Placebo analgesia persistence: evaluating behavioural stability in repeated trials.
Overview
- School of Medical Sciences (Neuroscience), University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW Australia
- Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW Australia
- School of Nursing and Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA USA
Abstract
Placebo analgesia is widely believed to rely on psychological, genetic, and biological factors. Whilst these factors have been assessed in single expressions of this phenomenon, few have documented its consistency over time, limiting understanding of its stability, and by extension, consideration in non-experimental settings. Here we show in 30 control participants by combining magnetic resonance imaging and a longitudinal design spanning five sessions, the psychological and neural substrates underpinning Placebo Analgesia response consistency.
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Code
The paper says that its authors' code is available on request: it was not published with the paper, so there is nothing to verify.
Code availability
All code required to generate the findings of this study are available through public download of MATLAB Version 2023a and listed toolboxes found within the 'Method' section, Statistical Parametric Mapping Version 12, MRIcroGL and Graphpad Prism version 10.1.2.
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Tracing map
A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none (its code is available on request), so it has no map.
Data
No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.
Data availability
Raw and coded behavioural, psychological and both main effect and responder-specific effect functional imaging cluster data supporting these findings can be found in the associated Supplementary Data Excel document. Further data are available from the corresponding author (LAH), upon reasonable request.
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 1, 28 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 10 authors, 2 keywords, 8 MeSH terms, 1 funder, 62 references.
Cite
This paper
Crawford, L. S., Boorman, D. C., Wake, A. H., Peng, A., Robertson, R. V., Kang, J. W. M., Robson, F., Macey, P. M., Keay, K. A., & Henderson, L. A. (2026). Placebo analgesia persistence: evaluating behavioural stability in repeated trials. Communications biology, 9(1), 1133. https://
BibTeX
@article{crawford2026pla
author = {Crawford, Lewis S and Boorman, Damien C and Wake, Ashleigh H and Peng, Allan and Robertson, Rebecca V and Kang, James W M and Robson, Furby and Macey, Paul M and Keay, Kevin A and Henderson, Luke A},
title = {{Placebo analgesia persistence: evaluating behavioural stability in repeated trials}},
journal = {Communications biology},
year = {2026},
month = may,
volume = {9},
number = {1},
pages = {1133},
publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
issn = {2399-3642},
doi = {10.1038/
url = {https://
pmid = {42209674},
pmcid = {PMC13500666}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Crawford, Lewis S
AU - Boorman, Damien C
AU - Wake, Ashleigh H
AU - Peng, Allan
AU - Robertson, Rebecca V
AU - Kang, James W M
AU - Robson, Furby
AU - Macey, Paul M
AU - Keay, Kevin A
AU - Henderson, Luke A
TI - Placebo analgesia persistence: evaluating behavioural stability in repeated trials
T2 - Communications biology
J2 - Commun Biol
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 9
IS - 1
SP - 1133
SN - 2399-3642
PB - Nature Publishing Group
DO - 10.1038/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.1038/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Placebo analgesia persistence: evaluating behavioural stability in repeated trials",
"container-title": "Communications biology",
"author": [
{
"family": "Crawford",
"given": "Lewis S"
},
{
"family": "Boorman",
"given": "Damien C"
},
{
"family": "Wake",
"given": "Ashleigh H"
},
{
"family": "Peng",
"given": "Allan"
},
{
"family": "Robertson",
"given": "Rebecca V"
},
{
"family": "Kang",
"given": "James W M"
},
{
"family": "Robson",
"given": "Furby"
},
{
"family": "Macey",
"given": "Paul M"
},
{
"family": "Keay",
"given": "Kevin A"
},
{
"family": "Henderson",
"given": "Luke A"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "9",
"issue": "1",
"page": "1133",
"DOI": "10.1038/
"PMID": "42209674",
"PMCID": "PMC13500666",
"ISSN": "2399-3642",
"publisher": "Nature Publishing Group",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
5,
28
]
]
}
}
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.1017/s0033291726103924 [code]
- Brain network representations of placebo analgesia.Journal: Psychological medicineIn common: pain, 9 references
- [2] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-74743-0 [code]
- Meta-analytic evidence for distinct neural correlates of conditioned versus verbally induced placebo analgesia.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: pain, 7 references
- [3] doi:10.1186/s40708-026-00328-8 [code]
- Brain dysconnectivity patterns associated with chronic back pain development.Journal: Brain informaticsIn common: pain, clinical / translational, 3 references
- [4] doi:10.7554/elife.90013 [code]
- Exposure to false cardiac feedback alters pain perception and anticipatory cardiac frequency.Journal: eLifeIn common: pain, 3 references
- [5] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003675 [code]
- Dynamic expectation strength and precision shape human pain perception through shared and dissociable α-oscillatory mechanisms.Journal: PLoS biologyIn common: pain, 3 references
- [6] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71600-y [code]
- Temporal predictions shape somatosensory perception.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: pain, 2 references
- [7] doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1813590
- Alterations in cortical surface morphometry in fibromyalgia: a multi-parametric study.Journal: Frontiers in psychologyIn common: pain, structural MRI / diffusion, clinical / translational, 1 reference
- [8] doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcag146 [code]
- Convergent structural brain alterations in chronic pain: a multi-metric individual participant data meta-analysis.Journal: Brain communicationsIn common: pain, structural MRI / diffusion, 1 reference
- [9] doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.122002
- EEG-based clustering shows distinct separation of chronic pain patients before spinal cord stimulation surgery.Journal: NeuroImageIn common: pain, clinical / translational, 1 reference
- [10] doi:10.1002/hbm.70507 [code]
- Somatosensory Evoked BOLD-Signals With Ultra-High Temporal Resolution.Journal: Human brain mappingIn common: 2 references
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Request its removal
To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
