OSCR

Latent neural architecture organising shared aesthetic evaluations of visual artworks.

Code ↔ Paper

16 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of its authors' code, computed by the harvester (lexical-v1). Click a colored paragraph or line to see its counterpart.

The 16 matches · 3 of them tie a paragraph to a whole file, not to given lines: weak matches, whose lines are not tinted
  1. [1] § Methods › Neuroimaging analyses › Specificity and generalisability of neural signatures ↔ Main_codes/m4_Model_generalization.m, lines 16–43 · score 0.81 · working memory task, gambling task, contrast maps, signature response, cosine, valence
  2. [2] § Methods › Trial-wise fMRI response estimation ↔ Validation_codes/Validation_RSA/run_RSAsearchlight_validation.m, lines 48–50 · score 0.78 · FITHRF GLMDENOISE RR, single trial betas, GLMsingle, Art
  3. [3] § Methods › Equipment and software ↔ Utilities/cluster_identification.m, lines 19–76 · score 0.74 · Melbourne Subcortex Atlas, Cluster identification, CIFTI, mmp, locate, HCP
  4. [4] § Methods › Neuroimaging analyses › Specificity and generalisability of neural signatures ↔ Main_codes/m3_Predict_crossmodel.m, lines 36–104 · score 0.65 · cross prediction accuracies, fold cross validation, dissociation, permutation, models
  5. [5] § Methods › Behavioural data analysis › Construction of the aesthetic agreement matrix ↔ Main_codes/m1_AAT_Grades.m, lines 1–54 · score 0.64 · standard deviations, negative correlations, AI, behavioural, Pearson, validated
  6. [6] § Methods › Trial-wise fMRI response estimation ↔ Validation_codes/Validation_RSA/Validation_distance_RSA_subcortical.m, lines 33–36 · score 0.64 · FITHRF GLMDENOISE RR, GLMsingle, Art
  7. [7] § Methods › Neuroimaging analyses › Quantification of regional importance ↔ Utilities/fast_haufe.m, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.63 · Haufe transformation, forward model, backward, fitted, weights
  8. [8] § Results › Neural signatures of aesthetic experience are linked to distributed neural systems ↔ Utilities/fast_haufe.m, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.63 · Haufe transformed, forward models, model weights, fitted
  9. [9] § Methods › Neuroimaging analyses › Multivariate neural decoding ↔ Main_codes/m3_Predict_crossmodel.m, lines 36–104 · score 0.61 · fold cross validation, predictive accuracy, error, permutation, correlations
  10. [10] § Methods › Behavioural data analysis › Decomposition of shared aesthetic experience ↔ Utilities/parallel_analysis.m, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.60 · principal component, simulations, parallel, Jolliffe, eigenvalues, variance
  11. [11] § Results › Neural representation of the latent aesthetic space is modulated by expertise in arts ↔ Validation_codes/Validation_RSA/Validation_RSA_TFCE_correction.m, lines 55–101 · score 0.57 · Threshold Free Cluster, Enhancement, TFCE, fMRI, RSA
  12. [12] § Methods › Behavioural data analysis › Construction of the aesthetic agreement matrix ↔ Validation_codes/Validation_matrixPCA_reliability.m, lines 1–8 · score 0.54 · aesthetic agreement matrix, aesthetic ratings, reliability, Pearson, stimulus, correlation
  13. [13] § Results › Neural representation of the latent aesthetic space is modulated by expertise in arts ↔ Main_codes/m6_RSA_trials.m, lines 136–157 · score 0.54 · Threshold Free Cluster, Enhancement, TFCE, RSA
  14. [14] § Results › Neural signatures of aesthetic experience generalise to core cognitive processes ↔ Main_codes/m4_Model_generalization.m, lines 16–43 · score 0.54 · gambling tasks, working memory, valence, HCP, signatures, semantics
  15. [15] § Results › Neural representation of the latent aesthetic space is modulated by expertise in arts ↔ Utilities/cluster_identification.m, lines 19–76 · score 0.51 · Melbourne Subcortex Atlas, located, medial, cortical, RSA
  16. [16] § Methods › Neuroimaging analyses › Multivariate neural decoding ↔ Main_codes/m2_Predict_Dimension1.m, lines 27–52 · score 0.50 · fold cross validation, RMSE, error, permutation, predictive, correlations

Paper

Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser, not stored by OSCR: doi.org · Europe PMC

The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.

