Exploring the mechanisms of biofield therapy through joint electrophysiological recordings in humans and mice.
Paper
Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser, not stored by OSCR: doi.org · Europe PMC
The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.
The authors' code
MATLAB · 58 lines · 1.9 KB · no license
- % simple coherence, pairwise between all channels of 2 datasets
- function [cohSelected,freqs] = simple_coherence(EEG1, EEG2, freqBands)
- if size(EEG1.data,2) ~= size(EEG2.data,2) || size(EEG1.data,3) ~= size(EEG2.data,3)
- error('The data must be synchronous')
- end
- if ~isequal(EEG1.srate, EEG2.srate)
- error('The sampling rate must be the same')
- end
- if length(EEG1.event) ~= length(EEG2.event)
- error('The event structure must have the same number of events')
- end
- if EEG1.trials == 1
- % create data epochs of winSize (truncate the end of data)
- EEG1 = eeg_regepochs(EEG1, 1, [0 1]);
- EEG2 = eeg_regepochs(EEG2, 1, [0 1]);
- if size(EEG1.data,2) ~= size(EEG2.data,2) || size(EEG1.data,3) ~= size(EEG2.data,3)
- error('Error when extracting epochs. The two datasets should have the same number of epochs')
- end
- end
- % compute spectral decomposition
- win = hanning(EEG1.pnts);
- data1 = bsxfun(@times, EEG1.data, win');
- data2 = bsxfun(@times, EEG2.data, win');
- datafft1 = fft( data1, [], 2);
- datafft2 = fft( data2, [], 2);
- freqs = linspace(0, EEG1.srate-1, size(datafft1,2));
- datafft1(:,end/2:end,:) = [];
- datafft2(:,end/2:end,:) = [];
- freqs(end/2:end) = [];
- coh = zeros(EEG1.nbchan, EEG2.nbchan, size(datafft2,2));
- for iChan1 = 1:EEG1.nbchan
- for iChan2 = 1:EEG2.nbchan
- % coherres = sum(alltfX .* conj(alltfY) , 3) ./ sqrt( sum(abs(alltfX ).^2,3) .* sum(abs(alltfY ).^2,3) ); % from newcrossf
- coh(iChan1, iChan2, :) = sum(datafft1(iChan1,:,:).* conj(datafft2(iChan2,:,:)), 3) ./ sqrt( sum(abs(datafft1(iChan1,:,:)).^2,3) .* sum(abs(datafft2(iChan2,:,:)).^2,3) );
- end
- end
- if nargin < 3
- cohSelected = coh;
- return
- end
- % select frequencies
- cohSelected = zeros(EEG1.nbchan, EEG2.nbchan, length(freqBands));
- for iFreq = 1:length(freqBands)
- [~,minFreq] = min(abs(freqs-freqBands{iFreq}(1)));
- [~,maxFreq] = min(abs(freqs-freqBands{iFreq}(2)));
- cohSelected(:,:,iFreq) = mean( coh(:, :, minFreq:maxFreq), 3 );
- end
simple_coherence.m at commit 5166416, no license · at the source
Overview
- Institute of Noetic Sciences, Petaluma, CA, USA
- University of California, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Independent Researcher, 11160 Caunes Minervois, France
- New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
Abstract
In this case study, a self-described biofield therapy (BT) therapist and a sham therapist participated in multiple (n = 24) treatment and control (non-treatment) sessions under double-blind conditions. During the treatment phases, BT and sham therapists attempted to influence mice with cancer and control mice, alternating BT with rest phases where no such efforts were made. Both the 64-channel EEG of the human participants and the simultaneous 3-channel EEG and 1-channel EMG of the mice were recorded. For human participants and for the analysis of human and mouse EEG comodulation, the EEG experimental setup was a 2 × 2 design, contrasting mouse type (cancer vs. control) against session type (BT vs. non-treatment; N = 8 in each of the four groups). For the mice EEG, the experimental setup was a 2x2x2 design, contrasting mouse type (cancer vs. control) against session type (treatment vs. non-treatment) and human participant (BT participant vs. sham participant). Although no changes in spectral power were detected in mice, a significant increase in theta band coherence indicates that this type of biofield therapy may influence large-scale neural coordination rather than localized activity. Concurrently, robust and reproducible alterations in the therapist’s EEG across all frequency bands during treatment periods, irrespective of mouse condition, suggest a consistent physiological signature associated with the act of intentional BT. Treatment was associated with changes in EEG coherence and spectral correlation between human and mouse signals. In particular, we observed an interaction in which treatment differentially affected brain-to-brain coherence in cancer versus control mice. These findings describe condition-dependent alterations in coupled physiological measures and suggest a complex relationship between human and mouse neural activity during BT sessions, while remaining agnostic about the underlying mechanism. We also outline the study's limitations and potential for follow-up investigations, acknowledging that these exploratory physiological findings do not have any clinical implications and should not be interpreted as justification for cancer treatment or as a substitute for evidence-based medical care.
