The oblique effect in visual working memory is enhanced by distraction, regardless of tDCS manipulations.

Overview

1. Department of Psychology, University of Houston,Houston, TX USA
2. Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University,703 3rd Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907 USA

Abstract

The sensory recruitment model suggests that visual working memory (VWM) relies on early visual cortex (EVC), while the alternative frontoparietal account argues VWM representation is independent from EVC. An emerging consensus suggests that VWM relies on a distributed network, with different brain loci serving behavior depending on task demands. To evaluate VWM reliance on EVC vs. parietal cortex, we applied anodal (or sham) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to either occipital cortex (Oz) or right posterior parietal cortex (P4) to manipulate cortical representations before an orientation VWM task. To provoke perceptual interference and encourage reliance on parietal cortex, in half of blocks, distractors appeared during VWM delays. We predicted that parietal tDCS would improve VWM capacity to protect representations against ongoing distractions. We also expected that occipital tDCS could either increase memory capacity in nondistraction blocks or increase susceptibility to ongoing distraction. Finally, we reasoned that the oblique effect, which is thought to rely in part on EVC, would be reduced by distractor presence and the accompanying shift to reliance on parietal representations. Contrary to our predictions, neither tDCS manipulation affected VWM reports and the oblique effect was always present but was paradoxically stronger with distraction. These results could suggest reliance on EVC for VWM maintenance, even under distraction. Alternatively, these results could signal loss of fine-grained VWM detail under distraction due to use of representational strategies that maximize task performance rather than veridical orientation representation.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13415-026-01443-z.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

• osf:5cnjt, at OSF; found in “Availability of data and materials”

Availability of data and materials

Data and materials will be made available on OSF (https://osf.io/5cnjt/) upon acceptance of the manuscript.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 29 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 2 authors, 6 keywords, 13 MeSH terms, 2 funders, 66 references.

Cite

This paper

Yörük, H., & Tamber-Rosenau, B. J. (2026). The oblique effect in visual working memory is enhanced by distraction, regardless of tDCS manipulations. Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 26(4), 1597-1612. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-026-01443-z

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1126/sciadv.aea7764 [code]

Spatial reorganization of object representations in high-level visual cortex distinguishes working memory from perception.

Journal: Science advances

In common: cognitive, 14 references

[2] doi:10.3390/vision10030044

Eccentricity Constrains Spatial Working Memory Fidelity: Evidence for the Cortical Maps Hypothesis.

Journal: Vision (Basel, Switzerland)

In common: cognitive, 6 references

[3] doi:10.1093/cercor/bhag058 [code]

Visual field inhomogeneities and the architectonics of early visual cortex shape visual working memory.

Journal: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)

In common: cognitive, 6 references

[4] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10071-9 [code]

Alpha phase coding supports feature binding during working memory maintenance.

Journal: Communications biology

In common: cognitive, 5 references

[5] doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcag153 [code]

Dual-site theta stimulation modulates connectivity, but not sequence memory in older adults.

Journal: Brain communications

In common: cognitive, 2 references

[6] doi:10.3758/s13428-026-03150-6 [code]

Tetrix: A novel Tetris-based paradigm for neuroimaging research and clinical applications.

Journal: Behavior research methods

In common: cognitive, 2 references

[7] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1034 [code]

Top-down selection of visual working memory contents is supported by alpha-band phase-synchronized oscillatory networks

Journal: n/a

In common: cognitive, 2 references

[8] doi:10.1523/eneuro.0346-25.2026 [code]

Effects of TMS on the Decoding and Electrophysiology of Priority in Working Memory.

Journal: eNeuro

In common: other, cognitive, 1 reference

[9] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-45549-3

Effects of single-session anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive and motor performance in athletes and healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal: Scientific reports

In common: other, cognitive, 1 reference

[10] doi:10.7554/elife.108934 [code]

A meta-analysis suggests that TMS targeting the hippocampal network selectively improves episodic memory.

Journal: eLife

In common: other, cognitive, 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.