The authors' code

MATLAB · 45 lines · 2 KB · GPL-3.0 · 2 matches

  1. %% get the prediction models
  2. G1_data = load('Data/ART_G1_4lvl_predictiondata.mat');
  3. G2_data = load('Data/ART_G2_4lvl_predictiondata.mat');
  4. svrobj_G1 = svr({'C=1', 'optimizer="andre"', kernel('linear')});
  5. svrobj_G2 = svr({'C=1', 'optimizer="andre"', kernel('linear')});
  6. dataobj_G1 = data('spider data', double(G1_data.AATpredition.dat)', G1_data.AATpredition.Y);
  7. dataobj_G2 = data('spider data', double(G2_data.AATpredition.dat)', G2_data.AATpredition.Y);
  8. [~, svrobj_G1] = train(svrobj_G1, dataobj_G1, loss);
  9. [~, svrobj_G2] = train(svrobj_G2, dataobj_G2, loss);
  10. weights_G1 = get_w(svrobj_G1)';
  11. weights_G2 = get_w(svrobj_G2)';
  12. %% load contrast maps from HCP dataset
  13. load('Data/HCP_generalization_contrast.mat')
  14. % gambling task
  15. similarity_generalvalence_map_G1 = canlab_pattern_similarity(general_valence_contrast', weights_G1, 'cosine_similarity');
  16. similarity_generalvalence_map_G2 = canlab_pattern_similarity(general_valence_contrast', weights_G2, 'cosine_similarity');
  17. C1_hex = {'#9dc4db','#e9a888'};
  18. C1_RGB = cellfun(@(x) sscanf(x(2:end),'%2x%2x%2x',[1 3])/255, C1_hex, 'UniformOutput', false);
  19. labels = {'Semantic','Value'};
  20. barplot_columns([similarity_generalvalence_map_G1,similarity_generalvalence_map_G2],...
  21. 'names',labels,'color',C1_RGB,'nostars','MarkerSize',5);
  22. ylim([-0.12,0.12])
  23. set(gcf,'position',[10,10,550,750])
  24. ylabel 'Signature Response (Cosine Similarity)'
  25. % working memory task
  26. similarity_placevsface_map_G1 = canlab_pattern_similarity(placevsface_contrast', weights_G1, 'cosine_similarity');
  27. similarity_placevsface_map_G2 = canlab_pattern_similarity(placevsface_contrast', weights_G2, 'cosine_similarity');
  28. C2_hex = {'#b8262b','#316eac'};
  29. C2_RGB = cellfun(@(x) sscanf(x(2:end),'%2x%2x%2x',[1 3])/255, C2_hex, 'UniformOutput', false);
  30. labels = {'Semantic','Value'};
  31. barplot_columns([similarity_placevsface_map_G1,similarity_placevsface_map_G2],'names',labels,'color',C2_RGB,'nostars');
  32. ylim([-0.1,0.2])
  33. set(gcf,'position',[10,10,550,750])
  34. ylabel 'Signature Response (Cosine Similarity)'

m4_Model_generalization.m at commit e6d46da, under GPL-3.0 · at the source

Overview

  1. Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  2. Zhangjiang International Brain Imaging Centre, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  3. Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
  4. MIND & AI Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
  5. SRT AI, Society & Social Dynamics, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
Journal: Nature communications, volume 17, issue 1, article 6510
Dates: received 15 September 2025; accepted 30 April 2026; published online 16 May 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY-NC-ND
Identifiers: DOI 10.1038/s41467-026-73153-6 · PMID 42143057 · PMCID PMC13377068 · OpenAlex W7161409037
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code verified
Categories: fMRI (modality), human (organism), pain (population), cognitive (subfield)
Methods: Connectivity, Statistics, Smoothing, state filtering, decompositions, Machine learning, Preprocessing, fMRI & imaging
Keywords: Perception, Decision, Functional magnetic resonance imaging, Neural decoding
MeSH: Brain*, Esthetics*, Paintings*, Visual Perception*, Adult, Art, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Semantics, Young Adult (* major topic)
Topic: Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Funding: China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022M720818); Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2022ZD0207900); Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology) (2022ZD0207900)
Citations: cited by 2 papers (Europe PMC); 115 references in the paper

Abstract

The abstract is not reproduced here: the paper's license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow it. Read it in the paper, at the publisher or on Europe PMC.

Repositories

Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above, with 16 matches between paragraphs and lines of code.

cognizelab/ARTyficial

License: GPL-3.0
State: the link answers, verified on 28 September 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Commit: e6d46da781102d6be76b5cc72482bea608e63b74, 9 April 2026
Languages: MATLAB (23), Jupyter (7)
Size: 84 files, 30 scripts
Software Heritage: not archived
Found in: “Code availability”
Holds: README, license file, CITATION.cff, 7 notebooks
Not found: environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Tools: Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox (14 files), cifti-matlab (6 files), Matplotlib (6 files), NumPy (6 files), SciPy (6 files), seaborn (6 files), pandas (5 files), CoSMoMVPA (4 files), GIfTI library for MATLAB (3 files), scikit-learn (3 files), h5py (1 file), Pillow (1 file), Pingouin (1 file), PyTorch (1 file)
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 28 September 2026: the link answers
  • 28 September 2026: the link answers
32 files

Zenodo 19486642

License: GPL-3.0
State: the link answers, verified on 28 September 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Size: 1 file
Software Heritage: not checked
Found in: the references
Not found: README, license file, CITATION.cff, environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 28 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
  • 28 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
At the source:

Code availability statement

The paper has a code availability statement. Its license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow reproducing it here; in short, from what the harvester recognized in it:

Read it in the paper: doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73153-6.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 2 repositories of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 30 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • 16 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of the code (method lexical-v1);
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

Datasets cited

Data availability statement

The paper has a data availability statement. Its license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow reproducing it here; in short, from what the harvester recognized in it:

Read it in the paper: doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73153-6.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 28 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 8 authors, 4 keywords, 13 MeSH terms, 3 funders, 106 references.

