A Disorder-Aware Computational Framework to Identify Structurally Tractable Targets in Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy.
The 4 matches
- [1] § Methods › Evaluation of a Target Protein–SNAIL1 › RFdiffusion-Based Binder Design ↔ rf/examples/diffusion.ipynb, lines 475–514 · score 0.67 · initial_guess, rm aa, ProteinMPNN, soluble, folded, binder
- [2] § Methods › Evaluation of a Target Protein–SNAIL1 › RFdiffusion-Based Binder Design ↔ af/examples/RSO.ipynb, lines 257–320 · score 0.60 · initial guess, rm aa, Cysteine, soluble, backbone, sequences
- [3] § Methods › Evaluation of a Target Protein–SNAIL1 › RFdiffusion-Based Binder Design ↔ af/examples/RSO.ipynb, lines 767–801 · score 0.55 · multimer model, generated sequences, recycles, RMSD, template, pLDDT
- [4] § Results › RFdiffusion-Based Binder Design for SNAIL1 ↔ af/examples/RSO.ipynb, lines 121–231 · score 0.53 · designed sequence, ProteinMPNN sequence, AlphaFold, confidence, pLDDT, score
Paper
Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser, not stored by OSCR: doi.org · Europe PMC
The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.
The authors' code
Jupyter notebook · 1,098 lines · 56 KB · other · 3 matches
RSO.ipynb at commit e31a56f, under other · at the source
Overview
- Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- University of Miami, Miami, Florida
- Department of Ophthalmology, Broward Health North, Pompano Beach, Florida
- Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Mid Atlantic Retina at Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Abstract
Objective: Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) remains a major cause of failure after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair and lacks effective pharmacologic therapies. Although epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is central to PVR pathogenesis, the structural determinants governing the tractability of EMT regulators, particularly those involving intrinsic disorder, remain poorly defined. We developed a disorder-aware, artificial intelligence–enabled computational framework to evaluate EMT-associated proteins in PVR and prioritize structurally tractable regulators for structure-based targeting.
Design: A computational, hypothesis-generating study employing an in silico screening and structural modeling pipeline.
Subjects: No human subjects or biological specimens were included. The dataset comprised 25 EMT-associated proteins implicated in PVR, curated through a narrative review of peer-reviewed literature.
Methods: Candidate proteins were evaluated using a multistage pipeline integrating intrinsic disorder profiling (Rapid Intrinsic Disorder Analysis Online), redox-sensitive disorder-to-order transition (DOT) analysis (AIUPred), and protein–protein interaction network assessment (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/
Main Outcome Measures: Primary measures were the proportion of intrinsically disordered residues, redox-sensitive disorder change, STRING network coherence within EMT-related pathways, and the structural consistency of the designed binder–target complex, assessed by root mean square deviation (RMSD) and mean per-residue confidence (predicted local distance difference test [pLDDT]).
Results: Of the 25 EMT-associated proteins screened, several exhibited intermediate intrinsic disorder profiles and measurable DOT potential. Snail Family Transcriptional Repressor 1 (SNAIL1) emerged as the highest-priority candidate, demonstrating an intermediate intrinsic disorder profile (∼35%), a pronounced redox-sensitive DOT region, and selective connectivity within EMT-related signaling networks. Functional mapping of the SNAIL1 C-terminal DOT segment identified 6 basic residues with literature-supported or motif-based regulatory significance (K187, R191, R224, K234, K253, and R264). Following sequence design and structural validation, the top-ranked binder exhibited the lowest structural deviation within the generated ensemble (RMSD 18.5 Å) and high per-residue confidence (mean pLDDT 0.84).
Conclusions: Our study introduces a disorder-informed computational framework for prioritizing structurally tractable EMT regulators in PVR. As a proof-of-concept, the pipeline nominates SNAIL1 and generates a structure-aware de novo binder targeting its C-terminal DOT region, providing a foundation for disorder-based therapeutic discovery in fibrotic retinal disease.
Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Repository
Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above, with 4 matches between paragraphs and lines of code.
sokrypton/colabdesign
e31a56fe1d9b4de25c8697f3a28b75892941cc72, 23 October 2025Availability: 1 check, the latest on 28 September 2026: the link answers
- 28 September 2026: the link answers
126 files, not copied: shown from their source
OSCR keeps no copy of these files: the license of this repository (other) is not one it has verified to allow it. The reader above shows each one from its source, fetched by your browser at commit e31a56f, when its fingerprint is the one OSCR verified. How this works.
- af/
design.ipynb — Jupyter, 193 lines, shown from its source - af/
examples/ — Jupyter, 338 lines, shown from its sourceAF2Rank.ipynb - af/
examples/ — Jupyter, 1,098 lines, 3 matches, shown from its sourceRSO.ipynb - af/
examples/ — Jupyter, 625 lines, shown from its sourceaf2cycler.ipynb - af/
examples/ — Jupyter, 166 lines, shown from its sourceaf_cyc_design.ipynb - af/
examples/ — Jupyter, 174 lines, shown from its sourceaf_pseudo_diffusion.ipyn b - af/
examples/ — Jupyter, 281 lines, shown from its sourceaf_pseudo_diffusion_dgra m.ipynb - af/
examples/ — Jupyter, 234 lines, shown from its sourceaf_pseudo_diffusion_recy cle.ipynb - af/
examples/ — Jupyter, 274 lines, shown from its sourceaf_relax_design.ipynb - af/
examples/ — Jupyter, 98 lines, shown from its sourceaf_single_sequential.ipy nb - af/
examples/ — Jupyter, 100 lines, shown from its sourceafdesign_hotspot_test.ip ynb - af/
examples/ — Jupyter, 5 lines, shown from its sourcebinder_hallucination.ipy nb - af/
examples/ — Jupyter, 204 lines, shown from its sourcedisulfide_design.ipynb - af/
examples/ — Jupyter, 112 lines, shown from its sourcehallucination.ipynb - af/
examples/ — Jupyter, 115 lines, shown from its sourcehallucination_custom_los s.ipynb - af/
examples/ — Jupyter, 82 lines, shown from its sourcepartial_hallucination_re wire.ipynb - af/
examples/ — Jupyter, 215 lines, shown from its sourcepeptide_binder_design.ip ynb - af/
examples/ — Jupyter, 152 lines, shown from its sourceuse_esm_1b_bias.ipynb - af_design_tutorial.ipynb
— Jupyter, 9 lines, shown from its source - colabdesign/
__init__.py — Python, 16 lines, shown from its source - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 13 lines, shown from its source__init__.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 14 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ __init__.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 14 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ common/ __init__.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 169 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ common/ confidence.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 229 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ common/ protein.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 911 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ common/ residue_constants.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 14 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ data/ __init__.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 384 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ data/ mmcif_parsing.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 364 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ data/ parsers.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 72 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ data/ pipeline.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 284 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ data/ pipeline_multimer.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 132 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ data/ prep_inputs.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 14 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ data/ tools/ __init__.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 40 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ data/ tools/ utils.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 14 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ __init__.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 1,131 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ all_atom.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 966 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ all_atom_multimer.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 184 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ common_modules.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 611 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ config.