OSCR

Sensory basis of speech motor learning and memory.

Overview

Authors: Nishant Rao1, Rosalie Gendron2, Timothy F. Manning2, David J. Ostry1,2
  1. Yale Child Study Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511
  2. Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1G1, Canada
Institutions: Yale University (United States); McGill University (Canada)
Dates: received 10 September 2025; accepted 28 February 2026; published online 24 April 2026; in print 28 April 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1073/pnas.2525468123 · PMID 42030143 · PMCID PMC13123799 · OpenAlex W7155559258
Open access: hybrid, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: empty repository
Categories: other (modality), human (organism), cognitive (subfield)
Methods: Connectivity, Statistics, Spectral & time-frequency
Keywords: human speech production, auditory cortex, somatosensory cortex, motor cortex, transcranial magnetic stimulation
MeSH: Learning*, Memory*, Speech*, Adult, Auditory Cortex, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Cortex, Somatosensory Cortex, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult (* major topic)
Journal subjects: Biological Sciences, Neuroscience
Topic: Action Observation and Synchronization (Social Psychology, Psychology), according to OpenAlex
Citations: cited by 1 paper (Europe PMC); 79 references in the paper

Abstract

Changes to speech offer a quantifiable means to assess speech motor learning, and the resulting memory is thought to be motor in nature. Here, we evaluate this idea and show instead that memory for speech movements has a sensory basis. Speech motor learning, using altered auditory feedback, provides an experimental model to address this question as it involves auditory, somatosensory, and motor components to learning. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to disrupt auditory (superior temporal gyrus, STG), posterior somatosensory (S1), or motor (M1) cortex following speech motor learning. Retention tests were conducted 24 h later. It was found that following disruption of either STG or S1, motor memory retention was impaired whereas disruption of M1 led to retention that was no different than that of a no TMS control condition. The effects of disruption were specific to speech motor learning and did not interfere with speech production per se. Taken together, the findings support the notion that plasticity in the sensory cortex, both auditory and somatosensory, is necessary for speech motor learning and memory. In speech, changes to sensory systems enable the production of newly learned movements.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.

OSF 4n2ux

License: none: the authors keep all their rights
State: the link answers, verified on 30 September 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Size: 10 files, 0 scripts
Software Heritage: not checked
Found in: the references
Not found: README, license file, CITATION.cff, environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 30 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
  • 30 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
At the source: osf.io/4n2ux/overview

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • no match between paragraphs and code yet;
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data, Materials, and Software Availability

Data shown in Figs. 2–4 on which the statistical analyses were conducted have been deposited in OSF (79). Since speech acoustical data cannot be anonymized, only processed data are available.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 30 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 4 authors, 5 keywords, 12 MeSH terms, 1 funder, 74 references.

Cite

This paper

Rao, N., Gendron, R., Manning, T. F., & Ostry, D. J. (2026). Sensory basis of speech motor learning and memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 123(17), e2525468123. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2525468123

BibTeX

@article{rao2026sensory,
author = {Rao, Nishant and Gendron, Rosalie and Manning, Timothy F. and Ostry, David J.},
title = {{Sensory basis of speech motor learning and memory}},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
year = {2026},
month = apr,
volume = {123},
number = {17},
pages = {e2525468123},
publisher = {National Academy of Sciences},
issn = {0027-8424},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.2525468123},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2525468123},
pmid = {42030143},
pmcid = {PMC13123799}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Rao, Nishant
AU - Gendron, Rosalie
AU - Manning, Timothy F.
AU - Ostry, David J.
TI - Sensory basis of speech motor learning and memory
T2 - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
J2 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/04/24
VL - 123
IS - 17
SP - e2525468123
SN - 0027-8424
PB - National Academy of Sciences
DO - 10.1073/pnas.2525468123
UR - https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2525468123
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1073/pnas.2525468123",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Sensory basis of speech motor learning and memory",
"container-title": "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
"author": [
{
"family": "Rao",
"given": "Nishant"
},
{
"family": "Gendron",
"given": "Rosalie"
},
{
"family": "Manning",
"given": "Timothy F."
},
{
"family": "Ostry",
"given": "David J."
}
],
"container-title-short": "Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A",
"volume": "123",
"issue": "17",
"page": "e2525468123",
"DOI": "10.1073/pnas.2525468123",
"PMID": "42030143",
"PMCID": "PMC13123799",
"ISSN": "0027-8424",
"publisher": "National Academy of Sciences",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2525468123",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
4,
24
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1073/pnas.2530123123
Individual differences in speech monitoring: Functional and structural correlates of delayed auditory feedback.
Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
In common: cognitive, 3 references
[2] doi:10.1073/pnas.2536563123 [code]
Temporally structured motor and auditory representations in covert syllable production.
Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
In common: cognitive, 3 references
[3] doi:10.1038/s41398-026-03851-8
Consistent cortico-basal ganglia-cerebellar activation in early motor sequence learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal: Translational psychiatry
In common: cognitive, 2 references
[4] doi:10.1093/cercor/bhag125 [code]
Heritable and experience-dependent cortical traits of reading ability.
Journal: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
In common: 2 references
[5] doi:10.7554/elife.102813
Multiple functions of cerebello-thalamic neurons in learning and offline consolidation of a motor skill in mice.
Journal: eLife
In common: 2 references
[6] doi:10.7554/elife.107635 [code]
Stable excitatory-inhibitory synapse balance despite dynamic turnover.
Journal: eLife
In common: 2 references
[7] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-74869-1 [code]
Complementary roles of cell-type-specific plasticity in shaping neocortical dynamics for learning action timing.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: 2 references
[8] doi:10.1111/desc.70272
Distinct Neural Signatures of Novel Word-Referent Mapping in Monolingual and Bilingual Toddlers.
Journal: Developmental science
In common: 2 references
[9] doi:10.3390/brainsci16050530
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over the Left Inferior Parietal Lobule Facilitates Early-Stage Processing During Natural Chinese-English Bilingual Reading.
Journal: Brain sciences
In common: other, cognitive, 1 reference
[10] doi:10.1073/pnas.2604933123
Neuromotor modules revealed by direct electrical stimulation of the human primary motor cortex.
Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
In common: other, 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.