OSCR

Neurophysiological mechanisms of optimized graphomotor performance in biscriptuals.

Overview

Authors: Yitong Zuo1, Gaëlle Alhaddad1, Víctor J. López-Madrona2, Laure Spieser1, Antonella Iannotta1,3,4, Jean-Claude Gilhodes1, Benjamin Morillon2, Marieke Longcamp1
  1. Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, CRPN, Centre de Recherche en Psychologie et Neurosciences, Marseille, France
  2. Aix Marseille Université, INSERM, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France
  3. Laboratory of Functional Anatomy, Faculty of Human Motor Sciences, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
  4. Laboratoire de Neuroanatomie et Neuroimagerie translationnelles, UNI – ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), volume 4, article IMAG.a.1265
Dates: received 5 January 2026; accepted 8 May 2026; published online 5 June 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1162/imag.a.1265 · PMID 42266202 · PMCID PMC13245215 · OpenAlex W7161550942
Open access: diamond, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code on request
Categories: EEG (modality), human (organism)
Methods: Preprocessing, Physiology & signal measures
Keywords: EEG, neural oscillations, predictive coding, biscriptuality, handwriting, graphomotor control
Topic: Writing and Handwriting Education (Education, Social Sciences), according to OpenAlex
Funding: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-23-CE28-0025, ANR-17-EURE-0029, ANR-16-CONV-0002); Initiative d’Excellence d’Aix-Marseille Université (AMX-19-IET-004); France 2030 Investment Plan (ANR-16-CONV000X/ANR-17-EURE-0029); Ampiric pilot center of research in education; NeuroMarseille ICR grant
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 102 references in the paper

Abstract

Many literate adults master two writing systems: a phenomenon termed biscriptuality. Biscriptuals do not just juggle two scripts—their graphomotor coordination also generally outperforms that of monoscriptuals, suggesting that some components of their motor system have been optimized. To uncover the neurocognitive foundations of this biscriptual advantage, we synchronized a loop-tracing task on a digitizing tablet with electroencephalographical (EEG) recordings. Theta (4–7 Hz) and beta (13–30 Hz) oscillatory dynamics were analyzed to test whether biscriptuals display better optimized planning and monitoring, and/or better sensorimotor control. At the behavioral level, biscriptuals displayed a robust advantage in tracing frequency and stability compared to monoscriptuals. At the neural level, biscriptuals showed lower frontal theta power than monoscriptuals, with frontal theta power positively correlated with behavioral variability. Optimization of predictive inference mediated by midfrontal theta oscillations thus stands out as a hallmark of the biscriptual advantage. Biscriptuals also displayed a lower degree of beta synchronization over parieto-occipital electrodes than monoscriptuals, with beta power being less correlated with kinematic dynamics. Similar effects in the beta band were observed for all participants when task difficulty decreased. These effects suggest higher reliance on sensory feedback when graphomotor execution is more demanding. Overall, these results call for a model of handwriting control where prefrontal and sensorimotor components contribute to implementing internal predictive models, whose accuracy and reliability depend on the type of expertise acquired when learning to write.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper says that its authors' code is available on request: it was not published with the paper, so there is nothing to verify.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none (its code is available on request), so it has no map.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data and Code Availability

All the data and code in this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable requests.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 8 authors, 6 keywords, 5 funders, 101 references.

Cite

This paper

Zuo, Y., Alhaddad, G., López-Madrona, V. J., Spieser, L., Iannotta, A., Gilhodes, J.-C., Morillon, B., & Longcamp, M. (2026). Neurophysiological mechanisms of optimized graphomotor performance in biscriptuals. Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 4, IMAG.a.1265. https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1265

