OSCR

Reliability of magnetoencephalography beta desynchronization for language lateralization in a subsequent memory effect paradigm.

Overview

Authors: Emilie Müller1, Paulina Riegler Vergara1, Nadia Müller-Voggel1, Martin Kaltenhäuser1, Arnd Doerfler2, Hajo Hamer3,4, Daniel Delev1, Oliver Schnell1, Stefan Rampp1,2,5
  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
  2. Department of Neuroradiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
  3. Department of Neurology, Epilepsy Center, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
  4. Full Member of ERN EpiCARE, Germany
  5. Department of Neurosurgery University Hospital Halle (Saale), Germany
Journal: Clinical neurophysiology practice, volume 11, pages 472-482
Dates: received 20 January 2026; accepted 8 June 2026; published online 12 June 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1016/j.cnp.2026.06.005 · PMID 42389228 · PMCID PMC13320422 · OpenAlex W7164550568
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code on request
Categories: MEG (modality), human (organism)
Methods: Statistics, Preprocessing, Spectral & time-frequency, Source localization, fMRI & imaging, Physiology & signal measures
Keywords: Language lateralization, MEG, SME, Surgery
Topic: Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Funding: Universitätsklinikum Erlangen; Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 52 references in the paper

Abstract

Objective: Verb generation is associated with significant lateralized beta desynchronization in language but also motor related areas. Subsequent Memory Effect (SME) paradigms comprise receptive language and memory tasks. The current study examined whether lateralized beta patterns in language and/or motor related areas can be obtained with the receptive SME paradigm.

Methods: MEG was recorded in 20 healthy right-handed adults during encoding and recognition phases of a word SME task. Measurements were repeated after 7–10 days to assess reliability. Post-stimulus beta (13–35 Hz) decrease was analyzed, and lateralization indices (LI > 0.1 indicating left dominance) were evaluated. Regions of interest (ROI) included IFG pars opercularis and triangularis (IFGO, IFGT), supramarginal gyrus, angular gyrus, superior temporal gyrus, and precentral gyrus (PreCG). An exploratory analysis included additional AAL regions.

Results: Significant beta desynchronization within the ROIs was observed in 65–90% of participants. Lateralization was successful in up to 79% in the IFGT during encoding, 76% during recognition and 100% in the IFGO in encoding-recognition concordant cases. Exploratory analyses showed strong left lateralization in frontal, temporal and especially parietal areas. Initial reliability was limited, yet within-session concordance showed robust dominance with up to 100% concordance. Significant lateralized beta desynchronization was observed in the PreCG in 70–90% of participants.

Conclusion: The SME paradigm shows promise in healthy participants, warranting investigation in patients with atypical language organization.

Significance: Language related beta desynchronization is also observed in a receptive SME-task. Lateralized beta desynchronization in motor areas however suggest their contribution in verbal working memory and semantic control.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper says that its authors' code is available on request: it was not published with the paper, so there is nothing to verify.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none (its code is available on request), so it has no map.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data and code availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the requirement for a formal data sharing agreement but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 9 authors, 4 keywords, 2 funders, 49 references.

Cite

This paper

Müller, E., Vergara, P. R., Müller-Voggel, N., Kaltenhäuser, M., Doerfler, A., Hamer, H., Delev, D., Schnell, O., & Rampp, S. (2026). Reliability of magnetoencephalography beta desynchronization for language lateralization in a subsequent memory effect paradigm. Clinical neurophysiology practice, 11, 472-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2026.06.005

