A minimal model of working memory in neural systems and neuromorphic circuits.
The 3 matches
- [1] § Results › Networks of self-excitatory neurons and mean-field models ↔ Network and Mean-field/network_analysis.ipynb, lines 285–373 · score 0.71 · Population firing rate, interval coefficient, Membrane potential, Raster, CV, variation
- [2] § Results › Networks of self-excitatory neurons and mean-field models ↔ Network and Mean-field/network_analysis.ipynb, lines 169–220 · score 0.70 · synaptic conductance, eQIF, gsyn, post, pre, quenched
- [3] § Results › Networks of self-excitatory neurons and mean-field models ↔ Network and Mean-field/network_analysis.ipynb, lines 285–373 · score 0.56 · inter spike intervals, coefficient, CV, variation, activity, firing
Paper
Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser, not stored by OSCR: doi.org · Europe PMC
The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.
The authors' code
Jupyter notebook · 373 lines · 13 KB · no license · 3 matches
- # %%
- import numpy as np
- import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
- from scipy.integrate import solve_ivp
- from brian2 import *
- import collections
- # %%
- def compute_chi_sliding_window(state_monitor, time_window, f_sample, window_size=50*ms, step_size=10*ms):
- """
- In each window, compute the population mean voltage and variance, and the mean of individual variances.
- χ(t) = sqrt(Var(V_pop) / mean(Var(V_i)))
- Input:
- state_monitor : StateMonitor, Brian2 StateMonitor with voltage recordings
- window_size : time of the sliding window
- step_size : time step between successive windows
- Returns:
- times : array, center times of each window
- chi_t : array, time-resolved synchrony measure
- """
- time_mask = (state_monitor.t/ms >= time_window[0]) & (state_monitor.t/ms < time_window[1])
- V_traces = state_monitor.V[:, time_mask] / mV
- effective_times = state_monitor.t[time_mask]
- # Convert to indices
- window_samples = int(window_size / f_sample)
- step_samples = int(step_size / f_sample)
- n_timepoints = V_traces.shape[1]
- chi_t = []
- times = []
- var_V = []
- mean_var_Vi = []
- for start_idx in range(0, n_timepoints, step_samples):
- end_idx = start_idx + window_samples
- # Extract window
- V_window = V_traces[:, start_idx:end_idx]
- # Compute χ for this window
- V_pop_window = np.mean(V_window, axis=0)
- sigma_V_squared = np.var(V_pop_window)
- sigma_Vi_squared = np.var(V_window, axis=1)
- mean_sigma_Vi_squared = np.sum(sigma_Vi_squared)/N
- if mean_sigma_Vi_squared > 0:
- chi = np.sqrt(sigma_V_squared / mean_sigma_Vi_squared)
- else:
- chi = 0.0
- time = effective_times[start_idx:end_idx].mean()
- chi_t.append(chi)
- times.append(time/ms)
- var_V.append(sigma_V_squared)
- mean_var_Vi.append(mean_sigma_Vi_squared)
- return np.array(times), np.array(chi_t), np.array(var_V), np.array(mean_var_Vi)
- # %%
- # Define parameters of the model and the default values for the mean field parameters
- DynMemory = collections.namedtuple(
- typename='DynMemory',
- field_names='C ,g_L ,E_L ,v_th ,T_w ,a ,b ,E_e ,Q_e ,T_s, Eta ,Delta ,v_reset, v_peak')
- default_adj_params = DynMemory(
- C=200, g_L=10, E_L=-62, v_th=-55, T_w=20, a=4, b=20, E_e=0, Q_e=4, T_s=6, Eta=10, Delta=.5, v_reset=-70., v_peak=-10.)
