OSCR

Suture-Button Fixation Provides a Statistically But Not Clinically Important Improvement in Function for Syndesmotic Injuries in Unstable Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Overview

Authors: Wayne Hoskins1,2,3, Charles Gusho4, Kevin Horner4, Douglas Haase4
ORCID iDs: Wayne Hoskins, Charles Gusho, Kevin Horner, Douglas Haase
  1. Northland Orthopaedic Research Consortium, Whangarei Hospital, Whangarei, Northland New Zealand
  2. Northland Knee & Hip, Whangarei, Northland New Zealand
  3. Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
  4. Missouri Orthopaedic Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
Institutions: The University of Melbourne (Australia); Northland District Health Board (New Zealand); University of Missouri (United States)
Journal: JB & JS open access, volume 11, issue 4, article e26.00303
Dates: published online 27 October 2026
Type: Review · Language: English
License: CC BY-NC-ND
Identifiers: DOI 10.2106/jbjs.oa.26.00303 · PMID 42924391 · PMCID PMC13690456 · OpenAlex W7223574769
Open access: green, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code on request (how the code is found and verified)
Categories: human (organism), clinical / translational (subfield)
Journal subjects: Evidence-Based Systematic Reviews
Topic: Foot and Ankle Surgery (Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Medicine), according to OpenAlex
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 51 references in the paper

Abstract

The abstract is not reproduced here: the paper's license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow it. Read it in the paper, at the publisher or on Europe PMC.

Code

The paper says that its authors' code is available on request: it was not published with the paper, so there is nothing to verify.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none (its code is available on request), so it has no map.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Code and data availability statement

The paper has a code and data availability statement. Its license (CC BY-NC-ND) does not allow reproducing it here; in short, from what the harvester recognized in it:

  • it says that the data are available on request
  • it says that the code is available on request

Read it in the paper: doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.oa.26.00303.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 October 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 4 authors, 47 references.

Cite

This paper

Hoskins, W., Gusho, C., Horner, K., & Haase, D. (2026). Suture-Button Fixation Provides a Statistically But Not Clinically Important Improvement in Function for Syndesmotic Injuries in Unstable Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. JB & JS open access, 11(4), e26.00303. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.oa.26.00303

BibTeX

@article{hoskins2026suture,
author = {Hoskins, Wayne and Gusho, Charles and Horner, Kevin and Haase, Douglas},
title = {{Suture-Button Fixation Provides a Statistically But Not Clinically Important Improvement in Function for Syndesmotic Injuries in Unstable Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials}},
journal = {JB \& JS open access},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
volume = {11},
number = {4},
pages = {e26.00303},
publisher = {Wolters Kluwer Health},
issn = {2472-7245},
doi = {10.2106/jbjs.oa.26.00303},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.oa.26.00303},
pmid = {42924391},
pmcid = {PMC13690456}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Hoskins, Wayne
AU - Gusho, Charles
AU - Horner, Kevin
AU - Haase, Douglas
TI - Suture-Button Fixation Provides a Statistically But Not Clinically Important Improvement in Function for Syndesmotic Injuries in Unstable Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
T2 - JB & JS open access
J2 - JB JS Open Access
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/27
VL - 11
IS - 4
SP - e26.00303
SN - 2472-7245
PB - Wolters Kluwer Health
DO - 10.2106/jbjs.oa.26.00303
UR - https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.oa.26.00303
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.2106/jbjs.oa.26.00303",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Suture-Button Fixation Provides a Statistically But Not Clinically Important Improvement in Function for Syndesmotic Injuries in Unstable Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials",
"container-title": "JB & JS open access",
"author": [
{
"family": "Hoskins",
"given": "Wayne"
},
{
"family": "Gusho",
"given": "Charles"
},
{
"family": "Horner",
"given": "Kevin"
},
{
"family": "Haase",
"given": "Douglas"
}
],
"container-title-short": "JB JS Open Access",
"volume": "11",
"issue": "4",
"page": "e26.00303",
"DOI": "10.2106/jbjs.oa.26.00303",
"PMID": "42924391",
"PMCID": "PMC13690456",
"ISSN": "2472-7245",
"publisher": "Wolters Kluwer Health",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.oa.26.00303",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
10,
27
]
]
}
}

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1080/20008066.2025.2508548
Efficacy of psychosocial interventions on social functioning in individuals with childhood maltreatment experiences: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Journal: European journal of psychotraumatology
In common: clinical / translational, 7 references
[2] doi:10.1002/pcn5.70136 [code]
Comparative efficacy and safety of intravenous racemic ketamine, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroconvulsive therapy for Stage 2 or higher treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Journal: PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences
In common: clinical / translational, 5 references
[3] doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.41159 [code]
Theta Burst Stimulation Protocols for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Journal: JAMA network open
In common: clinical / translational, 4 references
[4] doi:10.1186/s13102-026-01593-0
Effects of exercise on cognitive performance and ERP (P3, N2) in overweight and obese populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal: BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation
In common: clinical / translational, 4 references
[5] doi:10.3390/nu18172887
Unmetabolized Folic Acid: Biology, Epidemiology, and Clinical Consequences: A Systematic Review.
Journal: Nutrients
In common: clinical / translational, 4 references
[6] doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107697
Liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion thresholds in acute acquired brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal: BMJ open
In common: clinical / translational, 4 references
[7] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.117250
Comparative effectiveness of multiple interventions for Alzheimer's disease on ABC syndromes and QoL: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Journal: iScience
In common: clinical / translational, 3 references
[8] doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102889
Treatment for essential tremor: a systematic review and Bayesian Model-based Network Meta-analysis of RCTs.
Journal: EClinicalMedicine
In common: clinical / translational, 3 references
[9] doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.1090305
Association of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and clinical outcomes in patients with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal: Frontiers in immunology
In common: clinical / translational, 3 references
[10] doi:10.3390/s26165121 [code]
Electrophysiological Signatures of Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review of sEMG Features, Fatigue Indices and AI-Based Classifiers.
Journal: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
In common: 3 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: code errors and mismatches between the code and the paper about this paper and its code, from readers and its authors, beside the paper and its tracing map.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code and did not get the paper's result, what they ran, with which environment, commit and data.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.