BibTeX

@article{zuo2026neurophysiological,
author = {Zuo, Yitong and Alhaddad, Gaëlle and López-Madrona, Víctor J. and Spieser, Laure and Iannotta, Antonella and Gilhodes, Jean-Claude and Morillon, Benjamin and Longcamp, Marieke},
title = {{Neurophysiological mechanisms of optimized graphomotor performance in biscriptuals}},
journal = {Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
volume = {4},
pages = {IMAG.a.1265},
publisher = {MIT Press},
issn = {2837-6056},
doi = {10.1162/imag.a.1265},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1265},
pmid = {42266202},
pmcid = {PMC13245215}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Zuo, Yitong
AU - Alhaddad, Gaëlle
AU - López-Madrona, Víctor J.
AU - Spieser, Laure
AU - Iannotta, Antonella
AU - Gilhodes, Jean-Claude
AU - Morillon, Benjamin
AU - Longcamp, Marieke
TI - Neurophysiological mechanisms of optimized graphomotor performance in biscriptuals
T2 - Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
J2 - Imaging Neurosci (Camb)
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/05
VL - 4
SP - IMAG.a.1265
SN - 2837-6056
PB - MIT Press
DO - 10.1162/imag.a.1265
UR - https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1265
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1162/imag.a.1265",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Neurophysiological mechanisms of optimized graphomotor performance in biscriptuals",
"container-title": "Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)",
"author": [
{
"family": "Zuo",
"given": "Yitong"
},
{
"family": "Alhaddad",
"given": "Gaëlle"
},
{
"family": "López-Madrona",
"given": "Víctor J."
},
{
"family": "Spieser",
"given": "Laure"
},
{
"family": "Iannotta",
"given": "Antonella"
},
{
"family": "Gilhodes",
"given": "Jean-Claude"
},
{
"family": "Morillon",
"given": "Benjamin"
},
{
"family": "Longcamp",
"given": "Marieke"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Imaging Neurosci (Camb)",
"volume": "4",
"page": "IMAG.a.1265",
"DOI": "10.1162/imag.a.1265",
"PMID": "42266202",
"PMCID": "PMC13245215",
"ISSN": "2837-6056",
"publisher": "MIT Press",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1265",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
6,
5
]
]
}
}

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003979 [code]
Impaired midfrontal‑motor theta phase synchronization characterizes maladaptive motivational behavior in people with obsessive‑compulsive disorder.
Journal: PLoS biology
In common: EEG, 4 references
[2] doi:10.3758/s13415-026-01434-0
Neural mechanisms of negative emotionality and cognitive control: The role of frontal midline theta.
Journal: Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience
In common: EEG, 4 references
[3] doi:10.1186/s12984-026-01985-w
Cortical beta coherence provides a stronger non-invasive predictor of movement vigor than local beta power.
Journal: Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
In common: EEG, 3 references
[4] doi:10.1111/psyp.70345 [code]
sBOSC: A Method for Source-Level Identification of Neural Oscillations in Electromagnetic Brain Signals.
Journal: Psychophysiology
In common: EEG, 3 references
[5] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-47973-x
Neural and behavioral signatures of error monitoring are differentially modulated by social hierarchy and trial type.
Journal: Scientific reports
In common: EEG, 3 references
[6] doi:10.1111/psyp.70301
Oscillatory Markers of Interoceptive Attention: Beta Suppression as a Neural Signature of Heartbeat Processing.
Journal: Psychophysiology
In common: 3 references
[7] doi:10.1111/ejn.70615
Sleep Oscillations Across Cortical, Subcortical and Cerebellar Structures in Magnetoencephalography.
Journal: The European journal of neuroscience
In common: 3 references
[8] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-73553-8 [code]
Universal rhythmic architecture uncovers two modes of neural dynamics.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: EEG, 3 references
[9] doi:10.1523/eneuro.0012-26.2026 [code]
I Can't Hear You Both at the Same Time: A Temporal Dilemma During Inter-Regional Communication.
Journal: eNeuro
In common: 3 references
[10] doi:10.1111/ejn.70543 [code]
Neural Oscillations Track Subjective and Pupillary Arousal During Naturalistic Movie Viewing.
Journal: The European journal of neuroscience
In common: EEG, 3 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.