OSCR

Migraine is associated with altered approach-avoidance decision processing: a case control study.

Overview

Authors: Sebastian Evers1,2, Andrea Kübler3,2, Claudia Sommer1,4
  1. Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  2. Research Training Group 2660 “Approach-Avoidance”, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  3. Department of Psychology I, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
  4. Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Institutions: University of Würzburg (Germany); Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (Germany)
Journal: The journal of headache and pain, volume 27, issue 1, article 183
Dates: received 4 May 2026; accepted 30 June 2026; published online 16 July 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.1186/s10194-026-02445-5 · PMID 42464113 · PMCID PMC13377724 · OpenAlex W7168625898
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: data only
Categories: EEG (modality), human (organism), pain (population), cognitive (subfield)
Methods: Spectral & time-frequency, Statistics, Smoothing, state filtering, decompositions, Preprocessing, Evoked potentials, fMRI & imaging, Physiology & signal measures
Keywords: High-density EEG, Migraine, Behavioral, Approach and avoidance, Trigger confrontation, Frontal-alpha-asymmetry, Frontal-midline-theta, Functional connectivity
MeSH: Avoidance Learning*, Decision Making*, Migraine Disorders*, Adult, Case-Control Studies, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Young Adult (* major topic)
Topic: Migraine and Headache Studies (Psychiatry and Mental health, Medicine), according to OpenAlex
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 41 references in the paper

Abstract

Background: Behavioral management of migraine has traditionally emphasized trigger avoidance, although emerging evidence supports a shift toward more confrontative coping strategies. Understanding how individuals with migraine process and respond to trigger-related information in approach-avoidance situations is critical for developing targeted interventions.

Methods: Individuals with migraine and migraine-free controls were exposed to visual trigger-related and neutral stimuli prior to making approach-avoidance decisions in an adapted virtual T-maze paradigm. Behavioral measures included decision time (DT) and initial movement response (IMR). Neurophysiological activity was assessed through high-density EEG focusing on frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA), frontal midline theta activity (FMT), and functional connectivity as indexed by the debiased weighted phase lag index (dwPLI).

Results: Both groups achieved comparable overall performance. Individuals with migraine exhibited significantly prolonged decision times (DTs), particularly in avoidance and high-conflict conditions, indicating increased cognitive demand. This effect was contrary to the initial hypothesis. Importantly, indirect trigger confrontation did not significantly influence avoidance behavior or decision times, nor did it modulate EEG measures, indicating a robust null effect. As secondary results, neurophysiological analyses revealed reduced FAA and FMT activity as well as situation-dependent alterations in dwPLI-based functional connectivity, providing converging evidence for altered regulatory control and increased neural excitability in migraine.

Conclusions: Migraine is associated with altered approach–avoidance decision processing characterized by increased cognitive demand and impaired regulatory control. Indirect trigger confrontation appears insufficient to systematically modulate these processes within the present paradigm. These findings indicate alterations in decision-making dynamics in migraine. Further research using simpler behavioral paradigms and the utilization of neuromodulation strategies targeting FAA and FMT are required.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-026-02445-5.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 3 authors, 8 keywords, 10 MeSH terms, 32 references.

Cite

This paper

Evers, S., Kübler, A., & Sommer, C. (2026). Migraine is associated with altered approach-avoidance decision processing: a case control study. The journal of headache and pain, 27(1), 183. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-026-02445-5

BibTeX

@article{evers2026migraine,
author = {Evers, Sebastian and Kübler, Andrea and Sommer, Claudia},
title = {{Migraine is associated with altered approach-avoidance decision processing: a case control study}},
journal = {The journal of headache and pain},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
volume = {27},
number = {1},
pages = {183},
publisher = {BMC},
issn = {1129-2369},
doi = {10.1186/s10194-026-02445-5},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-026-02445-5},
pmid = {42464113},
pmcid = {PMC13377724}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Evers, Sebastian
AU - Kübler, Andrea
AU - Sommer, Claudia
TI - Migraine is associated with altered approach-avoidance decision processing: a case control study
T2 - The journal of headache and pain
J2 - J Headache Pain
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/16
VL - 27
IS - 1
SP - 183
SN - 1129-2369
PB - BMC
DO - 10.1186/s10194-026-02445-5
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-026-02445-5
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.1186/s10194-026-02445-5",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Migraine is associated with altered approach-avoidance decision processing: a case control study",
"container-title": "The journal of headache and pain",
"author": [
{
"family": "Evers",
"given": "Sebastian"
},
{
"family": "Kübler",
"given": "Andrea"
},
{
"family": "Sommer",
"given": "Claudia"
}
],
"container-title-short": "J Headache Pain",
"volume": "27",
"issue": "1",
"page": "183",
"DOI": "10.1186/s10194-026-02445-5",
"PMID": "42464113",
"PMCID": "PMC13377724",
"ISSN": "1129-2369",
"publisher": "BMC",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-026-02445-5",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
7,
16
]
]
}
}

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1186/s10194-026-02399-8
Early life stress induces brain-wide electrical network predisposition to migraine.
Journal: The journal of headache and pain
In common: pain, 3 references
[2] doi:10.3390/brainsci16070678
CP5-Centered Parietal HD-tACS Is Associated with Improved Performance in a Smartphone-Based Shopping Task in Older Adults: A Behavioral and EEG Investigation.
Journal: Brain sciences
In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references
[3] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003979 [code]
Impaired midfrontal‑motor theta phase synchronization characterizes maladaptive motivational behavior in people with obsessive‑compulsive disorder.
Journal: PLoS biology
In common: EEG, 3 references
[4] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-47973-x
Neural and behavioral signatures of error monitoring are differentially modulated by social hierarchy and trial type.
Journal: Scientific reports
In common: EEG, 3 references
[5] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-53726-7 [code]
Integrated anatomical and functional connectivity mapping in episodic migraine: a spectral graph theory approach.
Journal: Scientific reports
In common: pain, 2 references
[6] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003675 [code]
Dynamic expectation strength and precision shape human pain perception through shared and dissociable α-oscillatory mechanisms.
Journal: PLoS biology
In common: pain, EEG, 2 references
[7] doi:10.1111/psyp.70376 [code]
Changes in Aperiodic (1/f Slope) Activity During a Picture-Word Interference Task: Effects of Congruency and Sequence Manipulations.
Journal: Psychophysiology
In common: EEG, cognitive, 2 references
[8] doi:10.3758/s13415-026-01434-0
Neural mechanisms of negative emotionality and cognitive control: The role of frontal midline theta.
Journal: Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience
In common: EEG, cognitive, 2 references
[9] doi:10.7554/elife.108673 [code]
Adaptive behavior is guided by integrated representations of controlled and non-controlled information.
Journal: eLife
In common: EEG, 2 references
[10] doi:10.1111/psyp.70265 [code]
Neurocognitive Dynamics of Translating Information From a Spatial Map Into Action.
Journal: Psychophysiology
In common: EEG, cognitive, 2 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.