- # Define the adjusted mean field equations for a network of eQIF neurons
- # The correction term of the current is discussed in SuppmentaL Material section of the paper
- def adjusted_dmMF(t, y, p:DynMemory, I_func):
- r, v, w, s = y
- C ,g_L ,E_L ,v_th ,T_w ,a ,b ,E_e ,Q_e ,T_s, Eta ,Delta, v_reset, v_peak = p
- I0 = I_func(t)
- alpha = g_L*(v_th + E_L) + s
- beta = g_L*v_th*E_L + s*E_e + w + I0 + Eta
- mu = 4*beta/g_L - (alpha/g_L)**2
- if mu >= 0:
- gamma = np.arctan((2*v_peak - alpha/g_L)/np.sqrt(mu)) - np.arctan((2*v_reset - alpha/g_L)/np.sqrt(mu))
- I_adj = g_L*mu*np.pi**2 / (4*gamma**2) + alpha**2 / (4*g_L) -g_L*E_L*v_th - s*E_e - w - Eta
- else:
- I_adj = I0
- dr = r*(g_L*(2*v-v_th-E_L) - s) / C + Delta*g_L/(np.pi*C**2)
- dv = (g_L * (E_L - v) * (v_th - v) + w + I_adj + s*(E_e - v) + Eta - (np.pi*C*r)**2/g_L) / C
- dw = (a * (v - E_L) - w) / T_w + b*r
- ds = -s/T_s + Q_e*r
- return np.array([dr, dv, dw, ds])
- # %%
- # Define time parameters for integration
- dt = 0.01
- duration_mf = 1500
- dtime = dt * ms
- duration = duration_mf * ms
- defaultclock.dt = dtime
- # Set parameters for the mean-field model
- adj_params = default_adj_params
- # Define parameters with units for Brian2 simulation (same as in mean-field)
- N=5000
- C = adj_params.C * pF
- g_L = adj_params.g_L * nS/mV
- E_L = adj_params.E_L * mV
- V_T = adj_params.v_th * mV
- tau_w = adj_params.T_w * ms
- a = adj_params.a * nS
- b = adj_params.b * pA
- V_reset = adj_params.v_reset * mV
- V_peak = adj_params.v_peak * mV
- Ee = adj_params.E_e * mV
- Qe = adj_params.Q_e/N * nS
- Tsyn = adj_params.T_s * ms
- # %%
- # Define time-varying external current for mean-field simualtion
- AmpStep = 60
- BaseI = 90
- Pert = 10
- def input_current(t):
- # Definition of the external time-varying current
- if t>105 and t<250:
- return BaseI+AmpStep # 100-600 ms: 130 pA
- elif t>650 and t<720:
- return BaseI-Pert
- elif t>780 and t<850:
- return BaseI+Pert
- elif t>1000 and t<1150:
- return BaseI-AmpStep
- elif t>1250 and t<1320:
- return BaseI+Pert
- elif t>1350 and t<1420:
- return BaseI-Pert
- else:
- return BaseI
- time_array = np.arange(0, duration_mf, dt)
- current_array = []
- for step in time_array:
- current_array.append(input_current(step))
- # Define time-varying external current for Brian2 simulation using TimedArray
- time_steps = int(duration / dtime)
- current_array = np.full(time_steps, BaseI)
- current_array[int(100*ms/dtime):int(250*ms/dtime)] = BaseI+AmpStep
- current_array[int(650*ms/dtime):int(720*ms/dtime)] = BaseI-Pert
- current_array[int(780*ms/dtime):int(850*ms/dtime)] = BaseI+Pert
- current_array[int(1000*ms/dtime):int(1150*ms/dtime)] = BaseI-AmpStep
- current_array[int(1250*ms/dtime):int(1320*ms/dtime)] = BaseI+Pert
- current_array[int(1350*ms/dtime):int(1420*ms/dtime)] = BaseI-Pert
- I_t = TimedArray(current_array * pA, dt=dtime)
- # %%
- # Simulate the adjusted mean-field model with random initial conditions
- rnd = np.random.default_rng()
- y0 = [np.round(rnd.uniform(.001, .003), 3), np.round(rnd.uniform(-70., -65.), 3),
- np.round(rnd.uniform(1., 5.), 3), np.round(rnd.uniform(.001, .005), 3)]
- adj_sim = solve_ivp(adjusted_dmMF, (0, duration_mf), y0, args=(adj_params, lambda t: input_current(t)), max_step=dt)
- # %%
- # Define the spiking neural network in Brian2
- start_scope()
- # Set shared variable for synaptic conductance
- Gsyn = NeuronGroup(1, '''
- dGesyn/dt = -Gesyn/Tsyn : siemens
