Latent neural architecture organising shared aesthetic evaluations of visual artworks.
The 16 matches · 3 of them tie a paragraph to a whole file, not to given lines: weak matches, whose lines are not tinted
- [1] § Methods › Neuroimaging analyses › Specificity and generalisability of neural signatures ↔ Main_codes/m4_Model_generalization.m, lines 16–43 · score 0.81 · working memory task, gambling task, contrast maps, signature response, cosine, valence
- [2] § Methods › Trial-wise fMRI response estimation ↔ Validation_codes/Validation_RSA/run_RSAsearchlight_validation.m, lines 48–50 · score 0.78 · FITHRF GLMDENOISE RR, single trial betas, GLMsingle, Art
- [3] § Methods › Equipment and software ↔ Utilities/cluster_identification.m, lines 19–76 · score 0.74 · Melbourne Subcortex Atlas, Cluster identification, CIFTI, mmp, locate, HCP
- [4] § Methods › Neuroimaging analyses › Specificity and generalisability of neural signatures ↔ Main_codes/m3_Predict_crossmodel.m, lines 36–104 · score 0.65 · cross prediction accuracies, fold cross validation, dissociation, permutation, models
- [5] § Methods › Behavioural data analysis › Construction of the aesthetic agreement matrix ↔ Main_codes/m1_AAT_Grades.m, lines 1–54 · score 0.64 · standard deviations, negative correlations, AI, behavioural, Pearson, validated
- [6] § Methods › Trial-wise fMRI response estimation ↔ Validation_codes/Validation_RSA/Validation_distance_RSA_subcortical.m, lines 33–36 · score 0.64 · FITHRF GLMDENOISE RR, GLMsingle, Art
- [7] § Methods › Neuroimaging analyses › Quantification of regional importance ↔ Utilities/fast_haufe.m, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.63 · Haufe transformation, forward model, backward, fitted, weights
- [8] § Results › Neural signatures of aesthetic experience are linked to distributed neural systems ↔ Utilities/fast_haufe.m, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.63 · Haufe transformed, forward models, model weights, fitted
- [9] § Methods › Neuroimaging analyses › Multivariate neural decoding ↔ Main_codes/m3_Predict_crossmodel.m, lines 36–104 · score 0.61 · fold cross validation, predictive accuracy, error, permutation, correlations
- [10] § Methods › Behavioural data analysis › Decomposition of shared aesthetic experience ↔ Utilities/parallel_analysis.m, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.60 · principal component, simulations, parallel, Jolliffe, eigenvalues, variance
- [11] § Results › Neural representation of the latent aesthetic space is modulated by expertise in arts ↔ Validation_codes/Validation_RSA/Validation_RSA_TFCE_correction.m, lines 55–101 · score 0.57 · Threshold Free Cluster, Enhancement, TFCE, fMRI, RSA
- [12] § Methods › Behavioural data analysis › Construction of the aesthetic agreement matrix ↔ Validation_codes/Validation_matrixPCA_reliability.m, lines 1–8 · score 0.54 · aesthetic agreement matrix, aesthetic ratings, reliability, Pearson, stimulus, correlation
- [13] § Results › Neural representation of the latent aesthetic space is modulated by expertise in arts ↔ Main_codes/m6_RSA_trials.m, lines 136–157 · score 0.54 · Threshold Free Cluster, Enhancement, TFCE, RSA
- [14] § Results › Neural signatures of aesthetic experience generalise to core cognitive processes ↔ Main_codes/m4_Model_generalization.m, lines 16–43 · score 0.54 · gambling tasks, working memory, valence, HCP, signatures, semantics
- [15] § Results › Neural representation of the latent aesthetic space is modulated by expertise in arts ↔ Utilities/cluster_identification.m, lines 19–76 · score 0.51 · Melbourne Subcortex Atlas, located, medial, cortical, RSA
- [16] § Methods › Neuroimaging analyses › Multivariate neural decoding ↔ Main_codes/m2_Predict_Dimension1.m, lines 27–52 · score 0.50 · fold cross validation, RMSE, error, permutation, predictive, correlations
Paper
Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser, not stored by OSCR: doi.org · Europe PMC
The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.
