MEG Neural Decoding Pipeline: The Issues Residing Within The Data and Methods to Improve Your Decoding Accuracy.
Overview
- Waseda Research Institute for Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
- Center for Brain Science, RIKEN Institute, Saitama, Japan
- Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
- Faculty of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
- Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Tokyo, Japan
- Sumimec Engineering, Niihama, Japan
- Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Yokosuka, Kanagawa Japan
- Department of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Denki University, Saitama, Japan
Abstract
This study suggests a new analysis pipeline of MEG data, uniquely designed for neural decoding of small-sized datasets. It combines classic methods that assume stationarity of the data together with non-stationary methods to compensate for the distortions created by the classic approach. Popular Fourier-based methods are applied in a classic fashion, followed by additional filters using empirical mode decomposition and principal component analysis to further clean the data. An automated approach for epoch rejection is proposed as well. In this work, we propose a novel approach for data augmentation. Unlike most other solutions, combinations’ averaging technique can be used on real data rather than synthetic one, making it more reliable from the neuroscientific point of view. It is also shown that this approach does not create any unnatural patterns within the augmented data. The proposed approach allows for application of machine learning algorithms on small-sized datasets. This broadens the list of available analyses for datasets with limited number of recorded examples. An image naming task was used for in-subject neural decoding estimations. In this work, we propose and compare four different machine learning designs. It is shown that a careful selection of the used channels, reduction of the feature dimensions, and averaging of the recorded epochs may significantly increase the accuracy of neural decoding.
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Code
The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.
Tracing map
A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.
Data
Datasets cited
- zenodo:15789568 — at Zenodo; found in DataCite
- zenodo:15789569 — at Zenodo; found in DataCite
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 1, 29 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 9 authors, 9 keywords, 5 MeSH terms, 1 funder, 32 references.
Cite
This paper
Patashov, D., Liu, L., Tominaga, J., Nakajima, K., Miyanaga, H., Tsunematsu, S., Kato, T., Tanaka, K., & Sakai, H. (2026). MEG Neural Decoding Pipeline: The Issues Residing Within The Data and Methods to Improve Your Decoding Accuracy. Annals of biomedical engineering, 54(8), 2450-2468. https://
BibTeX
@article{patashov2026meg
author = {Patashov, Dmitry and Liu, Li and Tominaga, Jion and Nakajima, Kai and Miyanaga, Hiroki and Tsunematsu, Shoji and Kato, Takanori and Tanaka, Keita and Sakai, Hiromu},
title = {{MEG Neural Decoding Pipeline: The Issues Residing Within The Data and Methods to Improve Your Decoding Accuracy}},
journal = {Annals of biomedical engineering},
year = {2026},
month = apr,
volume = {54},
number = {8},
pages = {2450--2468},
publisher = {Springer Science+Business Media},
issn = {0090-6964},
doi = {10.1007/
url = {https://
pmid = {41954685},
pmcid = {PMC13391774}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Patashov, Dmitry
AU - Liu, Li
AU - Tominaga, Jion
AU - Nakajima, Kai
AU - Miyanaga, Hiroki
AU - Tsunematsu, Shoji
AU - Kato, Takanori
AU - Tanaka, Keita
AU - Sakai, Hiromu
TI - MEG Neural Decoding Pipeline: The Issues Residing Within The Data and Methods to Improve Your Decoding Accuracy
T2 - Annals of biomedical engineering
J2 - Ann Biomed Eng
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 54
IS - 8
SP - 2450
EP - 2468
SN - 0090-6964
PB - Springer Science+Business Media
DO - 10.1007/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.1007/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "MEG Neural Decoding Pipeline: The Issues Residing Within The Data and Methods to Improve Your Decoding Accuracy",
"container-title": "Annals of biomedical engineering",
"author": [
{
"family": "Patashov",
"given": "Dmitry"
},
{
"family": "Liu",
"given": "Li"
},
{
"family": "Tominaga",
"given": "Jion"
},
{
"family": "Nakajima",
"given": "Kai"
},
{
"family": "Miyanaga",
"given": "Hiroki"
},
{
"family": "Tsunematsu",
"given": "Shoji"
},
{
"family": "Kato",
"given": "Takanori"
},
{
"family": "Tanaka",
"given": "Keita"
},
{
"family": "Sakai",
"given": "Hiromu"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "54",
"issue": "8",
"page": "2450-2468",
"DOI": "10.1007/
"PMID": "41954685",
"PMCID": "PMC13391774",
"ISSN": "0090-6964",
"publisher": "Springer Science+Business Media",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
4,
9
]
]
}
}
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.1002/hbm.70368 [code]
- The Mismatch Negativity Compared: EEG, SQUID‐MEG, and Novel 4 Helium‐OPMsJournal: —In common: MEG, 4 references
- [2] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1040 [code]
- Novel 4 He-OPMs support waveform-specific beta burst analysis comparable to SQUID-MEGJournal: —In common: MEG, 3 references
- [3] doi:10.7554/elife.108023 [code]
- Challenges in replay detection by TDLM in post-encoding resting state.Journal: eLifeIn common: MEG, 3 references
- [4] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1301 [code]
- MEG-GPT: A transformer-based foundation model for magnetoencephalography data.Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)In common: MEG, methods / tools, 2 references
- [5] doi:10.1038/s41597-025-06397-4 [code]
- MEG-SCANS - A comprehensive magnetoencephalography speech dataset with Stories, Chirps and Noisy SentencesJournal: —In common: MEG, methods / tools, 2 references
- [6] doi:10.1038/s41597-025-05174-7 [code]
- A large-scale MEG and EEG dataset for object recognition in naturalistic scenesJournal: —In common: MEG, methods / tools, 2 references
- [7] doi:10.1038/s42003-025-09444-3 [code]
- Decoupling of neurophysiological activity from structure mirrors global microarchitectural and neuromodulatory trends.Journal: Communications biologyIn common: MEG, 2 references
- [8] doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2026.100378 [code]
- From head to toe: Efficient somatosensory mapping with fast stimulation and multivariate pattern analysis.Journal: Neuroimage. ReportsIn common: 3 references
- [9] doi:10.1167/jov.26.8.4 [code]
- The neural processes of illusory occlusion in object recognition.Journal: Journal of visionIn common: 3 references
- [10] doi:10.1093/cercor/bhag075 [code]
- Cortical dynamics of icon perception: effects of concreteness and attractiveness.Journal: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)In common: MEG, 2 references
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Request its removal
To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
