The Strength of Target Representations Drives Mnemonic Discrimination: Evidence From Extended Delay and Hippocampal Damage.
Overview
- MindCORE, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
- Department of Psychology University of Wisconsin Milwaukee Milwaukee Wisconsin USA
- Department of Psychology University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA
- St. Luke's Rehabilitation Hospital Boise Idaho USA
- Department of Psychology & Neuroscience Center Brigham Young University Provo Utah USA
Abstract
Mnemonic discrimination is critical for episodic memory and is dependent on the computational process of pattern separation, which allows the memory system to disambiguate prior memories from potentially overlapping new memories and avoid interference. Prior work with tasks such as the Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST) has demonstrated that discrimination performance is disproportionately affected by hippocampal insult. Further studies have demonstrated that the quality of initial encoding may affect subsequent discrimination performance. Taken together, these results imply that the strength of target memory representations determines discrimination performance in the MST. Here, we manipulated target memory strength by examining MST performance at delays ranging from a few minutes to seven days in three experiments with healthy young adults and a patient with hippocampal damage. Consistent with prior forgetting literature, both target recognition and lure discrimination declined with delay in controls. In the immediate delay condition, the similarity of lures to targets drove discrimination performance, with more similar lures eliciting false alarms and less similar lures eliciting correct rejections, as reflected in the lure discrimination index (LDI). This graded relationship was attenuated or absent at delays longer than one day. However, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses revealed preserved discrimination across delays and target‐lure similarity levels. Similarly, the hippocampal patient was impaired relative to controls when considering LDI, but ROC‐based analysis revealed intact lure discrimination for the lowest‐similarity lures at immediate delays. Finally, we observed an inversion of the typical confidence‐accuracy relationship for lure trials at longer delays, with low‐confidence responses more likely to be correct for high‐similarity lures. Together these findings demonstrate that both the strength of target representations and the degree of lure similarity interact to drive discrimination performance.
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Code
No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.
OSF sw69d
Availability: 3 checks, the latest on 13 November 2026: unreachable at the last attempt (HTTP 401)
- 13 November 2026: unreachable at the last attempt (HTTP 401)
- 12 November 2026: unreachable at the last attempt (HTTP 401)
- 1 November 2026: unreachable at the last attempt (HTTP 401)
Tracing map
Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.
What the map holds:
- 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
- 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
- no match between paragraphs and code yet;
- neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.
Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.
Data
No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in OSF at https://
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 1, 1 November 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 6 authors, 3 keywords, 11 MeSH terms, 48 references.
Cite
This paper
Kirwan, C. B., Chipman, S. P., Hollearn, M. K., Inman, C. S., Shields, M. S., & Cobia, D. (2026). The Strength of Target Representations Drives Mnemonic Discrimination: Evidence From Extended Delay and Hippocampal Damage. Hippocampus, 36(6), e70141. https://
BibTeX
@article{kirwan2026stren
author = {Kirwan, C. Brock and Chipman, Samuel P. and Hollearn, Martina K. and Inman, Cory S. and Shields, Michaela S. and Cobia, Derin},
title = {{The Strength of Target Representations Drives Mnemonic Discrimination: Evidence From Extended Delay and Hippocampal Damage}},
journal = {Hippocampus},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
volume = {36},
number = {6},
pages = {e70141},
publisher = {Wiley},
issn = {1050-9631},
doi = {10.1002/
url = {https://
pmid = {42897927},
pmcid = {PMC13680973}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Kirwan, C. Brock
AU - Chipman, Samuel P.
AU - Hollearn, Martina K.
AU - Inman, Cory S.
AU - Shields, Michaela S.
AU - Cobia, Derin
TI - The Strength of Target Representations Drives Mnemonic Discrimination: Evidence From Extended Delay and Hippocampal Damage
T2 - Hippocampus
J2 - Hippocampus
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 36
IS - 6
SP - e70141
SN - 1050-9631
PB - Wiley
DO - 10.1002/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.1002/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "The Strength of Target Representations Drives Mnemonic Discrimination: Evidence From Extended Delay and Hippocampal Damage",
"container-title": "Hippocampus",
"author": [
{
"family": "Kirwan",
"given": "C. Brock"
},
{
"family": "Chipman",
"given": "Samuel P."
