OSCR

The theta paradox-delayed reduction of frontal midline theta following downregulation neurofeedback training.

Overview

Authors: Thomas Kanatschnig1, Lisa Maria Berger1, Norbert Schrapf2, Markus Tilp2,3, Silvia Erika Kober1
  1. Department of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
  2. Department of Human Movement Science, Sport and Health, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
  3. BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria
Institutions: University of Graz (Austria); BioTechMed-Graz (Austria)
Journal: Frontiers in human neuroscience, volume 20, article 1806951
Dates: received 8 February 2026; accepted 6 July 2026; published online 22 July 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2026.1806951 · PMID 42558674 · PMCID PMC13438158 · OpenAlex W7170047133
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: empty repository
Categories: EEG (modality), cognitive (subfield)
Methods: Preprocessing, Spectral & time-frequency, Statistics, Smoothing, state filtering, decompositions, fMRI & imaging, Physiology & signal measures
Keywords: anticipation, EEG, frontal midline theta, neurofeedback, sport
Topic: Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 82 references in the paper

Abstract

Phasic increase of frontal midline theta (Fm theta) power has been described as a key indicator of cognitive processing, while relatively lower task-related Fm theta power is associated with reduced cognitive strain, reflecting less intensive cognitive processing. In a previous investigation, reduced task-related Fm theta power in relation to higher expertise, as well as higher setting anticipation performance in the domain of volleyball was identified. In the present study a single-session sham-controlled neurofeedback training (NFT) intervention was conducted to investigate the feasibility of Fm theta downregulation for the improvement of volleyball setting anticipation. A total of 24 volleyball novices was allocated to “Real” (n = 12) and “Sham” (n = 12) Fm theta downregulation NFT groups. Event-related de−/synchronization (ERD/S) of Fm theta during the NFT intervention, as well as pre−/post-NFT setting anticipation task performance and corresponding Fm theta ERD/S were analyzed. Additionally, resting EEG power directly before and after the experiment was examined. Incongruous with our expectations, the Real NFT group showed a tendency toward stronger event-related Fm theta synchronization compared with the Sham group during NFT. Anticipation task performance did not change significantly from before to after NFT in both groups, yet a significantly stronger event-related desynchronization of Fm theta was observed in the Real NFT group, during the post-NFT anticipation task measurement. A post-NFT rebound of Fm theta power could be responsible for this result. With our findings we provide further evidence for the existence of an apparent paradox of Fm theta downregulation, in which cognitive control mechanisms, associated with oscillatory Fm theta activity, appear to hinder explicit downregulation of Fm theta power through classical neurofeedback learning mechanisms.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.

OSF bu924

License: none: the authors keep all their rights
State: the link answers, verified on 27 September 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Size: 1 file, 0 scripts
Software Heritage: not checked
Found in: the text, “Statistical analysis”
Not found: README, license file, CITATION.cff, environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 27 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
  • 27 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
At the source: osf.io/bu924/

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • no match between paragraphs and code yet;
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at https://osf.io/bu924/.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 5 authors, 5 keywords, 69 references.

Cite

This paper

Kanatschnig, T., Berger, L. M., Schrapf, N., Tilp, M., & Kober, S. E. (2026). The theta paradox-delayed reduction of frontal midline theta following downregulation neurofeedback training. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 20, 1806951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2026.1806951

BibTeX

@article{kanatschnig2026theta,
author = {Kanatschnig, Thomas and Berger, Lisa Maria and Schrapf, Norbert and Tilp, Markus and Kober, Silvia Erika},
title = {{The theta paradox-delayed reduction of frontal midline theta following downregulation neurofeedback training}},
journal = {Frontiers in human neuroscience},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
volume = {20},
pages = {1806951},
publisher = {Frontiers Media SA},
issn = {1662-5161},
doi = {10.3389/fnhum.2026.1806951},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2026.1806951},
pmid = {42558674},
pmcid = {PMC13438158}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Kanatschnig, Thomas
AU - Berger, Lisa Maria
AU - Schrapf, Norbert
AU - Tilp, Markus
AU - Kober, Silvia Erika
TI - The theta paradox-delayed reduction of frontal midline theta following downregulation neurofeedback training
T2 - Frontiers in human neuroscience
J2 - Front Hum Neurosci
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/22
VL - 20
SP - 1806951
SN - 1662-5161
PB - Frontiers Media SA
DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2026.1806951
UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2026.1806951
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.3389/fnhum.2026.1806951",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "The theta paradox-delayed reduction of frontal midline theta following downregulation neurofeedback training",
"container-title": "Frontiers in human neuroscience",
"author": [
{
"family": "Kanatschnig",
"given": "Thomas"
},
{
"family": "Berger",
"given": "Lisa Maria"
},
{
"family": "Schrapf",
"given": "Norbert"
},
{
"family": "Tilp",
"given": "Markus"
},
{
"family": "Kober",
"given": "Silvia Erika"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Front Hum Neurosci",
"volume": "20",
"page": "1806951",
"DOI": "10.3389/fnhum.2026.1806951",
"PMID": "42558674",
"PMCID": "PMC13438158",
"ISSN": "1662-5161",
"publisher": "Frontiers Media SA",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2026.1806951",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
7,
22
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1258 [code]
Non-specific increase in alpha power during a neurofeedback session targeting its downregulation.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: EEG, 6 references
[2] doi:10.3758/s13415-026-01434-0
Neural mechanisms of negative emotionality and cognitive control: The role of frontal midline theta.
Journal: Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience
In common: EEG, cognitive, 5 references
[3] doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.122115 [code]
Midfrontal theta power relates to response speeding following frustrative nonreward.
Journal: NeuroImage
In common: EEG, cognitive, 5 references
[4] doi:10.1111/ejn.70681
Bidirectional EEG Neurofeedback of Sensorimotor Beta Oscillations Reveals Asymmetric Modulation and Strategy-Dependent Learning.
Journal: The European journal of neuroscience
In common: EEG, 4 references
[5] doi:10.3389/fnins.2026.1907378 [code]
Explainable machine-learning integration of pre-task and preparatory EEG: revealing complementary predictive information for expert action reliability.
Journal: Frontiers in neuroscience
In common: EEG, 4 references
[6] doi:10.1007/s12671-026-02850-6 [code]
Meditation-Specific Neural Predictors of State Mindfulness During Eyes Open Meditation.
Journal: Mindfulness
In common: EEG, 5 references
[7] doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1746761 [code]
<i>From concept to proof:</i> developing a neurofeedback-fNIRS protocol to train self-regulation for music performance anxiety in adolescent musicians.
Journal: Frontiers in psychology
In common: 3 references
[8] doi:10.1002/advs.77165
Perceived Time Shapes Physical Fatigue Accumulation and Its Neural Oscillatory Correlates.
Journal: Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)
In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references
[9] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0348608
A novel approach for the EEG-driven assessment of divided attention through mutual information theory: A case study at the wheel.
Journal: PloS one
In common: EEG, 3 references
[10] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1336 [code]
Brain network dynamics in the wake-sleep transition reorganize according to task engagement.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.