OSCR

Prefrontal parvalbumin neurons mediate working memory in a task demand-dependent manner.

Code ↔ Paper

2 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of its authors' code, computed by the harvester (lexical-v1). Click a colored paragraph or line to see its counterpart.

The 2 matches
  1. [1] § Methods › Fiber photometry analysis ↔ photobatch/Processing/Signal/fitting.py, lines 53–99 · score 0.55 · linear regression, deviation, fit, isobestic, median, filtered
  2. [2] § Methods › Fiber photometry ↔ photobatch/Processing/IO/Photometry/doric.py, lines 145–282 · score 0.55 · Doric Studio software, TTL, channel, photometry, signals

Paper

Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser, not stored by OSCR: doi.org · Europe PMC

The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.

The authors' code

Python · 387 lines · 13 KB · GPL-3.0 · 1 match

  1. """Signal/fitting.py
  2. Baseline fitting and delta-F/F computation.
  3. Entry point: `signal_fit` (previously `doric_fit` on the PhotometryData class).
  4. Supported fitting strategies
  5. -----------------------------
  6. linear / lin
  7. Ordinary least-squares (polyfit) or robust HuberRegressor.
  8. irls
  9. Robust linear model using statsmodels RLM with Huber's T loss.
  10. expodecay / exp_decay / exp
  11. Single-component exponential decay fitted over time.
  12. biexponential / biexp
  13. Two-component exponential decay fitted over time.
  14. arpls / ar_pls / ar-pls
  15. Asymmetrically Reweighted Penalised Least Squares (Baek et al. 2015).
  16. """
  17. import logging
  18. import numpy as np
  19. import pandas as pd
  20. import scipy.sparse as sparse
  21. import statsmodels.api as sm
  22. from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
  23. from scipy.sparse.linalg import spsolve
  24. from sklearn.linear_model import HuberRegressor
  25. logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
  26. def _ols_fit(filtered_f0, filtered_f):
  27. """Fit the active channel to the control channel with ordinary least squares.
  28. Parameters
  29. ----------
  30. filtered_f0 : numpy.ndarray
  31. Filtered isobestic/control signal.
  32. filtered_f : numpy.ndarray
  33. Filtered active signal.
  34. Returns
  35. -------
  36. numpy.ndarray
  37. Predicted active-channel baseline computed from a first-order
  38. polynomial fit of ``filtered_f0`` onto ``filtered_f``.
  39. """
  40. poly = np.polyfit(filtered_f0, filtered_f, 1)
  41. return np.multiply(poly[0], filtered_f0) + poly[1]
  42. def _linear_fit(filtered_f0, filtered_f, robust_fit=True, huber_epsilon='auto'):
  43. """Fit the isobestic channel to the active channel using linear regression.
  44. Parameters
  45. ----------
  46. filtered_f0 : numpy.ndarray
  47. Filtered isobestic/control signal.
  48. filtered_f : numpy.ndarray
  49. Filtered active signal to be modeled.
  50. robust_fit : bool, optional
  51. If ``True``, fit with ``HuberRegressor``. If ``False``, use an
  52. ordinary least-squares line fit.
  53. huber_epsilon : str or float, optional
  54. Huber loss threshold. Values ``"auto"`` and ``"mad"`` derive the
  55. threshold from the residual median absolute deviation. Numeric values
  56. are used directly and clipped to be greater than ``1.0``.
  57. Returns
  58. -------
  59. numpy.ndarray
  60. Predicted active-channel baseline for each sample in
  61. ``filtered_f0``.
  62. """
  63. if robust_fit:
  64. f0_reshaped = filtered_f0.reshape(-1, 1)
  65. epsilon_str = str(huber_epsilon).strip().lower()