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 41 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ data.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 982 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ folding.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 1,033 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ folding_multimer.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 31 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ geometry/ __init__.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 106 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ geometry/ rigid_matrix_vector.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 157 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ geometry/ rotation_matrix.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 220 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ geometry/ struct_of_array.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 98 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ geometry/ test_utils.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 23 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ geometry/ utils.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 217 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ geometry/ vector.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 274 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ layer_stack.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 88 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ lddt.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 233 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ mapping.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 97 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ model.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 1,780 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ modules.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 805 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ modules_multimer.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 67 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ prng.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 459 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ quat_affine.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 320 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ r3.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 14 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ tf/ __init__.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 20 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ tf/ shape_placeholders.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 125 lines, shown from its sourcealphafold/ model/ utils.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 1 line, shown from its sourcecontrib/ __init__.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 154 lines, shown from its sourcecontrib/ crop.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 561 lines, shown from its sourcedesign.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 155 lines, shown from its sourceinputs.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 548 lines, shown from its sourceloss.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 245 lines, shown from its sourcemodel.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 581 lines, shown from its sourceprep.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 189 lines, shown from its sourceutils.py - colabdesign/
af/ — Python, 1 line, shown from its sourceweights/ __init__.py - colabdesign/
esm_msa/ — Python, 9 lines, shown from its source__init__.py - colabdesign/
esm_msa/ — Python, 200 lines, shown from its sourceaxial_attention.py - colabdesign/
esm_msa/ — Python, 37 lines, shown from its sourceconfig.py - colabdesign/
esm_msa/ — Python, 10 lines, shown from its sourceconstants.py - colabdesign/
esm_msa/ — Python, 294 lines, shown from its sourcedata.py - colabdesign/
esm_msa/ — Python, 141 lines, shown from its sourcemodel.py - colabdesign/
esm_msa/ — Python, 229 lines, shown from its sourcemodules.py - colabdesign/
esm_msa/ — Python, 10 lines, shown from its sourcepretrained.py - colabdesign/
mpnn/ — Python, 10 lines, shown from its source__init__.py - colabdesign/
mpnn/ — Jupyter, 77 lines, shown from its sourcelegacy/ example.ipynb - colabdesign/
mpnn/ — Python, 408 lines, shown from its sourcelegacy/ modules.py - colabdesign/
mpnn/ — Python, 214 lines, shown from its sourcelegacy/ sample.py - colabdesign/
mpnn/ — Python, 469 lines, shown from its sourcelegacy/ utils.py - colabdesign/
mpnn/ — Python, 294 lines, shown from its sourcelegacy/ wrapper.py - colabdesign/
mpnn/ — Python, 324 lines, shown from its sourcemodel.py - colabdesign/