The authors' code
MATLAB · 45 lines · 2 KB · GPL-3.0 · 2 matches
- %% get the prediction models
- G1_data = load('Data/ART_G1_4lvl_predictiondata.mat');
- G2_data = load('Data/ART_G2_4lvl_predictiondata.mat');
- svrobj_G1 = svr({'C=1', 'optimizer="andre"', kernel('linear')});
- svrobj_G2 = svr({'C=1', 'optimizer="andre"', kernel('linear')});
- dataobj_G1 = data('spider data', double(G1_data.AATpredition.dat)', G1_data.AATpredition.Y);
- dataobj_G2 = data('spider data', double(G2_data.AATpredition.dat)', G2_data.AATpredition.Y);
- [~, svrobj_G1] = train(svrobj_G1, dataobj_G1, loss);
- [~, svrobj_G2] = train(svrobj_G2, dataobj_G2, loss);
- weights_G1 = get_w(svrobj_G1)';
- weights_G2 = get_w(svrobj_G2)';
- %% load contrast maps from HCP dataset
- load('Data/HCP_generalization_contrast.mat')
- % gambling task
- similarity_generalvalence_map_G1 = canlab_pattern_similarity(general_valence_contrast', weights_G1, 'cosine_similarity');
- similarity_generalvalence_map_G2 = canlab_pattern_similarity(general_valence_contrast', weights_G2, 'cosine_similarity');
- C1_hex = {'#9dc4db','#e9a888'};
- C1_RGB = cellfun(@(x) sscanf(x(2:end),'%2x%2x%2x',[1 3])/255, C1_hex, 'UniformOutput', false);
- labels = {'Semantic','Value'};
- barplot_columns([similarity_generalvalence_map_G1,similarity_generalvalence_map_G2],...
- 'names',labels,'color',C1_RGB,'nostars','MarkerSize',5);
- ylim([-0.12,0.12])
- set(gcf,'position',[10,10,550,750])
- ylabel 'Signature Response (Cosine Similarity)'
- % working memory task
- similarity_placevsface_map_G1 = canlab_pattern_similarity(placevsface_contrast', weights_G1, 'cosine_similarity');
- similarity_placevsface_map_G2 = canlab_pattern_similarity(placevsface_contrast', weights_G2, 'cosine_similarity');
- C2_hex = {'#b8262b','#316eac'};
- C2_RGB = cellfun(@(x) sscanf(x(2:end),'%2x%2x%2x',[1 3])/255, C2_hex, 'UniformOutput', false);
- labels = {'Semantic','Value'};
- barplot_columns([similarity_placevsface_map_G1,similarity_placevsface_map_G2],'names',labels,'color',C2_RGB,'nostars');
- ylim([-0.1,0.2])
- set(gcf,'position',[10,10,550,750])
- ylabel 'Signature Response (Cosine Similarity)'
m4_Model_generalization.m at commit e6d46da, under GPL-3.0 · at the source
Overview
- Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Zhangjiang International Brain Imaging Centre, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
- MIND & AI Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- SRT AI, Society & Social Dynamics, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
Abstract
The abstract is not reproduced here: the paper's license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow it. Read it in the paper, at the publisher or on Europe PMC.
Repositories
Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above, with 16 matches between paragraphs and lines of code.
