Reply to: “Model mimicry limits conclusions about neural tuning and can mistakenly imply unlikely priors”
Paper
Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser, not stored by OSCR: doi.org · Europe PMC
The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.
The authors' code
MATLAB · 36 lines · 811 B · no license
- function gabor = Gabor2D(lambda, theta, phase, stdev, imSize, elCentre)
- if nargin==5
- elCentre=round(imSize/2);
- end
- if size(imSize)==1
- nRows=imSize;
- nCols=imSize;
- else
- nRows=imSize(2);
- nCols=imSize(1);
- end
- if size(elCentre)==1
- yCentre=elCentre;
- xCentre=elCentre;
- else
- yCentre=elCentre(2);
- xCentre=elCentre(1);
- end
- if size(stdev)==1
- stdevY=stdev;
- stdevX=stdev;
- else
- stdevY=stdev(1);
- stdevX=stdev(2);
- end
- angle=theta*pi/180; % orientation deg to radians.
- phase=phase*pi/180; % phase deg to radians.
- sinX=sin(angle)*((2*pi)/lambda);
- cosY=cos(angle)*((2*pi)/lambda);
- [x,y]=meshgrid(1-yCentre:nRows-yCentre,1-xCentre:nCols-xCentre);
- gabor=exp(-(x.^2)/(2*stdevX.^2)-(y.^2)/(2*stdevY.^2)).*sin(sinX*x+cosY*y+phase);
Gabor2D.m, no license · at the source
Overview
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW Australia
- Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD Australia
- Department of Psychology, The University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- School of Health, The University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD Australia
Abstract
No abstract was found for this paper: the paper, at the publisher.
Repository
Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above.
OSF 65dca
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 26 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
- 26 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
6 files
- Gabor2D.m, MATLAB, 36 lines
- bipolarRaisedCos.m, MATLAB, 27 lines
- maxContrast.m, MATLAB, 24 lines
- polarDistFun.m, MATLAB, 21 lines
- raisedCos.m, MATLAB, 34 lines
- stimAnalysis_flexibleSFs
.m , MATLAB, 98 lines
Code availability statement
The paper has a code availability statement. Its license (none stated) does not allow reproducing it here; in short, from what the harvester recognized in it:
- it points to the authors' code: OSF 65dca
Read it in the paper: doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60860-9.
Tracing map
Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.
What the map holds:
- 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
- 6 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
- no match between paragraphs and code yet;
- neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.
Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.
Data
Datasets cited
- doi:10.5061/
dryad.m57sd , at Dryad; found in “Data availability” - osf:5ba9y, at OSF; found in “Data availability”
Data availability statement
The paper has a data availability statement. Its license (none stated) does not allow reproducing it here; in short, from what the harvester recognized in it:
- it points to 2 datasets: Dryad 10.5061/
dryad.m57sd , OSF 5ba9y
Read it in the paper: doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60860-9.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 3 authors, 2 keywords, 2 funders, 44 references.
Cite
This paper
Rideaux, R., Bays, P. M., & Harrison, W. J. (2025). Reply to: “Model mimicry limits conclusions about neural tuning and can mistakenly imply unlikely priors”. Nature Communications, 16(1), 6229. https://
BibTeX
@article{rideaux2025repl
author = {Rideaux, Reuben and Bays, Paul M and Harrison, William J},
title = {{Reply to: “Model mimicry limits conclusions about neural tuning and can mistakenly imply unlikely priors”}},
journal = {Nature Communications},
year = {2025},
volume = {16},
number = {1},
pages = {6229},
publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
issn = {2041-1723},
doi = {10.1038/
url = {https://
pmcid = {PMC12234690}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Rideaux, Reuben
AU - Bays, Paul M
AU - Harrison, William J
TI - Reply to: “Model mimicry limits conclusions about neural tuning and can mistakenly imply unlikely priors”
T2 - Nature Communications
J2 - Nat Commun
PY - 2025
DA - 2025
VL - 16
IS - 1
SP - 6229
SN - 2041-1723
PB - Nature Publishing Group
DO - 10.1038/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.1038/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Reply to: “Model mimicry limits conclusions about neural tuning and can mistakenly imply unlikely priors”",
"container-title": "Nature Communications",
"author": [
{
"family": "Rideaux",
"given": "Reuben"
},
{
"family": "Bays",
"given": "Paul M"
},
{
"family": "Harrison",
"given": "William J"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "16",
"issue": "1",
"page": "6229",
"DOI": "10.1038/
"PMCID": "PMC12234690",
"ISSN": "2041-1723",
"publisher": "Nature Publishing Group",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2025
]
]
}
}
The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0154-26.2026 [code]
- Faster but less precise: expectation enhances response speed while reducing sensory fidelity.Journal: The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for NeuroscienceIn common: CircStat, Image Processing Toolbox, 9 references, author Reuben Rideaux
- [2] doi:10.1093/cercor/bhag058 [code]
- Visual field inhomogeneities and the architectonics of early visual cortex shape visual working memory.Journal: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)In common: 4 references
- [3] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-70124-9 [code]
- Alpha frequency shapes perceptual sensitivity by modulating optimal phase likelihood.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: CircStat, Image Processing Toolbox, 1 reference
- [4] doi:10.1126/sciadv.aea1037 [code]
- Distinct cortical spatial representations learned along disparate visual pathways.Journal: Science advancesIn common: CircStat, Image Processing Toolbox, systems
- [5] doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2001-25.2026 [code]
- Dynamics of Dentate Gyrus Place Cells and Dentate Spikes during Spatial and Nonspatial Changes in Environments.Journal: The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for NeuroscienceIn common: CircStat, Image Processing Toolbox, systems
- [6] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-76581-6 [code]
- Thalamocortical bursts encode reward contingencies and drive associative learning.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: CircStat, Image Processing Toolbox, systems
- [7] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75347-4 [code]
- Sleep reveals dynamics integrating and segregating movement and stimulus representations in V1.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: CircStat, Image Processing Toolbox, systems
- [8] doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2026.117646 [code]
- Medial entorhinal-hippocampal desynchronization parallels the emergence of memory impairment in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease pathology.Journal: Cell reportsIn common: CircStat, Image Processing Toolbox, systems
- [9] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003818 [code]
- Human neuronal firing varies with the frequency of local field potential oscillations.Journal: PLoS biologyIn common: CircStat, Image Processing Toolbox, systems
- [10] doi:10.7554/elife.100642 [code]
- Disrupted hippocampal theta-gamma coupling and spike-field coherence following experimental traumatic brain injury.Journal: eLifeIn common: CircStat, Image Processing Toolbox, systems
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Validate its tracing map
You validate the map as this page shows it: 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit and with its license, 6 scripts, and 0 matches between paragraphs and code (see the Code and Map sections). It then receives a DOI on Zenodo, with you (your ORCID iD) and OSCR as its creators; the code itself is not deposited.
The map's fingerprint: sha256:f77598e894c0245e…
Add the badge to its README
The badge links the code to this page. Copy one of these into the README of the paper's code: only you decide where it goes, and nothing is changed for you.
Markdown
[.
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
