An in silico framework for dissecting the mechanistic origins of in vivo recorded neuronal activity.

Overview

1. Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, Bonn, Germany
2. International Max Planck Research School (IMPRS) for Brain and Behavior, Bonn, Germany
3. Department of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Abstract

How can we identify the mechanistic origins of the electrophysiological activity that is recorded from neurons in the living brain? A promising strategy for addressing this question is to generate biologically realistic models of in vivo recorded neurons, and simulate how they transform synaptic inputs from the network into their observed neuronal activity. For this purpose, we here provide our approaches for the generation, simulation, and analysis of network-embedded neuron models as an open source, fully documented and freely available software environment: In Silico Framework (ISF). ISF is centered around the concept of achieving “model consensus” about the mechanistic origins of in vivo recorded activity across biologically diverse sets of models. To achieve such model consensus, ISF offers three key workflows. First, ISF enables users to generate models that are equally well constrained by empirical data at subcellular, cellular and network scales, while the set of models as a whole is constructed to exhibit maximally diverse parameters, spanning the full ranges permitted by the empirically observed biological variability at each scale. Second, ISF enables users to identify those subsets of model configurations that predict the in vivo observations without being tuned to do so. Third, for each of those model configurations, ISF enables users to identify which mechanisms at subcellular, cellular and network scales are necessary to predict the in vivo observations, and which mechanisms are dispensable. Thereby, ISF can reveal which mechanisms are common across model configurations, and whether the diversity of model configurations could account for the variability of the in vivo observed activity across animals, cells and trials. In essence, by achieving such model consensus, ISF predicts mechanisms that are robust across biological variability, and which may hence indeed be used in vivo. Finally, ISF enables users to derive model consensus for in silico manipulations, to identify which experimental strategies would be best suited to test the predicted mechanisms in vivo. We exemplify how we have used this iterative in silico - in vivo approach of ISF to dissect the mechanistic origins of sensory responses in the barrel cortex. By making ISF available as a standalone online resource, we believe it will facilitate the generation, simulation and analysis of models that reveal mechanistic origins of in vivo recorded activity beyond the barrel cortex for which it was originally designed.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

• 2 repositories of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
• 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
• no match between paragraphs and code yet;
• neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data Availability

All code and data presented in this paper are available without restrictions from https://mpinb.github.io/in_silico_framework/index.html.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 7 authors, 9 MeSH terms, 9 funders, 58 references.

Cite

This paper

Meulemeester, B., Bast, A., Royo, M., Fruengel, R., Saka, S., Kastrinakis, F., & Oberlaender, M. (2026). An in silico framework for dissecting the mechanistic origins of in vivo recorded neuronal activity. PLoS computational biology, 22(8), e1014617. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014617

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1007/s12021-025-09766-x [code]

The Neural Analysis Toolkit Unifies Semi-Analytical Techniques to Simplify, Understand, and Simulate Dendrites.

Journal: Neuroinformatics

In common: computational modeling (no new data), 4 references

[2] doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014458 [code]

Neuronal excitability and parameter variability in the Hodgkin-Huxley model.

Journal: PLoS computational biology

In common: none (in silico), computational, computational modeling (no new data), 3 references

[3] doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btag328 [code]

eFEL: electrophysiology feature extraction library.

Journal: Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)

In common: none (in silico), 3 references

[4] doi: [code]

Going deeper with morphologically detailed neural networks by simulation-based gradient propagation

Journal: Frontiers in computational neuroscience

In common: none (in silico), computational, computational modeling (no new data), 2 references

[5] doi:10.1007/s11571-026-10522-3 [code]

Acetylcholine enhances deviance detection in Hodgkin-Huxley neuronal networks.

Journal: Cognitive neurodynamics

In common: none (in silico), computational, computational modeling (no new data), 2 references

[6] doi:10.3389/fncom.2026.1771884 [code]

NEURONpyxl: fast, flexible, Python-integrated simulation of biophysical neural networks with complex plastic synapses.

Journal: Frontiers in computational neuroscience

In common: computational modeling (no new data), 3 references

[7] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10032-2 [code]

Data-driven mouse motor thalamus model reveals topography and spatial weight scaling govern spindle dynamics.

Journal: Communications biology

In common: computational, computational modeling (no new data), 3 references

[8] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0354021 [code]

A genetic algorithm for self-supervised models of oscillatory neurodynamics.

Journal: PloS one

In common: computational modeling (no new data), 3 references

[9] doi:10.7554/elife.108208 [code]

Realistic coupling enables flexible macroscopic traveling waves in the mouse cortex.

Journal: eLife

In common: computational, 3 references

[10] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.116144 [code]

Spatial continuity of neurons explains non-random network architecture.

Journal: iScience

In common: 3 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.