An in silico framework for dissecting the mechanistic origins of in vivo recorded neuronal activity.
Overview
- Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, Bonn, Germany
- International Max Planck Research School (IMPRS) for Brain and Behavior, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Abstract
How can we identify the mechanistic origins of the electrophysiological activity that is recorded from neurons in the living brain? A promising strategy for addressing this question is to generate biologically realistic models of in vivo recorded neurons, and simulate how they transform synaptic inputs from the network into their observed neuronal activity. For this purpose, we here provide our approaches for the generation, simulation, and analysis of network-embedded neuron models as an open source, fully documented and freely available software environment: In Silico Framework (ISF). ISF is centered around the concept of achieving “model consensus” about the mechanistic origins of in vivo recorded activity across biologically diverse sets of models. To achieve such model consensus, ISF offers three key workflows. First, ISF enables users to generate models that are equally well constrained by empirical data at subcellular, cellular and network scales, while the set of models as a whole is constructed to exhibit maximally diverse parameters, spanning the full ranges permitted by the empirically observed biological variability at each scale. Second, ISF enables users to identify those subsets of model configurations that predict the in vivo observations without being tuned to do so. Third, for each of those model configurations, ISF enables users to identify which mechanisms at subcellular, cellular and network scales are necessary to predict the in vivo observations, and which mechanisms are dispensable. Thereby, ISF can reveal which mechanisms are common across model configurations, and whether the diversity of model configurations could account for the variability of the in vivo observed activity across animals, cells and trials. In essence, by achieving such model consensus, ISF predicts mechanisms that are robust across biological variability, and which may hence indeed be used in vivo. Finally, ISF enables users to derive model consensus for in silico manipulations, to identify which experimental strategies would be best suited to test the predicted mechanisms in vivo. We exemplify how we have used this iterative in silico - in vivo approach of ISF to dissect the mechanistic origins of sensory responses in the barrel cortex. By making ISF available as a standalone online resource, we believe it will facilitate the generation, simulation and analysis of models that reveal mechanistic origins of in vivo recorded activity beyond the barrel cortex for which it was originally designed.
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Code
No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.
mpinb.github.io/in_silico_framework
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 27 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
- 27 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
pypi.org/project/isf-pandas-msgpack
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 27 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
- 27 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.
Tracing map
Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.
What the map holds:
- 2 repositories of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
- 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
- no match between paragraphs and code yet;
- neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.
Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.
Data
No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.
Data Availability
All code and data presented in this paper are available without restrictions from https://
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 7 authors, 9 MeSH terms, 9 funders, 58 references.
Cite
This paper
Meulemeester, B., Bast, A., Royo, M., Fruengel, R., Saka, S., Kastrinakis, F., & Oberlaender, M. (2026). An in silico framework for dissecting the mechanistic origins of in vivo recorded neuronal activity. PLoS computational biology, 22(8), e1014617. https://
BibTeX
@article{meulemeester202
author = {Meulemeester, Bjorge and Bast, Arco and Royo, María and Fruengel, Rieke and Saka, Su and Kastrinakis, Foivos and Oberlaender, Marcel},
title = {{An in silico framework for dissecting the mechanistic origins of in vivo recorded neuronal activity}},
journal = {PLoS computational biology},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
volume = {22},
number = {8},
pages = {e1014617},
publisher = {PLOS},
issn = {1553-734X},
doi = {10.1371/
url = {https://
pmid = {42627867},
pmcid = {PMC13529221}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Meulemeester, Bjorge
AU - Bast, Arco
AU - Royo, María
AU - Fruengel, Rieke
AU - Saka, Su
AU - Kastrinakis, Foivos
AU - Oberlaender, Marcel
TI - An in silico framework for dissecting the mechanistic origins of in vivo recorded neuronal activity
T2 - PLoS computational biology
J2 - PLoS Comput Biol
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 22
IS - 8
SP - e1014617
SN - 1553-734X
PB - PLOS
DO - 10.1371/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.1371/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "An in silico framework for dissecting the mechanistic origins of in vivo recorded neuronal activity",
"container-title": "PLoS computational biology",
