OSCR

From head to toe: Efficient somatosensory mapping with fast stimulation and multivariate pattern analysis.

Overview

  1. Cognitive Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
  2. Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
Institutions: University of Salzburg (Austria)
Journal: Neuroimage. Reports, volume 6, issue 3, article 100378
Dates: received 16 March 2026; accepted 2 July 2026; published online 7 July 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1016/j.ynirp.2026.100378 · PMID 42436666 · PMCID PMC13355695 · OpenAlex W7167613092
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code found, not verified yet
Categories: EEG (modality)
Methods: Connectivity, Statistics, Smoothing, state filtering, decompositions, Machine learning, Preprocessing, Single-unit activity, calcium imaging, Physiology & signal measures
Keywords: EEG, Somatosensory evoked potentials, Tactile, Decoding, Classification
Topic: Tactile and Sensory Interactions (Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Funding: Paris Lodron University of Salzburg
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 42 references in the paper

Abstract

Background: Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) measured with electroencephalography (EEG) are widely used to study cortical responses to touch but most research has limited the focus on few body parts, typically a finger, and applied time-consuming testing protocols. To determine whether faster stimulation protocols can improve efficiency without compromising SEP and multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) results, we compared fast and slow tactile stimulation across four body parts.

Methods: Fifteen participants received vibrotactile stimulation on the finger, hand, cheek, and foot while EEG was recorded. We compared a traditional “slow” stimulation protocol (800-1200 ms inter-stimulus intervals) with a “fast” protocol (300-500 ms). We compared temporal and topographical aspects between SEP and MVPA.

Results: Both stimulation protocols produced highly similar SEP components (P100, N140, P200), topographies, and classification results, while the fast protocol reduced testing time by about 60%. SEPs revealed systematic body-part differences, with earlier components for cheek stimulation and delayed responses for the foot. Multivariate classification distinguished body parts with accuracies up to ∼50-55% (chance: 25%), peaking around 100 ms after stimulus onset. Classifier weight maps closely matched SEP topographies over centroparietal electrodes, indicating that classification relied on physiologically meaningful somatosensory signals. Classification accuracy peaked around 100 ms after stimulus onset, coinciding with the SEP P100 component, but declined gradually thereafter, suggesting that early somatosensory responses contain particularly informative multivariate patterns that generalize over time.

Conclusions: Faster stimulation protocols substantially increase efficiency without compromising interpretability. Combining classical SEP analysis with multivariate classification provides complementary insights and offers a powerful framework for mapping somatosensory representations across the body.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.

OSF yx7wh

License: none: the authors keep all their rights
State: unreachable at the last attempt, verified on 29 September 2026
Evidence: found in the paper
Software Heritage: not checked
Found in: “Software and data availability”
Not found: README, license file, CITATION.cff, environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Availability: 5 checks, the latest on 29 September 2026: unreachable at the last attempt (HTTP 401)
  • 29 September 2026: unreachable at the last attempt (HTTP 401)
  • 28 September 2026: unreachable at the last attempt (HTTP 401)
  • 28 September 2026: unreachable at the last attempt (HTTP 401)
  • 27 September 2026: unreachable at the last attempt (HTTP 401)
  • 27 September 2026: unreachable at the last attempt (HTTP 401)
At the source: osf.io/yx7wh/

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • no match between paragraphs and code yet;
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data Availability Statement

All code used for experimental testing and for data analysis are available in an online repository hosted on the website of the Open Science Framework, retrievable via https://osf.io/yx7wh/. The EEG data are available in a public online repository of the Austrian Neurocloud and can be retrieved via https://doi.org/10.60817/QQBF-1R49.

All data and code has been made available in public repositories and the links are provided in the article.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 2, 28 September 2026

  • Authors: added Juliane Schubert (0000-0002-2536-6522); removed Juliane Schubert

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 3 authors, 5 keywords, 1 funder, 41 references.

Cite

This paper

Fuchs, X., Schubert, J., & Heed, T. (2026). From head to toe: Efficient somatosensory mapping with fast stimulation and multivariate pattern analysis. Neuroimage. Reports, 6(3), 100378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynirp.2026.100378

BibTeX

@article{fuchs2026head,
author = {Fuchs, Xaver and Schubert, Juliane and Heed, Tobias},
title = {{From head to toe: Efficient somatosensory mapping with fast stimulation and multivariate pattern analysis}},
journal = {Neuroimage. Reports},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
volume = {6},
number = {3},
pages = {100378},
publisher = {Elsevier},
issn = {2666-9560},
doi = {10.1016/j.ynirp.2026.100378},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynirp.2026.100378},
pmid = {42436666},
pmcid = {PMC13355695}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Fuchs, Xaver
AU - Schubert, Juliane
AU - Heed, Tobias
TI - From head to toe: Efficient somatosensory mapping with fast stimulation and multivariate pattern analysis
T2 - Neuroimage. Reports
J2 - Neuroimage Rep
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/07
VL - 6
IS - 3
SP - 100378
SN - 2666-9560
PB - Elsevier
DO - 10.1016/j.ynirp.2026.100378
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynirp.2026.100378
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1016/j.ynirp.2026.100378",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "From head to toe: Efficient somatosensory mapping with fast stimulation and multivariate pattern analysis",
"container-title": "Neuroimage. Reports",
"author": [
{
"family": "Fuchs",
"given": "Xaver"
},
{
"family": "Schubert",
"given": "Juliane"
},
{
"family": "Heed",
"given": "Tobias"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Neuroimage Rep",
"volume": "6",
"issue": "3",
"page": "100378",
"DOI": "10.1016/j.ynirp.2026.100378",
"PMID": "42436666",
"PMCID": "PMC13355695",
"ISSN": "2666-9560",
"publisher": "Elsevier",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynirp.2026.100378",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
7,
7
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-74824-0 [code]
Learning regularities in noise engages both neural predictive activity and representational changes.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: 5 references
[2] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1207 [code]
Investigating the temporal dynamics and modeling of mid-level feature representations in humans.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: EEG, 4 references
[3] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-09834-1 [code]
Distinct perceptual and conceptual representations of natural actions along the lateral and dorsal visual streams.
Journal: Communications biology
In common: EEG, 4 references
[4] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1332 [code]
Decision processes underlying effort avoidance and their relationship with metacognition.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: EEG, 4 references
[5] doi:10.1167/jov.26.8.4 [code]
The neural processes of illusory occlusion in object recognition.
Journal: Journal of vision
In common: EEG, 4 references
[6] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003740 [code]
Sleep strengthens successor representations of learned sequences in humans.
Journal: PLoS biology
In common: EEG, 3 references
[7] doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2026.100347
App-based mindfulness meditation training enhances cognitive flexibility and modulates ACC and medial frontal gyrus activation during task switching in adolescent OCD.
Journal: Neuroimage. Reports
In common: EEG, 3 references
[8] doi:10.1111/ejn.70639 [code]
Action Intentions Shape Task- and Phase-Specific Integration of Object Features.
Journal: The European journal of neuroscience
In common: EEG, 3 references
[9] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003938 [code]
Theta oscillations tag episodic memories for sleep-dependent consolidation.
Journal: PLoS biology
In common: EEG, 3 references
[10] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.115708 [code]
Integrating multiple sensory modalities during dyadic interactions drives self-other distinction at the behavioral and electrocortical level.
Journal: iScience
In common: 3 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.