- ''', method='rk4')
- Gsyn.Gesyn = 0*siemens
- # eQIF model equations with synaptic input and external current
- adj_eqs = '''
- dV/dt = (g_L * (E_L - V) * (V_T - V) + w + I_ext + n - Gesyn*(V-Ee)) / C : volt
- dw/dt = (a * (V - E_L) - w) / tau_w : amp
- I_ext = I_t(t) : amp
- n : amp
- Gesyn : siemens (linked)
- '''
- # Set neuron group
- G = NeuronGroup(N, adj_eqs, threshold='V > V_peak', reset='V = V_reset; w += b', method='rk4')
- # Initialize variables for quenched heterogeneity
- e = adj_params.Eta
- d = adj_params.Delta
- x = np.linspace(0+1/N,1-1/N,N)
- rng = np.random.default_rng()
- adj_etas = e + d*np.tan(np.pi*(x-0.5))
- rng.shuffle(adj_etas)
- # Initialize variables with some randomness
- Vinit = np.round(rnd.uniform(-70., -60., size=N), 3)
- Winit = np.round(rnd.uniform(1., 5., size=N), 3)
- G.n = adj_etas * pA
- G.V = Vinit * mV
- G.w = Winit * pA
- G.Gesyn = linked_var(Gsyn, 'Gesyn')
- # Connect neurons
- S = Synapses(G, Gsyn, on_pre='Gesyn_post += Qe')
- S.connect()
- # Monitor variables
- adj_M_spike = SpikeMonitor(G)
- adj_M_FR = PopulationRateMonitor(G)
- # Optional: record membrane potential with a specific dt
- # instead of default one (for reduce memory usage)
- sample_rate = 0.1*ms
- adj_M_voltage = StateMonitor(G, 'V', record=True, dt=sample_rate)
- # Continue without recording
- run(duration)
- # %%
- # Safety check: plot raster to verify activity and membrane potential of a few neurons to verify dynamics
- raster_activity = np.array([adj_M_spike.t/ms, adj_M_spike.i])
- index_mask = (raster_activity[1] <= 1000)
- plt.figure(figsize=(15, 5))
- plt.plot(raster_activity[0][index_mask], raster_activity[1][index_mask], ',k')
- plt.show()
- plt.figure(figsize=(12, 6))
- for i in range(5):
- plt.plot(adj_M_voltage.t/ms, adj_M_voltage.V[i]/mV + i*20, label=f'Neuron {i}') # Offset for visibility
- plt.xlim(50, 1100)
- plt.show()
- # %%
- # Compute ISI Coefficient of Variation (CV) for each neuron within stimulation
- # peak period (50-1100 ms). Sliding windows used to capture time-varying behaviors
- time_interval = 75
- time_windows = np.arange(50, 1100 + time_interval, time_interval)
- N = int(np.max(raster_activity[1])) + 1
- cv_measure = [[] for _ in range(len(time_windows) - 1)]
- for i in range(len(time_windows) - 1):
- mask = (raster_activity[0] >= time_windows[i]) & (raster_activity[0] < time_windows[i+1])
- N = int(np.max(raster_activity[1])) + 1
- results = [[] for _ in range(N)]
- for time, idx in zip(raster_activity[0][mask], raster_activity[1][mask].astype(int)):
- results[idx].append(np.round(time,2))
- results = [times for times in results if len(times) > 0]
- cvs = [np.std(np.diff(times)) / np.mean(np.diff(times)) if len(times) > 2 else np.nan for times in results]
- cv_measure[i] = cvs
- # Extract mean, min, max, std for each time window and create arrays for plotting
- time_bin_len = int(time_interval / (dtime/ms))
- cv_means = np.concatenate([np.ones(time_bin_len) * mean
- for mean in [np.nanmean(cvs) for cvs in cv_measure]])
- cv_mins = np.concatenate([np.ones(time_bin_len) * mn
- for mn in [np.nanmin(cvs) for cvs in cv_measure]])
- cv_maxs = np.concatenate([np.ones(time_bin_len) * mx
- for mx in [np.nanmax(cvs) for cvs in cv_measure]])
- cv_stds = np.concatenate([np.ones(time_bin_len) * std
- for std in [np.nanstd(cvs) for cvs in cv_measure]])
- # %%
- # Compute time-resolved synchrony measure based on membrane potential and plot it.
