Quantifying Olfactory and Alveolar Deposition of Ultrafine Particles Using Multiscale Modeling: Implications for Brain Exposure.

Overview

1. CEREA, ENPC, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, EDF R&D, IPSL, 77 455 Marne la Vallée, France
2. AIRPARIF, The Air Quality Observatory for the Paris Region, 77 004 Paris, France

Abstract

Atmospheric particle exposure is commonly characterized using mass-based metrics that inadequately capture particle surface area, respiratory deposition, and direct brain delivery pathways. Ultrafine particles (UFPs) contribute marginally to PM2.5 mass yet account for a disproportionate fraction of deposited surface area in both the lungs and the nasal olfactory region, a critical gateway for direct particle translocation to the brain. Using multiscale atmospheric modeling from continental to street level, evaluated against NO2, particulate mass, chemical composition, and size-resolved particle observations, we quantify particle deposition through lung-deposited surface area (LDSA) and olfactory deposition, explicitly accounting for hygroscopic growth. UFPs account for more than one-third of alveolar surface deposition in urban environments, and particles smaller than 400 nm dominate alveolar deposition despite their marginal contribution to PM2.5 mass. Decoupling between PM2.5 and deposited surface area persists across cities, source contributions, and population groups, with children experiencing approximately 3-fold higher alveolar doses than adults. Residential wood heating dominates winter PM2.5 and alveolar deposition, whereas traffic controls particle number and olfactory deposition. Critically, under the tested translocation assumptions, olfactory deposition of UFPs is estimated to exceed blood-borne translocation to the brain by several hundred-fold, supporting the relevance of neuronal pathways for brain-relevant particle delivery and consistent with recent observations of black carbon in the human olfactory bulb.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

• 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
• 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
• no match between paragraphs and code yet;
• neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 2, 28 September 2026

• Publisher: n/a → American Chemical Society

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 4 authors, 8 keywords, 6 MeSH terms, 3 funders, 62 references.

Cite

This paper

Sartelet, K., Lugon, L., Park, S.-J., & Gaie-Levrel, F. (2026). Quantifying Olfactory and Alveolar Deposition of Ultrafine Particles Using Multiscale Modeling: Implications for Brain Exposure. Environmental science & technology, 60(27), 19465-19475. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6c05750

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1186/s12989-025-00647-4

A systematic review of the potential neurotoxicity of micro-and nanoplastics: the known and unknown.

Journal: Particle and fibre toxicology

In common: 2 references

[2] doi:10.3390/ph16010081 [code]

Numerical and Machine Learning Analysis of the Parameters Affecting the Regionally Delivered Nasal Dose of Nano- and Micro-Sized Aerosolized Drugs.

Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)

In common: 2 references

[3] doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56508-3 [code]

Acute particulate matter exposure diminishes executive cognitive functioning after four hours regardless of inhalation pathway.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: 2 references

[4] doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2026.106469 [code]

Residential early-life air pollution exposure and oculomotor markers of cognitive workload in children: a prospective birth cohort study.

Journal: EBioMedicine

In common: 1 reference

[5] doi:10.1016/j.jnha.2026.100836

Accelerated biological aging and brain structural alterations linking air pollution to dementia risk: a prospective cohort study.

Journal: The journal of nutrition, health & aging

In common: 1 reference

[6] doi:10.1073/pnas.2513317123 [code]

The α-synuclein proteostasis network and its translational applications in Parkinson's disease.

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

In common: 1 reference

[7] doi:10.1038/s43856-024-00576-x [code]

Exposure to multiple ambient air pollutants changes white matter microstructure during early adolescence with sex-specific differences.

Journal: Communications medicine

In common: 1 reference

[8] doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2026.107379 [code]

DYRK1A and Parkinson's disease, facts and hypotheses.

Journal: Neurobiology of disease

In common: 1 reference

[9] doi:10.1186/s40035-026-00535-7

Mapping cellular vulnerability in Parkinson's disease using retro-AAVs and preformed α-synuclein fibrils.

Journal: Translational neurodegeneration

In common: 1 reference

[10] doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120523 [code]

Whole-brain mapping of increased manganese levels in welders and its association with exposure and motor function.

Journal: NeuroImage

In common: 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
[![OSCR](https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1021/acs.est.6c05750.svg)](https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1021/acs.est.6c05750)
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->

.. oscr-badge:start

.. image:: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1021/acs.est.6c05750.svg
   :target: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1021/acs.est.6c05750
   :alt: OSCR

.. oscr-badge:end

<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
<a href="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1021/acs.est.6c05750"><img src="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1021/acs.est.6c05750.svg" alt="OSCR"></a>
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: code errors and mismatches between the code and the paper about this paper and its code, from readers and its authors, beside the paper and its tracing map.

Report a mismatch between the code and the paper · Report a code error (signed in)

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code and did not get the paper's result, what they ran, with which environment, commit and data.

Report a reproduction failure (signed in)

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.