A three-component dynamical index of consciousness-related neural organisation.
The 25 matches
- [1] § Generative model and data generation › Simulation of EEG-like signals ↔ Ugail-Howard-Conciousness-Index_State_Simulator.ipynb, lines 321–410 · score 0.80 · 13–30 Hz, 8–13 Hz, 30–80 Hz, mixing, 1–4 Hz, 4–8 Hz
- [2] § Generative model and data generation › Simulation of EEG-like signals ↔ Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index_Validation_updated.ipynb, lines 356–445 · score 0.80 · 13–30 Hz, 8–13 Hz, 30–80 Hz, mixing, 1–4 Hz, 4–8 Hz
- [3] § Mathematical framework › Organised cross-frequency complexity ↔ Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index_Validation_updated.ipynb, lines 1239–1304 · score 0.80 · shift surrogates, Tort MI, theta phase, gamma amplitude, Sleep EDF, bins
- [4] § Generative model and data generation › Simulated states ↔ Ugail-Howard-Conciousness-Index_State_Simulator.ipynb, lines 416–492 · score 0.78 · reduced alpha, Dreaming states, sleep states, Minimally conscious states, REM sleep, delta
- [5] § Generative model and data generation › Simulated states ↔ Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index_Validation_updated.ipynb, lines 451–527 · score 0.78 · reduced alpha, Dreaming states, sleep states, Minimally conscious states, REM sleep, delta
- [6] § Mathematical framework › Organised cross-frequency complexity ↔ Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index.ipynb, lines 192–260 · score 0.75 · phase bins, uniform reference, amplitude guard, Tort MI, Phase amplitude, divergence
- [7] § Mathematical framework › Scale-free temporal organisation ( ) ↔ Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index.ipynb, lines 263–361 · score 0.73 · DFA scaling exponent, range normalised triangular, scale free temporal, fallback, tuning, Kuramoto
- [8] § Results › Validation of using real EEG ↔ Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index_Validation_updated.ipynb, lines 1340–1385 · score 0.70 · Friedman omnibus, pairwise Wilcoxon, rank biserial, Bonferroni correction, Validation
- [9] § Mathematical framework › Scale-free temporal organisation ( ) ↔ Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index.ipynb, lines 124–189 · score 0.69 · DFA scaling exponent, cumulative sum, windows, stationary, detrended, persistent
- [10] § Generative model and data generation › Simulated states ↔ Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index.ipynb, lines 402–461 · score 0.66 · cross channel phase, slow drift, theta gamma, coupling, noise, PAC
- [11] § Results › Monte carlo distributions across states ↔ Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index_Validation_updated.ipynb, lines 625–678 · score 0.65 · Kruskal Wallis omnibus, adjacent state, task engaged, minimally conscious, Cliff, Dreaming
- [12] § Mathematical framework › Organised cross-frequency complexity ↔ Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index.ipynb, lines 192–260 · score 0.64 · binary sequence, Lempel Ziv complexity, amplitude envelope
- [13] § Results › Validation of using real EEG ↔ Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index_Validation_updated.ipynb, lines 1786–1871 · score 0.64 · Empirical benchmarking heatmap, spectral slope, alpha power, Sleep EDF, LZC, row
- [14] § Generative model and data generation › Simulation of EEG-like signals ↔ Ugail-Howard-Conciousness-Index_State_Simulator.ipynb, lines 321–410 · score 0.64 · 0.5–4 Hz, 30–80 Hz, ictal, Hilbert, filtering, scored
- [15] § Results › Validation of using real EEG ↔ Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index_Validation_updated.ipynb, lines 1340–1385 · score 0.63 · Friedman omnibus, Pairwise Wilcoxon, rank biserial, Bonferroni, Validation
- [16] § Generative model and data generation › Simulation of EEG-like signals ↔ Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index_Validation_updated.ipynb, lines 356–445 · score 0.63 · 0.5–4 Hz, 30–80 Hz, ictal, Hilbert, filtering, scored
- [17] § Results › Ablation study ↔ Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index.ipynb, lines 263–361 · score 0.61 · DFA scaling exponents, organisation score, scale free temporal, phase amplitude, cross frequency, Kuramoto
- [18] § Results › Validation of using real EEG ↔ Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index_Validation_updated.ipynb, lines 1786–1871 · score 0.60 · single metric, spectral slope, alpha power, LZC, benchmark, bootstrap
- [19] § Results › Validation of using real EEG ↔ Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index_Validation_updated.ipynb, lines 1511–1635 · score 0.58 · Stratified epoch sampling, capped, night, Sleep EDF, real EEG, validation
- [20] § Mathematical framework › Scale-free temporal organisation ( ) ↔ Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index.ipynb, lines 124–189 · score 0.58 · detrended fluctuation, long range correlations, sum, temporal, DFA
