OSCR

Delivery and Attitude Modulate Shared Neural Processing of Speech Through Distinct Frequency Channels.

Code ↔ Paper

30 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of its authors' code, computed by the harvester (lexical-v1). Click a colored paragraph or line to see its counterpart.

The 30 matches · 7 of them tie a paragraph to a whole file without given lines: weak matches, whose lines are not tinted
  1. [1] § Study 2: Listener Attitude and Social Context › Results ↔ study2_isc_stats.py, lines 1 to 45 · score 0.93 · left paracentral lobule, orbital superior frontal, superior temporal gyrus, right perisylvian regions, sided FDR, Regionally · Report a mismatch
  2. [2] § Study 2: Listener Attitude and Social Context › Results ↔ study2_trait_synchrony.py, lines 1 to 18 · score 0.89 · stable individual trait, extreme point, signal quality, Neural synchronizability, cue video, attitude video · Report a mismatch
  3. [3] § General Methods › Inferential Approach ↔ study1_feature_families.py, lines 1 to 32 · score 0.87 · peakRate, log mel, amplitude envelope, syllable rate, phase scrambled, derivative · Report a mismatch
  4. [4] § Study 2: Listener Attitude and Social Context › Results ↔ roi_stage_grid.py, lines 1 to 45 · score 0.87 · 13–51 %, inflates gamma, feature regression, absorb, loss, baseline · Report a mismatch
  5. [5] § Study 1: Delivery Style › Method › Questionnaires ↔ study1_behaviour.py, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.87 · Conger Kanungo charismatic, collective efficacy, manipulation check, modified, leadership, cognition · Report a mismatch
  6. [6] § Study 1: Delivery Style › Results ↔ study1_behaviour.py, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.84 · standard deviation, perceived charisma, Collective efficacy, manipulation check, dz, PANAS · Report a mismatch
  7. [7] § General Discussion ↔ matlab/render_convergence.m, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.82 · sylvian fissure, lateral view, 0–0.09, right auditory perisylvian, buried, unthresholded · Report a mismatch
  8. [8] § General Methods › Preprocessing ↔ matlab/ft_ica_full3.m, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.81 · FieldTrip, source reconstruction, classified, kurtosis, Ocular, preprocessing · Report a mismatch
  9. [9] § Study 2: Listener Attitude and Social Context › Results ↔ study2_feature_regression.py, lines 1 to 43 · score 0.80 · right rolandic operculum, stimulus locked, stimulus driven, phase scrambled, focal, uncorrected · Report a mismatch
  10. [10] § Study 2: Listener Attitude and Social Context › Results ↔ study2_feature_regression.py, lines 1 to 43 · score 0.80 · right inferior frontal, right rolandic operculum, regions survived, focal, uncorrected, insula · Report a mismatch
  11. [11] § Study 1: Delivery Style › Results › Inter‐Subject Correlation ↔ study1_isc.py, lines 1 to 48 · score 0.79 · phase scrambled feature, word onsets, aperiodic removed, feature regression, cingulate, frontal · Report a mismatch
  12. [12] § Study 2: Listener Attitude and Social Context › Results ↔ study2_isc_stats.py, lines 1 to 45 · score 0.78 · superior temporal gyrus, sided FDR, Global ISC, right perisylvian, regions surviving, audience cue · Report a mismatch
  13. [13] § General Methods › Inferential Approach ↔ study1_isc.py, lines 1 to 48 · score 0.71 · phase scrambled feature, forced alignment, word onsets, components, aperiodic, regressed · Report a mismatch