  66. if epsilon_str in ('auto', 'mad'):
  67. f_naive_pred = _ols_fit(filtered_f0, filtered_f)
  68. residuals = filtered_f - f_naive_pred
  69. mad_val = np.median(np.abs(residuals - np.median(residuals)))
  70. epsilon_val = max(1.01, 1.4826 * mad_val)
  71. logger.debug("Huber epsilon (auto/MAD): %.4f", epsilon_val)
  72. else:
  73. try:
  74. epsilon_val = max(1.01, float(huber_epsilon))
  75. except (ValueError, TypeError):
  76. epsilon_val = 1.35
  77. logger.debug("Huber epsilon (user-specified): %.4f", epsilon_val)
  78. huber = HuberRegressor(epsilon=epsilon_val)
  79. huber.fit(f0_reshaped, filtered_f)
  80. fitted = huber.predict(f0_reshaped)
  81. else:
  82. fitted = _ols_fit(filtered_f0, filtered_f)
  83. return fitted
  84. def _irls_fit(filtered_f0, filtered_f):
  85. """Fit the control channel to the active channel with robust IRLS.
  86. Parameters
  87. ----------
  88. filtered_f0 : numpy.ndarray
  89. Filtered isobestic/control signal.
  90. filtered_f : numpy.ndarray
  91. Filtered active signal to be modeled.
  92. Returns
  93. -------
  94. numpy.ndarray
  95. Predicted active-channel baseline from a robust linear model fit with
  96. Huber's T loss.
  97. """
  98. design_matrix = sm.add_constant(np.asarray(filtered_f0, dtype=float), has_constant='add')
  99. response = np.asarray(filtered_f, dtype=float)
  100. rlm_result = sm.RLM(response, design_matrix, M=sm.robust.norms.HuberT()).fit()
  101. return rlm_result.predict(design_matrix)
  102. def _exp_decay_fit(filtered_f0, filtered_f, time_data):
  103. """Fit the active channel using a single-exponential decay over time.
  104. Parameters
  105. ----------
  106. filtered_f0 : numpy.ndarray
  107. Filtered isobestic/control signal. This is only used for fallback
  108. linear fitting if the exponential optimization fails.
  109. filtered_f : numpy.ndarray
  110. Filtered active signal to be modeled.
  111. time_data : numpy.ndarray
  112. Time vector associated with the filtered signals.
  113. Returns
  114. -------
  115. numpy.ndarray
  116. Predicted baseline from a single-exponential decay model. Falls back
  117. to an OLS control-to-active fit if nonlinear optimization fails.
  118. """
  119. yf = np.asarray(filtered_f, dtype=float)
  120. t = np.asarray(time_data, dtype=float)
  121. try:
  122. p_95 = np.percentile(yf, 95)
  123. p_05 = np.percentile(yf, 5)
  124. a0 = p_95 - p_05
  125. k0 = 1.0 / max((t[-1] - t[0]), 1.0)
  126. c0 = np.min(yf)
  127. popt, _ = curve_fit(
  128. lambda tt, amp, decay, offset: amp * np.exp(-decay * tt) + offset,
  129. t,
  130. yf,
  131. p0=[a0, k0, c0],
  132. maxfev=10000,
  133. )
  134. fitted = popt[0] * np.exp(-popt[1] * t) + popt[2]
  135. except (RuntimeError, TypeError, ValueError):
  136. fitted = _ols_fit(filtered_f0, filtered_f)
  137. return fitted
  138. def _biexp_decay_fit(filtered_f0, filtered_f, time_data):
  139. """Fit the active channel with a biexponential decay over time.
  140. Parameters
  141. ----------
  142. filtered_f0 : numpy.ndarray
  143. Filtered isobestic/control signal. Used for fallback linear fitting
  144. if the biexponential optimization fails.
  145. filtered_f : numpy.ndarray
  146. Filtered active signal to be modeled.
  147. time_data : numpy.ndarray
  148. Time vector associated with the filtered signals.
  149. Returns
  150. -------
  151. numpy.ndarray
  152. Predicted baseline from a two-component exponential decay model.
  153. Falls back to an OLS control-to-active fit if nonlinear optimization
