The Emotional Experience of Time: Effects of Anxiety and Interoceptive Ability on Temporal Perception.

Overview

1. Department of Psychology University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria
2. Department of General Psychology University of Padua Padua Italy
3. Department of Education, Psychology and Communication Sciences University of Bari Bari Italy
4. Division of Science New York University Abu Dhabi Abu Dhabi UAE
5. Center for Brain & Health New York University Abu Dhabi Abu Dhabi UAE

Abstract

Our experience of time is deeply shaped by emotional and bodily states. Anxiety is known to distort our temporal perception, yet the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we tested whether interoception links anxiety to variability in timing. Thirty participants underwent fMRI while performing a temporal reproduction task within a modified Threat of Scream paradigm. Safe and Threat blocks alternated, with aversive screams unpredictably delivered during Threat blocks. Screams reliably increased subjective anxiety and engaged salience and limbic regions, including the amygdala, hippocampus, and insula. Despite these affective and neural responses, Threat did not produce systematic changes in temporal accuracy. Instead, individuals with higher interoceptive accuracy tended to preserve reproduction accuracy under elevated anxiety, implicating an interoceptive contribution to anxiety‐related variability in timing. At the neural level, reproduction compared with the encoding phase increased activity in sensorimotor and parietal regions, with engagement of the insula, cingulate, and striato‐thalamic regions in the Safe context. Under Threat, the same contrast encompassed a more circumscribed set of sensorimotor and parietal regions, and screams robustly recruited a salience–limbic–temporal network relative to both non‐emotional tones. Together, these findings suggest that individual differences in interoceptive accuracy may moderate the relationship between anxiety and temporal reproduction, and characterize the neural response to threat during a timing task.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data and to no code of its authors: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

• osf:8u9pt, at OSF; found in “Data Availability Statement”

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in EmoTime at https://osf.io/8u9pt/overview.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 1 October 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 5 authors, 4 keywords, 13 MeSH terms, 1 funder, 86 references.

Cite

This paper

Lapomarda, G., Fracasso, A., Morawetz, C., Grecucci, A., & Melcher, D. (2026). The Emotional Experience of Time: Effects of Anxiety and Interoceptive Ability on Temporal Perception. Human brain mapping, 47(14), e70650. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.70650

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf496 [code]

Subjective time perception in dementia: a behavioural and neuroanatomical analysis.

Journal: Brain communications

In common: cognitive, 7 references

[2] doi:10.1523/eneuro.0088-23.2023 [code]

Interoceptive Awareness of the Breath Preserves Attention and Language Networks amidst Widespread Cortical Deactivation: A Within-Participant Neuroimaging Study.

Journal: eNeuro

In common: cognitive, 8 references

[3] doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2023.100173

Perceiving visual negative stimuli in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: Meta-analytic evidence of a common altered thalamic-parahippocampal-basal ganglia circuit.

Journal: Neuroimage. Reports

In common: 2 authors

[4] doi:10.3390/brainsci14060579

The Utility of Heartrate and Heartrate Variability Biofeedback for the Improvement of Interoception across Behavioural, Physiological and Neural Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review.

Journal: Brain sciences

In common: 6 references

[5] doi:10.3390/brainsci13101396 [code]

Within-Person Modulation of Neural Networks following Interoceptive Awareness Training through Mindful Awareness in Body-Oriented Therapy (MABT): A Pilot Study.

Journal: Brain sciences

In common: 7 references

[6] doi:10.1038/s41598-022-26070-9

Temporal judgments of actions following unilateral brain damage.

Journal: Scientific reports

In common: cognitive, 5 references

[7] doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45433-6 [code]

A neural signature for the subjective experience of threat anticipation under uncertainty.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: cognitive, 5 references

[8] doi:10.1186/s12915-024-01911-3 [code]

Modality-specific effects of threat on self-motion perception.

Journal: BMC biology

In common: cognitive, other condition, 4 references

[9] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003704

Neuronal populations across the cortex underlie discrete, categorical, and subjective representations of visual durations.

Journal: PLoS biology

In common: 6 references

[10] doi:10.1111/ejn.16045 [code]

A machine learning approach towards the differentiation between interoceptive and exteroceptive attention.

Journal: The European journal of neuroscience

In common: cognitive, 6 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: code errors and mismatches between the code and the paper about this paper and its code, from readers and its authors, beside the paper and its tracing map.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code and did not get the paper's result, what they ran, with which environment, commit and data.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.