- # NOTE: the more fsample to store the membrane values is small the more the figure is refined
- times, chi_t, var_V, mean_var_Vi = compute_chi_sliding_window(adj_M_voltage, [50, 1100], f_sample=sample_rate, window_size=10*ms, step_size=2*ms)
- plt.figure(figsize=(12, 4))
- ax = plt.gca()
- ax.plot(adj_M_FR.t[int((50/dtime)*ms):]/ms, current_array[int((50/dtime)*ms):])
- ax2 = ax.twinx()
- ax2.plot(times, chi_t)
- ax2.set_ylabel('χ(t)')
- ax2.set_xlim(50, 1500)
- plt.show()
- # %%
- # Final figure: top three panels full range, bottom two zoomed and aligned
- # Grid and style
- #grid_scheme = GridSpec(nrows=5, ncols=1, height_ratios=[.5, 1, 1, .5, .5], hspace=0.5)
- plt.rcParams.update({
- 'font.size': 20, # Controls default text size
- 'axes.titlesize': 20, # Title font size
- 'axes.labelsize': 20, # X/Y label font size
- 'xtick.labelsize': 18, # X tick labels
- 'ytick.labelsize': 18, # Y tick labels
- 'legend.fontsize': 14, # Legend font size
- })
- fig, axs = plt.subplots(5, 1 , height_ratios=[.5, 1, 1, .5, .5], figsize=(12, 12), sharex=True)
- ax0, ax1, ax2, ax3, ax4 = axs[0], axs[1], axs[2], axs[3], axs[4]
- # Plot time ranges (ms)
- full_start, full_end = 0, 1500
- zoom_start, zoom_end = 50, 1100
- # (a) Current array ---
- ax0.plot(adj_M_FR.t/ms, current_array, color='purple')
- ax0.set_xlim(full_start, full_end)
- ax0.set_ylabel('$I_{ext}$ (pA)')
- ax0.xaxis.set_visible(False)
- ax0.spines['top'].set_visible(False)
- ax0.spines['right'].set_visible(False)
- # (b) Population firing rate
- adj_M_FRsmt = adj_M_FR.smooth_rate(window='flat', width=1.01*ms)
- ax1.plot(adj_M_FR.t/ms, adj_M_FRsmt/Hz, 'k', label='SNN')
- ax1.plot(adj_sim.t, adj_sim.y[0]*1000, 'r', lw=2, label='MF')
- ax1.set_ylabel('$FR$ (Hz)')
- ax1.set_xlim(full_start, full_end)
- ax1.set_ylim(0,150)
- ax1.legend(loc='upper right')
- ax1.xaxis.set_visible(False)
- ax1.spines['top'].set_visible(False)
- ax1.spines['right'].set_visible(False)
- # (c) Raster plot
- # (green shaded area highlight the region were the measures were computed)
- index_mask = (raster_activity[1] <= 1000)
- ax2.plot(raster_activity[0][index_mask], raster_activity[1][index_mask], ',k')
- ax2.fill([zoom_start, zoom_start, zoom_end, zoom_end], [0, 1000, 1000, 0], color='lightgreen', alpha=0.5)
- ax2.set_xlim(full_start, full_end)
- ax2.set_ylabel('Neuron #')
- ax2.spines['top'].set_visible(False)
- ax2.spines['right'].set_visible(False)
- # (d) χ(t) synchrony measure (based on membrane potential)
- ax3.plot(times, chi_t, 'k')
- ax3.set_ylabel('χ(t)')
- ax3.xaxis.set_visible(False)
- ax3.spines['top'].set_visible(False)
- ax3.spines['right'].set_visible(False)
- # (e) Mean inter-spike intervals Coefficient of variation (CV) across the population
- cv_time = np.linspace(zoom_start, zoom_end, len(cv_means))
- yerr_lower = cv_means - cv_mins
- yerr_upper = cv_maxs - cv_means
- ax4.errorbar(cv_time, cv_means, yerr=[yerr_lower, yerr_upper], fmt='none', ecolor='orange', alpha=0.01)
- ax4.plot(cv_time, cv_means, 'k')
- ax4.set_ylabel('CV')
- ax4.set_xlabel('t (ms)')
- ax4.spines['top'].set_visible(False)
- ax4.spines['right'].set_visible(False)
- # Reposition bottom axes to match the highlighted horizontal region under the full-width axes
- # Align y-labels across subplots and ensure left margin is sufficient
- fig.align_ylabels(axs)
- fig.subplots_adjust(left=0.12)
- fig.canvas.draw()
- full_pos = ax1.get_position()
- # Place aligned subplot letters using figure coordinates (left of y-axis labels)
- # compute a common x in figure coords slightly left of the full axis left edge
- x_fig = full_pos.x0 - .12
- axes_list = [ax0, ax1, ax2, ax3, ax4]
- letters = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e']
- for ax, letter in zip(axes_list, letters):
- pos = ax.get_position()
- y_fig = pos.y0 + pos.height * 0.98
- fig.text(x_fig, y_fig, letter, va='top', ha='left')
- plt.show()
network_analysis.ipynb at commit 5021ac2, no license · at the source
Overview
- Aix Marseille Université, INSERM, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes (INS),Marseille, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Laboratoire de Physique des Solides,Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Cité, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center,Paris, France
