Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) via the Fp3-Fp2 montage disrupts face recognition skills.

Overview

1. Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Building, Perry Road, Exeter EX4 4QG, United Kingdom

Abstract

Over the past fifteen years, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used to modulate face recognition skills. One influential line of work has shown that anodal stimulation delivered with the anode at Fp3, a site overlying the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and the return/cathode at Fp2 reduces the face inversion effect (FIE) by selectively disrupting recognition of upright faces, an effect interpreted as the disruption of perceptual learning. A recurring limitation is that the behavioural paradigms employed have relied on stimulus recognition rather than face identity recognition, because the same images were shown at study and test. It therefore remains unclear whether this procedure modulates face identity recognition or merely image-level recognition. Here we addressed this by applying the tDCS procedure during upright and inverted versions of the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT), a robust identity-recognition paradigm in which learned identities must be recognised across novel images varying in viewpoint, lighting, and noise. Participants (N = 64) were randomly assigned in a double-blind, between-subjects design to anodal or sham/control tDCS. A robust FIE was obtained overall, and it was significantly reduced in the anodal group relative to sham. Critically, this reduction was driven by impaired recognition of upright faces under anodal stimulation, with no difference between groups for inverted faces. These results extend the modulation of the FIE from image to face identity recognition, demonstrating that anodal stimulation, via the Fp3–Fp2 montage, disrupts face recognition skills indexed by one of the most widely used tests of face-recognition ability.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

• osf:y4j5k, at OSF; found in “Data availability”

Data availability

The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author, and are available in an open repository (https://osf.io/y4j5k).

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 3 authors, 5 keywords, 46 references.

Cite

This paper

Civile, C., Wang, G., & Moore, A. (2026). Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) via the Fp3-Fp2 montage disrupts face recognition skills. Oxford open neuroscience, 5, kvag010. https://doi.org/10.1093/oons/kvag010

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1671509 [code]

Visual exposure to masked faces benefits personally familiar but not famous face recognition.

Journal: Frontiers in psychology

In common: cognitive, 3 references

[2] doi:10.1162/opmi.a.363

Experience Alone Can Generate Human Face Specialization: Evidence From Deep Learning Models.

Journal: Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science

In common: 2 references

[3] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0345947

Integrating multi-session transcranial direct current stimulation with routine physical therapy to improve quadriceps strength and activation in athletes during subacute recovery following ACL reconstruction: A double-blind RCT.

Journal: PloS one

In common: other, 2 references

[4] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0357956 [code]

Early electrophysiological responses reflect precision-weighted prediction errors to face features.

Journal: PloS one

In common: cognitive, 2 references

[5] doi:10.3389/fnins.2026.1794676 [code]

Occipital and parietal non-invasive brain stimulation enhances perceptual learning and transfer: evidence from high-frequency tRNS.

Journal: Frontiers in neuroscience

In common: cognitive, 2 references

[6] doi:10.1038/s43856-026-01595-6 [code]

Non-vectorial integration of intersectional short-pulse stimulation enables enhanced deep brain modulation and effective seizure control.

Journal: Communications medicine

In common: 2 references

[7] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-45549-3

Effects of single-session anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive and motor performance in athletes and healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal: Scientific reports

In common: other, cognitive, 1 reference

[8] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0352320

Additive effect of tDCS and neuromotor recruitment on functional recovery in chronic paraplegia: A randomized controlled trial.

Journal: PloS one

In common: other, 1 reference

[9] doi:10.1002/mdc3.70734

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Dual Upper-Extremity Training [DUET]: Combining Neurologic Music Therapy® with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Upper-Limb Performance in Corticobasal Syndrome.

Journal: Movement disorders clinical practice

In common: other, 1 reference

[10] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.116443

High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation enhances exercise-induced hypoalgesia in patients with chronic low back pain.

Journal: iScience

In common: other, 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.