OSCR

Composite reaction time and variability correlate with whole-brain white-matter characteristics.

Overview

Authors: Eirini Messaritaki1, Craig Hedge1,2, Pedro Luque Laguna1, Carolyn B McNabb1, Derek K Jones1, Petroc Sumner1
  1. Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
  2. School of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Institutions: Cardiff University (United Kingdom); Aston University (United Kingdom)
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), volume 4, article IMAG.a.1303
Dates: received 14 May 2025; accepted 24 June 2026; published online 17 July 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1162/imag.a.1303 · PMID 42518980 · PMCID PMC13382963 · OpenAlex W7166847799
Open access: diamond, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: data only
Categories: structural MRI / diffusion (modality), computational (subfield)
Methods: Connectivity, Smoothing, state filtering, decompositions, Statistics, Preprocessing, Graphs, fMRI & imaging, Physiology & signal measures
Keywords: processing speed, intelligence, cognitive efficiency, connectivity, graph theory, information
Topic: Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Funding: Wellcome Trust (096646/Z/11/Z, 227882/Z/23/Z, 104943/Z/14/Z, 317797/Z/24/Z)
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 143 references in the paper

Abstract

The relationship between processing speed and brain network characteristics has been widely studied, yet the results remain inconsistent. While many studies have linked processing speed to the microstructure of white matter, discrepancies arise due to differences in the tasks used, behavioral measures assessed (based on raw reaction time or modeled processing speed), and specific white-matter tracts considered. To address these challenges and clarify any relationship between individual differences in speed and white-matter brain networks, we present a pre-registered analysis using a large (N = 159) dataset, incorporating state-of-the-art MRI data acquired from a high-gradient 3T Connectom scanner. We combine data from three reaction-time tasks to create composite measures of cognitive performance, mitigating the limitations of experiment-specific analyses. Alongside classic behavioral measures of mean reaction time, reaction-time variability, and accuracy, we applied the drift–diffusion model to derive the common metric of modeled processing speed, drift rate, as well as accompanying parameters of boundary separation, and non-decision time. Using general linear models, we explored the relationship between these parameters and the whole-brain and task-specific structural networks of the brain, weighted by volume-normalized streamline counts and myelin water fraction. Our results revealed negative associations between the global efficiency of streamline-weighted networks and both mean reaction time and reaction-time variability (β = -0.18/-0.21, p = 0.025/0.01 for whole-brain and β = -0.18/-0.18, p = 0.028/0.022 for the task-specific network). Effect sizes were small, consistent with other pre-registered assessments of brain–behavior correlations. These effects were not captured by decision model parameters signaling a note of caution for the assumed interpretation of these parameters. The significant association with reaction-time variability was robust to controlling for age, while age captured significant variance in the association with mean reaction time. This may imply that physiological changes associated with age would be an avenue for research to uncover mechanisms relating structure to reaction time. In sum, we attempted a state-of-the art clarification of whether structural brain organization is associated with speed in common cognitive tasks, and we found a small association with reaction-time variability and mean reaction time (and age).

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

Data and Code Availability

The WAND data are freely available at https://doi.org/10.12751/g-node.5mv3bf. MRtrix and the Brain Connectivity Toolbox, which were used for the analysis of the MRI data, are freely available packages.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 6 authors, 6 keywords, 1 funder, 142 references.

Cite

This paper

Messaritaki, E., Hedge, C., Laguna, P. L., McNabb, C. B., Jones, D. K., & Sumner, P. (2026). Composite reaction time and variability correlate with whole-brain white-matter characteristics. Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 4, IMAG.a.1303. https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1303

BibTeX

@article{messaritaki2026composite,
author = {Messaritaki, Eirini and Hedge, Craig and Laguna, Pedro Luque and McNabb, Carolyn B and Jones, Derek K and Sumner, Petroc},
title = {{Composite reaction time and variability correlate with whole-brain white-matter characteristics}},
journal = {Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
volume = {4},
pages = {IMAG.a.1303},
publisher = {MIT Press},
issn = {2837-6056},
doi = {10.1162/imag.a.1303},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1303},
pmid = {42518980},
pmcid = {PMC13382963}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Messaritaki, Eirini
AU - Hedge, Craig
AU - Laguna, Pedro Luque
AU - McNabb, Carolyn B
AU - Jones, Derek K
AU - Sumner, Petroc
TI - Composite reaction time and variability correlate with whole-brain white-matter characteristics
T2 - Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
J2 - Imaging Neurosci (Camb)
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/17
VL - 4
SP - IMAG.a.1303
SN - 2837-6056
PB - MIT Press
DO - 10.1162/imag.a.1303
UR - https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1303
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1162/imag.a.1303",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Composite reaction time and variability correlate with whole-brain white-matter characteristics",
"container-title": "Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)",
"author": [
{
"family": "Messaritaki",
"given": "Eirini"
},
{
"family": "Hedge",
"given": "Craig"
},
{
"family": "Laguna",
"given": "Pedro Luque"
},
{
"family": "McNabb",
"given": "Carolyn B"
},
{
"family": "Jones",
"given": "Derek K"
},
{
"family": "Sumner",
"given": "Petroc"
}
],
"container-title-short": "Imaging Neurosci (Camb)",
"volume": "4",
"page": "IMAG.a.1303",
"DOI": "10.1162/imag.a.1303",
"PMID": "42518980",
"PMCID": "PMC13382963",
"ISSN": "2837-6056",
"publisher": "MIT Press",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1303",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
7,
17
]
]
}
}

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1162/nol.a.265 [code]
Structural Brain Correlates of Poor Reading Comprehension.
Journal: Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 14 references
[2] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1325 [code]
Decoding everyday levels of musical training from subcortical white-matter architecture.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 12 references
[3] doi:10.7554/elife.107661 [code]
In vivo mapping of striatal neurodegeneration in Huntington's disease with Soma and Neurite Density Imaging.
Journal: eLife
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 11 references
[4] doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1771088 [code]
Few-shot deployment of pretrained MRI transformers in brain imaging tasks.
Journal: Frontiers in artificial intelligence
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 10 references
[5] doi:10.7554/elife.108109 [code]
Multimodal MRI marker of cognition explains the association between cognition and mental health in the UK Biobank.
Journal: eLife
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 11 references
[6] doi:10.1126/sciadv.aec2348 [code]
Congenital blindness reduces myelination in human visual cortex.
Journal: Science advances
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 11 references
[7] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1298 [code]
Frontoparietal control-default mode connectivity predicts TMS effects on cognitive control.
Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
In common: 7 references
[8] doi:10.3389/fpain.2026.1850836 [code]
Diffusion tensor imaging in chronic tension-type headache.
Journal: Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 9 references
[9] doi:10.1002/hbm.70533 [code]
Trait-Relevant Tasks Improve Personality Prediction From Structural-Functional Brain Network Coupling.
Journal: Human brain mapping
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 9 references
[10] doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2026.101721 [code]
Neonatal amygdala microstructure and structural connectivity are associated with autistic traits at 2 years of age.
Journal: Developmental cognitive neuroscience
In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 9 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.