Rumination Out Loud? Linguistic, Neural, and Psychophysiological Correlates of the Think-Aloud Paradigm.

Overview

1. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, uni-tuebingen.de
2. German Center for Mental Health, partner site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

Abstract

Stress and rumination are closely linked and contribute to the development and maintenance of mental disorders, yet assessing rumination in an ecologically valid way remains challenging. Conducting the think aloud paradigm (TAP) following the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) allows for the real‐time evaluation of ruminative responses, providing insights beyond traditional self‐report measures. This study aimed to investigate ruminative responses to the TSST using the TAP, while simultaneously assessing psychological (stress, affect, state rumination), physiological (heart rate), and neural data with functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). For this, a total of 58 healthy participants (mean age 23.47 years (SD = 3.87), 63.8% females) completed a 10‐min resting‐state period both before and after the TSST, verbalizing their thoughts. In response to the TSST, we observed significant increases in stress, state rumination, negative affect, heart rate, and cortical oxygenation in all regions of interest except the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), reflecting a successful stress induction. Although we observed higher stress, state rumination, and negative affect, alongside lower positive affect in high ruminators using questionnaires, linguistic evaluation of the verbalized thought content showed no significant time effects but revealed generally lower sentiment scores for high ruminators and only partly showed differences dependent on trait rumination levels. With respect to neural correlates, we observed prefrontal hypoactivation under stress in medium and high compared to low ruminators. Comparing the results with previous studies, the administration of the TAP following the TSST seems to function as a form of emotion regulation, thereby reducing state rumination. Further studies are required to explore the underlying mechanisms.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper says that its authors' code is available on request: it was not published with the paper, so there is nothing to verify.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none (its code is available on request), so it has no map.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data Availability Statement

Data and analysis scripts are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 29 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 4 authors, 5 keywords, 11 MeSH terms, 88 references.

Cite

This paper

Int-Veen, I., Fallgatter, A. J., Ehlis, A.-C., & Rosenbaum, D. (2026). Rumination Out Loud? Linguistic, Neural, and Psychophysiological Correlates of the Think-Aloud Paradigm. Depression and anxiety, 2026(1), 8855110. https://doi.org/10.1155/da/8855110

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2026.104019 [code]

Stress-related hypofrontality in depression and its relation to altered activation prior to the stress response.

Journal: NeuroImage. Clinical

In common: 15 references, author Isabell Int-Veen

[2] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1268 [code]

Real-time fMRI-triggered experience sampling: A proof-of-concept study.

Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

In common: 4 references

[3] doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2026.104025

Functional brain biomarkers of self-referential bias in remitted depressed outpatients: a randomized controlled trial.

Journal: NeuroImage. Clinical

In common: 3 references

[4] doi:10.1002/hbm.70522 [code]

Investigating Emotional Reactivity in Experienced Users of Psychedelics: A Cross-Sectional fMRI Study.

Journal: Human brain mapping

In common: cognitive, 2 references

[5] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.115767

Acute stress impairs attentional control and emotional processing in social anxiety.

Journal: iScience

In common: cognitive, 2 references

[6] doi:10.1038/s41398-026-04122-2 [code]

Multi-session CBM-I for social anxiety: examining psychopathology, cognitive, neural, and psychophysiological effects in a randomized controlled trial.

Journal: Translational psychiatry

In common: 2 references

[7] doi:10.1111/jne.70185 [code]

Testosterone, cortisol, and fNIRS-based cortical activation associated with competitive task persistence and difficulty.

Journal: Journal of neuroendocrinology

In common: 2 references

[8] doi:10.64898/2026.06.26.26356643

Complex harmonic manifolds in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for major depressive disorder

Journal: medRxiv (preprint)

In common: 2 references

[9] doi:10.1038/s44220-026-00680-y [code]

The neuroimaging correlates of depression established across six large-scale population datasets.

Journal: Nature. Mental health

In common: 2 references

[10] doi: [code]

Neural Correlates of Inhibitory Control in Impulsivity Traits in Non-Ecological Human–Computer Tasks: An ALE Meta-Analysis

Journal: Brain sciences

In common: cognitive, 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.