"author": [
{
"family": "Meulemeester",
"given": "Bjorge"
},
{
"family": "Bast",
"given": "Arco"
},
{
"family": "Royo",
"given": "María"
},
{
"family": "Fruengel",
"given": "Rieke"
},
{
"family": "Saka",
"given": "Su"
},
{
"family": "Kastrinakis",
"given": "Foivos"
},
{
"family": "Oberlaender",
"given": "Marcel"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "22",
"issue": "8",
"page": "e1014617",
"DOI": "10.1371/
"PMID": "42627867",
"PMCID": "PMC13529221",
"ISSN": "1553-734X",
"publisher": "PLOS",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
21
]
]
}
}
The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64152-0 [code]
- Thalamus enables active dendritic coupling of inputs arriving at different cortical layers.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: computational modeling (no new data), 15 references, 2 authors
- [2] doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011468 [code]
- Network-neuron interactions underlying sensory responses of layer 5 pyramidal tract neurons in barrel cortex.Journal: PLoS computational biologyIn common: computational modeling (no new data), 13 references, 2 authors
- [3] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.108222 [code]
- Controlling morpho-electrophysiologi
cal variability of neurons with detailed biophysical models. Journal: iScienceIn common: none (in silico), computational, computational modeling (no new data), 12 references - [4] doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011406 [code]
- Simulation-based inference for efficient identification of generative models in computational connectomics.Journal: PLoS computational biologyIn common: computational, computational modeling (no new data), 6 references, author Marcel Oberlaender
- [5] doi:10.7554/elife.103324 [code]
- DendroTweaks, an interactive approach for unraveling dendritic dynamics.Journal: eLifeIn common: computational modeling (no new data), 10 references
- [6] doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111757 [code]
- Circuit-selective cell-autonomous regulation of inhibition in pyramidal neurons by Ste20-like kinase.Journal: Cell reportsIn common: 6 references, author Marcel Oberlaender
- [7] doi:10.7554/elife.79535 [code]
- Ultrafast simulation of large-scale neocortical microcircuitry with biophysically realistic neurons.Journal: eLifeIn common: none (in silico), computational, computational modeling (no new data), 8 references
- [8] doi:10.7554/elife.95135 [code]
- The NeuroML ecosystem for standardized multi-scale modeling in neuroscience.Journal: eLifeIn common: computational modeling (no new data), 9 references
- [9] doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010353 [code]
- Brain signal predictions from multi-scale networks using a linearized framework.Journal: PLoS computational biologyIn common: none (in silico), computational, computational modeling (no new data), 7 references
- [10] doi:10.3389/fninf.2022.884046 [code]
- Modernizing the NEURON Simulator for Sustainability, Portability, and Performance.Journal: Frontiers in neuroinformaticsIn common: none (in silico), computational, computational modeling (no new data), 7 references
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Validate its tracing map
You validate the map as this page shows it: 2 repositories of the authors' code, each at its verified commit and with its license, 0 scripts, and 0 matches between paragraphs and code (see the Code and Map sections). It then receives a DOI on Zenodo, with you (your ORCID iD) and OSCR as its creators; the code itself is not deposited.
The map's fingerprint: sha256:f90796d3e9cacb76…
Add the badge to the code's README
If you are an author or a maintainer of this paper's code, you can add this badge. It says what OSCR knows of the paper (its code, its validated tracing map) and links the code to this page. Paste one of these snippets under the README's title. Keep the two marks around it, so that the badge can be replaced in place and is never added twice. OSCR changes nothing in your repository.
Markdown
<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
[](https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014617)
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->reStructuredText
.. oscr-badge:start
.. image:: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014617.svg
:target: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014617
:alt: OSCR
.. oscr-badge:endHTML
<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
<a href="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014617"><img src="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014617.svg" alt="OSCR"></a>
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->If you choose to, you can have the badge kept up to date for you, with oscr badge --write from the command line or with the GitHub Action in your repository's workflows. Every other form and option (a card, AsciiDoc, LaTeX, shields.io) is on the badge page.
Request its removal
To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: code errors and mismatches between the code and the paper about this paper and its code, from readers and its authors, beside the paper and its tracing map.
Report a mismatch between the code and the paper · Report a code error (signed in)
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code and did not get the paper's result, what they ran, with which environment, commit and data.
Report a reproduction failure (signed in)
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
