Spatial reorganization of object representations in high-level visual cortex distinguishes working memory from perception.
Overview
- School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
- Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
- IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Abstract
The visual system balances veridical object perception with flexible visual working memory (VWM), both engaging high-level visual regions. However, how these competing demands shape object-selective cortex (OSC) representations remains unclear. Here, we ask whether VWM inherits the spatial constraints observed in the OSC during perception or reorganizes representations to meet mnemonic demands. Using a matched task design and functional magnetic resonance imaging–based decoding, we systematically compared the localization of object-identity representations during perception and VWM. A robust dissociation emerged: Perception kept object information largely contralateral, whereas VWM produced robust ipsilateral representation even when memorizing bilateral items. These expanded representations exploited more than 90% of ipsilateral OSC vertices and could not be attributed to increased attentional span. Critically, the ipsilateral representations closely mirrored contralateral representations, implicating interhemispheric coordination in VWM. Together, these findings demonstrate that object VWM flexibly recruits distributed high-level visual cortex, with spatial reorganization distinguishing mnemonic flexibility from perceptual fidelity.
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY-NC), from the paper cited above.
Code
No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.
doi:10.5061/dryad.3xsj3txts
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 28 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
- 28 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.
Tracing map
Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.
What the map holds:
- 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
- 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
- no match between paragraphs and code yet;
- neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.
Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.
Data
No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.
Data, code, and materials availability
All data and code needed to evaluate and reproduce the results in the paper are present in the paper and/
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY-NC), from the paper cited above.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 1, 28 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 3 authors, 11 MeSH terms, 4 funders, 95 references.
Cite
This paper
Li, W., Yang, J., & Bao, P. (2026). Spatial reorganization of object representations in high-level visual cortex distinguishes working memory from perception. Science advances, 12(19), eaea7764. https://
BibTeX
@article{li2026spatial,
author = {Li, Wanru and Yang, Jia and Bao, Pinglei},
title = {{Spatial reorganization of object representations in high-level visual cortex distinguishes working memory from perception}},
journal = {Science advances},
year = {2026},
month = may,
volume = {12},
number = {19},
pages = {eaea7764},
publisher = {American Association for the Advancement of Science},
issn = {2375-2548},
doi = {10.1126/
url = {https://
pmid = {42102191},
pmcid = {PMC13155342}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Li, Wanru
AU - Yang, Jia
AU - Bao, Pinglei
TI - Spatial reorganization of object representations in high-level visual cortex distinguishes working memory from perception
T2 - Science advances
J2 - Sci Adv
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 12
IS - 19
SP - eaea7764
SN - 2375-2548
PB - American Association for the Advancement of Science
DO - 10.1126/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.1126/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Spatial reorganization of object representations in high-level visual cortex distinguishes working memory from perception",
"container-title": "Science advances",
"author": [
{
"family": "Li",
"given": "Wanru"
},
{
"family": "Yang",
"given": "Jia"
},
{
"family": "Bao",
"given": "Pinglei"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "12",
"issue": "19",
"page": "eaea7764",
"DOI": "10.1126/
"PMID": "42102191",
"PMCID": "PMC13155342",
"ISSN": "2375-2548",
"publisher": "American Association for the Advancement of Science",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
5,
8
]
]
}
}
The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.1098/rsos.230321 [code]
- Causal evidence for the role of the sensory visual cortex in visual short-term memory maintenance.Journal: Royal Society open scienceIn common: 26 references
- [2] doi:10.7554/elife.75688 [code]
- Flexible utilization of spatial- and motor-based codes for the storage of visuo-spatial information.Journal: eLifeIn common: 25 references
- [3] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1049
- Interactive shape and color representation in visual working memory for colored objects in the human occipitotemporal cortex.Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)In common: cognitive, 17 references
- [4] doi:10.1523/eneuro.0162-25.2025 [code]
- Transformed Visual Working Memory Representations in Human Occipitotemporal and Posterior Parietal Cortices.Journal: eNeuroIn common: cognitive, 17 references
- [5] doi:10.1126/sciadv.adr8015 [code]
- Neural mechanisms of resource allocation in working memory.Journal: Science advancesIn common: cognitive, 16 references
- [6] doi:10.1523/eneuro.0270-20.2024
- Investigating the Roles of the Visual and Parietal Cortex in Representing Content versus Context in Visual Working Memory.Journal: eNeuroIn common: cognitive, 15 references
- [7] doi:10.7554/elife.94191 [code]
- Visual working memories are abstractions of percepts.Journal: eLifeIn common: cognitive, 15 references
- [8] doi:10.3758/s13415-026-01443-z
- The oblique effect in visual working memory is enhanced by distraction, regardless of tDCS manipulations.Journal: Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscienceIn common: cognitive, 14 references
- [9] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002915 [code]
- The human posterior parietal cortices orthogonalize the representation of different streams of information concurrently coded in visual working memory.Journal: PLoS biologyIn common: cognitive, 14 references
- [10] doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59825-9 [code]
- Supramodal and cross-modal representations of working memory in higher-order cortex.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: cognitive, 14 references
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Validate its tracing map
You validate the map as this page shows it: 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit and with its license, 0 scripts, and 0 matches between paragraphs and code (see the Code and Map sections). It then receives a DOI on Zenodo, with you (your ORCID iD) and OSCR as its creators; the code itself is not deposited.
The map's fingerprint: sha256:e25a3c9b6cfffd33…
Add the badge to the code's README
If you are an author or a maintainer of this paper's code, you can add this badge. It says what OSCR knows of the paper (its code, its validated tracing map) and links the code to this page. Paste one of these snippets under the README's title. Keep the two marks around it, so that the badge can be replaced in place and is never added twice. OSCR changes nothing in your repository.
Markdown
<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
[](https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aea7764)
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->reStructuredText
.. oscr-badge:start
.. image:: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aea7764.svg
:target: https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aea7764
:alt: OSCR
.. oscr-badge:endHTML
<!-- oscr-badge:start -->
<a href="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aea7764"><img src="https://openscicode.org/badge/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aea7764.svg" alt="OSCR"></a>
<!-- oscr-badge:end -->If you choose to, you can have the badge kept up to date for you, with oscr badge --write from the command line or with the GitHub Action in your repository's workflows. Every other form and option (a card, AsciiDoc, LaTeX, shields.io) is on the badge page.
Request its removal
To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: code errors and mismatches between the code and the paper about this paper and its code, from readers and its authors, beside the paper and its tracing map.
Report a mismatch between the code and the paper · Report a code error (signed in)
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code and did not get the paper's result, what they ran, with which environment, commit and data.
Report a reproduction failure (signed in)
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.