  154. fails or the inputs are too short for stable fitting.
  155. """
  156. yf = np.asarray(filtered_f, dtype=float)
  157. control = np.asarray(filtered_f0, dtype=float)
  158. t = np.asarray(time_data, dtype=float)
  159. if yf.size < 5 or t.size != yf.size:
  160. return _ols_fit(control, yf)
  161. t_shifted = t - t[0]
  162. duration = max(float(t_shifted[-1]), 1.0)
  163. p10, p50, p90 = np.percentile(yf, [10, 50, 90])
  164. signal_span = max(float(p90 - p10), np.finfo(float).eps)
  165. baseline_floor = float(np.min(yf))
  166. amp_total = max(float(p90 - baseline_floor), np.finfo(float).eps)
  167. slow_amp = max(float(p90 - p50), 0.25 * amp_total)
  168. fast_amp = max(float(p50 - p10), 0.15 * amp_total)
  169. k_slow_0 = 0.5 / duration
  170. k_fast_0 = 5.0 / duration
  171. c0 = baseline_floor
  172. lower_bounds = [0.0, 0.0, 1e-8, 1e-8, baseline_floor - signal_span]
  173. upper_bounds = [
  174. 4.0 * amp_total,
  175. 4.0 * amp_total,
  176. 10.0 / duration,
  177. 100.0 / duration,
  178. float(np.max(yf)),
  179. ]
  180. def biexponential(tt, amp_slow, amp_fast, k_slow, k_fast, offset):
  181. return amp_slow * np.exp(-k_slow * tt) + amp_fast * np.exp(-k_fast * tt) + offset
  182. try:
  183. popt, _ = curve_fit(
  184. biexponential,
  185. t_shifted,
  186. yf,
  187. p0=[slow_amp, fast_amp, k_slow_0, k_fast_0, c0],
  188. bounds=(lower_bounds, upper_bounds),
  189. maxfev=20000,
  190. )
  191. fitted = biexponential(t_shifted, *popt)
  192. except (RuntimeError, TypeError, ValueError):
  193. fitted = _ols_fit(control, yf)
  194. return fitted
  195. def _arpls_drift_fit(
  196. dff_initial,
  197. arpls_lambda=1e5,
  198. arpls_max_iter=50,
  199. arpls_tol=1e-6,
  200. arpls_eps=1e-8,
  201. arpls_weight_scale=2.0,
  202. ):
  203. """Estimate baseline drift using Asymmetrically Reweighted Penalised Least Squares.
  204. Parameters
  205. ----------
  206. dff_initial : numpy.ndarray
  207. Initial delta-F/F trace from which slow baseline drift should be
  208. estimated.
  209. arpls_lambda : float, optional
  210. Smoothness penalty applied to the second-derivative term.
  211. arpls_max_iter : int, optional
  212. Maximum number of reweighting iterations.
  213. arpls_tol : float, optional
  214. Relative convergence tolerance for weight updates.
  215. arpls_eps : float, optional
  216. Lower bound applied to weights for numerical stability.
  217. arpls_weight_scale : float, optional
  218. Scaling factor controlling the sharpness of the logistic reweighting
  219. transition.
  220. Returns
  221. -------
  222. numpy.ndarray
  223. Estimated slow drift component with the same shape as
  224. ``dff_initial``.
  225. """
  226. y = dff_initial.astype(float)
  227. n = y.size
  228. lam = float(arpls_lambda)
  229. ratio = float(arpls_tol)
  230. max_iter = int(arpls_max_iter)
  231. eps = float(arpls_eps)
  232. weight_scale = float(arpls_weight_scale)
  233. e = np.ones(n)
  234. d_matrix = sparse.diags([e, -2 * e, e], [0, 1, 2], shape=(n - 2, n))
  235. penalty = lam * (d_matrix.transpose().dot(d_matrix))
  236. weights = np.ones(n)
  237. baseline = np.zeros(n)
  238. for _ in range(max_iter):
  239. weight_matrix = sparse.diags(weights, 0)
  240. system = (weight_matrix + penalty).tocsc()
  241. baseline = spsolve(system, weights * y)
  242. residuals = y - baseline
  243. negative_residuals = residuals[residuals < 0]
  244. if negative_residuals.size == 0:
  245. break
  246. mean_neg = negative_residuals.mean()
