Assessment of cerebral hemodynamics in patients with acute brain injury: a group-based multivariate trajectory approach.
The 1 match
- [1] § Results › Characterization of clusters ↔ 1002-code/5.2 compare.r, lines 92–135 · score 0.51 · paco2, SpO2, chloride, pH, pairwise, CV
Paper
Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser, not stored by OSCR: doi.org · Europe PMC
The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.
The authors' code
R · 202 lines · 8.3 KB · no license · 1 match
- # //SECTION - 1day mean indicators
- # //ANCHOR - preprocess
- library(tidyverse)
- compareGroupDay1 <- icpBpHr2 %>%
- filter(interval < 288) %>%
- group_by(icuid) %>%
- summarize(
- avgicp = round(mean(icp, na.rm = TRUE), 2),
- avgisbp = round(mean(isbp, na.rm = TRUE), 2),
- avgidbp = round(mean(idbp, na.rm = TRUE), 2),
- avghr = round(mean(hr, na.rm = TRUE), 2),
- avgmbp = round(mean(mbp, na.rm = TRUE), 2),
- avgpp = round(mean(pp, na.rm = TRUE), 2),
- avgcpp = round(mean(cpp, na.rm = TRUE), 2),
- avgrpp = round(mean(rpp, na.rm = TRUE), 2),
- cvicp = round((sd(icp, na.rm = TRUE) / mean(icp, na.rm = TRUE)), 2),
- cvisbp = round((sd(isbp, na.rm = TRUE) / mean(isbp, na.rm = TRUE)), 2),
- cvidbp = round((sd(idbp, na.rm = TRUE) / mean(idbp, na.rm = TRUE)), 2),
- cvhr = round((sd(hr, na.rm = TRUE) / mean(hr, na.rm = TRUE)), 2),
- cvmbp = round((sd(mbp, na.rm = TRUE) / mean(mbp, na.rm = TRUE)), 2),
- cvpp = round((sd(pp, na.rm = TRUE) / mean(pp, na.rm = TRUE)), 2),
- cvcpp = round((sd(cpp, na.rm = TRUE) / mean(cpp, na.rm = TRUE)), 2),
- cvrpp = round((sd(rpp, na.rm = TRUE) / mean(rpp, na.rm = TRUE)), 2),
- .groups = "drop"
- )
- # link predictors, group
- compareGroupDay1 <- merge(compareGroupDay1, varsImp[, c(1, 31, 67, 69, 71, 77)], by = "icuid", all.y = TRUE)
- # //ANCHOR - comparegroups
- library(compareGroups)
- tableDay1Traj <- descrTable(group ~ . - icuid,
- data = compareGroupDay1,
- method = NA,
- show.all = TRUE
- )
- # export2word(tableDay1Traj, file = "tableDay1Traj.docx")
- # //ANCHOR - pairwise
- bonfAvgICPDay1 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay1$avgicp, compareGroupDay1$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay1)
- print(bonfAvgICPDay1)
- bonfAvgIsbpDay1 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay1$avgisbp, compareGroupDay1$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay1)
- print(bonfAvgIsbpDay1)
- bonfAvgIdbpDay1 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay1$avgidbp, compareGroupDay1$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay1)
- print(bonfAvgIdbpDay1)
- bonfAvgHrDay1 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay1$avghr, compareGroupDay1$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay1)
- print(bonfAvgHrDay1)
- bonfAvgMbpDay1 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay1$avgmbp, compareGroupDay1$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay1)
- print(bonfAvgMbpDay1)
- bonfAvgPPDay1 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay1$avgpp, compareGroupDay1$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay1)
- print(bonfAvgPPDay1)
- bonfAvgCPPDay1 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay1$avgcpp, compareGroupDay1$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay1)
- print(bonfAvgCPPDay1)
- # bonfAvgRPPDay1 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay1$avgrpp, compareGroupDay1$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay1)
- # print(bonfAvgRPPDay1)
- bonfCVICPDay1 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay1$cvicp, compareGroupDay1$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay1)
- print(bonfCVICPDay1)
- bonfCVIsbpDay1 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay1$cvisbp, compareGroupDay1$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay1)
- print(bonfCVIsbpDay1)
- bonfCVIdbpDay1 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay1$cvidbp, compareGroupDay1$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay1)
- print(bonfCVIdbpDay1)
- bonfCVHrDay1 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay1$cvhr, compareGroupDay1$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay1)
- print(bonfCVHrDay1)
- bonfCVMbpDay1 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay1$cvmbp, compareGroupDay1$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay1)
- print(bonfCVMbpDay1)
- bonfCVPPDay1 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay1$cvpp, compareGroupDay1$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay1)
- print(bonfCVPPDay1)
- bonfCVCPPDay1 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay1$cvcpp, compareGroupDay1$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay1)
- print(bonfCVCPPDay1)
- # bonfCVRPPDay1 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay1$cvrpp, compareGroupDay1$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay1)
- # print(bonfCVRPPDay1)
- bonfChlorideDay1 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay1$chloride, compareGroupDay1$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay1)
- print(bonfChlorideDay1)
- bonfPhDay1 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay1$ph, compareGroupDay1$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay1)
