Investigating the test-retest reliability and behavioral correlates of pupil responses in the n-back task.
Overview
- Department of Cognitive Science, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Budapest University of Technology and Economics,Műegyetem Rkp. 3., Budapest, 1111 Hungary
- Neurocognitive Research Centre, Nyírő Gyula National Institute of Psychiatry and Addictology, Lehel U. 59., Budapest, 1135 Hungary
- Cognitive Medicine Research Group, Competence Centre for Neurocybernetics of the Life Sciences Cluster of the Centre of Excellence for Interdisciplinary Research, Development and Innovation of the University of Szeged, University of Szeged,Szeged, Hungary
Abstract
Measurement of pupil size changes is a promising method to investigate information processing. Our study contributes to this stream of research (1) by investigating whether pupillary changes during performing a demanding working memory (n-back) task are associated with performance, and (2) by testing whether these pupil responses demonstrate temporal stability over a period of multiple weeks. We conducted two experiments using two different variants of an n-back task differing in task durations and found that both phasic and tonic pupil size measures are characterized by good test–retest reliability. Furthermore, phasic, task-evoked pupillary responses were positively correlated with task performance, whereas no evidence was found for a similar link in the case of tonic pupil size measures, possibly due to design characteristics. Importantly, the dissociation of validity and reliability regarding tonic pupil size measures suggests that pupil responses might be temporally stable also in such cases when the pupil response itself is not predictive of task performance. Our results imply that pupillometry can be an appropriate tool to assess individual differences in cognition or underlying neural functioning, but one must ensure that the between-sessions correlations among participants are caused by individual differences in information processing, and not by other methodological factors (e.g. participant-specific, systematic measurement noise).
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Code
No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.
OSF gj7xa
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 29 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
- 29 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.
Tracing map
Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.
What the map holds:
- 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
- 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
- no match between paragraphs and code yet;
- neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.
Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.
Data
No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.
Data availability
The code for the pupil data preprocessing and the code and data for statistical analyses are publicly available on this OSF link: https://
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 1, 29 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 2 authors, 9 keywords, 11 MeSH terms, 1 funder, 74 references.
Cite
This paper
Bényei, G. L., & Pajkossy, P. (2026). Investigating the test-retest reliability and behavioral correlates of pupil responses in the n-back task. Scientific reports, 16(1), 17032. https://
BibTeX
@article{benyei2026inves
author = {Bényei, Gábor László and Pajkossy, Péter},
title = {{Investigating the test-retest reliability and behavioral correlates of pupil responses in the n-back task}},
journal = {Scientific reports},
year = {2026},
month = apr,
volume = {16},
number = {1},
pages = {17032},
publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
issn = {2045-2322},
doi = {10.1038/
url = {https://
pmid = {41965881},
pmcid = {PMC13230787}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Bényei, Gábor László
AU - Pajkossy, Péter
TI - Investigating the test-retest reliability and behavioral correlates of pupil responses in the n-back task
T2 - Scientific reports
J2 - Sci Rep
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 16
IS - 1
SP - 17032
SN - 2045-2322
PB - Nature Publishing Group
DO - 10.1038/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.1038/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Investigating the test-retest reliability and behavioral correlates of pupil responses in the n-back task",
"container-title": "Scientific reports",
"author": [
{
"family": "Bényei",
"given": "Gábor László"
},
{
"family": "Pajkossy",
"given": "Péter"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "16",
"issue": "1",
"page": "17032",
"DOI": "10.1038/
"PMID": "41965881",
"PMCID": "PMC13230787",
"ISSN": "2045-2322",
"publisher": "Nature Publishing Group",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
4,
11
]
]
}
}
The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0355165 [code]
- Pupillary dynamics during hands-off L2 driving and transitions of control under high cognitive load.Journal: PloS oneIn common: cognitive, 8 references
- [2] doi:10.1126/sciadv.adz6495
- Pupil-linked arousal heterogeneously modulates cell-type-specific sensory processing.Journal: Science advancesIn common: 6 references
- [3] doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02533-1 [code]
- Fluctuations in arousal reflect latent state transitions that facilitate behavioural optimization.Journal: Nature human behaviourIn common: cognitive, 5 references
- [4] doi:10.7554/elife.110685 [code]
- Sensory adaptation and pupil-linked arousal support flexible evidence accumulation during perceptual decision making.Journal: eLifeIn common: cognitive, 5 references
- [5] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1200 [code]
- An fMRI examination of the role of the Locus Coeruleus in state regulation in ADHD.Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)In common: 5 references
- [6] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-57256-0 [code]
- Pupil- and gaze dynamics track emotion content in naturalistic speech.Journal: Scientific reportsIn common: other, cognitive, 4 references
- [7] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-70659-x [code]
- Noradrenaline causes a spread of association in the hippocampal cognitive map.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: cognitive, 3 references
- [8] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71604-8 [code]
- Respiration as a dynamic modulator of sensory sampling.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: cognitive, 3 references
- [9] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1331 [code]
- Beyond the canonical HRF: Flexible temporal modeling reveals unconstrained BOLD profiles during naturalistic viewing.Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)In common: 3 references
- [10] doi:10.7554/elife.99278 [code]
- Brain-wide arousal signals are segregated from movement planning in the superior colliculus of the macaque.Journal: eLifeIn common: 3 references
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Validate its tracing map
You validate the map as this page shows it: 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit and with its license, 0 scripts, and 0 matches between paragraphs and code (see the Code and Map sections). It then receives a DOI on Zenodo, with you (your ORCID iD) and OSCR as its creators; the code itself is not deposited.
The map's fingerprint: sha256:775db4af29fab422…
Add the badge to its README
The badge links the code to this page. Copy one of these into the README of the paper's code: only you decide where it goes, and nothing is changed for you.
Markdown
[.
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