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Repositories
Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above.
OSF n2gwj
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 28 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
- 28 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
arnodelorme/simple_coherence
516641633955da30e595bb5eda02cbf1fabe7504, 23 April 2026Availability: 1 check, the latest on 28 September 2026: the link answers
- 28 September 2026: the link answers
1 file
- simple_coherence.m, MATLAB, 58 lines
The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.
Tracing map
Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.
What the map holds:
- 2 repositories of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
- 1 script, each with its path and the digest of its content;
- no match between paragraphs and code yet;
- neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.
Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.
Data
No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.
Data availability
The data was converted to the BIDS EEG format (Pernet et al., 2018) using the EEG-BIDS plugin of the EEGLAB software (Delorme and Makeig, 2004). It is large (350 Gb) and available upon request.
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 2, 28 September 2026
- Authors: added Arnaud Delorme (0000-0002-0799-3557); Lorenzo Cohen (0000-0003-4372-9208); removed Arnaud Delorme; Lorenzo Cohen
Version 1, 28 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 10 authors, 4 keywords, 1 funder, 35 references.
Cite
This paper
Delorme, A., Cusimano, A., Tran, M., Nguyen, P., Deng, D., Fields, C., Velíšek, L., Wagner, R., Yang, P., & Cohen, L. (2026). Exploring the mechanisms of biofield therapy through joint electrophysiological recordings in humans and mice. IBRO neuroscience reports, 21, 52-62. https://
BibTeX
@article{delorme2026expl
author = {Delorme, Arnaud and Cusimano, Andrew and Tran, Megan and Nguyen, Phuong and Deng, Defeng and Fields, Chris and Velíšek, Libor and Wagner, Richard and Yang, Peiying and Cohen, Lorenzo},
title = {{Exploring the mechanisms of biofield therapy through joint electrophysiological recordings in humans and mice}},
journal = {IBRO neuroscience reports},
year = {2026},
month = may,
volume = {21},
pages = {52--62},
publisher = {Elsevier},
issn = {2667-2421},
doi = {10.1016/
url = {https://
pmid = {42305856},
pmcid = {PMC13266234}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Delorme, Arnaud
AU - Cusimano, Andrew
AU - Tran, Megan
AU - Nguyen, Phuong
AU - Deng, Defeng
AU - Fields, Chris
AU - Velíšek, Libor
AU - Wagner, Richard
AU - Yang, Peiying
AU - Cohen, Lorenzo
TI - Exploring the mechanisms of biofield therapy through joint electrophysiological recordings in humans and mice
T2 - IBRO neuroscience reports
J2 - IBRO Neurosci Rep
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 21
SP - 52
EP - 62
SN - 2667-2421
PB - Elsevier
DO - 10.1016/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.1016/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Exploring the mechanisms of biofield therapy through joint electrophysiological recordings in humans and mice",
"container-title": "IBRO neuroscience reports",
"author": [
{
"family": "Delorme",
"given": "Arnaud"
},
{
"family": "Cusimano",
"given": "Andrew"
},
{
"family": "Tran",
"given": "Megan"
},
{
"family": "Nguyen",
"given": "Phuong"
},
{
"family": "Deng",
"given": "Defeng"
},
{
"family": "Fields",
"given": "Chris"
},
{
"family": "Velíšek",
"given": "Libor"
},
{
"family": "Wagner",
"given": "Richard"
},
{
"family": "Yang",
"given": "Peiying"
},
{
"family": "Cohen",
"given": "Lorenzo"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "21",
"page": "52-62",