cognizelab/ARTyficial
e6d46da781102d6be76b5cc72482bea608e63b74, 9 April 2026Availability: 1 check, the latest on 28 September 2026: the link answers
- 28 September 2026: the link answers
32 files
- Figure_codes/
Figure1.ipynb , Jupyter, 96 lines - Figure_codes/
Figure2.ipynb , Jupyter, 218 lines - Figure_codes/
Figure3.ipynb , Jupyter, 237 lines - Figure_codes/
Figure4.ipynb , Jupyter, 268 lines - Figure_codes/
Figure5.ipynb , Jupyter, 80 lines - Figure_codes/
SFigures.ipynb , Jupyter, 691 lines - Main_codes/
m1_AAT_Grades.m , MATLAB, 93 lines, 1 match - Main_codes/
m2_Predict_Dimension1.m , MATLAB, 192 lines, 1 match - Main_codes/
m2_Predict_Dimension2.m , MATLAB, 189 lines - Main_codes/
m3_Predict_crossmodel.m , MATLAB, 104 lines, 2 matches - Main_codes/
m4_Model_generalization. , MATLAB, 45 lines, 2 matchesm - Main_codes/
m5_Neurosynth_decoding_o , MATLAB, 61 linesnSurface.m - Main_codes/
m6_RSA_trials.m , MATLAB, 211 lines, 1 match - Utilities/
GenerateCV.m , MATLAB, 12 lines - Utilities/
cluster_identification.m , MATLAB, 390 lines, 2 matches - Utilities/
fast_haufe.m , MATLAB, 72 lines, 2 matches - Utilities/
g_ls.m , MATLAB, 200 lines - Utilities/
get_permutation_p.m , MATLAB, 21 lines - Utilities/
parallel_analysis.m , MATLAB, 79 lines, 1 match - Utilities/
pca_structure_comparison , MATLAB, 54 lines.m - Validation_codes/
CLIP_model/ , Jupyter, 42 linesCLIP_embeddings.ipynb - Validation_codes/
Model_expressions_img.m , MATLAB, 96 lines - Validation_codes/
Validation_PCA_significa , MATLAB, 36 linesnce.m - Validation_codes/
Validation_RSA/ , MATLAB, 101 lines, 1 matchValidation_RSA_TFCE_corr ection.m - Validation_codes/
Validation_RSA/ , MATLAB, 100 lines, 1 matchValidation_distance_RSA_ subcortical.m - Validation_codes/
Validation_RSA/ , MATLAB, 72 linesget_RSAsearchlight_resul ts.m - Validation_codes/
Validation_RSA/ , MATLAB, 18 linesload_RSAsearchlight_resu lts.m - Validation_codes/
Validation_RSA/ , MATLAB, 101 lines, 1 matchrun_RSAsearchlight_valid ation.m - Validation_codes/
Validation_matrixPCA_mea , MATLAB, 102 linesning.m - Validation_codes/
Validation_matrixPCA_rel , MATLAB, 106 lines, 1 matchiability.m - LICENSE, License, 674 lines
- README.md, Text, 75 lines
Zenodo 19486642
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 28 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
- 28 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
Code availability statement
The paper has a code availability statement. Its license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow reproducing it here; in short, from what the harvester recognized in it:
- it points to the authors' code: cognizelab/
ARTyficial
Read it in the paper: doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73153-6.
Tracing map
Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.
What the map holds:
- 2 repositories of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
- 30 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
- 16 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of the code (method lexical-v1);
- neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.
Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.
Data
Datasets cited
- github.com/
canlab , at github.com; found in “Data Availability Statement” - qunex.readthedocs.io, at qunex.readthedocs.io; found in “Data Availability Statement”
Data availability statement
The paper has a data availability statement. Its license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow reproducing it here; in short, from what the harvester recognized in it:
- it points to 2 datasets: github.com/
canlab , qunex.readthedocs.io
Read it in the paper: doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73153-6.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 1, 28 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 8 authors, 4 keywords, 13 MeSH terms, 3 funders, 106 references.