  247. std_neg = negative_residuals.std()
  248. if std_neg <= 0:
  249. break
  250. next_weights = 1.0 / (1.0 + np.exp(weight_scale * (residuals - (2.0 * std_neg - mean_neg)) / std_neg))
  251. next_weights = np.clip(next_weights, eps, 1.0)
  252. if np.linalg.norm(weights - next_weights) / np.linalg.norm(weights) < ratio:
  253. weights = next_weights
  254. break
  255. weights = next_weights
  256. return baseline
  257. def signal_fit(
  258. fit_type,
  259. filtered_f0,
  260. filtered_f,
  261. time_data,
  262. robust_fit=True,
  263. baseline_detrend=None,
  264. arpls_lambda=1e5,
  265. arpls_max_iter=50,
  266. arpls_tol=1e-6,
  267. arpls_eps=1e-8,
  268. arpls_weight_scale=2.0,
  269. huber_epsilon='auto',
  270. ):
  271. """Fit a baseline to the photometry signals and compute delta-F/F.
  272. Parameters
  273. ----------
  274. fit_type : str
  275. Baseline fitting strategy. Supported values include ``"linear"``,
  276. ``"lin"``, ``"irls"``, ``"expodecay"``, ``"exp_decay"``,
  277. ``"exp"``, ``"biexponential"``, and ``"biexp"``.
  278. filtered_f0 : numpy.ndarray
  279. Filtered isobestic/control signal.
  280. filtered_f : numpy.ndarray
  281. Filtered active signal.
  282. time_data : numpy.ndarray
  283. Time vector corresponding to the filtered signals.
  284. robust_fit : bool, optional
  285. If ``True``, the linear fit strategy uses ``HuberRegressor``.
  286. baseline_detrend : str or None, optional
  287. Optional post-fit detrending method. Currently ``"arpls"`` applies
  288. arPLS drift removal; any other value leaves delta-F/F unchanged.
  289. arpls_lambda : float, optional
  290. Smoothness penalty used when ``baseline_detrend`` is ``"arpls"``.
  291. arpls_max_iter : int, optional
  292. Maximum number of arPLS iterations.
  293. arpls_tol : float, optional
  294. Convergence tolerance for arPLS weight updates.
  295. arpls_eps : float, optional
  296. Lower clipping bound for arPLS weights.
  297. arpls_weight_scale : float, optional
  298. Logistic weight transition scale for arPLS.
  299. huber_epsilon : str or float, optional
  300. Huber threshold control for the linear robust fit path.
  301. Returns
  302. -------
  303. pandas.DataFrame
  304. DataFrame with columns ``Time`` and ``DeltaF`` containing the input
  305. time vector and the computed delta-F/F trace.
  306. """
  307. fit_type_lower = str(fit_type).lower() if fit_type is not None else 'linear'
  308. if fit_type_lower in ('linear', 'lin'):
  309. fitted = _linear_fit(filtered_f0, filtered_f, robust_fit=robust_fit, huber_epsilon=huber_epsilon)
  310. elif fit_type_lower == 'irls':
  311. fitted = _irls_fit(filtered_f0, filtered_f)
  312. elif fit_type_lower in ('expodecay', 'exp_decay', 'exp'):
  313. fitted = _exp_decay_fit(filtered_f0, filtered_f, time_data)
  314. elif fit_type_lower in ('biexponential', 'biexp'):
  315. fitted = _biexp_decay_fit(filtered_f0, filtered_f, time_data)
  316. else:
  317. fitted = _ols_fit(filtered_f0, filtered_f)
  318. with np.errstate(divide='ignore', invalid='ignore'):
  319. delta_f = (filtered_f - fitted) / fitted
  320. delta_f = np.nan_to_num(delta_f)
  321. if baseline_detrend == 'arpls':
  322. drift_fit = _arpls_drift_fit(
  323. delta_f,
  324. arpls_lambda=arpls_lambda,
  325. arpls_max_iter=arpls_max_iter,
  326. arpls_tol=arpls_tol,
  327. arpls_eps=arpls_eps,
  328. arpls_weight_scale=arpls_weight_scale,
  329. )
  330. delta_f -= drift_fit
  331. result_pd = pd.DataFrame({'Time': time_data, 'DeltaF': delta_f})
  332. return result_pd