- print(bonfPhDay1)
- bonfPaco2Day1 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay1$paco2, compareGroupDay1$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay1)
- print(bonfPaco2Day1)
- bonfSpo2Day1 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay1$spo2_cv, compareGroupDay1$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay1)
- print(bonfSpo2Day1)
- # //!SECTION
- # //SECTION - 5day mean indicators
- # //ANCHOR - preprocess
- library(tidyverse)
- compareGroupDay5 <- icpBpHr2 %>%
- group_by(icuid) %>%
- summarize(
- avgicp = round(mean(icp, na.rm = TRUE), 2),
- avgisbp = round(mean(isbp, na.rm = TRUE), 2),
- avgidbp = round(mean(idbp, na.rm = TRUE), 2),
- avghr = round(mean(hr, na.rm = TRUE), 2),
- avgmbp = round(mean(mbp, na.rm = TRUE), 2),
- avgpp = round(mean(pp, na.rm = TRUE), 2),
- avgcpp = round(mean(cpp, na.rm = TRUE), 2),
- avgrpp = round(mean(rpp, na.rm = TRUE), 2),
- cvicp = round((sd(icp, na.rm = TRUE) / mean(icp, na.rm = TRUE)), 2),
- cvisbp = round((sd(isbp, na.rm = TRUE) / mean(isbp, na.rm = TRUE)), 2),
- cvidbp = round((sd(idbp, na.rm = TRUE) / mean(idbp, na.rm = TRUE)), 2),
- cvhr = round((sd(hr, na.rm = TRUE) / mean(hr, na.rm = TRUE)), 2),
- cvmbp = round((sd(mbp, na.rm = TRUE) / mean(mbp, na.rm = TRUE)), 2),
- cvpp = round((sd(pp, na.rm = TRUE) / mean(pp, na.rm = TRUE)), 2),
- cvcpp = round((sd(cpp, na.rm = TRUE) / mean(cpp, na.rm = TRUE)), 2),
- cvrpp = round((sd(rpp, na.rm = TRUE) / mean(rpp, na.rm = TRUE)), 2),
- .groups = "drop"
- )
- # link group
- compareGroupDay5 <- merge(compareGroupDay5, varsImp[, c(1, 77)], by = "icuid", all.y = TRUE)
- # //ANCHOR - comparegroups
- library(compareGroups)
- tableDay5Traj <- descrTable(group ~ . - icuid,
- data = compareGroupDay5,
- method = NA,
- show.all = TRUE
- )
- # export2word(tableDay5Traj, file = "tableDay5Traj.docx")
- # //ANCHOR - pairwise
- bonfAvgICPDay5 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay5$avgicp, compareGroupDay5$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay5)
- print(bonfAvgICPDay5)
- bonfAvgIsbpDay5 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay5$avgisbp, compareGroupDay5$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay5)
- print(bonfAvgIsbpDay5)
- bonfAvgIdbpDay5 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay5$avgidbp, compareGroupDay5$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay5)
- print(bonfAvgIdbpDay5)
- bonfAvgHrDay5 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay5$avghr, compareGroupDay5$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay5)
- print(bonfAvgHrDay5)
- bonfAvgMbpDay5 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay5$avgmbp, compareGroupDay5$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay5)
- print(bonfAvgMbpDay5)
- bonfAvgPPDay5 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay5$avgpp, compareGroupDay5$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay5)
- print(bonfAvgPPDay5)
- bonfAvgCPPDay5 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay5$avgcpp, compareGroupDay5$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay5)
- print(bonfAvgCPPDay5)
- # bonfAvgRPPDay5 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay5$avgrpp, compareGroupDay5$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay5)
- # print(bonfAvgRPPDay5)
- bonfCVICPDay5 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay5$cvicp, compareGroupDay5$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay5)
- print(bonfCVICPDay5)
- bonfCVIsbpDay5 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay5$cvisbp, compareGroupDay5$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay5)
- print(bonfCVIsbpDay5)
- bonfCVIdbpDay5 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay5$cvidbp, compareGroupDay5$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay5)
- print(bonfCVIdbpDay5)
- bonfCVHrDay5 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay5$cvhr, compareGroupDay5$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay5)
- print(bonfCVHrDay5)
- bonfCVMbpDay5 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay5$cvmbp, compareGroupDay5$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay5)
- print(bonfCVMbpDay5)
- bonfCVPPDay5 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay5$cvpp, compareGroupDay5$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay5)
- print(bonfCVPPDay5)
- bonfCVCPPDay5 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay5$cvcpp, compareGroupDay5$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay5)
- print(bonfCVCPPDay5)
- # bonfCVRPPDay5 <- pairwise.t.test(compareGroupDay5$cvrpp, compareGroupDay5$group, p.adj = "bonf", data = compareGroupDay5)
- # print(bonfCVRPPDay5)
- # //!SECTION
5.2 compare.r at commit 752e922, no license · at the source
Overview
- Department of Sleep Medicine, Bayi Orthopedic Hospital, China RongTong Medical Healthcare Group Co. Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Longquan Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Department of Pain Management, Bayi Orthopedic Hospital, China RongTong Medical Healthcare Group Co. Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to describe the evolution patterns of cerebral hemodynamics in acute brain injury (ABI) patients.