Cite
This paper
Liang, X., Zhuang, K., Wang, Y., Su, Y., Feng, J., Zhou, F., Becker, B., & Vatansever, D. (2026). Latent neural architecture organising shared aesthetic evaluations of visual artworks. Nature communications, 17(1), 6510. https://
BibTeX
@article{liang2026latent
author = {Liang, Xinyu and Zhuang, Kaixiang and Wang, Yun and Su, Yueting and Feng, Jianfeng and Zhou, Feng and Becker, Benjamin and Vatansever, Deniz},
title = {{Latent neural architecture organising shared aesthetic evaluations of visual artworks}},
journal = {Nature communications},
year = {2026},
month = may,
volume = {17},
number = {1},
pages = {6510},
publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
issn = {2041-1723},
doi = {10.1038/
url = {https://
pmid = {42143057},
pmcid = {PMC13377068}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Liang, Xinyu
AU - Zhuang, Kaixiang
AU - Wang, Yun
AU - Su, Yueting
AU - Feng, Jianfeng
AU - Zhou, Feng
AU - Becker, Benjamin
AU - Vatansever, Deniz
TI - Latent neural architecture organising shared aesthetic evaluations of visual artworks
T2 - Nature communications
J2 - Nat Commun
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 17
IS - 1
SP - 6510
SN - 2041-1723
PB - Nature Publishing Group
DO - 10.1038/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.1038/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Latent neural architecture organising shared aesthetic evaluations of visual artworks",
"container-title": "Nature communications",
"author": [
{
"family": "Liang",
"given": "Xinyu"
},
{
"family": "Zhuang",
"given": "Kaixiang"
},
{
"family": "Wang",
"given": "Yun"
},
{
"family": "Su",
"given": "Yueting"
},
{
"family": "Feng",
"given": "Jianfeng"
},
{
"family": "Zhou",
"given": "Feng"
},
{
"family": "Becker",
"given": "Benjamin"
},
{
"family": "Vatansever",
"given": "Deniz"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "17",
"issue": "1",
"page": "6510",
"DOI": "10.1038/
"PMID": "42143057",
"PMCID": "PMC13377068",
"ISSN": "2041-1723",
"publisher": "Nature Publishing Group",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
5,
16
]
]
}
}
The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75841-9 [code]
- Model-based semantic distance reveals adaptive coordination of distinct cognitive systems in flexible knowledge retrieval.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: Pillow, PyTorch, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, 2 other tools, cognitive, 8 references, 3 authors
- [2] doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9326213/v1 [code]
- Multi-task fMRI outperforms resting-state fMRI for revealing task-invariant organization of the human brainJournal: Research Square (preprint)In common: GIfTI library for MATLAB, h5py, Pillow, 7 other tools, fMRI, cognitive, 11 references
- [3] doi:10.64898/2026.03.09.710558 [code]
- Multi-task fMRI outperforms resting-state fMRI for revealing task-invariant organization of the human brainJournal: bioRxiv (preprint)In common: GIfTI library for MATLAB, h5py, Pillow, 7 other tools, fMRI, cognitive, 11 references
- [4] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-76098-y [code]
- A single computational objective can produce specialization of streams in visual cortex.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: h5py, Pillow, PyTorch, 7 other tools, 8 references
- [5] doi:10.1002/hbm.70577 [code]
- Disgust Propensity, Not Disgust Sensitivity, Shapes the Reactivity of a Subjective Disgust Circuit in Humans.Journal: Human brain mappingIn common: cifti-matlab, GIfTI library for MATLAB, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, 3 other tools, fMRI, 4 references, author Benjamin Becker
- [6] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-74565-0 [code]
- The functional neurobiology of dispositions towards negative emotions.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: cifti-matlab, GIfTI library for MATLAB, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, 3 other tools, cognitive, 8 references
- [7] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-74462-6 [code]
- Neural similarity between choice options predicts group-level context effects.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: Pingouin, Pillow, PyTorch, 6 other tools, cognitive, 7 references
- [8] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71568-9 [code]
- Convergent and selective representations of pain, appetitive processes, aversive processes, and cognitive control in the insula.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: Pillow, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, scikit-learn, 4 other tools, pain, cognitive, 8 references
- [9] doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0038-26.2026 [code]
- Multidimensional Feature Tuning in Category Selective Areas of Human Visual Cortex.Journal: The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for NeuroscienceIn common: h5py, Pillow, PyTorch, 6 other tools, fMRI, 6 references
- [10] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71151-2 [code]
- Common and distinct neural correlates of social interaction processing and theory of mind in narratives.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: cifti-matlab, GIfTI library for MATLAB, Pillow, 7 other tools, cognitive, 5 references
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Validate its tracing map
You validate the map as this page shows it: 2 repositories of the authors' code, each at its verified commit and with its license, 30 scripts, and 16 matches between paragraphs and code (see the Code and Map sections). It then receives a DOI on Zenodo, with you (your ORCID iD) and OSCR as its creators; the code itself is not deposited.
The map's fingerprint: sha256:ba73b9ac306a3b7f…
Add the badge to its README
The badge links the code to this page. Copy one of these into the README of the paper's code: only you decide where it goes, and nothing is changed for you.
Markdown
[, paste the snippet at the top, then “Commit changes…” and, to review it first, “Create a new branch and start a pull request”. You open the pull request; OSCR asks for no permission.
Request its removal
To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
