Electrophysiological Correlates of Encoding Indicate Altered Processing but Comparable Subsequent Memory Effects Across Virtual Reality and Desktop-Based Conditions.

Overview

1. Experimental Psychology I, Institute of Psychology Osnabrück University Osnabrück Germany

Abstract

Successful episodic memory formation emerges from the interplay of perceptual, attentional, contextual, and elaborative processes. The relative contribution of these processes to encoding may vary with the conditions under which information is encountered. In particular, different presentation modalities, like virtual reality (VR) and desktop‐based presentations (PC), can convey the same semantic identity of an item while differing in perceptual, spatial, and contextual information. Although VR‐ and PC‐encoded memories have been observed to differ in retrieval processes, it remains unclear whether these differences arise during encoding. The present study addressed this question by comparing successful object encoding across presentation modes. Participants incidentally encoded everyday objects in VR and on a PC, and successful encoding was assessed by relating encoding‐related EEG activity to later memory. Subsequently remembered objects elicited reliable ERP subsequent memory effects, linked to semantic, contextual, and elaborative encoding processes, as well as an enhanced theta‐band response, indicating contextual integration. However, these effects were not modulated by presentation mode, consistent with comparable memory performance across conditions. In contrast, presentation mode affected encoding activity irrespective of subsequent memory success: VR elicited a more negative early ERP and stronger theta‐band activity at frontal sensors than PC‐based presentation, potentially reflecting altered object evaluation and enhanced visuospatial integration. These modality‐dependent differences could not be attributed primarily to early visual or attentional processing, as they were not accompanied by differences in P1 or alpha‐band responses. Thus, VR altered general object processing during encoding, whereas the neural processes predicting later recognition were comparable across presentation modes.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper says that its authors' code is available on request: it was not published with the paper, so there is nothing to verify.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none (its code is available on request), so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

• osf:yzfpx, at OSF; found in “Data Availability Statement”

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study are available in the online repository OSF: https://osf.io/yzfpx/overview?view_only=7bc737194c4a48bab36aef9288491c8b. Software applications and custom code can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 3, 28 September 2026

• Publisher: n/a → Wiley

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 3 authors, 4 keywords, 10 MeSH terms, 73 references.

Cite

This paper

Kisker, J., Sagehorn, M., & Gruber, T. (2026). Electrophysiological Correlates of Encoding Indicate Altered Processing but Comparable Subsequent Memory Effects Across Virtual Reality and Desktop-Based Conditions. The European journal of neuroscience, 64(5), e70664. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.70664

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.3758/s13415-026-01427-z

ERP effects at encoding: Image memorability or recognition success?

Journal: Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience

In common: EEG, cognitive, 4 references

[2] doi:10.1073/pnas.2528246123

Protecting episodic memory after sleep loss: Similar benefits of exercise and naps via distinct neural contributions.

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

In common: EEG, cognitive, 4 references

[3] doi:10.1111/ejn.70543 [code]

Neural Oscillations Track Subjective and Pupillary Arousal During Naturalistic Movie Viewing.

Journal: The European journal of neuroscience

In common: EEG, cognitive, 4 references

[4] doi:10.1007/s10548-026-01249-9

What Static Connectivity Misses: Dynamic Alpha-Band Brain Network States in First-Episode Psychosis.

Journal: Brain topography

In common: EEG, 4 references

[5] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1228 [code]

A unique neural signature of long-term memory encoding from EEG inter-electrode correlation.

Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references

[6] doi:10.1186/s40359-026-04717-w

Target detection enhances relational processing of background items: evidence from associative recognition paradigms and EEG.

Journal: BMC psychology

In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references

[7] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-47785-z [code]

Modulations of the P3b effect as a function of bilingual language experience.

Journal: Scientific reports

In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references

[8] doi:10.1111/psyp.70360

The Effect of Task Demand on EEG Responses to Irrelevant Sound and Speech in Simulated Surgical Environments.

Journal: Psychophysiology

In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references

[9] doi:10.3758/s13415-026-01450-0 [code]

Attentional processing in individual anxiety: Electrocortical correlates of threat- and safety-related declarative memory formation.

Journal: Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience

In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references

[10] doi:10.1002/hbm.70518

Voluntary Attention Selectively Modulates Omission Responses.

Journal: Human brain mapping

In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.