Spatial coding of conspecifics in the electrosensory system: Early segregation of information streams.

Overview

1. Department of Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, United States of America

Abstract

Localizing the source of a signal requires sophisticated neural mechanisms, and we are still uncovering the coding principles that support accurate spatial processing. Weakly electric fish can detect and localize distant conspecifics, but the way this spatial information is encoded is unclear. Here, we investigate the spatial representation of conspecific signals in the hindbrain to determine how the properties of the heterogeneous population of pyramidal cells affect the spatial coding accuracy of conspecific signals. We hypothesize that specific subsets of cells provide more accurate spatial information about conspecific location. We stimulated the fish with an artificial signal that replicates both the spatial and temporal structure of conspecific signals. We recorded from cells with various receptive field positions covering the entire body surface and analyzed the spike train with spike-train distance metrics to determine how accurately the location of the stimulus is encoded. We found that some pyramidal cells (such as ON-type and those within the deep layer) encode the spatial information more accurately, while other subgroups (OFF-type and superficial layer) provide less accurate information. Our results help us understand how conspecific location is represented across the heterogeneous population of cells and suggest that segregation of the spatial information stream begins early in the sensory pathway.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

• github.com/gmarsat/2026_ell_paper_data, at github.com; found in “Data Availability”

Data Availability

The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from https://github.com/gmarsat/2026_ELL_paper_data.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 2, 28 September 2026

• Funding: added National Science Foundation: 1942960

Version 1, 28 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 2 authors, 5 MeSH terms, 67 references.

Cite

This paper

Milam, O. E., & Marsat, G. (2026). Spatial coding of conspecifics in the electrosensory system: Early segregation of information streams. PloS one, 21(5), e0348018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0348018

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1523/eneuro.0357-25.2026 [code]

Spike Generation in Electroreceptor Afferents Introduces Additional Spectral Response Components by Weakly Nonlinear Interactions.

Journal: eNeuro

In common: 6 references

[2] doi:10.1007/s00422-026-01063-3 [code]

Increased firing rates monotonically expand neuronal coding bandwidth.

Journal: Biological cybernetics

In common: 4 references

[3] doi:10.1073/pnas.2616911123 [code]

Cerebellar microcircuits enable robust evidence-based decisions through cortico-cerebellar coupling.

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

In common: 2 references

[4] doi:10.1007/s12021-025-09759-w [code]

Limitations of Variational Laplace-Based Dynamic Causal Modelling for Multistable Cortical Circuits.

Journal: Neuroinformatics

In common: 2 references

[5] doi:10.1002/hipo.70131 [code]

Decoding Medial Entorhinal Cortical Dynamics Produces Planning-Like Alternations in Hippocampal theta Sequences.

Journal: Hippocampus

In common: 1 reference

[6] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75349-2 [code]

Neuronal dynamics, timing, and flow of sensory and choice-related information in auditory-prefrontal circuitry.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: 1 reference

[7] doi: [code]

Limit-Cycle Proliferation Under Parametric Delayed Feedback in a Conductance-Based Neuron: Bifurcation Landscape, Orbit Catalog, and Capacity Analysis

Journal: Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)

In common: 1 reference

[8] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003789 [code]

Encoding performance of cortical neurons critically depends on their morphological and neurophysiological properties.

Journal: PLoS biology

In common: 1 reference

[9] doi:10.1007/s00422-026-01043-7

Fluctuation-response relations for a two-stage population of spiking neurons stimulated by common noise.

Journal: Biological cybernetics

In common: 1 reference

[10] doi:10.7554/elife.104684 [code]

Regime shift detection and neurocomputational substrates for under and overreactions to change.

Journal: eLife

In common: 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.