Common inputs to motor units are modulated by force profile and muscle length.

Overview

1. Department of Physical Therapy, Movement, and Rehabilitation Science Northeastern University Boston Massachusetts USA
2. Department of Neurology Tufts Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA
3. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Northeastern University Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

Groups of motor units receive common synaptic inputs from specialized networks of premotor neurons to produce movement. Here, we test whether common inputs received by motor units in the first dorsal interosseous are fixed or task‐dependent during submaximal isometric contractions. Discharge times of motor units were identified and tracked across a set of conditions. Factor analysis identified a single motor unit mode that captured most of the covariation in the discharge rates of motor units, presumably reflecting common synaptic inputs. This was supported by the high correlation values between motor unit pairs from the same participant. Next, displacement analysis on the discharge rates of motor units was computed to capture the magnitude of departures from a monotonic control structure expected from fixed common inputs. For the same force profile, activity of motor units was limited to a set of discharge rate–time trajectories across trials, suggesting a constrained pattern of premotor inputs to motor units. Importantly, changes in force profile and muscle length modulated synaptic inputs to motor units, as observed in the divergent rate–time trajectories of motor units and high displacement values. These findings highlight that common input is a key feature in the neural control of motor units and is subject to substantial modulation. The composition of inputs to motor units depends on the force profile and muscle length, and the system relies on reusing a common input structure when performing the same task.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

• figshare:32509461 — at figshare; found in “DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT”

Data availability statement

Data for this study are publicly available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32509461.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, pages, dates, 4 authors, 8 keywords, 2 funders, 54 references.

Cite

This paper

Darendeli, A., Soto, O., Tunik, E., & Yarossi, M. (2026). Common inputs to motor units are modulated by force profile and muscle length. Experimental physiology, 10.1113/EP094031. https://doi.org/10.1113/ep094031

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1186/s12984-026-02029-z

Structured modulations in high-density EMG patterns from a single muscle enable simultaneous control of natural and extra degrees of freedom.

Journal: Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation

In common: 10 references

[2] doi:10.1126/sciadv.aee9425 [code]

Probabilistic inference of homonymous and heteronymous recurrent inhibition in human muscles from large-scale motor neuron recordings.

Journal: Science advances

In common: 5 references

[3] doi:10.1113/ep094110

Stretch versus shortening contractions subsequently decrease versus increase neural drive to the human tibialis anterior.

Journal: Experimental physiology

In common: 5 references

[4] doi:10.1073/pnas.2604933123

Neuromotor modules revealed by direct electrical stimulation of the human primary motor cortex.

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

In common: 3 references

[5] doi:10.1007/s00421-026-06239-0

Differential changes in the effective neural drive following new motor skill acquisition between vastus lateralis and medialis.

Journal: European journal of applied physiology

In common: 3 references

[6] doi:10.1186/s12984-026-02041-3 [code]

Mental tasks induce common modulations of oscillations in cortex and spinal cord.

Journal: Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation

In common: 3 references

[7] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-76522-3 [code]

Transcriptomic analysis of spinal V1 interneurons informs their multifunctional role in motor output.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: 2 references

[8] doi:10.1113/jp290395

Spinal motor neuron pools may be partly driven by impulsive common inputs.

Journal: The Journal of physiology

In common: 2 references

[9] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-74243-1 [code]

Spiking neural network decoders of finger forces from high-density intramuscular microelectrode arrays.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: 2 references

[10] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-76185-0 [code]

Spinal-inspired artificial tactile interneuron with high-order burst spiking for intelligent edge interfaces.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.