- [21] § Results › Sensitivity analysis ↔ Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index_Validation_updated.ipynb, lines 1035–1174 · score 0.57 · Hyperparameter sensitivity, adjacent state pairs, pair AUC, sweeps, worst
- [22] § Results › Component discriminability in synthetic data ↔ Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index_Validation_updated.ipynb, lines 1035–1174 · score 0.57 · state discrimination, adjacent state pair, Task engaged, Minimally Conscious, hierarchy, AUC
- [23] § Results › Monte carlo convergence ↔ Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index_Validation_updated.ipynb, lines 1177–1236 · score 0.56 · Monte Carlo convergence, median deviation, maximum deviation
- [24] § Mathematical framework › Scale-free temporal organisation ( ) ↔ Ugail-Howard-Conciousness-Index_State_Simulator.ipynb, lines 117–199 · score 0.56 · DFA scaling exponent, cumulative sum, stationary, persistent, signal
- [25] § Generative model and data generation › Simulated states ↔ Ugail-Howard-Conciousness-Index_State_Simulator.ipynb, lines 416–492 · score 0.50 · Task engaged states, prominent, moderate, beta, coupling, simulate
Paper
Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser, not stored by OSCR: doi.org · Europe PMC
The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.
The authors' code
Jupyter notebook · 1,872 lines · 1.1 MB · no license · 13 matches
Ugail-Howard-Consciousness-Index_Validation_updated.ipynb at commit 89ad301, no license · at the source
Overview
- Centre for Visual Computing and Intelligent Systems, University of Bradford,Bradford, UK
- School of Individualized Study, Rochester Institute of Technology,Rochester, USA
Abstract
Quantifying consciousness from brain activity remains a major challenge in neuroscience and clinical practice. Many existing EEG measures focus on a single feature of neural activity, such as complexity, synchrony, or spectral structure, but no single feature appears sufficient across different brain states. We introduce a composite dynamical framework that combines three complementary properties of brain activity, i.e., scale-free temporal organisation, cross-frequency organisation, and metastable flexibility in large-scale synchronisation. These components are normalised and combined into a single index designed to capture organised dynamical complexity rather than raw signal complexity alone. We test the framework in both synthetic and empirical settings. In a generative model of nine EEG-like brain states, including wakefulness, dreaming, anaesthesia, non-conscious states, and seizure states, the index separates the synthetic conscious and non-conscious classes without overlap and remains stable across ablation, sensitivity, and Monte Carlo analyses. We then apply the framework to two-channel Sleep-EDF recordings from 30 healthy adults, where it provides a proof-of-principle subject-level separation of wakefulness from N2 and REM sleep. The framework is dynamical-systems-inspir
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Repository
Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above, with 25 matches between paragraphs and lines of code.
ugail/Index-for-Consciousness-Dynamics
89ad301bf5b457920b457ff4d58f96c41512299c, 13 July 2026Availability: 1 check, the latest on 27 September 2026: the link answers
- 27 September 2026: the link answers
4 files, not copied: shown from their source
OSCR keeps no copy of these files: this repository has no license that allows it. The reader above shows each one from its source, fetched by your browser at commit 89ad301, when its fingerprint is the one OSCR verified. How this works.
- Ugail-Howard-Conciousnes
s-Index_State_Simulator. — Jupyter, 715 lines, 5 matches, shown from its sourceipynb - Ugail-Howard-Consciousne
ss-Index.ipynb — Jupyter, 552 lines, 7 matches, shown from its source - Ugail-Howard-Consciousne
ss-Index_Validation_upda — Jupyter, 1,872 lines, 13 matches, shown from its sourceted.ipynb - README.md — Text, 46 lines, shown from its source
The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.
Tracing map
Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.
What the map holds:
- 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
- 3 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
- 25 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of the code (method lexical-v1);
- neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.
Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.
Data
Datasets cited
- physionet.org/
content/ — at PhysioNet; found in “Data Availability”sleep-edfx
Data Availability
The code to compute the consciousness index Ψ Ψ, including the feature pipeline, the synthetic EEG generator, and validation scripts, is publicly available in a dedicated GitHub repository: https://
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 2, 28 September 2026
- Publisher: — → Springer Science+Business Media
Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 2 authors, 7 MeSH terms, 50 references.