mpnn/ — Python, 332 lines, shown from its sourcemodules.py - colabdesign/
mpnn/ — Python, 107 lines, shown from its sourcesample.py - colabdesign/
mpnn/ — Python, 80 lines, shown from its sourcescore.py - colabdesign/
mpnn/ — Python, 26 lines, shown from its sourceutils.py - colabdesign/
mpnn/ — Python, 1 line, shown from its sourceweights/ __init__.py - colabdesign/
mpnn/ — Python, 1 line, shown from its sourceweights_soluble/ __init__.py - colabdesign/
rf/ — Python, 1 line, shown from its source__init__.py - colabdesign/
rf/ — JavaScript, 115 lines, shown from its sourceblueprint.js - colabdesign/
rf/ — Python, 199 lines, shown from its sourcedesignability_test.py - colabdesign/
rf/ — Python, 246 lines, shown from its sourceutils.py - colabdesign/
seq/ — Python, 1 line, shown from its source__init__.py - colabdesign/
seq/ — Python, 133 lines, shown from its sourcekmeans.py - colabdesign/
seq/ — Python, 89 lines, shown from its sourcelearn_msa.py - colabdesign/
seq/ — Python, 314 lines, shown from its sourcemrf.py - colabdesign/
seq/ — Python, 77 lines, shown from its sourcestats.py - colabdesign/
seq/ — Python, 60 lines, shown from its sourceutils.py - colabdesign/
shared/ — Python, 1 line, shown from its source__init__.py - colabdesign/
shared/ — Python, 223 lines, shown from its sourcemodel.py - colabdesign/
shared/ — Python, 55 lines, shown from its sourceparse_args.py - colabdesign/
shared/ — Python, 337 lines, shown from its sourceplot.py - colabdesign/
shared/ — Python, 72 lines, shown from its sourceprep.py - colabdesign/
shared/ — Python, 29 lines, shown from its sourceprng.py - colabdesign/
shared/ — Python, 288 lines, shown from its sourceprotein.py - colabdesign/
shared/ — Python, 111 lines, shown from its sourceutils.py - colabdesign/
tr/ — Python, 14 lines, shown from its source__init__.py - colabdesign/
tr/ — Python, 66 lines, shown from its sourcejoint_model.py - colabdesign/
tr/ — Python, 233 lines, shown from its sourcelegacy/ model.py - colabdesign/
tr/ — Python, 314 lines, shown from its sourcelegacy/ utils.py - colabdesign/
tr/ — Python, 341 lines, shown from its sourcemodel.py - colabdesign/
tr/ — Python, 115 lines, shown from its sourcetrrosetta.py - esm_msa/
example.ipynb — Jupyter, 38 lines, shown from its source - mpnn/
convert_weights/ — Jupyter, 56 lines, shown from its sourceconvert.ipynb - mpnn/
examples/ — Jupyter, 135 lines, shown from its sourceafdesign_and_proteinmpnn _bias.ipynb - mpnn/
examples/ — Jupyter, 288 lines, shown from its sourceproteinmpnn_in_jax.ipynb - rf/
examples/ — Jupyter, 595 lines, 1 match, shown from its sourcediffusion.ipynb - rf/
examples/ — Jupyter, 624 lines, shown from its sourcediffusion_foldcond.ipynb - rf/
examples/ — Jupyter, 286 lines, shown from its sourcediffusion_ori.ipynb - setup.py — Python, 15 lines, shown from its source
- tr/
design.ipynb — Jupyter, 134 lines, shown from its source - LICENSE.txt — License, 8 lines, shown from its source
- README.md — Text, 29 lines, shown from its source
Tracing map
Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.
What the map holds:
- 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
- 124 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
- 4 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of the code (method lexical-v1);
- neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.
Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.
Data
Datasets cited
- alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/
entry/ — at EMBL-EBI; found in the text, “SNAIL1 Structural Assessment”o95863
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 2, 28 September 2026
- Authors: added Nedym Hadzijahic (0009-0004-1454-2705); removed Nedym Hadzijahic
Version 1, 28 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 6 authors, 5 keywords, 1 funder, 62 references.
Cite
This paper
Djulbegovic, M. B., Hadzijahic, N., Taylor Gonzalez, D. J., Antonietti, M., Zafar, S., & Kuriyan, A. E. (2026). A Disorder-Aware Computational Framework to Identify Structurally Tractable Targets in Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmology science, 6(8), 101249. https://
BibTeX
@article{djulbegovic2026
author = {Djulbegovic, Mak B and Hadzijahic, Nedym and Taylor Gonzalez, David J and Antonietti, Michael and Zafar, Sidra and Kuriyan, Ajay E},
title = {{A Disorder-Aware Computational Framework to Identify Structurally Tractable Targets in Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy}},
journal = {Ophthalmology science},
year = {2026},
month = may,
volume = {6},
number = {8},
pages = {101249},
publisher = {Elsevier},
issn = {2666-9145},
doi = {10.1016/
url = {https://
pmid = {42421755},
pmcid = {PMC13343151}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Djulbegovic, Mak B