Cite

This paper

Liang, X., Zhuang, K., Wang, Y., Su, Y., Feng, J., Zhou, F., Becker, B., & Vatansever, D. (2026). Latent neural architecture organising shared aesthetic evaluations of visual artworks. Nature communications, 17(1), 6510. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73153-6

BibTeX

@article{liang2026latent,
author = {Liang, Xinyu and Zhuang, Kaixiang and Wang, Yun and Su, Yueting and Feng, Jianfeng and Zhou, Feng and Becker, Benjamin and Vatansever, Deniz},
title = {{Latent neural architecture organising shared aesthetic evaluations of visual artworks}},
journal = {Nature communications},
year = {2026},
month = may,
volume = {17},
number = {1},
pages = {6510},
publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
issn = {2041-1723},
doi = {10.1038/s41467-026-73153-6},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73153-6},
pmid = {42143057},
pmcid = {PMC13377068}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Liang, Xinyu
AU - Zhuang, Kaixiang
AU - Wang, Yun
AU - Su, Yueting
AU - Feng, Jianfeng
AU - Zhou, Feng
AU - Becker, Benjamin
AU - Vatansever, Deniz
TI - Latent neural architecture organising shared aesthetic evaluations of visual artworks
T2 - Nature communications
J2 - Nat Commun
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/05/16
VL - 17
IS - 1
SP - 6510
SN - 2041-1723
PB - Nature Publishing Group
DO - 10.1038/s41467-026-73153-6
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73153-6
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1038/s41467-026-73153-6",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Latent neural architecture organising shared aesthetic evaluations of visual artworks",
"container-title": "Nature communications",
"author": [
{
"family": "Liang",
"given": "Xinyu"
},
{
"family": "Zhuang",
"given": "Kaixiang"
},
{
"family": "Wang",
"given": "Yun"
},
{
"family": "Su",
"given": "Yueting"
},
{
"family": "Feng",
"given": "Jianfeng"
},
{
"family": "Zhou",
"given": "Feng"
},
{
"family": "Becker",
"given": "Benjamin"
},
{
"family": "Vatansever",
"given": "Deniz"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Nat Commun",
"volume": "17",
"issue": "1",
"page": "6510",
"DOI": "10.1038/s41467-026-73153-6",
"PMID": "42143057",
"PMCID": "PMC13377068",
"ISSN": "2041-1723",
"publisher": "Nature Publishing Group",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73153-6",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
5,
16
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75841-9 [code]
Model-based semantic distance reveals adaptive coordination of distinct cognitive systems in flexible knowledge retrieval.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: Pillow, PyTorch, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, 2 other tools, cognitive, 8 references, 3 authors
[2] doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9326213/v1 [code]
Multi-task fMRI outperforms resting-state fMRI for revealing task-invariant organization of the human brain
Journal: Research Square (preprint)
In common: GIfTI library for MATLAB, h5py, Pillow, 7 other tools, fMRI, cognitive, 11 references
[3] doi:10.64898/2026.03.09.710558 [code]
Multi-task fMRI outperforms resting-state fMRI for revealing task-invariant organization of the human brain
Journal: bioRxiv (preprint)
In common: GIfTI library for MATLAB, h5py, Pillow, 7 other tools, fMRI, cognitive, 11 references
[4] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-76098-y [code]
A single computational objective can produce specialization of streams in visual cortex.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: h5py, Pillow, PyTorch, 7 other tools, 8 references
[5] doi:10.1002/hbm.70577 [code]
Disgust Propensity, Not Disgust Sensitivity, Shapes the Reactivity of a Subjective Disgust Circuit in Humans.
Journal: Human brain mapping
In common: cifti-matlab, GIfTI library for MATLAB, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, 3 other tools, fMRI, 4 references, author Benjamin Becker
[6] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-74565-0 [code]
The functional neurobiology of dispositions towards negative emotions.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: cifti-matlab, GIfTI library for MATLAB, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, 3 other tools, cognitive, 8 references
[7] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-74462-6 [code]
Neural similarity between choice options predicts group-level context effects.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: Pingouin, Pillow, PyTorch, 6 other tools, cognitive, 7 references
[8] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71568-9 [code]
Convergent and selective representations of pain, appetitive processes, aversive processes, and cognitive control in the insula.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: Pillow, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, scikit-learn, 4 other tools, pain, cognitive, 8 references
[9] doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0038-26.2026 [code]
Multidimensional Feature Tuning in Category Selective Areas of Human Visual Cortex.
Journal: The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience
In common: h5py, Pillow, PyTorch, 6 other tools, fMRI, 6 references
[10] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71151-2 [code]
Common and distinct neural correlates of social interaction processing and theory of mind in narratives.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: cifti-matlab, GIfTI library for MATLAB, Pillow, 7 other tools, cognitive, 5 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.