fitting.py at commit 25f8e4a, under GPL-3.0 · at the source

Overview

Authors: Tyler D. Dexter1,2, Meira M. F. Machado2, Shahnaza Hamidullah1,2, Daniel Palmer2, Ahmed. M. Hashad2,3, Marcus Doyle1,2, Megan Attard1,2, Brian L. Allman4, Wataru Inoue2, Lisa M. Saksida2, Timothy J. Bussey2,5
  1. Neuroscience Program, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University,London, ON Canada
  2. Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University,London, ON Canada
  3. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University,Alexandria, Egypt
  4. Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University,London, ON Canada
  5. Department of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University,London, ON Canada
Institutions: Western University (Canada); Alexandria University (Egypt)
Journal: Nature communications, volume 17, issue 1, article 7349
Dates: received 29 November 2024; accepted 18 May 2026; published online 10 June 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY-NC-ND
Identifiers: DOI 10.1038/s41467-026-73818-2 · PMID 42265093 · PMCID PMC13402680 · OpenAlex W7164002838
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code verified
Categories: mouse (organism), schizophrenia / psychosis (population), cognitive (subfield)
Methods: Statistics, Evoked potentials, Single-unit activity, calcium imaging
Keywords: Working memory, Neural circuits, Schizophrenia
MeSH: Memory, Short-Term*, Neurons*, Parvalbumins*, Prefrontal Cortex*, Animals, Cognition, Gamma Rhythm, Male, Mice, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Optogenetics (* major topic)
Topic: Stress Responses and Cortisol (Behavioral Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Funding: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (426966, PJT 426966); Ontario Research Foundation (ORF); Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (2019-06102 and 2019-06087, RGPIN-2019-06087); Canada First Research Excellence Fund Canada Foundation for Innovation; Western University BrainsCAN Postdoctoral Fellowship; Canada First Research Excellence Fund (Fonds d'excellence en recherche Apogée Canada); Canada Foundation for Innovation
Citations: cited by 1 paper (Europe PMC); 96 references in the paper

Abstract

The abstract is not reproduced here: the paper's license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow it. Read it in the paper, at the publisher or on Europe PMC.

Repositories

Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above, with 2 matches between paragraphs and lines of code.

dpalmer9/photobatch

License: GPL-3.0
State: the link answers, verified on 27 September 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Commit: 25f8e4a52a4e2b9911fe59895be8f9dc33f7cb6f, 22 June 2026
Languages: Python (28)
Size: 45 files, 28 scripts
Software Heritage: not archived
Found in: “Code availability”
Holds: README, license file, CITATION.cff, environment (pyproject.toml, requirements.txt), tests
Not found: continuous integration, documentation
Tools: NumPy (15 files), pandas (13 files), SciPy (5 files), h5py (2 files), scikit-learn (2 files), statsmodels (2 files), Matplotlib (1 file)
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 27 September 2026: the link answers
  • 27 September 2026: the link answers
30 files

Zenodo 7577053

License: other-open
State: the link answers, verified on 27 September 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Size: 1 file
Software Heritage: not checked
Found in: “Code availability”
Not found: README, license file, CITATION.cff, environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Tools: NumPy (1 file), pandas (1 file), SciPy (1 file)
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 27 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
  • 27 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
3 files
At the source:

Code availability statement

The paper has a code availability statement. Its license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow reproducing it here; in short, from what the harvester recognized in it:

Read it in the paper: doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73818-2.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 2 repositories of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 29 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • 2 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of the code (method lexical-v1);
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data availability statement

The paper has a data availability statement. Its license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow reproducing it here; in short, from what the harvester recognized in it:

  • no repository, dataset or request procedure was recognized in it

Read it in the paper: doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73818-2.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 11 authors, 3 keywords, 11 MeSH terms, 7 funders, 94 references.

Cite

This paper

Dexter, T. D., Machado, M. M. F., Hamidullah, S., Palmer, D., Hashad, A. M., Doyle, M., Attard, M., Allman, B. L., Inoue, W., Saksida, L. M., & Bussey, T. J. (2026). Prefrontal parvalbumin neurons mediate working memory in a task demand-dependent manner. Nature communications, 17(1), 7349. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73818-2