  14. [14] § Study 1: Delivery Style › Method › Stimuli ↔ stimulus_acoustic_features.py, lines 1 to 20 · score 0.70 · loudness normalized, spectral centroid, playback, modulation, stimulus, matched · Report a mismatch
  15. [15] § Study 1: Delivery Style › Results › Spectral Power ↔ study2_power_specparam.py, lines 1 to 33 · score 0.70 · spectral power, aperiodic exponent, band power, broadband, oscillatory, occipital · Report a mismatch
  16. [16] § General Methods › Preprocessing ↔ matlab/ft_source_broadband_ica.m, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.70 · source reconstruction, FieldTrip, kurtosis, Ocular, preprocessing, concatenated · Report a mismatch
  17. [17] § Study 2: Listener Attitude and Social Context › Results ↔ fig_trait_synchrony.py, lines 1 to 37 · score 0.70 · stable individual trait, signal quality, alpha ISC, audience cue, Spearman, extreme · Report a mismatch
  18. [18] § General Discussion ↔ study1_feature_families.py, lines 1 to 32 · score 0.69 · log mel, amplitude envelope, syllable rate, spectral, regression · Report a mismatch
  19. [19] § Study 1: Delivery Style › Results › Inter‐Subject Correlation ↔ study1_envelope_control.py, lines 1 to 25 · score 0.68 · circular shift, Envelope tracking, 1–8 Hz, coupling, S3, acoustic · Report a mismatch
  20. [20] § General Discussion ↔ roi_contiguity_null.py, lines 1 to 76 · score 0.68 · right lateralization, right hemisphere, adjacent, enrichment, zero, auditory · Report a mismatch
  21. [21] § Study 2: Listener Attitude and Social Context › Results ↔ fig_trait_synchrony.py, lines 1 to 37 · score 0.67 · general signal quality, cross task, audience cue, trait, synchronization, delta · Report a mismatch
  22. [22] § Study 2: Listener Attitude and Social Context › Results ↔ study2_trait_synchrony.py, lines 1 to 18 · score 0.66 · signal quality, survived partialing, trait, synchronization, ask, stimulus · Report a mismatch
  23. [23] § Study 1: Delivery Style › Results › Inter‐Subject Correlation ↔ study1_is_rsa.py, lines 41 to 45 · score 0.66 · nearest neighbor, Anna Karenina, scores, model, behaviorally · Report a mismatch
  24. [24] § General Methods › Inter‐Subject Correlation Pipeline ↔ matlab/source_reconstruction_iscex.m, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.64 · Voxel, LCMV, beamforming, covariance, Hilbert, linearly · Report a mismatch
  25. [25] § General Discussion ↔ roi_contiguity_null.py, lines 1 to 76 · score 0.64 · right lateral, right auditory perisylvian, enumerated, enrichment, maps, atlas · Report a mismatch
  26. [26] § General Methods › Inter‐Subject Correlation Pipeline ↔ matlab/ft_ica_full3.m, the whole file · a weak match · score 0.63 · trace, LCMV, beamforming, covariance, Hilbert, linearly · Report a mismatch
  27. [27] § Study 1: Delivery Style › Results › Inter‐Subject Correlation ↔ study1_anova.py, lines 1 to 27 · score 0.61 · Post hoc, global ISC, ANOVA, intermediate, silent, delta · Report a mismatch
  28. [28] § Study 2: Listener Attitude and Social Context › Results ↔ study2_behaviour.py, lines 1 to 61 · score 0.59 · Attitude manipulation check, scoring lower, memory, lecture, correlation · Report a mismatch
  29. [29] § Study 2: Listener Attitude and Social Context › Results ↔ roi_against_zero.py, lines 1 to 50 · score 0.57 · feature regression, departs, answer, S7, zero, concentrated · Report a mismatch
  30. [30] § Study 1: Delivery Style › Results › Inter‐Subject Correlation ↔ isc_within_condition_null.py, lines 1 to 46 · score 0.51 · circular shift, envelope, signal, temporal, correlation, ISC · Report a mismatch