BibTeX

@article{muller2026reliability,
author = {Müller, Emilie and Vergara, Paulina Riegler and Müller-Voggel, Nadia and Kaltenhäuser, Martin and Doerfler, Arnd and Hamer, Hajo and Delev, Daniel and Schnell, Oliver and Rampp, Stefan},
title = {{Reliability of magnetoencephalography beta desynchronization for language lateralization in a subsequent memory effect paradigm}},
journal = {Clinical neurophysiology practice},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
volume = {11},
pages = {472--482},
publisher = {Elsevier},
issn = {2467-981X},
doi = {10.1016/j.cnp.2026.06.005},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2026.06.005},
pmid = {42389228},
pmcid = {PMC13320422}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Müller, Emilie
AU - Vergara, Paulina Riegler
AU - Müller-Voggel, Nadia
AU - Kaltenhäuser, Martin
AU - Doerfler, Arnd
AU - Hamer, Hajo
AU - Delev, Daniel
AU - Schnell, Oliver
AU - Rampp, Stefan
TI - Reliability of magnetoencephalography beta desynchronization for language lateralization in a subsequent memory effect paradigm
T2 - Clinical neurophysiology practice
J2 - Clin Neurophysiol Pract
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/12
VL - 11
SP - 472
EP - 482
SN - 2467-981X
PB - Elsevier
DO - 10.1016/j.cnp.2026.06.005
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2026.06.005
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1016/j.cnp.2026.06.005",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Reliability of magnetoencephalography beta desynchronization for language lateralization in a subsequent memory effect paradigm",
"container-title": "Clinical neurophysiology practice",
"author": [
{
"family": "Müller",
"given": "Emilie"
},
{
"family": "Vergara",
"given": "Paulina Riegler"
},
{
"family": "Müller-Voggel",
"given": "Nadia"
},
{
"family": "Kaltenhäuser",
"given": "Martin"
},
{
"family": "Doerfler",
"given": "Arnd"
},
{
"family": "Hamer",
"given": "Hajo"
},
{
"family": "Delev",
"given": "Daniel"
},
{
"family": "Schnell",
"given": "Oliver"
},
{
"family": "Rampp",
"given": "Stefan"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Clin Neurophysiol Pract",
"volume": "11",
"page": "472-482",
"DOI": "10.1016/j.cnp.2026.06.005",
"PMID": "42389228",
"PMCID": "PMC13320422",
"ISSN": "2467-981X",
"publisher": "Elsevier",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2026.06.005",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
6,
12
]
]
}
}

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.122051 [code]
Determining hemispheric language dominance from MEG beta-power modulations: Concordance with fMRI.
Journal: NeuroImage
In common: MEG, 10 references
[2] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71918-7 [code]
Developmental disinhibition gates language lateralization in childhood.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: 4 references
[3] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1305
Can you <i>feel</i> what I am saying? Speech-based vibrotactile stimulation enhances the cortical tracking of attended speech in a multi-talker background.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: MEG, 3 references
[4] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1218 [code]
Reliability and signal comparison of OPM-MEG, fMRI & iEEG in a repeated movie viewing paradigm.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: MEG, 3 references
[5] doi:10.1111/psyp.70341 [code]
The Brain Signature of Reward Processing During Cooperative Gaming.
Journal: Psychophysiology
In common: 3 references
[6] doi:10.1002/hbm.70624 [code]
Exploring the Sensitivity Limits of Neuronal Current Imaging With MRI and MEG in the Human Brain.
Journal: Human brain mapping
In common: MEG, 2 references
[7] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.116586 [code]
Condition-specific neural signatures of reactivation during post-retrieval rest: An EEG study.
Journal: iScience
In common: 3 references
[8] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75745-8 [code]
A language network in the individualized functional connectomes of 1199 human brains doing arbitrary tasks.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: 2 references
[9] doi:10.3389/fncom.2026.1816522 [code]
MEG state dynamics of sentence generation: evidence for a compensatory segmentation mechanism in healthy aging.
Journal: Frontiers in computational neuroscience
In common: MEG, 2 references
[10] doi:10.1002/hbm.70368 [code]
The Mismatch Negativity Compared: EEG, SQUID‐MEG, and Novel 4 Helium‐OPMs
Journal: n/a
In common: MEG, 2 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.