The speed limit of visual perception: Bidirectional influence of image memorability and processing speed on perceived duration and recognition.

Overview

1. Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, United States of America

Abstract

Visual stimuli are known to vary in their perceived duration, with some stimuli engendering so-called “time dilation” and others “time compression” effects, in which stimuli appear to last for relatively longer or shorter durations, respectively. Extant theories have suggested these effects rely on the level of attention devoted to stimuli, the magnitude of the stimulus, or the intensity of the neural response, yet none of these can fully account for the observed effects. Recently, we demonstrated that perceived time is dilated by the memorability of an image (Ma, et al. 2024). To explain the memorability effect, we found that a recurrent convolutional neural network (rCNN) could recapitulate the time dilation effect by indexing the rate of entropy decline, or “speed”, across successive timesteps, with more memorable images associated with faster speeds. Here, we replicate and extend these findings by applying this model to a wider array of images and testing three groups of subjects (n = 20ea.) on images sampled according to their speed, memorability, or both. We found that images that increased in speed, but with constant memorability, or images that increased in memorability, but with constant speed, both dilated perceived time, and further found that speed alone could induce a shift in 24h memory recognition performance of ~17%. However, we also found that images with very fast speeds exhibited an opposite, time compression effect. These findings can be explained by a simple inverted-U model between speed and perceived duration that scales with the memorability of the image. Overall, our findings provide the boundaries of speed and memorability effects on time perception, suggesting the visual system dilates time when presented with informative stimuli but compresses it when these stimuli become overwhelmingly complex.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

• osf:5bfvh, at OSF; found in “Data Availability”
• osf:fx3n2, at OSF; found in the text, “Results”

Data Availability

Data are available at https://osf.io/5bfvh/.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 2, 28 September 2026

• Funding: added National Science Foundation: 2508756; Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences: 2508756

Version 1, 28 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 6 authors, 10 MeSH terms, 36 references.

Cite

This paper

Wiener, M., Mondok, C., Ma, A., Desai, C., Joyner, A., & Macedo, G. (2026). The speed limit of visual perception: Bidirectional influence of image memorability and processing speed on perceived duration and recognition. PLoS computational biology, 22(5), e1013448. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013448

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.3758/s13415-026-01427-z

ERP effects at encoding: Image memorability or recognition success?

Journal: Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience

In common: cognitive, 4 references

[2] doi:10.1038/s41593-026-02285-1 [code]

Fixation duration on natural scenes is explained by memory encoding not processing demand.

Journal: Nature neuroscience

In common: cognitive, 2 references

[3] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-72146-9 [code]

Modeling attention and binding in the brain through bidirectional recurrent gating.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: 2 references

[4] doi:10.3389/fncom.2026.1760701 [code]

Analyzing rescaling, discretization, and linearization in RNNs for neural system modeling.

Journal: Frontiers in computational neuroscience

In common: 2 references

[5] doi:10.1073/pnas.2616911123 [code]

Cerebellar microcircuits enable robust evidence-based decisions through cortico-cerebellar coupling.

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

In common: cognitive, 1 reference

[6] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1213

Neural correlates of emotional memory enhancement: The role of valence and arousal.

Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

In common: cognitive, 1 reference

[7] doi:10.1167/jov.26.8.4 [code]

The neural processes of illusory occlusion in object recognition.

Journal: Journal of vision

In common: cognitive, 1 reference

[8] doi:10.1167/jov.26.5.7 [code]

Representations in vision and language converge in a shared, multidimensional space of perceived similarities.

Journal: Journal of vision

In common: cognitive, 1 reference

[9] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.117110

Orbitofrontal cortex contributes to context-dependent timing under ambiguity.

Journal: iScience

In common: cognitive, 1 reference

[10] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10843-3 [code]

Self-supervised learning yields representational signatures of category-selective cortex.

Journal: Communications biology

In common: 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.