AU - Hadzijahic, Nedym
AU - Taylor Gonzalez, David J
AU - Antonietti, Michael
AU - Zafar, Sidra
AU - Kuriyan, Ajay E
TI - A Disorder-Aware Computational Framework to Identify Structurally Tractable Targets in Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy
T2 - Ophthalmology science
J2 - Ophthalmol Sci
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 6
IS - 8
SP - 101249
SN - 2666-9145
PB - Elsevier
DO - 10.1016/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.1016/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "A Disorder-Aware Computational Framework to Identify Structurally Tractable Targets in Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy",
"container-title": "Ophthalmology science",
"author": [
{
"family": "Djulbegovic",
"given": "Mak B"
},
{
"family": "Hadzijahic",
"given": "Nedym"
},
{
"family": "Taylor Gonzalez",
"given": "David J"
},
{
"family": "Antonietti",
"given": "Michael"
},
{
"family": "Zafar",
"given": "Sidra"
},
{
"family": "Kuriyan",
"given": "Ajay E"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "6",
"issue": "8",
"page": "101249",
"DOI": "10.1016/
"PMID": "42421755",
"PMCID": "PMC13343151",
"ISSN": "2666-9145",
"publisher": "Elsevier",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
5,
25
]
]
}
}
The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10957-8 [code]
- Brain defence by the extracellular matrix protein Cochlin.Journal: Communications biologyIn common: JAX, Biopython, Hugging Face Transformers, 8 other tools
- [2] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0346575 [code]
- Statistically valid explainable black-box machine learning: applications in sex classification across species using brain imaging.Journal: PloS oneIn common: JAX, Hugging Face Transformers, TensorFlow, 6 other tools
- [3] doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2026.07.006 [code]
- DeorphaNN: Virtual screening of GPCR peptide agonists using AlphaFold-predicted active-state complexes and deep learning embeddings.Journal: Molecular cellIn common: JAX, Biopython, TensorFlow, 5 other tools, 1 reference
- [4] doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10658-6 [code]
- An AI system to help scientists write expert-level empirical software.Journal: NatureIn common: JAX, Hugging Face Transformers, TensorFlow, 5 other tools, 1 reference
- [5] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-53415-5 [code]
- Computational design and immunoinformatics validation of a T cell multi-epitope vaccine targeting glioblastoma stem cells.Journal: Scientific reportsIn common: JAX, Biopython, TensorFlow, 5 other tools
- [6] doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10391-0 [code]
- Cell-type-targeted mitochondrial transplantation rescues cell degeneration.Journal: NatureIn common: JAX, Biopython, TensorFlow, 5 other tools
- [7] doi:10.3390/ijms27156614 [code]
- Candidalysin Inhibits &
lt;i& gt;Porphyromonas gingivalis& lt;/ i& gt; Lipoprotein-Induced IL-1β Production in BV-2 Microglia via Hydrophobic Microbial Interactions. Journal: International journal of molecular sciencesIn common: JAX, Biopython, TensorFlow, 5 other tools - [8] doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10670-w [code]
- Zero-shot design of drug-binding proteins via neural iterative selection-expansion.Journal: NatureIn common: Plotly, PyTorch, pandas, 3 other tools, 3 references
- [9] doi:10.1038/s41592-026-03057-2 [code]
- CREsted: modeling genomic and synthetic cell-type-specific enhancers across tissues and species.Journal: Nature methodsIn common: Biopython, Keras, TensorFlow, 5 other tools
- [10] doi:10.1093/nar/gkag706 [code]
- scDifformer: diffusion-based post-training for virtual cell modeling across large-scale single-cell data.Journal: Nucleic acids researchIn common: Keras, TensorFlow, PyTorch, 4 other tools, 1 reference
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Validate its tracing map
You validate the map as this page shows it: 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit and with its license, 124 scripts, and 4 matches between paragraphs and code (see the Code and Map sections). It then receives a DOI on Zenodo, with you (your ORCID iD) and OSCR as its creators; the code itself is not deposited.
The map's fingerprint: sha256:3fdd107cbd8ef60c…
Add the badge to its README
The badge links the code to this page. Copy one of these into the README of the paper's code: only you decide where it goes, and nothing is changed for you.
Markdown
[, paste the snippet at the top, then “Commit changes…” and, to review it first, “Create a new branch and start a pull request”. You open the pull request; OSCR asks for no permission.
Request its removal
To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