},
{
"family": "Hollearn",
"given": "Martina K."
},
{
"family": "Inman",
"given": "Cory S."
},
{
"family": "Shields",
"given": "Michaela S."
},
{
"family": "Cobia",
"given": "Derin"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "36",
"issue": "6",
"page": "e70141",
"DOI": "10.1002/
"PMID": "42897927",
"PMCID": "PMC13680973",
"ISSN": "1050-9631",
"publisher": "Wiley",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
11,
1
]
]
}
}
The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.1002/hipo.70137 [code]
- Temporal Interference Modulates Medial Temporal and Frontoparietal Activity During Mnemonic Discrimination: A High-Resolution Whole-Brain fMRI Investigation.Journal: HippocampusIn common: 17 references
- [2] doi:10.1073/pnas.2603114123 [code]
- The human hippocampus can pattern separate memories by meaning.Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaIn common: 15 references
- [3] doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1080366 [code]
- Optimizing the mnemonic similarity task for efficient, widespread use.Journal: Frontiers in behavioral neuroscienceIn common: behavior only, 14 references
- [4] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1088 [code]
- fMRI signals of pattern separation in the neocortex and hippocampus to non-meaningful objects and their spatial location.Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)In common: 12 references
- [5] doi:10.1162/imag_a_00404 [code]
- Pattern separation involves regions beyond the hippocampus in non-demented elderly individuals: A 7T object lure task fMRI study.Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)In common: 12 references
- [6] doi:10.1038/s41598-024-68380-0 [code]
- Discrimination of semantically similar verbal memory traces is affected in healthy aging.Journal: Scientific reportsIn common: 9 references
- [7] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0322652 [code]
- Menstrual cycle and perceived stress predict performance on the mnemonic similarity task.Journal: PloS oneIn common: 9 references
- [8] doi:10.1002/alz.14163 [code]
- Cognitive modeling of the Mnemonic Similarity Task as a digital biomarker for Alzheimer's disease.Journal: Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's AssociationIn common: 8 references
- [9] doi:10.1038/s41598-024-82292-z
- Age-related differences in the relationship between confidence and false memory in a mnemonic discrimination task.Journal: Scientific reportsIn common: 8 references
- [10] doi:10.1038/s42003-025-09408-7
- Hippocampal-prefrontal connectivity relates to inter-individual differences and training gains in distinguishing similar memories.Journal: Communications biologyIn common: 8 references
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Validate its tracing map
You validate the map as this page shows it: 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit and with its license, 0 scripts, and 0 matches between paragraphs and code (see the Code and Map sections). It then receives a DOI on Zenodo, with you (your ORCID iD) and OSCR as its creators; the code itself is not deposited.
The map's fingerprint: sha256:3e279be824afca27…
Add the badge to the code's README
If you are an author or a maintainer of this paper's code, you can add this badge. It says what OSCR knows of the paper (its code, its validated tracing map) and links the code to this page. Paste one of these snippets under the README's title. Keep the two marks around it, so that the badge can be replaced in place and is never added twice. OSCR changes nothing in your repository.
Markdown
<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
[](https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1002/hipo.70141)
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->reStructuredText
.. oscr-badge:start
.. image:: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1002/hipo.70141.svg
:target: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1002/hipo.70141
:alt: OSCR
.. oscr-badge:endHTML
<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
<a href="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1002/hipo.70141"><img src="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1002/hipo.70141.svg" alt="OSCR"></a>
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->If you choose to, you can have the badge kept up to date for you, with oscr badge --write from the command line or with the GitHub Action in your repository's workflows. Every other form and option (a card, AsciiDoc, LaTeX, shields.io) is on the badge page.
Request its removal
To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: code errors and mismatches between the code and the paper about this paper and its code, from readers and its authors, beside the paper and its tracing map.
Report a mismatch between the code and the paper · Report a code error (signed in)
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code and did not get the paper's result, what they ran, with which environment, commit and data.
Report a reproduction failure (signed in)
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.