Spontaneous changes in the prestimulus alpha power predict both objective and subjective aspects of perception-evidence from 4 paradigms and 471 experimental sessions.

Overview

1. Centre for Brain Research, Jagiellonian University, 24 Golebia Street, 31-007 Krakow, Poland
2. Doctoral School in the Social Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Main Square 34, 31-010 Krakow, Poland
3. Consciousness Lab, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, 6 Ingardena Street, 30-060 Krakow, Poland

Abstract

Whether a given stimulus will be perceived depends not only on its physical intensity but also by the functional state of the visual system, particularly power of the spontaneous electroencephalography (EEG) alpha-band activity (7 to 14 Hz) at the stimulus onset. The mechanism behind this effect remains a matter of debate, as some studies reported that low alpha power improves perceptual sensitivity, but others showed alpha power affects only the subjective measures (criterion and confidence/awareness ratings) and thus concluded it is related with non-specific cortical excitability. To address this controversy, we analyzed data from four experimental paradigms in which different types of stimuli—from Gabor patches, through face images, to real-world scenes—were presented to participants at a perceptual threshold. Single-trial analyses revealed that the prestimulus alpha power predicted not only subjective visibility but also objective identification accuracy. Therefore, our results are incompatible with the view that spontaneous alpha activity defines nonspecific, general cortical excitability only, and rather indicates its role in defining perceptual sensitivity and improving signal-to-noise ratio.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY-NC), from the paper cited above.

Code

No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

• 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
• 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
• no match between paragraphs and code yet;
• neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data availability

Data and materials, including source code of experimental paradigms, code for data preprocessing and analysis pipeline, and data derivatives (in the form of time-frequency decomposition of EEG signals) are freely available from OSF (https://osf.io/54zqj/?view_only=c653960098ed45d9b6351eda48de540e).

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY-NC), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 7 authors, 5 keywords, 10 MeSH terms, 2 funders, 74 references.

Cite

This paper

Zębrowski, A., Ciupińska, K., Jakubowska, W., Łępa, L., Koculak, M., Wierzchoń, M., & Bola, M. (2026). Spontaneous changes in the prestimulus alpha power predict both objective and subjective aspects of perception-evidence from 4 paradigms and 471 experimental sessions. Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 36(8), bhag117. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhag117

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.7554/elife.106050

Cross-modal interaction of human alpha activity does not reflect inhibition of early sensory processing in a frequency-tagging study using EEG and MEG.

Journal: eLife

In common: EEG, cognitive, 7 references

[2] doi:10.7554/elife.110000 [code]

Alpha-band phase modulates perceptual sensitivity by changing internal noise and sensory tuning.

Journal: eLife

In common: EEG, 6 references

[3] doi:10.1093/nc/niag036

Neurodynamic profiles in the alpha band distinguish different forms of meditation.

Journal: Neuroscience of consciousness

In common: EEG, 7 references

[4] doi:10.7554/elife.100605 [code]

Age-related changes in ‘cortical’ 1/f dynamics are linked to cardiac activity

Journal: —

In common: 7 references

[5] doi:10.1093/cercor/bhag113 [code]

Long-term reliability and stability of parameterized resting state EEG: evidence from a five-year follow-up.

Journal: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)

In common: EEG, 6 references

[6] doi:10.1111/ejn.70543 [code]

Neural Oscillations Track Subjective and Pupillary Arousal During Naturalistic Movie Viewing.

Journal: The European journal of neuroscience

In common: EEG, cognitive, 6 references

[7] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1263

Individual alpha frequency predicts the sensitivity of time perception.

Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

In common: cognitive, 5 references

[8] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1335 [code]

Functionally distinct alpha components are differentially modulated by attention and affect behavior.

Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

In common: cognitive, 5 references

[9] doi:10.1111/ejn.70255 [code]

A Systematic Review of Aperiodic Neural Activity in Clinical Investigations

Journal: —

In common: EEG, 5 references

[10] doi:10.1111/psyp.70376 [code]

Changes in Aperiodic (1/f Slope) Activity During a Picture-Word Interference Task: Effects of Congruency and Sequence Manipulations.

Journal: Psychophysiology

In common: EEG, cognitive, 5 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.