OSCR

Target detection enhances relational processing of background items: evidence from associative recognition paradigms and EEG.

Overview

Authors: Peijie Chen1, Yingfang Meng1, Zejun Liu2
ORCID iDs: Peijie Chen
  1. School of Psychology, Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou, 350100 China
  2. School of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai, China
Journal: BMC psychology, volume 14, issue 1, article 1015
Dates: received 7 December 2025; accepted 4 May 2026; published online 16 May 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1186/s40359-026-04717-w · PMID 42143383 · PMCID PMC13348689 · OpenAlex W7161404692
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code on request
Categories: EEG (modality), human (organism), cognitive (subfield)
Methods: Spectral & time-frequency, Preprocessing, Statistics, Smoothing, state filtering, decompositions, Evoked potentials, fMRI & imaging
Keywords: Attentional boost effect, Item-specific vs. relational processing, Associative memory, Familiarity, Recollection
MeSH: Association Learning*, Attention*, Evoked Potentials*, Recognition, Psychology*, Adult, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Young Adult (* major topic)
Topic: Memory Processes and Influences (Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 61 references in the paper

Abstract

Background: The Attentional Boost Effect (ABE) refers to the enhancement of memory for concurrently presented background information when target detection is performed during encoding. However, there is still controversy regarding whether ABE-related manipulations can both enhance item-specific and relational processing. Given that resolving this issue can enhance our understanding of the generality of the ABE, we will validate this issue and explore its underlying neural mechanisms.

Methods: The current study combined the ABE paradigm with the associative recognition paradigm and employed compound pairs and unrelated pairs as memory materials to manipulate the reliance on item-specific or relational information, using a 2 (detection stimulus type: target vs. distractor) × 2 (word pair: compound vs. unrelated) within-subject design. Furthermore, we conducted event-related potential (ERP) and time–frequency analyses (TFA) on participants' electrophysiological data during associative recognition to further explore the underlying neural mechanisms of the ABE.

Results: The results showed that, behaviorally, participants remembered more target-paired pairs than distractor-paired pairs for both types of word pairs, demonstrating an ABE. In the ERP results, target word pairs evoked a significant FN400 effect, related to familiarity, whereas distractor word pairs did not evoke this effect. Furthermore, for compound pairs, target pairs evoked larger LPC effects than distractor pairs, which were related to recollection; however, for unrelated pairs, there was no difference in the LPC effect between target and distractor pairs. The TFA results showed that target word pairs induced lower gamma-band activity than distractor word pairs, reflecting familiarity processing.

Conclusions: Taken together, target detection enhanced associative memory performance, indicating that ABE-related manipulations can both facilitate item-specific and relational processing. At the neural mechanism level, ABE-related manipulations enhanced the contribution of familiarity in associative recognition, and when the semantic association between items was stronger, ABE-related manipulations further enhanced recollection.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper says that its authors' code is available on request: it was not published with the paper, so there is nothing to verify.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none (its code is available on request), so it has no map.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data availability

All datasets, procedures, materials and code used in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 28 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 3 authors, 5 keywords, 10 MeSH terms, 61 references.

Cite

This paper

Chen, P., Meng, Y., & Liu, Z. (2026). Target detection enhances relational processing of background items: evidence from associative recognition paradigms and EEG. BMC psychology, 14(1), 1015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04717-w

BibTeX

@article{chen2026target,
author = {Chen, Peijie and Meng, Yingfang and Liu, Zejun},
title = {{Target detection enhances relational processing of background items: evidence from associative recognition paradigms and EEG}},
journal = {BMC psychology},
year = {2026},
month = may,
volume = {14},
number = {1},
pages = {1015},
publisher = {BMC},
issn = {2050-7283},
doi = {10.1186/s40359-026-04717-w},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04717-w},
pmid = {42143383},
pmcid = {PMC13348689}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Chen, Peijie
AU - Meng, Yingfang
AU - Liu, Zejun
TI - Target detection enhances relational processing of background items: evidence from associative recognition paradigms and EEG
T2 - BMC psychology
J2 - BMC Psychol
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/05/16
VL - 14
IS - 1
SP - 1015
SN - 2050-7283
PB - BMC
DO - 10.1186/s40359-026-04717-w
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04717-w
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1186/s40359-026-04717-w",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Target detection enhances relational processing of background items: evidence from associative recognition paradigms and EEG",
"container-title": "BMC psychology",
"author": [
{
"family": "Chen",
"given": "Peijie"
},
{
"family": "Meng",
"given": "Yingfang"
},
{
"family": "Liu",
"given": "Zejun"
}
],
"container-title-short": "BMC Psychol",
"volume": "14",
"issue": "1",
"page": "1015",
"DOI": "10.1186/s40359-026-04717-w",
"PMID": "42143383",
"PMCID": "PMC13348689",
"ISSN": "2050-7283",
"publisher": "BMC",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04717-w",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
5,
16
]
]
}
}

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1111/ejn.70447
Beyond Context-Transfer Effects: Attenuated Familiarity During Virtual Reality-Based Retrieval Across Different Encoding Modalities.
Journal: The European journal of neuroscience
In common: EEG, cognitive, 5 references
[2] doi:10.1111/ejn.70664
Electrophysiological Correlates of Encoding Indicate Altered Processing but Comparable Subsequent Memory Effects Across Virtual Reality and Desktop-Based Conditions.
Journal: The European journal of neuroscience
In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references
[3] doi:10.3758/s13415-026-01427-z
ERP effects at encoding: Image memorability or recognition success?
Journal: Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience
In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references
[4] doi:10.1093/cercor/bhag075 [code]
Cortical dynamics of icon perception: effects of concreteness and attractiveness.
Journal: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
In common: cognitive, 2 references
[5] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0347992 [code]
Rotation-tolerant representations elucidate the time-course of high-level object processing.
Journal: PloS one
In common: EEG, cognitive, 2 references
[6] doi:10.1002/hbm.70518
Voluntary Attention Selectively Modulates Omission Responses.
Journal: Human brain mapping
In common: EEG, cognitive, 2 references
[7] doi:10.1007/s00221-026-07266-1
Working memory load and search efficiency in conventional monitor-based 2D versus 3D virtual settings: analysis of response times and parietal induced alpha activity in a modified Sternberg task.
Journal: Experimental brain research
In common: EEG, cognitive, 2 references
[8] doi:10.1111/psyp.70370 [code]
Song Familiarity Relies on Evidence Accumulation.
Journal: Psychophysiology
In common: EEG, cognitive, 2 references
[9] doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02533-1 [code]
Fluctuations in arousal reflect latent state transitions that facilitate behavioural optimization.
Journal: Nature human behaviour
In common: EEG, cognitive, 2 references
[10] doi:10.1155/da/2882097
The Narrowing Self: Depressive Tendency Attenuates the Mother-Reference Effect.
Journal: Depression and anxiety
In common: EEG, 2 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.