Structural characteristics of local cortical networks wired by distance dependent connectivity rules.

Overview

1. Rempartstr. 11, 79098 Freiburg, Germany

Abstract

Background: The function of the cerebral cortex is shaped by its anatomical connectivity, yet experimental findings on connection probabilities in local cortical networks remain inconsistent. This study explores structural characteristics of local cortical networks based on distance dependent, Gaussian connectivity profiles. Monolayers of 101 × 101 pyramidal neurons were examined. Their connectivity was based on experimental anatomical or electrophysiological data. In the anatomical setting the connection probability between neighboring neurons was 0.8. In the electrophysiological scenario connection probabilities for adjacent neurons ranged between 0.08 and 0.23. All distance dependent networks were compared to the configuration model which generates degree-preserving but otherwise randomly rewired networks. The networks thus constructed were analyzed applying tools of network science, i.e. average degrees, degree distributions, local clustering coefficients and graph distances. Moreover, the numbers, sizes and spatial dimensions of cliques were investigated as well as the cost of connectivity.

Results: Distance-dependent networks differed fundamentally from configuration-model networks across all structural measures. They showed substantially higher local clustering, formed more numerous and more spatially compact groups of strongly connected neurons, and required lower wiring cost. Importantly, the structure of distance-dependent networks was highly sensitive to near-neighbor connectivity: when neurons had a high probability of connecting locally, the network reliably developed tightly wired, spatially localized neuronal clusters.

Conclusions: Distance-dependent connectivity gives rise to structural network features that may facilitate the emergence of functional neuronal assemblies. Based on the findings of this study, a general probabilistic rule for local cortical connectivity is proposed that can be used to design artificial neural networks with biologically inspired wiring principles.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

• zenodo:17455934, at Zenodo; found in “Data availability”

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the zenodo repository: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17455934.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 1 author, 7 keywords, 6 MeSH terms, 46 references.

Cite

This paper

Hellwig, B. (2026). Structural characteristics of local cortical networks wired by distance dependent connectivity rules. BMC neuroscience, 27(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-026-01050-1

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.116144 [code]

Spatial continuity of neurons explains non-random network architecture.

Journal: iScience

In common: 4 references

[2] doi:10.7554/elife.95562 [code]

Spatially targeted inhibitory rhythms differentially affect neuronal integration.

Journal: eLife

In common: 4 references

[3] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10418-2 [code]

Cortical PV and VIP interneurons similarly influence SST neuron output despite distinct unitary properties.

Journal: Communications biology

In common: 3 references

[4] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003789 [code]

Encoding performance of cortical neurons critically depends on their morphological and neurophysiological properties.

Journal: PLoS biology

In common: systems, 2 references

[5] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.115861 [code]

Functional organization of dendritic spines in mouse visual cortex layer 2/3 neurons.

Journal: iScience

In common: systems, 2 references

[6] doi:10.7554/elife.107099 [code]

Local inhibitory dynamics underpin temporal integration and functional segregation between barrels and septa in the mouse barrel cortex.

Journal: eLife

In common: systems, 2 references

[7] doi:10.1113/jp289827 [code]

Neurons embedded in loop-like motifs act as central hubs for brain-wide integration.

Journal: The Journal of physiology

In common: systems, 2 references

[8] doi: [code]

Limit-Cycle Proliferation Under Parametric Delayed Feedback in a Conductance-Based Neuron: Bifurcation Landscape, Orbit Catalog, and Capacity Analysis

Journal: Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)

In common: 2 references

[9] doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013958 [code]

Computing the effects of excitatory-inhibitory balance on neuronal input-output properties.

Journal: PLoS computational biology

In common: 2 references

[10] doi:10.1126/sciadv.adz4123 [code]

Highly attenuated dendritic propagation of isolated synaptic potentials in vivo.

Journal: Science advances

In common: 2 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.