentials, Motor*, Isometric Contraction*, Muscle, Skeletal*, Pyramidal Tracts*, Resistance Training*, Reticular Formation*, Adult, Electromyography, Humans, Male, Reaction Time, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult (* major topic)
Topic: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (Neurology, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Funding: University of Jyväskylä
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 42 references in the paper

Abstract

The latest hypothesis regarding the source of enhanced neural activation from resistance training is the reticulospinal rather than the corticospinal tract, based on invasive animal and emerging human data. The present study employed a six-week isometric resistance training intervention in a randomized controlled design to address this knowledge gap. Thirty-nine healthy, untrained males (age ~23 y, sustained contraction group n = 13, explosive contraction group n = 9, control group n = 17) underwent neuromuscular and electrophysiological testing and completed all study requirements. Maximal isometric torque (MVC) and rate of torque development (RTD) were measured during a familiarization session as well as before and after the six-week period. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess motor-evoked potential (MEP) area and silent period duration while subjects contracted to 10% of MVC. Loud sound (120 dB) was used to modulate MEP area and reaction time to visual stimuli during the StartReact test. Only the intervention groups demonstrated significant improvements in MVC (27%) and RTD (60%) (both P < 0.01), along with reduced MEP area (− 21%) and silent period duration (− 23%) (both P < 0.01). The sustained contraction group showed reduced modulation of reaction time and increased MEP suppression due to loud sound. Short-term resistance training seemed to reduce cortical inhibition and corticospinal excitability in both training groups. The study showed conflicting changes in measures purported to evaluate reticulospinal functioning. It is recommended to examine different forms of resistance training and longer training exposure in future.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

Data availability

The data used in this article is freely available from the Mendeley Data Repository (https://data.mendeley.com/research-data/) from 1.10.2026 https://doi.org/10.17632/f5hc9nfmbz.1

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 3, 28 September 2026

  • Publisher: n/a → Springer Science+Business Media

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 7 authors, 4 keywords, 14 MeSH terms, 1 funder, 41 references.

Cite

This paper

Walker, S., Keogh, K. E. J., Tanel, M., Baker, A. S. W., Baker, A. M. E., Kidgell, D. J., & Baker, S. N. (2026). Six weeks of isometric resistance training led to evidence of corticospinal but not reticulospinal adaptation in previously untrained adult males. Experimental brain research, 244(10), 191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-026-07391-x

BibTeX

@article{walker2026six,
author = {Walker, Simon and Keogh, Katherine E J and Tanel, Meghan and Baker, Aidan S W and Baker, Anne M E and Kidgell, Dawson J and Baker, Stuart N},
title = {{Six weeks of isometric resistance training led to evidence of corticospinal but not reticulospinal adaptation in previously untrained adult males}},
journal = {Experimental brain research},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
volume = {244},
number = {10},
pages = {191},
publisher = {Springer Science+Business Media},
issn = {0014-4819},
doi = {10.1007/s00221-026-07391-x},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-026-07391-x},
pmid = {42690424},
pmcid = {PMC13541792}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Walker, Simon
AU - Keogh, Katherine E J
AU - Tanel, Meghan
AU - Baker, Aidan S W
AU - Baker, Anne M E
AU - Kidgell, Dawson J
AU - Baker, Stuart N
TI - Six weeks of isometric resistance training led to evidence of corticospinal but not reticulospinal adaptation in previously untrained adult males
T2 - Experimental brain research
J2 - Exp Brain Res
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/03
VL - 244
IS - 10
SP - 191
SN - 0014-4819
PB - Springer Science+Business Media
DO - 10.1007/s00221-026-07391-x
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-026-07391-x
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1007/s00221-026-07391-x",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Six weeks of isometric resistance training led to evidence of corticospinal but not reticulospinal adaptation in previously untrained adult males",
"container-title": "Experimental brain research",
"author": [
{
"family": "Walker",
"given": "Simon"
},
{
"family": "Keogh",
"given": "Katherine E J"
},
{
"family": "Tanel",
"given": "Meghan"
},
{
"family": "Baker",
"given": "Aidan S W"
},
{
"family": "Baker",
"given": "Anne M E"
},
{
"family": "Kidgell",
"given": "Dawson J"
},
{
"family": "Baker",
"given": "Stuart N"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Exp Brain Res",
"volume": "244",
"issue": "10",
"page": "191",
"DOI": "10.1007/s00221-026-07391-x",
"PMID": "42690424",
"PMCID": "PMC13541792",
"ISSN": "0014-4819",
"publisher": "Springer Science+Business Media",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-026-07391-x",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
9,
3
]
]
}
}

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1113/jp290395
Spinal motor neuron pools may be partly driven by impulsive common inputs.
Journal: The Journal of physiology
In common: 2 references, author Stuart N Baker
[2] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0346417
Muscle activation and intermuscular coordination adaptations to early strength training during maximal force production.
Journal: PloS one
In common: other, 3 references
[3] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.115998
Hardwired differences: Sexually dimorphic neural connectomes in the brain-lung axis.
Journal: iScience
In common: data.mendeley.com/research-data
[4] doi:10.1113/jp290979 [code]
A method of compensating for the excitability of spinal motoneurones when estimating the magnitude of potentials evoked in skeletal muscles.
Journal: The Journal of physiology
In common: other, 2 references
[5] doi:10.1016/j.neurot.2026.e00960 [code]
Personalizing neuromodulation for chronic pain: A connectivity-guided trial.
Journal: Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics
In common: other, 2 references
[6] doi:10.64898/2026.03.02.26347430 [code]
Personalizing neuromodulation for chronic pain: A connectivity-guided randomized trial
Journal: medRxiv (preprint)
In common: 2 references
[7] doi:10.1113/jp290164 [code]
Improved subjective sleep quality in older adults by enhancing the GABAergic system in the sensorimotor cortex.
Journal: The Journal of physiology
In common: other, 1 reference
[8] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1356
Sources of the N15 TMS-evoked potential following motor cortex stimulation localize rostrals to TMS-induced electric fields and depend on dose.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: other, 1 reference
[9] doi:10.1002/hbm.70629
Characterising the Diffusion Functional Signature of Negative BOLD With Interleaved TMS-fMRI in the Human Brain.
Journal: Human brain mapping
In common: other, 1 reference
[10] doi:10.1007/s10103-026-04962-w
Comparative efficacy and safety of photobiomodulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in Alzheimer's disease: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Journal: Lasers in medical science
In common: other, 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.