Paper

Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser; OSCR does not store it: doi.org · Europe PMC

The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.

The authors' code

Python · 92 lines · 4.7 KB · MIT · 2 matches

  1. """
  2. 01 - Inter-subject correlation for Study 2, tested at the SUBJECT level.
  3. Study 2 crossed two manipulations in one cohort: ATTITUDE (a positive or negative description of
  4. the speaker read before an identical lecture; field S2_band) and the AUDIENCE CUE (silhouettes
  5. present or absent during a second, different lecture; field S3_band). Each participant has one
  6. level of each factor, so leave-one-out ISC is computed WITHIN group and compared BETWEEN groups by
  7. permuting the group labels. Under permutation the leave-one-out ISC is RE-COMPUTED within the
  8. permuted groups, via the per-region ISC Gram matrix -- permuting frozen subject-level values
  9. instead treats them as exchangeable when they are not, and returns p values several times too
  10. small.
  11. Reports, per band:
  12. - global ISC (the 72-region mean) for the group difference, with the within-cohort baseline
  13. - the per-region difference with both the two-sided and the one-sided (effect > control)
  14. permutation p, and FDR across the 72 regions under each
  15. Both sidedness conventions are reported because Section 4.3 uses both: three right-perisylvian
  16. regions survive two-sided FDR in alpha, and the superior temporal gyrus, the orbital superior
  17. frontal gyrus and the left paracentral lobule survive only under the a priori direction. Section
  18. 2.5 fixes the permutation count at 10,000 (lib2.NPERM).
  19. The global test uses the same permutation as the regional one. An independent-samples t-test on
  20. the leave-one-out values, holding them fixed, is not equivalent: those values are computed against
  21. a group mean that each participant contributes to, so they are not independent observations, and
  22. the t-test returns p values several times too small. The difference is not academic here -- it
  23. moves the attitude contrast in theta from p < .001 to .004, in alpha from .0001 to .012, and in
  24. delta from .015 to .062.
  25. Writes <DERIV>/study2_isc_results.npz, which is read by cross_study_convergence.py,
  26. roi_contiguity_null.py and fig_export_render_stats.py.
  27. Requires: source_iscex/ from matlab/source_reconstruction_iscex.m.
  28. Usage: python study2_isc_stats.py
  29. """
  30. import gc, os, sys
  31. import numpy as np
  32. from lib2 import load, perm_between, perm_global, fdr, labels, BANDS, NPERM
  33. sys.stdout.reconfigure(encoding="utf-8", errors="replace")
  34. ROOT = r"G:/Barak1"
  35. DERIV = os.path.join(ROOT, "reanalysis") # reconstruction outputs and intermediate results; point anywhere
  36. OUT = os.path.join(DERIV, "study2_isc_results.npz")
  37. # One stream for the regional test, consumed study by study and band by band, so the reported p
  38. # values are reproducible from the seed alone. The global test draws from its own stream, so adding
  39. # or removing it cannot move the regional numbers.
  40. RNG_REGION = np.random.RandomState(0)
  41. RNG_GLOBAL = np.random.RandomState(1)
  42. # Result keys stay S2_*/S3_*: they name the MATLAB fields the two tasks are stored in
  43. # (S2_band, S3_band). Both belong to Study 2 of the manuscript, which is how they are labelled in
  44. # everything a reader sees.
  45. CONTRASTS = [
  46. ("S2", "S2_band", "include_S2", "attitude_grp", "Positive", "Negative",
  47. "Study 2: listener attitude (positive - negative)"),
  48. ("S3", "S3_band", "include_S3", "cue_grp", "With", "Without",
  49. "Study 2: audience cue (cue - no cue)"),
  50. ]
  51. out = {"labels": np.array(labels)}
  52. # The two region time-course sets are several gigabytes each, so only one is held at a time and
  53. # the run is dominated by reading them rather than by the permutations.
  54. for tag, field, inc, gcol, A, B, title in CONTRASTS:
  55. X = None; gc.collect()
  56. X, grp, _ = load(field, inc, gcol)
  57. gA = np.where(grp == A)[0]; gB = np.where(grp == B)[0]
  58. print(f"\n===== {title} ===== n={X.shape[0]} ({A}={len(gA)}, {B}={len(gB)}), "
  59. f"T={X.shape[2]}, {NPERM:,} permutations")
  60. print("\n global ISC, 72-region mean (one-sided, effect > control):")
  61. for bi, b in enumerate(BANDS):
  62. d, p, base = perm_global(X[:, :, :, bi], gA, gB, rng=RNG_GLOBAL)
  63. print(f" {b:6s} d={d:+.4f} p={p:.4f}{' *' if p < .05 else ''} (baseline ISC={base:.3f})")
  64. print("\n regional (FDR across 72 regions):")
  65. for bi, b in enumerate(BANDS):
  66. obs, p2, p1 = perm_between(X[:, :, :, bi], gA, gB, rng=RNG_REGION)
  67. sig2, sig1 = fdr(p2), fdr(p1)
  68. out[f"{tag}_{b}_obs"] = obs; out[f"{tag}_{b}_p2"] = p2; out[f"{tag}_{b}_p1"] = p1
  69. print(f" {b:6s}: two-sided {sig2.sum():2d} sig | one-sided {sig1.sum():2d} sig")
  70. for r in np.argsort(-obs):
  71. if sig2[r] or sig1[r]:
  72. print(f" {labels[r]:22s} d={obs[r]:+.4f} p2={p2[r]:.4f} p1={p1[r]:.4f}"
  73. f"{' [2s]' if sig2[r] else ''}{' [1s]' if sig1[r] else ''}")
  74. del X
  75. np.savez(OUT, **out)
  76. print(f"\nsaved {OUT}")

