OSCR

Path integration from optic flow and the role of eye movements.

Overview

Authors: Renate Reisenegger1,2, Frank Bremmer1,2,3
  1. Applied Physics and Neurophysics, University of Marburg,Karl-v-Frisch Str 8a, 35043 Marburg, Germany
  2. Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior, Universities of Marburg, Giessen, and Darmstadt,Hans-Meerwein-Str. 6, 35032 Marburg, Germany
  3. Department of Physiology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University,Melbourne, Australia
Institutions: Philipps University of Marburg (Germany); Monash University (Australia)
Journal: Scientific reports, volume 16, issue 1, article 17540
Dates: received 9 October 2025; accepted 29 May 2026; published online 7 June 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1038/s41598-026-56170-9 · PMID 42252306 · PMCID PMC13243615 · OpenAlex W4415660943
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code verified
Categories: human (organism), cognitive (subfield)
Methods: Spectral & time-frequency, Statistics, Machine learning, Preprocessing, Physiology & signal measures
Keywords: Distance perception, Optic flow, Self-motion, Eye movements, Fixation, Path integration, Neuroscience, Psychology
MeSH: Eye Movements*, Motion Perception*, Optic Flow*, Adult, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Saccades, Young Adult (* major topic)
Topic: Visual perception and processing mechanisms (Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Funding: Philipps-Universität Marburg (1009)
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 82 references in the paper

Abstract

Optic flow provides critical visual information for self-motion perception, including direction (heading), speed, and travel distance (path integration). While eye movements are naturally elicited during optic flow, most lab-based studies of human path integration require central fixation, potentially altering perception. Here, we examined whether free eye movements improve distance discrimination compared with fixation, testing the hypothesis that oculomotor signals may support oculomotor odometry. The participants viewed two consecutive optic flow stimuli simulating forward self-motion across a ground plane and judged which interval represented the longer travel distance. Eye movement instructions varied across the four conditions, allowing either free-viewing or requiring fixation (still allowing for miniature slow and fast eye movements within a control window) during each interval. Behavioral accuracy was analyzed with generalized linear mixed-effects models, and eye movements were quantified either including or excluding saccades. As expected, free-viewing induced larger and faster saccades and higher smooth eye-movement speeds than fixation did. However, contrary to our hypothesis, fixation did not systematically impair distance discrimination. While cumulative eye-movement amplitudes scaled with travel distance as predicted, psychometric functions for perceived distance were similar across conditions. These findings, together with results from other recent studies, suggest that fixation-based paradigms do not impair the study of certain aspects of self-motion perception, including settings requiring stable gaze (e.g., EEG recordings).

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-026-56170-9.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.

tam-datahub.online.uni-marburg.de/handle/tam

License: none: the authors keep all their rights
State: the link answers, verified on 27 September 2026
Evidence: the link answers
Software Heritage: not checked
Found in: “Code availability”
Not found: README, license file, CITATION.cff, environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 27 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
  • 27 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)

Code availability

Stimulus and analysis scripts together with the raw and aggregated data can be found at https://tam-datahub.online.uni-marburg.de/handle/tam/43, with README files for the overall structure of the repository and instructions for the analysis pipeline.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • no match between paragraphs and code yet;
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data availability

Raw and aggregated data, and stimulus and analysis scripts can be found at https://tam-datahub.online.uni-marburg.de/handle/tam/43.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 2 authors, 8 keywords, 11 MeSH terms, 1 funder, 71 references.

Cite

This paper

Reisenegger, R., & Bremmer, F. (2026). Path integration from optic flow and the role of eye movements. Scientific reports, 16(1), 17540. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-56170-9

BibTeX

@article{reisenegger2026path,
author = {Reisenegger, Renate and Bremmer, Frank},
title = {{Path integration from optic flow and the role of eye movements}},
journal = {Scientific reports},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
volume = {16},
number = {1},
pages = {17540},
publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
issn = {2045-2322},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-56170-9},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-56170-9},
pmid = {42252306},
pmcid = {PMC13243615}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Reisenegger, Renate
AU - Bremmer, Frank
TI - Path integration from optic flow and the role of eye movements
T2 - Scientific reports
J2 - Sci Rep
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/07
VL - 16
IS - 1
SP - 17540
SN - 2045-2322
PB - Nature Publishing Group
DO - 10.1038/s41598-026-56170-9
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-56170-9
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1038/s41598-026-56170-9",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Path integration from optic flow and the role of eye movements",
"container-title": "Scientific reports",
"author": [
{
"family": "Reisenegger",
"given": "Renate"
},
{
"family": "Bremmer",
"given": "Frank"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Sci Rep",
"volume": "16",
"issue": "1",
"page": "17540",
"DOI": "10.1038/s41598-026-56170-9",
"PMID": "42252306",
"PMCID": "PMC13243615",
"ISSN": "2045-2322",
"publisher": "Nature Publishing Group",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-56170-9",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
6,
7
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.7554/elife.110770 [code]
Retinal curl as a functional signal for heading estimation beyond the focus of expansion.
Journal: eLife
In common: cognitive, 5 references
[2] doi:10.1186/s12915-026-02609-4
Saccade-synchronized alpha rhythms predict strength of memory trace of stimulus orientation.
Journal: BMC biology
In common: cognitive, 2 references
[3] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-39420-8
Eye movement dynamics are a key factor for intra-saccadic motion perception.
Journal: Scientific reports
In common: cognitive, 2 references
[4] doi:10.1038/s41467-025-67545-3 [code]
Updating an allocentric goal from lateralised egocentric visual memories.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: cognitive, 2 references
[5] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-51489-9 [code]
Unified modelling of gaze and pupil dynamics in saccadic tasks.
Journal: Scientific reports
In common: 2 references
[6] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-53424-4 [code]
Cognitive control networks causally support implicit emotion regulation: evidence from dlPFC stimulation and directed functional connectivity.
Journal: Scientific reports
In common: cognitive, 2 references
[7] doi:10.1126/sciadv.aeh7220 [code]
Central complex representations of self-movement are sufficient to compute wind direction in flight.
Journal: Science advances
In common: 2 references
[8] doi:10.1093/cercor/bhag108 [code]
Action fluency and conscious intention: being aware of what we are about to do.
Journal: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
In common: cognitive, 2 references
[9] doi:10.1186/s12915-026-02630-7 [code]
Phasic modulation of attentional rhythmic sampling according to task demands.
Journal: BMC biology
In common: cognitive, 2 references
[10] doi:10.1523/eneuro.0346-25.2026 [code]
Effects of TMS on the Decoding and Electrophysiology of Priority in Working Memory.
Journal: eNeuro
In common: cognitive, 2 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.