Caste- and sex-specific differential investment in brain regions of Australian ants.

Overview

1. School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia

Abstract

Insect species have distinct lifestyles and behaviors, which require unique information processing requirements. Ants are unusual in that closely related individuals within a single species exhibit distinct lifestyles and locomotory strategies: workers are exclusively pedestrian and engage in foraging and colony maintenance tasks; alate males lead a life exclusively on the wing and are tasked with locating females; alate females exhibit both modes of locomotion and engage in mating, colony establishment and foraging. Here, we aim to identify within a single species the neural adaptations required for carrying out specific information processing tasks. We addressed this question by comparing volumes of functionally distinct brain regions in three castes of two Australian ants. We found that female castes had larger brains with pronounced mushroom bodies, supporting their broader behavioral repertoire and navigational tasks. Male ants had enlarged optic lobes and central complexes, highlighting the significance of vision and orientation in mate searching.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

• 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
• 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
• no match between paragraphs and code yet;
• neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data and code availability

Data reported in this paper are publicly available at https://tinyurl.com/ypbvbbh7 as of the date of publication.

Original code used in this paper is publicly available at https://tinyurl.com/ypbvbbh7 as of the date of publication.

Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 28 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 5 authors, 4 keywords, 1 funder, 57 references, 2 RRIDs.

Cite

This paper

Ellendula, S., Sheehan, Z. B., Sayre, M. E., Ponton, F., & Narendra, A. (2026). Caste- and sex-specific differential investment in brain regions of Australian ants. iScience, 29(6), 116039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.116039

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.7554/elife.107589 [code]

Distinct evolutionary trajectories of two integration centres, the central complex and mushroom bodies, across Heliconiini butterflies.

Journal: eLife

In common: other, 9 references

[2] doi:10.1126/sciadv.aeh7220 [code]

Central complex representations of self-movement are sufficient to compute wind direction in flight.

Journal: Science advances

In common: 3 references

[3] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75945-2 [code]

Neural dynamics for working memory and evidence integration during olfactory navigation in Drosophila.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: 3 references

[4] doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10827-7 [code]

A vector-based strategy for olfactory navigation in Drosophila.

Journal: Nature

In common: 3 references

[5] doi:10.1073/pnas.2514030123

When a bigger brain is better: The case of bee olfactory learning.

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

In common: other, 2 references

[6] doi:10.3389/fnsys.2026.1822122 [code]

Convergence-divergence circuits for multimodal integration of innate and learned opponent valences.

Journal: Frontiers in systems neuroscience

In common: 2 references

[7] doi:10.1073/pnas.2609141123

Odor tracking in flying <i>Drosophila</i> requires visual reafference and compass neurons.

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

In common: 2 references

[8] doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10735-w [code]

Distributed control circuits across a brain-and-cord connectome.

Journal: Nature

In common: 2 references

[9] doi:10.1002/cne.70197

Anatomical Investigation Reveals a Second Olfactory System in Locusts.

Journal: The Journal of comparative neurology

In common: other, 1 reference

[10] doi:10.1242/jeb.252086 [code]

Transcriptional predictors of rescue behaviour in ants.

Journal: The Journal of experimental biology

In common: other, 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.