study2_isc_stats.py at commit ae45996, under MIT · at the source

Overview

Authors: Barak Atia1, Yair Berson2, Abraham Goldstein1
  1. Department of Psychology and Gonda Brain Research Center Bar‐Ilan University Ramat Gan Israel
  2. DeGroote School of Business McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada
Institutions: Bar-Ilan University (Israel); McMaster University (Canada)
Journal: Psychophysiology, volume 63, issue 10, article e70407
Dates: received 5 March 2026; accepted 15 September 2026; published online 28 September 2026; in print October 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY-NC-ND
Identifiers: DOI 10.1111/psyp.70407 · PMID 42806684 · PMCID PMC13620440 · OpenAlex W7214709310
Open access: hybrid, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code verified (how the code is found and verified)
Categories: MEG (modality), human (organism), cognitive (subfield)
Methods: Spectral & time-frequency, Statistics, Smoothing, state filtering, decompositions, fMRI & imaging, Physiology & signal measures
MeSH: Attitude*, Brain*, Speech Perception*, Adult, Female, Humans, Magnetoencephalography, Male, Young Adult (* major topic)
Topic: Action Observation and Synchronization (Social Psychology, Psychology), according to OpenAlex
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 90 references in the paper

Abstract

The abstract is not reproduced here: the paper's license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow it. Read it in the paper, at the publisher or on Europe PMC.

Repositories

Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above, with 30 matches between paragraphs and lines of code.

Zenodo 22808469

License: MIT
State: the link answers, verified on 1 October 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Size: 1 file
Software Heritage: not checked
Found in: “Data Availability Statement”
Not found: README, license file, CITATION.cff, environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Tools: NumPy (39 files), SciPy (28 files), Matplotlib (8 files), FieldTrip (6 files), pandas (6 files), specparam (formerly FOOOF) (5 files), Signal Processing Toolbox (2 files), Pillow (2 files), Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox (1 file), MNE-Python (1 file), PyTorch (1 file), Hugging Face Transformers (1 file)
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 1 October 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
  • 1 October 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
48 files

avigoldstein-biu/delivery-attitude-isc

License: MIT
State: the link answers, verified on 1 October 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Commit: ae45996cc16ae80b1d041ef2de0b46bdef313a07, 17 September 2026
Languages: Python (40), MATLAB (6)
Size: 51 files, 46 scripts
Software Heritage: not archived
Found in: the Zenodo archive record
Holds: README, license file, CITATION.cff
Not found: environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Tools: NumPy (39 files), SciPy (28 files), Matplotlib (8 files), FieldTrip (6 files), pandas (6 files), specparam (formerly FOOOF) (5 files), Signal Processing Toolbox (2 files), Pillow (2 files), Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox (1 file), MNE-Python (1 file), PyTorch (1 file), Hugging Face Transformers (1 file)
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 1 October 2026: the link answers
  • 1 October 2026: the link answers
48 files

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 2 repositories of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 92 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • 30 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of the code (method lexical-v1);
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

Datasets cited

Code and data availability statement

The paper has a code and data availability statement. Its license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow reproducing it here; in short, from what the harvester recognized in it:

Read it in the paper: doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70407.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 1 October 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 3 authors, 9 MeSH terms, 76 references.

Cite

This paper

Atia, B., Berson, Y., & Goldstein, A. (2026). Delivery and Attitude Modulate Shared Neural Processing of Speech Through Distinct Frequency Channels. Psychophysiology, 63(10), e70407. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70407