- Department of Physics, University of California,San Diego, CA USA
Abstract
Phenomenological spiking neuron models such as Izhikevich, adaptive quadratic integrate-and-fire (aQIF), and Adaptive Exponential (AdEx) are widely used because of their simplicity and numerical efficiency. These models reproduce diverse neuronal dynamics through a slow self-inhibitory adaptation variable. Here we introduce their symmetric counterpart by replacing adaptation with slow self-excitation, motivated by intrinsic calcium-mediated membrane currents. This minimal modification enables robust persistent spiking and working-memory dynamics without compromising computational efficiency. These properties remain in excitatory spiking neural networks. We then derive and validate a mean-field neural mass model that remains stable while retaining working-memory functionality. Additionally, we implement the single-neuron model in a minimal memristor-based neuromorphic circuit and experimentally confirm its dynamics. These results provide scalable tools for large-scale brain simulations and neuromorphic applications in robotics, brain-machine interfaces, and edge AI devices.
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Repository
Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above, with 3 matches between paragraphs and lines of code.
GabrieleCasagrande/MinimalNeuro_WorkingMemo
5021ac21b45b729cc9f27977e5b15aceb306a2d6, 8 June 2026Availability: 1 check, the latest on 27 September 2026: the link answers
- 27 September 2026: the link answers
11 files
- Network and Mean-field/
network_analysis.ipynb , Jupyter, 373 lines, 3 matches - Single eQIF neuron/
AdEx.py , Python, 124 lines - Single eQIF neuron/
Izhikevic.py , Python, 126 lines - Single eQIF neuron/
eLIF.py , Python, 119 lines - Single eQIF neuron/
eQIF.py , Python, 119 lines - Single eQIF neuron/
eQIF_3d_bifurcation.ipyn , Jupyter, 188 linesb - Single eQIF neuron/
eQIF_PhasePlane.py , Python, 152 lines - Single eQIF neuron/
eQIF_hysteresis.ipynb , Jupyter, 336 lines - Single eQIF neuron/
eQIF_perturbation.ipynb , Jupyter, 217 lines - Single eQIF neuron/
eQIF_utils.py , Python, 220 lines - README.md, Text, 88 lines
Code availability
The code is available on the Ocean Code Project associated to this article and on GitHub at: https://
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Tracing map
Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.
What the map holds:
- 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
- 10 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
- 3 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of the code (method lexical-v1);
- neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.
Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.
Data
No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.
Data availability
The data associated to this article are available as code and algorithms, with the link provided in the following “Code availability” section.
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 5 authors, 2 keywords, 9 MeSH terms, 2 funders, 53 references.
Cite
This paper
Depannemaecker, D., d’Hollande, A., Casagrande, G., Wu, J., & Rozenberg, M. J. (2026). A minimal model of working memory in neural systems and neuromorphic circuits. Nature communications, 17(1), 9867. https://
BibTeX
@article{depannemaecker2
author = {Depannemaecker, Damien and d’Hollande, Adrien and Casagrande, Gabriele and Wu, Jiaming and Rozenberg, Marcelo J.},
title = {{A minimal model of working memory in neural systems and neuromorphic circuits}},
journal = {Nature communications},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
volume = {17},
number = {1},
pages = {9867},
publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
issn = {2041-1723},
doi = {10.1038/
url = {https://
pmid = {42744781},
pmcid = {PMC13578268}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Depannemaecker, Damien
AU - d’Hollande, Adrien
AU - Casagrande, Gabriele
AU - Wu, Jiaming
AU - Rozenberg, Marcelo J.
