Contextual Modulation of Semantic Coherence in vmPFC Patients' Mental Constructions.

Overview

1. Dipartimento di Psicologia ‘Renzo Canestrari’, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
2. Centro di Studi e Ricerche in Neuroscienze Cognitive, University of Bologna, Cesena Campus, 47521 Cesena, Italy; (M.R.); (F.D.P.); (E.G.); (M.G.)

Abstract

Previous evidence has identified the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) as crucial for implementing high-level semantic memory structures (schemas) during event construction. If this is the case, one would expect reduced semantic coherence in events mentally constructed by vmPFC patients compared to healthy and brain-damaged controls. We tested this prediction by having participants mentally construct events using objects as cues and reanalyzing a published dataset using sentences as cues. In both cases, we measured the semantic coherence of patients’ mental constructions and their semantic coherence with the cue, using transformer-based sentence embeddings (S-BERT), and further corroborated the findings with E5 Multilingual and E5 Italian embedding models. Our results reveal that the hypothesized impairment in semantic coherence following vmPFC damage is, in fact, task-dependent. With minimal (object) cues, vmPFC patients’ reports exhibited reduced local coherence, increased connectedness to the cues, and reduced lexical diversity. In contrast, with extended (sentence) cues, they showed preserved- or even enhanced-local and global coherence. We suggest that vmPFC integrity is necessary to trigger schema activation under minimal cue conditions. Although extended cues may facilitate schema activation, schemas are degraded and essentialized following vmPFC damage, thereby constraining patients’ mental constructions within a narrower—hence overly coherent—semantic space.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

• osf:trk9g, at OSF; found in “Data Availability Statement”

Data Availability Statement

All data (except for raw transcripts, for privacy concerns), are available in a publicly accessible repository at the link: https://osf.io/trk9g/overview?view_only=5d2c90061c474a61be8210ca9145fd91 (accessed on 24 December 2025).

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 29 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 6 authors, 3 keywords, 1 funder, 51 references.

Cite

This paper

Stendardi, D., Reale, M., Dalle Piagge, F., Garavini, E., Grasselli, M., & Ciaramelli, E. (2026). Contextual Modulation of Semantic Coherence in vmPFC Patients' Mental Constructions. Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 28(5), 488. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28050488

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71428-6 [code]

Binding items to contexts through conjunctive neural representations with the method of loci.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: 4 references

[2] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75843-7 [code]

Compressive learning scaffolds higher-order network structure to enhance human knowledge acquisition.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: 3 references

[3] doi:10.1016/j.cub.2026.05.068 [code]

An abstract relational map emerges in the human medial prefrontal cortex with consolidation.

Journal: Current biology : CB

In common: 3 references

[4] doi:10.1038/s44271-026-00481-0 [code]

Natural language processing captures memory content associated with shared neural patterns at encoding and retrieval.

Journal: Communications psychology

In common: 3 references

[5] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-77318-1 [code]

Offline generative network reconfiguration guides insight-like accelerated learning by assimilation into schema in rats.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: 2 references

[6] doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2026.101791 [code]

Age-related differences in hippocampal network engagement during safety processing in adolescents.

Journal: Developmental cognitive neuroscience

In common: 1 reference

[7] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-74743-0 [code]

Meta-analytic evidence for distinct neural correlates of conditioned versus verbally induced placebo analgesia.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: 1 reference

[8] doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10691-5 [code]

Mapping the neuronal building blocks of human language with language models.

Journal: Nature

In common: 1 reference

[9] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10262-4 [code]

Brain-wide information flow dynamics during novel visual processing in humans.

Journal: Communications biology

In common: 1 reference

[10] doi:10.1073/pnas.2530482123 [code]

The detection of episodic memory in others biases social choice.

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

In common: 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.