BibTeX

@article{atia2026delivery,
author = {Atia, Barak and Berson, Yair and Goldstein, Abraham},
title = {{Delivery and Attitude Modulate Shared Neural Processing of Speech Through Distinct Frequency Channels}},
journal = {Psychophysiology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
volume = {63},
number = {10},
pages = {e70407},
publisher = {Wiley},
issn = {0048-5772},
doi = {10.1111/psyp.70407},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70407},
pmid = {42806684},
pmcid = {PMC13620440}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Atia, Barak
AU - Berson, Yair
AU - Goldstein, Abraham
TI - Delivery and Attitude Modulate Shared Neural Processing of Speech Through Distinct Frequency Channels
T2 - Psychophysiology
J2 - Psychophysiology
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/01
VL - 63
IS - 10
SP - e70407
SN - 0048-5772
PB - Wiley
DO - 10.1111/psyp.70407
UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70407
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1111/psyp.70407",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Delivery and Attitude Modulate Shared Neural Processing of Speech Through Distinct Frequency Channels",
"container-title": "Psychophysiology",
"author": [
{
"family": "Atia",
"given": "Barak"
},
{
"family": "Berson",
"given": "Yair"
},
{
"family": "Goldstein",
"given": "Abraham"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Psychophysiology",
"volume": "63",
"issue": "10",
"page": "e70407",
"DOI": "10.1111/psyp.70407",
"PMID": "42806684",
"PMCID": "PMC13620440",
"ISSN": "0048-5772",
"publisher": "Wiley",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70407",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
10,
1
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1093/scan/nsag058
Approach motivation sharpens shared neural processing: dissociable beta and alpha synchrony.
Journal: Social cognitive and affective neuroscience
In common: MEG, cognitive, 16 references, author Abraham Goldstein
[2] doi:10.1093/cercor/bhae353
The paradoxical brain: paradoxes impact conflict perspectives through increased neural alignment.
Journal: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
In common: MEG, 11 references
[3] doi:10.1162/nol.a.218
Successful Public Speaking Enhances Neural Alignment in Audience Language Networks.
Journal: Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: cognitive, 11 references
[4] doi:10.1111/ejn.70543 [code]
Neural Oscillations Track Subjective and Pupillary Arousal During Naturalistic Movie Viewing.
Journal: The European journal of neuroscience
In common: Signal Processing Toolbox, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, SciPy, 1 other tool, cognitive, 10 references
[5] doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.869426 [code]
Ear-EEG Measures of Auditory Attention to Continuous Speech.
Journal: Frontiers in neuroscience
In common: FieldTrip, Signal Processing Toolbox, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, cognitive, 9 references
[6] doi:10.1162/nol_a_00071
Differential Tracking of Linguistic vs. Mental State Content in Naturalistic Stimuli by Language and Theory of Mind (ToM) Brain Networks.
Journal: Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: cognitive, 11 references
[7] doi:10.1038/s41597-025-05017-5 [code]
A naturalistic fMRI dataset in response to public speaking.
Journal: Scientific data
In common: SciPy, Matplotlib, NumPy, 9 references
[8] doi:10.1523/eneuro.0484-22.2023 [code]
Exploring the Neural Processes behind Narrative Engagement: An EEG Study.
Journal: eNeuro
In common: FieldTrip, Signal Processing Toolbox, Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, 3 other tools, cognitive, 6 references
[9] doi:10.1038/s41539-025-00392-5 [code]
Differential effects of external noise and situational interest on neurophysiological responses during video based learning.
Journal: NPJ science of learning
In common: cognitive, 11 references
[10] doi:10.1038/s41539-026-00417-7 [code]
Enhanced word learning and neural synchrony during children's storytelling.
Journal: NPJ science of learning
In common: Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, pandas, SciPy, 2 other tools, 7 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Add the badge to the code's README

OSCR: the badge of this paper

If you are an author or a maintainer of this paper's code, you can add this badge. It says what OSCR knows of the paper (its code, its validated tracing map) and links the code to this page. Paste one of these snippets under the README's title. Keep the two marks around it, so that the badge can be replaced in place and is never added twice. OSCR changes nothing in your repository.

Markdown
<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
[![OSCR](https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1111/psyp.70407.svg)](https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1111/psyp.70407)
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->
reStructuredText
.. oscr-badge:start

.. image:: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1111/psyp.70407.svg
   :target: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1111/psyp.70407
   :alt: OSCR

.. oscr-badge:end
HTML
<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
<a href="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1111/psyp.70407"><img src="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1111/psyp.70407.svg" alt="OSCR"></a>
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->

On GitHub, open the README, choose Edit (the pencil), paste the snippet under the title, then "Commit changes".

If you choose to, you can have the badge kept up to date for you, with oscr badge --write from the command line or with the GitHub Action in your repository's workflows. Every other form and option (a card, AsciiDoc, LaTeX, shields.io) is on the badge page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: code errors and mismatches between the code and the paper about this paper and its code, from readers and its authors, beside the paper and its tracing map.

Report a mismatch between the code and the paper · Report a code error (signed in)

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code and did not get the paper's result, what they ran, with which environment, commit and data.

Report a reproduction failure (signed in)

Versions of its code: the releases of its code tied to a version of this paper (the preprint, the accepted manuscript, the version of record…), each with the tracing map versioned with it.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.