TI - A minimal model of working memory in neural systems and neuromorphic circuits
T2 - Nature communications
J2 - Nat Commun
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 17
IS - 1
SP - 9867
SN - 2041-1723
PB - Nature Publishing Group
DO - 10.1038/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.1038/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "A minimal model of working memory in neural systems and neuromorphic circuits",
"container-title": "Nature communications",
"author": [
{
"family": "Depannemaecker",
"given": "Damien"
},
{
"family": "d’Hollande",
"given": "Adrien"
},
{
"family": "Casagrande",
"given": "Gabriele"
},
{
"family": "Wu",
"given": "Jiaming"
},
{
"family": "Rozenberg",
"given": "Marcelo J."
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "17",
"issue": "1",
"page": "9867",
"DOI": "10.1038/
"PMID": "42744781",
"PMCID": "PMC13578268",
"ISSN": "2041-1723",
"publisher": "Nature Publishing Group",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
17
]
]
}
}
The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75705-2 [code]
- Redundant prefrontal hemispheres adapt storage strategy to working memory demands.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: Brian 2, SciPy, Matplotlib, 1 other tool, computational modeling (no new data), 4 references
- [2] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0340393 [code]
- A biologically plausible decision-making model based on interacting neural populations.Journal: PloS oneIn common: Numba, SciPy, Matplotlib, 1 other tool, 3 references
- [3] doi:10.1162/netn.a.543 [code]
- High-resolution Bayesian Virtual Epileptic Patient using neural field models.Journal: Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)In common: SciPy, Matplotlib, NumPy, 4 references
- [4] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-74460-8 [code]
- Spike-based alignment learning solves the weight transport problem.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: Numba, SciPy, Matplotlib, 1 other tool, computational modeling (no new data), 2 references
- [5] doi: [code]
- Limit-Cycle Proliferation Under Parametric Delayed Feedback in a Conductance-Based Neuron: Bifurcation Landscape, Orbit Catalog, and Capacity AnalysisJournal: Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)In common: Numba, SciPy, Matplotlib, 1 other tool, computational modeling (no new data), 2 references
- [6] doi:10.1002/hipo.70089 [code]
- The Role of Plasticity in Replay: Stability Through Anti-Hebbian Rules.Journal: HippocampusIn common: Brian 2, SciPy, Matplotlib, 1 other tool, 2 references
- [7] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-70354-x [code]
- Global error signal guides local optimization in mismatch calculation.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: Brian 2, Numba, SciPy, 2 other tools, computational modeling (no new data)
- [8] doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014752 [code]
- Hierarchical feature binding in a spiking neural network model of the primate ventral visual pathway.Journal: PLoS computational biologyIn common: Brian 2, SciPy, Matplotlib, 1 other tool, computational modeling (no new data), 1 reference
- [9] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-74243-1 [code]
- Spiking neural network decoders of finger forces from high-density intramuscular microelectrode arrays.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: SciPy, Matplotlib, NumPy, 3 references
- [10] doi:10.1073/pnas.2616911123 [code]
- Cerebellar microcircuits enable robust evidence-based decisions through cortico-cerebellar coupling.Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaIn common: Brian 2, Matplotlib, NumPy, computational modeling (no new data), 1 reference
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Validate its tracing map
You validate the map as this page shows it: 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit and with its license, 10 scripts, and 3 matches between paragraphs and code (see the Code and Map sections). It then receives a DOI on Zenodo, with you (your ORCID iD) and OSCR as its creators; the code itself is not deposited.
The map's fingerprint: sha256:3f9b75da77d82447…
Add the badge to its README
The badge links the code to this page. Copy one of these into the README of the paper's code: only you decide where it goes, and nothing is changed for you.
Markdown
[, paste the snippet at the top, then “Commit changes…” and, to review it first, “Create a new branch and start a pull request”. You open the pull request; OSCR asks for no permission.
Request its removal
To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