Methods: ABI patients with intracranial pressure (ICP), invasive arterial blood pressure, and heart rate (HR) records were identified from Medical Information Mart for the Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV 3.0, eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) 2.0, and the Department of Neurosurgery of Longquan Hospital. Group-based multivariate trajectory (GBMT) modeling was employed to identify clusters of participants with similar evolution patterns of cerebral hemodynamics. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between the GBMT clusters and outcomes. Features were selected using a random forest (RF) algorithm based on recursive feature elimination (RFE), and feature importance was interpreted using SHAP values. Furthermore, subgroup analyses were performed.
Results: Data from 477 eligible patients from the MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD databases were included in the trajectory analysis. Additionally, data from 519 patients from the Department of Neurosurgery were utilized for external validation. GBMT analyses identified five clusters with distinct cerebral hemodynamics evolution patterns. Compared to Cluster 1, Cluster 5 was the only one associated with an unfavorable outcome. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the effect size and direction in different subgroups were consistent, and the results were stable.
Conclusion: This study identified a unique cerebral hemodynamics evolution pattern in ABI that was associated with unfavorable outcomes. Notably, our study suggested that the longitudinal analysis of multiple hemodynamic indicators may offer a novel perspective for the treatment of ABI patients.
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Repositories
Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above, with 1 match between paragraphs and lines of code.
Nicholas2074/1002-stat
752e922d64f23065fadd62cefb0c7e98cba37f62, 9 May 2026Availability: 1 check, the latest on 27 September 2026: the link answers
- 27 September 2026: the link answers
17 files
- 1002-code/
1.1 predictors.r , R, 197 lines - 1002-code/
1.2 trajectories.r , R, 120 lines - 1002-code/
2.1 outcome.r , R, 59 lines - 1002-code/
3.0 features.r , R, 332 lines - 1002-code/
4.1 impMor.r , R, 105 lines - 1002-code/
4.2 impDis.r , R, 103 lines - 1002-code/
4.3 impDev.r , R, 104 lines - 1002-code/
4.4 impTraj.r , R, 103 lines - 1002-code/
4.5 logTraj.r , R, 739 lines - 1002-code/
4.7 subgroup.r , R, 272 lines - 1002-code/
5.1 baseline.r , R, 35 lines - 1002-code/
5.2 compare.r , R, 202 lines, 1 match - 1002-code/
5.3 stat.r , R, 85 lines - 1002-code/
6.1 valtraj.r , R, 239 lines - 1002-code/
6.2 vallogcrude.r , R, 203 lines - 1002-code/
7.1 review.r , R, 222 lines - 1002-code/
log.rmd , R, 44 lines
Nicholas2074/1002-data
3a99227eaa9808bcb26a7eeb9a1f5af1474e97b5, 29 April 2026Availability: 1 check, the latest on 27 September 2026: the link answers
- 27 September 2026: the link answers
The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.
Tracing map
Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.
What the map holds:
- 2 repositories of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
- 17 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
- 1 match between paragraphs of the paper and lines of the code (method lexical-v1);
- neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.
Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.
Data
No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.
Data availability statement
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. Data of the trajectory analysis cohort are available from the MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD databases, which require authorized access via PhysioNet (https://
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 6 authors, 5 keywords, 26 references.