BibTeX

@article{dexter2026prefrontal,
author = {Dexter, Tyler D. and Machado, Meira M. F. and Hamidullah, Shahnaza and Palmer, Daniel and Hashad, Ahmed. M. and Doyle, Marcus and Attard, Megan and Allman, Brian L. and Inoue, Wataru and Saksida, Lisa M. and Bussey, Timothy J.},
title = {{Prefrontal parvalbumin neurons mediate working memory in a task demand-dependent manner}},
journal = {Nature communications},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
volume = {17},
number = {1},
pages = {7349},
publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
issn = {2041-1723},
doi = {10.1038/s41467-026-73818-2},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73818-2},
pmid = {42265093},
pmcid = {PMC13402680}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Dexter, Tyler D.
AU - Machado, Meira M. F.
AU - Hamidullah, Shahnaza
AU - Palmer, Daniel
AU - Hashad, Ahmed. M.
AU - Doyle, Marcus
AU - Attard, Megan
AU - Allman, Brian L.
AU - Inoue, Wataru
AU - Saksida, Lisa M.
AU - Bussey, Timothy J.
TI - Prefrontal parvalbumin neurons mediate working memory in a task demand-dependent manner
T2 - Nature communications
J2 - Nat Commun
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/10
VL - 17
IS - 1
SP - 7349
SN - 2041-1723
PB - Nature Publishing Group
DO - 10.1038/s41467-026-73818-2
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73818-2
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1038/s41467-026-73818-2",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Prefrontal parvalbumin neurons mediate working memory in a task demand-dependent manner",
"container-title": "Nature communications",
"author": [
{
"family": "Dexter",
"given": "Tyler D."
},
{
"family": "Machado",
"given": "Meira M. F."
},
{
"family": "Hamidullah",
"given": "Shahnaza"
},
{
"family": "Palmer",
"given": "Daniel"
},
{
"family": "Hashad",
"given": "Ahmed. M."
},
{
"family": "Doyle",
"given": "Marcus"
},
{
"family": "Attard",
"given": "Megan"
},
{
"family": "Allman",
"given": "Brian L."
},
{
"family": "Inoue",
"given": "Wataru"
},
{
"family": "Saksida",
"given": "Lisa M."
},
{
"family": "Bussey",
"given": "Timothy J."
}
],
"container-title-short": "Nat Commun",
"volume": "17",
"issue": "1",
"page": "7349",
"DOI": "10.1038/s41467-026-73818-2",
"PMID": "42265093",
"PMCID": "PMC13402680",
"ISSN": "2041-1723",
"publisher": "Nature Publishing Group",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-73818-2",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
6,
10
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10071-9 [code]
Alpha phase coding supports feature binding during working memory maintenance.
Journal: Communications biology
In common: scikit-learn, SciPy, Matplotlib, 1 other tool, cognitive, 7 references
[2] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1034 [code]
Top-down selection of visual working memory contents is supported by alpha-band phase-synchronized oscillatory networks
Journal: n/a
In common: scikit-learn, pandas, SciPy, 2 other tools, cognitive, 6 references
[3] doi:10.7554/elife.95562 [code]
Spatially targeted inhibitory rhythms differentially affect neuronal integration.
Journal: eLife
In common: h5py, statsmodels, scikit-learn, 4 other tools, 4 references
[4] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71331-0 [code]
A multimodal approach for visualizing and identifying electrophysiological cell types in vivo.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: scikit-learn, pandas, SciPy, 2 other tools, mouse, 4 references
[5] doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10501-y [code]
Long-term editing of brain circuits using an engineered electrical synapse.
Journal: Nature
In common: statsmodels, scikit-learn, pandas, 3 other tools, mouse, 3 references
[6] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75705-2 [code]
Redundant prefrontal hemispheres adapt storage strategy to working memory demands.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: h5py, statsmodels, scikit-learn, 4 other tools, cognitive, 2 references
[7] doi:10.7554/elife.109717 [code]
Retrosplenial cortex enables context-dependent goal-directed sensorimotor transformation.
Journal: eLife
In common: h5py, statsmodels, scikit-learn, 4 other tools, mouse, 2 references
[8] doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014304 [code]
Linking reduced prefrontal microcircuit inhibition in schizophrenia to EEG biomarkers in silico.
Journal: PLoS computational biology
In common: scikit-learn, pandas, SciPy, 2 other tools, schizophrenia / psychosis, 3 references
[9] doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2026.117845 [code]
Hippocampal skill memory expansion drives online performance dynamics during skill learning.
Journal: Cell reports
In common: SciPy, Matplotlib, NumPy, cognitive, 4 references
[10] doi:10.1126/sciadv.aed6417 [code]
Intrinsic timing, not temporal prediction, underlies ramping dynamics in visual and parietal cortex during passive behavior.
Journal: Science advances
In common: h5py, scikit-learn, pandas, 3 other tools, mouse, 2 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.