OSCR

Reply to: “Model mimicry limits conclusions about neural tuning and can mistakenly imply unlikely priors”

Code ↔ Paper

The paper beside its authors' code: matches between them have not been computed for this paper yet.

Paper

Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser, not stored by OSCR: doi.org · Europe PMC

The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.

The authors' code

MATLAB · 36 lines · 811 B · no license

  1. function gabor = Gabor2D(lambda, theta, phase, stdev, imSize, elCentre)
  2. if nargin==5
  3. elCentre=round(imSize/2);
  4. end
  5. if size(imSize)==1
  6. nRows=imSize;
  7. nCols=imSize;
  8. else
  9. nRows=imSize(2);
  10. nCols=imSize(1);
  11. end
  12. if size(elCentre)==1
  13. yCentre=elCentre;
  14. xCentre=elCentre;
  15. else
  16. yCentre=elCentre(2);
  17. xCentre=elCentre(1);
  18. end
  19. if size(stdev)==1
  20. stdevY=stdev;
  21. stdevX=stdev;
  22. else
  23. stdevY=stdev(1);
  24. stdevX=stdev(2);
  25. end
  26. angle=theta*pi/180; % orientation deg to radians.
  27. phase=phase*pi/180; % phase deg to radians.
  28. sinX=sin(angle)*((2*pi)/lambda);
  29. cosY=cos(angle)*((2*pi)/lambda);
  30. [x,y]=meshgrid(1-yCentre:nRows-yCentre,1-xCentre:nCols-xCentre);
  31. gabor=exp(-(x.^2)/(2*stdevX.^2)-(y.^2)/(2*stdevY.^2)).*sin(sinX*x+cosY*y+phase);

Gabor2D.m, no license · at the source

Overview

Authors: Reuben Rideaux1,2, Paul M Bays3, William J Harrison4
  1. School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW Australia
  2. Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD Australia
  3. Department of Psychology, The University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  4. School of Health, The University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD Australia
Institutions: The University of Sydney (Australia); The University of Queensland (Australia); University of Cambridge (United Kingdom); University of the Sunshine Coast (Australia)
Journal: n/a, volume 16, issue 1, article 6229
Dates: received 20 May 2024; accepted 5 June 2025; published online 7 July 2025
Type: Letter · Language: English
License: none stated
Identifiers: DOI 10.1038/s41467-025-60860-9 · PMCID PMC12234690 · OpenAlex W4412069472
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code verified
Categories: systems (subfield)
Methods: Machine learning
Keywords: Neuroscience, Evolution
Topic: Neural dynamics and brain function (Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Funding: Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (2026318); Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (DE210100790)
Citations: cited by 5 papers (Europe PMC); 47 references in the paper

Abstract

No abstract was found for this paper: the paper, at the publisher.

Repository

Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above.

OSF 65dca

License: none: the authors keep all their rights
State: the link answers, verified on 26 September 2026
Evidence: files inventoried
Size: 1 file
Software Heritage: not checked
Found in: “Code availability”
Not found: README, license file, CITATION.cff, environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Tools: CircStat (1 file), Image Processing Toolbox (1 file)
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 26 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
  • 26 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
6 files

Code availability statement

The paper has a code availability statement. Its license (none stated) does not allow reproducing it here; in short, from what the harvester recognized in it:

Read it in the paper: doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60860-9.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 6 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • no match between paragraphs and code yet;
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

Datasets cited

Data availability statement

The paper has a data availability statement. Its license (none stated) does not allow reproducing it here; in short, from what the harvester recognized in it:

Read it in the paper: doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60860-9.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 3 authors, 2 keywords, 2 funders, 44 references.

Cite

This paper

Rideaux, R., Bays, P. M., & Harrison, W. J. (2025). Reply to: “Model mimicry limits conclusions about neural tuning and can mistakenly imply unlikely priors”. Nature Communications, 16(1), 6229. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60860-9

BibTeX

@article{rideaux2025reply,
author = {Rideaux, Reuben and Bays, Paul M and Harrison, William J},
title = {{Reply to: “Model mimicry limits conclusions about neural tuning and can mistakenly imply unlikely priors”}},
journal = {Nature Communications},
year = {2025},
volume = {16},
number = {1},
pages = {6229},
publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
issn = {2041-1723},
doi = {10.1038/s41467-025-60860-9},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60860-9},
pmcid = {PMC12234690}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Rideaux, Reuben
AU - Bays, Paul M
AU - Harrison, William J
TI - Reply to: “Model mimicry limits conclusions about neural tuning and can mistakenly imply unlikely priors”
T2 - Nature Communications
J2 - Nat Commun
PY - 2025
DA - 2025
VL - 16
IS - 1
SP - 6229
SN - 2041-1723
PB - Nature Publishing Group
DO - 10.1038/s41467-025-60860-9
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60860-9
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1038/s41467-025-60860-9",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Reply to: “Model mimicry limits conclusions about neural tuning and can mistakenly imply unlikely priors”",
"container-title": "Nature Communications",
"author": [
{
"family": "Rideaux",
"given": "Reuben"
},
{
"family": "Bays",
"given": "Paul M"
},
{
"family": "Harrison",
"given": "William J"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Nat Commun",
"volume": "16",
"issue": "1",
"page": "6229",
"DOI": "10.1038/s41467-025-60860-9",
"PMCID": "PMC12234690",
"ISSN": "2041-1723",
"publisher": "Nature Publishing Group",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60860-9",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2025
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0154-26.2026 [code]
Faster but less precise: expectation enhances response speed while reducing sensory fidelity.
Journal: The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience
In common: CircStat, Image Processing Toolbox, 9 references, author Reuben Rideaux
[2] doi:10.1093/cercor/bhag058 [code]
Visual field inhomogeneities and the architectonics of early visual cortex shape visual working memory.
Journal: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
In common: 4 references
[3] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-70124-9 [code]
Alpha frequency shapes perceptual sensitivity by modulating optimal phase likelihood.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: CircStat, Image Processing Toolbox, 1 reference
[4] doi:10.1126/sciadv.aea1037 [code]
Distinct cortical spatial representations learned along disparate visual pathways.
Journal: Science advances
In common: CircStat, Image Processing Toolbox, systems
[5] doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2001-25.2026 [code]
Dynamics of Dentate Gyrus Place Cells and Dentate Spikes during Spatial and Nonspatial Changes in Environments.
Journal: The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience
In common: CircStat, Image Processing Toolbox, systems
[6] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-76581-6 [code]
Thalamocortical bursts encode reward contingencies and drive associative learning.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: CircStat, Image Processing Toolbox, systems
[7] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75347-4 [code]
Sleep reveals dynamics integrating and segregating movement and stimulus representations in V1.
Journal: Nature communications
In common: CircStat, Image Processing Toolbox, systems
[8] doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2026.117646 [code]
Medial entorhinal-hippocampal desynchronization parallels the emergence of memory impairment in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease pathology.
Journal: Cell reports
In common: CircStat, Image Processing Toolbox, systems
[9] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003818 [code]
Human neuronal firing varies with the frequency of local field potential oscillations.
Journal: PLoS biology
In common: CircStat, Image Processing Toolbox, systems
[10] doi:10.7554/elife.100642 [code]
Disrupted hippocampal theta-gamma coupling and spike-field coherence following experimental traumatic brain injury.
Journal: eLife
In common: CircStat, Image Processing Toolbox, systems

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.