Can you <i>feel</i> what I am saying? Speech-based vibrotactile stimulation enhances the cortical tracking of attended speech in a multi-talker background.

Overview

1. Laboratoire de Neuroanatomie et Neuroimagerie translationnelles (LN2T), UNI – ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
2. Laboratory of Functional Anatomy, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
3. WEL Research Institute, Wavre, Belgium
4. Department of Translational Neuroimaging, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B.), Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
5. Aalto Neuroimaging, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
6. ULBabylab, Center for Research in Cognition and Neurosciences (CRCN), UNI – ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium

Abstract

In environments with multiple talkers, humans can ‘tune in’ to a speaker of interest while ignoring competing voices. In such conditions, however, auditory cortices track the attended speech envelope rhythms (cortical tracking of speech, CTS) less accurately than in quiet, hindering intelligibility. Visual speech cues (e.g., lip movements) can enhance this CTS, but it remains unclear whether other non-auditory sensory cues, such as tactile input, provide comparable benefits through similar neural mechanisms. Here, using magnetoencephalography, we quantified CTS as the coherence between the speech temporal envelope of the attended speaker and brain responses in supratemporal auditory areas at syllabic (4–8 Hz), word (1–4 Hz) and phrasal/sentential (<1 Hz) frequencies. Participants listened to connected speech presented alone, together with synchronous or asynchronous speech-based vibrations, or with the corresponding speaker video, in both quiet and a multi-talker background. We hypothesized that, in the presence of competing background speakers, speech-based vibrotactile stimulation improves comprehension by enhancing CTS of the attended speaker and modulating auditory-seeded functional brain connectivity with extra-auditory neocortical brain areas. Results revealed that synchronous vibrotactile stimulation improved comprehension in the multi-talker background and increased syllabic CTS at the right auditory cortex, with this CTS increase magnitude correlating with comprehension performance. Audio-tactile CTS enhancement was accompanied by stronger beta-band auditory cortex connectivity with ipsilateral angular and ventral inferior temporal gyri, alongside reduced alpha-band coupling with the precuneus. These findings suggest that vibrotactile input can support speech-in-noise processing by impacting both local auditory cortical activity and auditory-seeded long-range functional connectivity.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper says that its authors' code is available on request: it was not published with the paper, so there is nothing to verify.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none (its code is available on request), so it has no map.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data and Code Availability

Data and code supporting the current results will be provided upon reasonable request to the corresponding author and after the approval of the institutional authorities (Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles and Université libre de Bruxelles).

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 6 authors, 6 keywords, 3 funders, 122 references, 2 RRIDs.

Cite

This paper

Răutu, I. S., Bourguignon, M., Wens, V., Jousmäki, V., Bertels, J., & De Tiège, X. (2026). Can you &lt;i&gt;feel&lt;/i&gt; what I am saying? Speech-based vibrotactile stimulation enhances the cortical tracking of attended speech in a multi-talker background. Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 4, IMAG.a.1305. https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1305

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1111/ejn.70598 [code]

Enhanced Time-Locked Decoding for Spoken Words but Not Environmental Sounds in Natural-Like Auditory Conditions.

Journal: The European journal of neuroscience

In common: MEG, cognitive, 12 references

[2] doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcag261 [code]

Cortical speech envelope tracking reflects lesion-symptom profiles in post-stroke aphasia.

Journal: Brain communications

In common: cognitive, 10 references

[3] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-57256-0 [code]

Pupil- and gaze dynamics track emotion content in naturalistic speech.

Journal: Scientific reports

In common: cognitive, 9 references

[4] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.116458 [code]

Neural tracking of prosodic and statistical rhythms jointly supports artificial language learning.

Journal: iScience

In common: cognitive, 8 references

[5] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003924

Endogenous auditory and motor brain rhythms predict individual speech tracking.

Journal: PLoS biology

In common: MEG, cognitive, 7 references

[6] doi:10.3389/fnhum.2026.1692628 [code]

The effects of vocal emotions and emotional context on the neural tracking of speech envelopes and listeners' vigilance states.

Journal: Frontiers in human neuroscience

In common: cognitive, 8 references

[7] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1329

Atypical low-frequency and high-frequency neural entrainment to rhythmic audiovisual speech in adults with dyslexia.

Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

In common: cognitive, 7 references

[8] doi:10.1038/s41597-025-06397-4 [code]

MEG-SCANS - A comprehensive magnetoencephalography speech dataset with Stories, Chirps and Noisy Sentences

Journal: —

In common: MEG, 7 references

[9] doi:10.1162/nol.a.249 [code]

How Low-Frequency Neural Activity Structures Language in Time.

Journal: Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)

In common: cognitive, 7 references

[10] doi:10.1523/eneuro.0041-26.2026 [code]

Ocular Speech Tracking Persists in Blindness, but Its Dynamics and Oculo-Cerebral Connectivity Depend on Visual Status.

Journal: eNeuro

In common: MEG, cognitive, 6 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.