"DOI": "10.1016/
"PMID": "42305856",
"PMCID": "PMC13266234",
"ISSN": "2667-2421",
"publisher": "Elsevier",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
5,
28
]
]
}
}
The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1201 [code]
- All spectral frequencies of neural activity reveal semantic representation in the human anterior ventral temporal cortex.Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)In common: EEGLAB, 4 references
- [2] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-56070-y [code]
- SSDLabeler: realistic semi-synthetic data generation for multi-label artifact classification in EEG.Journal: Scientific reportsIn common: EEGLAB, EEG, 2 references
- [3] doi:10.1038/s41398-026-04055-w [code]
- Diminished variability of alpha and beta band-limited power as a neural signature in schizophrenia.Journal: Translational psychiatryIn common: EEGLAB, EEG, clinical / translational, 2 references
- [4] doi:10.1007/s00221-026-07266-1
- Working memory load and search efficiency in conventional monitor-based 2D versus 3D virtual settings: analysis of response times and parietal induced alpha activity in a modified Sternberg task.Journal: Experimental brain researchIn common: EEG, 3 references
- [5] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10108-z [code]
- Time-resolved EEG decoding reveals altered neural dynamics of affective semantic evaluation in depression and suicidality.Journal: Communications biologyIn common: EEGLAB, EEG, other condition, 2 references
- [6] doi:10.3389/fneur.2026.1791834 [code]
- Minimum data requirements and automated preprocessing for reliable EEG biomarkers in Rett syndrome.Journal: Frontiers in neurologyIn common: EEGLAB, EEG, clinical / translational, other condition, 1 reference
- [7] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-73878-4 [code]
- Neural Response to Familiar Names Predicts Outcome of Comatose ICU Patients: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: EEGLAB, EEG, clinical / translational, other condition, 1 reference
- [8] doi:10.1038/s41398-026-04098-z [code]
- Neural imbalance between feedback sensitivity and motor inhibition in compulsivity and negative urgency.Journal: Translational psychiatryIn common: EEGLAB, EEG, clinical / translational, other condition, 1 reference
- [9] doi:10.1111/ejn.70521 [code]
- Multivariate Pattern Analysis Identifies Potential Intertrial Resting-State EEG Biomarkers in Fibromyalgia.Journal: The European journal of neuroscienceIn common: EEGLAB, EEG, clinical / translational, other condition, 1 reference
- [10] doi:10.1007/s00221-026-07342-6 [code]
- A portable solution for simultaneous human movement and mobile EEG acquisition: readiness potential for basketball free-throw shooting.Journal: Experimental brain researchIn common: EEGLAB, EEG, 2 references
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Validate its tracing map
You validate the map as this page shows it: 2 repositories of the authors' code, each at its verified commit and with its license, 1 script, and 0 matches between paragraphs and code (see the Code and Map sections). It then receives a DOI on Zenodo, with you (your ORCID iD) and OSCR as its creators; the code itself is not deposited.
The map's fingerprint: sha256:38c3744199ff6c8f…
Add the badge to its README
The badge links the code to this page. Copy one of these into the README of the paper's code: only you decide where it goes, and nothing is changed for you.
Markdown
[, paste the snippet at the top, then “Commit changes…” and, to review it first, “Create a new branch and start a pull request”. You open the pull request; OSCR asks for no permission.
Request its removal
To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