Cite
This paper
Zhou, H., Chen, C., Zheng, H., Wu, Y., Zhu, L., & Zhou, C. (2026). Assessment of cerebral hemodynamics in patients with acute brain injury: a group-based multivariate trajectory approach. Frontiers in neurology, 17, 1783194. https://
BibTeX
@article{zhou2026assessm
author = {Zhou, Hai and Chen, Changcun and Zheng, Hui and Wu, Yuheng and Zhu, Li and Zhou, Changqing},
title = {{Assessment of cerebral hemodynamics in patients with acute brain injury: a group-based multivariate trajectory approach}},
journal = {Frontiers in neurology},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
volume = {17},
pages = {1783194},
publisher = {Frontiers Media SA},
issn = {1664-2295},
doi = {10.3389/
url = {https://
pmid = {42422201},
pmcid = {PMC13341458}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Zhou, Hai
AU - Chen, Changcun
AU - Zheng, Hui
AU - Wu, Yuheng
AU - Zhu, Li
AU - Zhou, Changqing
TI - Assessment of cerebral hemodynamics in patients with acute brain injury: a group-based multivariate trajectory approach
T2 - Frontiers in neurology
J2 - Front Neurol
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 17
SP - 1783194
SN - 1664-2295
PB - Frontiers Media SA
DO - 10.3389/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.3389/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Assessment of cerebral hemodynamics in patients with acute brain injury: a group-based multivariate trajectory approach",
"container-title": "Frontiers in neurology",
"author": [
{
"family": "Zhou",
"given": "Hai"
},
{
"family": "Chen",
"given": "Changcun"
},
{
"family": "Zheng",
"given": "Hui"
},
{
"family": "Wu",
"given": "Yuheng"
},
{
"family": "Zhu",
"given": "Li"
},
{
"family": "Zhou",
"given": "Changqing"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "17",
"page": "1783194",
"DOI": "10.3389/
"PMID": "42422201",
"PMCID": "PMC13341458",
"ISSN": "1664-2295",
"publisher": "Frontiers Media SA",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
6,
24
]
]
}
}
The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.116135 [code]
- Predicting ICU in-hospital mortality from text-encoded structured EHR data using adaptive transformer layer fusion.Journal: iScienceIn common: clinical / translational, 2 references
- [2] doi:10.3389/fneur.2026.1753639
- Early prophylactic heparin use is associated with reduced mortality in patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage.Journal: Frontiers in neurologyIn common: clinical / translational, 2 references
- [3] doi:10.3390/bioengineering13070794
- Mamba-Bi-LSTM with SHAP-Guided Iterative Refinement for Multimodal ARDS Diagnosis: A Dual-System Framework.Journal: Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)In common: 2 references
- [4] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75585-6 [code]
- Brain network dynamics reflect psychiatric illness status and transdiagnostic symptom profiles across health and disease.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: tidyverse, 1 reference
- [5] doi:10.34133/csbj.0108 [code]
- Latent Factor Modeling Reveals Unexpected Spatial Heterogeneity in Human Alzheimer's Disease Brain Transcriptomes.Journal: Computational and structural biotechnology journalIn common: tidyverse, 1 reference
- [6] doi:10.1007/s10143-026-04341-7 [code]
- The effect of intracranial pressure monitoring on severe traumatic brain injury patients who undergo subdural hematoma evacuation.Journal: Neurosurgical reviewIn common: clinical / translational, 1 reference
- [7] doi:10.64898/2026.06.23.26355958 [code]
- Motor imagery interventions in stroke patients modulate their brain-heart network dynamicsJournal: medRxiv (preprint)In common: clinical / translational, 1 reference
- [8] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-57238-2
- Cardiac biomarkers combined with neuroimaging localization predict long-term outcomes in acute stroke patients.Journal: Scientific reportsIn common: clinical / translational, 1 reference
- [9] doi:10.2147/ijgm.s603395
- Evolocumab Alters Transcriptomic Signatures and Identifies Inflammatory Biomarkers in Brain-Heart Syndrome with Coronary Heart Disease History.Journal: International journal of general medicineIn common: clinical / translational, 1 reference
- [10] doi:10.1117/1.nph.13.3.035010
- Toward comprehensive multimodal neuromonitoring of surrogates of cerebral autoregulation in traumatic brain injury: insights from a hyperventilation protocol.Journal: NeurophotonicsIn common: clinical / translational, 1 reference
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Validate its tracing map
You validate the map as this page shows it: 2 repositories of the authors' code, each at its verified commit and with its license, 17 scripts, and 1 match between paragraphs and code (see the Code and Map sections). It then receives a DOI on Zenodo, with you (your ORCID iD) and OSCR as its creators; the code itself is not deposited.
The map's fingerprint: sha256:c1f4dbe7ce821837…
Add the badge to its README
The badge links the code to this page. Copy one of these into the README of the paper's code: only you decide where it goes, and nothing is changed for you.
Markdown
[, paste the snippet at the top, then “Commit changes…” and, to review it first, “Create a new branch and start a pull request”. You open the pull request; OSCR asks for no permission.
Request its removal
To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