Cite
This paper
Ugail, H., & Howard, N. (2026). A three-component dynamical index of consciousness-related neural organisation. Biological cybernetics, 120(3-4), 20. https://
BibTeX
@article{ugail2026three,
author = {Ugail, Hassan and Howard, Newton},
title = {{A three-component dynamical index of consciousness-related neural organisation}},
journal = {Biological cybernetics},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
volume = {120},
number = {3-4},
pages = {20},
publisher = {Springer Science+Business Media},
issn = {0340-1200},
doi = {10.1007/
url = {https://
pmid = {42439951},
pmcid = {PMC13364888}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Ugail, Hassan
AU - Howard, Newton
TI - A three-component dynamical index of consciousness-related neural organisation
T2 - Biological cybernetics
J2 - Biol Cybern
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 120
IS - 3-4
SP - 20
SN - 0340-1200
PB - Springer Science+Business Media
DO - 10.1007/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.1007/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "A three-component dynamical index of consciousness-related neural organisation",
"container-title": "Biological cybernetics",
"author": [
{
"family": "Ugail",
"given": "Hassan"
},
{
"family": "Howard",
"given": "Newton"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "120",
"issue": "3-4",
"page": "20",
"DOI": "10.1007/
"PMID": "42439951",
"PMCID": "PMC13364888",
"ISSN": "0340-1200",
"publisher": "Springer Science+Business Media",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
7,
13
]
]
}
}
The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2026.117782 [code]
- Thermodynamics of consciousness: Non-equilibrium brain dynamics track conscious states.Journal: Cell reportsIn common: pandas, SciPy, Matplotlib, 1 other tool, EEG, cognitive, 6 references
- [2] doi:10.1038/s41597-026-07350-9 [code]
- An open multi-center MEG-EEG dataset for studying conscious visual perception.Journal: Scientific dataIn common: MNE-Python, scikit-learn, pandas, 3 other tools, EEG, 4 references
- [3] doi:10.1093/nc/niag029 [code]
- A data-driven approach to identifying and evaluating connectivity-based neural correlates of conscious visual perception.Journal: Neuroscience of consciousnessIn common: MNE-Python, NetworkX, scikit-learn, 4 other tools, cognitive, 3 references
- [4] doi:10.3389/fncom.2026.1786996 [code]
- Schumann-anchored golden ratio organization of human neural oscillations.Journal: Frontiers in computational neuroscienceIn common: MNE-Python, NetworkX, scikit-learn, 4 other tools, EEG, 2 references
- [5] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0348005 [code]
- THOI: An efficient and accessible library for computing higher-order interactions enhanced by batch-processing.Journal: PloS oneIn common: NetworkX, scikit-learn, pandas, 3 other tools, 3 references
- [6] doi:10.7554/elife.100605 [code]
- Age-related changes in ‘cortical’ 1/
f dynamics are linked to cardiac activity Journal: —In common: MNE-Python, NetworkX, scikit-learn, 4 other tools, 2 references - [7] doi:10.3390/s26103065 [code]
- Subject-Wise Depression Screening from Eight-Channel Resting-State EEG Using Asymmetry-Aware Spectral Features and Connectivity Ablation.Journal: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)In common: scikit-learn, pandas, SciPy, 2 other tools, EEG, author Hassan Ugail
- [8] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0351872 [code]
- Decoding visual object recognition from EEG signals.Journal: PloS oneIn common: MNE-Python, scikit-learn, pandas, 3 other tools, EEG, 2 references
- [9] doi:10.1038/s41593-026-02285-1 [code]
- Fixation duration on natural scenes is explained by memory encoding not processing demand.Journal: Nature neuroscienceIn common: MNE-Python, scikit-learn, pandas, 3 other tools, cognitive, 2 references
- [10] doi:10.1038/s41597-026-07377-y [code]
- An open-access multi-site fMRI dataset for investigating conscious visual perception.Journal: Scientific dataIn common: MNE-Python, scikit-learn, pandas, 3 other tools, 2 references
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Validate its tracing map
You validate the map as this page shows it: 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit and with its license, 3 scripts, and 25 matches between paragraphs and code (see the Code and Map sections). It then receives a DOI on Zenodo, with you (your ORCID iD) and OSCR as its creators; the code itself is not deposited.
The map's fingerprint: sha256:7655ace1499a13cd…
Add the badge to its README
The badge links the code to this page. Copy one of these into the README of the paper's code: only you decide where it goes, and nothing is changed for you.
Markdown
[, paste the snippet at the top, then “Commit changes…” and, to review it first, “Create a new branch and start a pull request”. You open the pull request; OSCR asks for no permission.
Request its removal
To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
