OSCR

Optically pumped magnetometers enhance neuroimaging performance-An EEG, OPM, and SQUID-MEG study.

Overview

Authors: Marion Brickwedde1,2, Paul Anders1, Peter Krüger1, Tilmann Sander1, Peter J Uhlhaas2
  1. Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Department for Biosignals, 10587 Berlin, Germany
  2. Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 13353 Berlin, Germany
Journal: iScience, volume 29, issue 5, article 115489
Dates: received 1 October 2025; accepted 23 March 2026; published online 26 March 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115489 · PMID 42011176 · PMCID PMC13091735 · OpenAlex W7140527626
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code on request (how the code is found and verified)
Categories: EEG (modality), MEG (modality)
Methods: Spectral & time-frequency, Preprocessing, Statistics, Smoothing, state filtering, decompositions, Connectivity, Physiology & signal measures
Keywords: neuroscience, sensory neuroscience, techniques in neuroscience
Topic: Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Physics and Astronomy), according to OpenAlex
Funding: German Research Foundation (460785001)
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 68 references in the paper

Abstract

Much of our understanding of how neural circuit activity relates to human behavior and cognition stems from non-invasive assessments of the central nervous system. Further progress on key questions, however, requires measurements with a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Here, we show that in an established 40 Hz auditory steady-state paradigm, optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) significantly outperform not only electroencephalography (EEG) but also conventional magnetoencephalography (MEG) in SNR and inter-trial phase coherence (ITPC). SNRs of OPMs were increased by up to 205% compared to EEG and by up to 40% compared to conventional MEG. As few as 10–16 OPM sensors were sufficient to significantly outperform 56 EEG electrodes. To maximize the representation of evoked responses, we employed spatial filters, which greatly enhanced SNRs across measurement modalities. Our data provide evidence for the potential of OPMs to enhance non-invasive neuroimaging, paving the way for important advances in basic as well as translational neuroscience.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper says that its authors' code is available on request: it was not published with the paper, so there is nothing to verify.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none (its code is available on request), so it has no map.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data and code availability

All data reported in this paper will be shared by the lead contact upon request.

This paper does not report original code.

Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 30 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 5 authors, 3 keywords, 1 funder, 68 references.

Cite

This paper

Brickwedde, M., Anders, P., Krüger, P., Sander, T., & Uhlhaas, P. J. (2026). Optically pumped magnetometers enhance neuroimaging performance-An EEG, OPM, and SQUID-MEG study. iScience, 29(5), 115489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.115489

BibTeX

@article{brickwedde2026optically,
author = {Brickwedde, Marion and Anders, Paul and Krüger, Peter and Sander, Tilmann and Uhlhaas, Peter J},
title = {{Optically pumped magnetometers enhance neuroimaging performance-An EEG, OPM, and SQUID-MEG study}},
journal = {iScience},
year = {2026},
month = mar,
volume = {29},
number = {5},
pages = {115489},
publisher = {Elsevier},
issn = {2589-0042},
doi = {10.1016/j.isci.2026.115489},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.115489},
pmid = {42011176},
pmcid = {PMC13091735}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Brickwedde, Marion
AU - Anders, Paul
AU - Krüger, Peter
AU - Sander, Tilmann
AU - Uhlhaas, Peter J
TI - Optically pumped magnetometers enhance neuroimaging performance-An EEG, OPM, and SQUID-MEG study
T2 - iScience
J2 - iScience
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/03/26
VL - 29
IS - 5
SP - 115489
SN - 2589-0042
PB - Elsevier
DO - 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115489
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.115489
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1016/j.isci.2026.115489",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Optically pumped magnetometers enhance neuroimaging performance-An EEG, OPM, and SQUID-MEG study",
"container-title": "iScience",
"author": [
{
"family": "Brickwedde",
"given": "Marion"
},
{
"family": "Anders",
"given": "Paul"
},
{
"family": "Krüger",
"given": "Peter"
},
{
"family": "Sander",
"given": "Tilmann"
},
{
"family": "Uhlhaas",
"given": "Peter J"
}
],
"container-title-short": "iScience",
"volume": "29",
"issue": "5",
"page": "115489",
"DOI": "10.1016/j.isci.2026.115489",
"PMID": "42011176",
"PMCID": "PMC13091735",
"ISSN": "2589-0042",
"publisher": "Elsevier",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.115489",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
3,
26
]
]
}
}

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1038/s41598-023-31111-y
Non-invasive measurements of ictal and interictal epileptiform activity using optically pumped magnetometers.
Journal: Scientific reports
In common: MEG, EEG, 15 references
[2] doi:10.1162/imag_a_00283 [code]
A novel, robust, and portable platform for magnetoencephalography using optically-pumped magnetometers.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: MEG, 16 references
[3] doi:10.1162/imag.a.10 [code]
Demonstrating equivalence across magnetoencephalography scanner platforms using neural fingerprinting.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: MEG, 14 references
[4] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1218 [code]
Reliability and signal comparison of OPM-MEG, fMRI & iEEG in a repeated movie viewing paradigm.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: MEG, 13 references
[5] doi:10.1162/imag_a_00179 [code]
Simultaneous whole-head electrophysiological recordings using EEG and OPM-MEG.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: MEG, EEG, 13 references
[6] doi:10.1162/imag_a_00020
Test-retest reliability of the human connectome: An OPM-MEG study.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: MEG, 13 references
[7] doi:10.1162/imag_a_00112
Optimising the sensitivity of optically-pumped magnetometer magnetoencephalography to gamma band electrophysiological activity.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: MEG, EEG, 12 references
[8] doi:10.3390/s23125454
Naturalistic Hyperscanning with Wearable Magnetoencephalography.
Journal: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
In common: MEG, 12 references
[9] doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2029-23.2024 [code]
40 Hz Steady-State Response in Human Auditory Cortex Is Shaped by Gabaergic Neuronal Inhibition.
Journal: The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience
In common: MEG, 7 references, author Peter J Uhlhaas
[10] doi:10.1038/s41598-024-51857-3 [code]
Combining OPM and lesion mapping data for epilepsy surgery planning: a simulation study.
Journal: Scientific reports
In common: MEG, EEG, 10 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: code errors and mismatches between the code and the paper about this paper and its code, from readers and its authors, beside the paper and its tracing map.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code and did not get the paper's result, what they ran, with which environment, commit and data.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.