Widening participation in cognitive neuroscience: a mixed-methods study of age-related motivators, barriers and attitudes towards imaging methods.
Overview
- School of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- School of Education, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- School of Medicine, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- Regional Neuropsychology Services, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
- School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- School of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
Abstract
Background: Cognitive neuroscience research often relies on convenience sampling of participants, which can result in biased sample demographics and an under-representation of older adults. There is a need to identify more effective routes to widen participation among older adults and to explore age-related differences in the motivators and barriers to research involvement.
Methods: This mixed methods study combined qualitative data from two focus groups, conducted with N = 11 healthy older adults aged 55–73, and an online questionnaire completed by N = 336 adults aged 18–88.
Results: Analysis of the focus group discussions identified 3 main themes that were most important to older adults: a) The importance of receiving transparent information about the aims, procedures and safety of the study, b) Distinguishing between medical and non-medical research, and c) Contributing to the “collective good”. The questionnaire echoed that altruism, and the prospect of scientific discovery, are increasingly important motivators with advancing age, whereas financial incentives become less important. Older adults have more free time to participate, are less deterred by the prospect of pain, and express more trust in researchers than younger people. Attitudes towards different imaging methods (MRI, EEG, NIBS and Eye tracking) varied, with fewest negative emotions for eye-tracking and most for non-invasive brain stimulation, but positive attitudes generally increased and negative attitudes reduced with age.
Conclusion: These findings can inform age-tailored recruitment strategies to improve diversity in neuroimaging research. Improving communication, addressing practical barriers, and framing studies in a meaningful context may help increase participation among groups who are traditionally underrepresented in neuroimaging research.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Code
The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.
Tracing map
A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.
Data
Datasets cited
Data availability
The data for the quantitative arm of the study is available at https://
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 6 authors, 5 keywords, 19 MeSH terms, 1 funder, 43 references.
Cite
This paper
Kotiusheva, K., Hilliker, L., Ibbotson, T., Baylan, S., Gardani, M., & Learmonth, G. (2026). Widening participation in cognitive neuroscience: a mixed-methods study of age-related motivators, barriers and attitudes towards imaging methods. BMC medical research methodology, 26(1), 192. https://
BibTeX
@article{kotiusheva2026w
author = {Kotiusheva, Ksenia and Hilliker, Laurel and Ibbotson, Tracy and Baylan, Satu and Gardani, Maria and Learmonth, Gemma},
title = {{Widening participation in cognitive neuroscience: a mixed-methods study of age-related motivators, barriers and attitudes towards imaging methods}},
journal = {BMC medical research methodology},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
volume = {26},
number = {1},
pages = {192},
publisher = {BMC},
issn = {1471-2288},
doi = {10.1186/
url = {https://
pmid = {42321621},
pmcid = {PMC13523283}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Kotiusheva, Ksenia
AU - Hilliker, Laurel
AU - Ibbotson, Tracy
AU - Baylan, Satu
AU - Gardani, Maria
AU - Learmonth, Gemma
TI - Widening participation in cognitive neuroscience: a mixed-methods study of age-related motivators, barriers and attitudes towards imaging methods
T2 - BMC medical research methodology
J2 - BMC Med Res Methodol
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 26
IS - 1
SP - 192
SN - 1471-2288
PB - BMC
DO - 10.1186/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.1186/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Widening participation in cognitive neuroscience: a mixed-methods study of age-related motivators, barriers and attitudes towards imaging methods",
"container-title": "BMC medical research methodology",
"author": [
{
"family": "Kotiusheva",
"given": "Ksenia"
},
{
"family": "Hilliker",
"given": "Laurel"
},
{
"family": "Ibbotson",
"given": "Tracy"
},
{
"family": "Baylan",
"given": "Satu"
},
{
"family": "Gardani",
"given": "Maria"
},
{
"family": "Learmonth",
"given": "Gemma"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "26",
"issue": "1",
"page": "192",
"DOI": "10.1186/
"PMID": "42321621",
"PMCID": "PMC13523283",
"ISSN": "1471-2288",
"publisher": "BMC",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
6,
19
]
]
}
}
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.1038/s41514-026-00456-9 [code]
- Exploring the link between body physiology and cognition: the role of the brain and aging.Journal: npj agingIn common: cognitive, 3 references
- [2] doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcag329
- A meta-analysis of periodic and aperiodic electrophysiological features in Parkinson's disease.Journal: Brain communicationsIn common: 2 references
- [3] doi:10.1093/cercor/bhag117 [code]
- Spontaneous changes in the prestimulus alpha power predict both objective and subjective aspects of perception-evidence from 4 paradigms and 471 experimental sessions.Journal: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)In common: cognitive, 2 references
- [4] doi:10.1093/cercor/bhag077 [code]
- The longitudinal development of intrinsic timescales in infancy and their relation to alpha brain rhythm.Journal: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)In common: 2 references
- [5] doi:10.3390/life16081356
- Regional Brain Volume Variation Across Adulthood: A Cross-Sectional MRI Analysis of Age, Sex, and Hemispheric Asymmetry.Journal: Life (Basel, Switzerland)In common: structural MRI / diffusion, 1 reference
- [6] doi:10.1111/psyp.70385 [code]
- Exploring EEG and ECG in Music Listening: A Scoping Review.Journal: PsychophysiologyIn common: cognitive, 1 reference
- [7] doi:10.3758/s13415-026-01453-x
- Influence of acculturation on the ERP correlates of self- and other-referencing.Journal: Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscienceIn common: cognitive, 1 reference
- [8] doi:10.1162/netn.a.542
- High brain network system segregation is differentially linked with cognitive performance across the life span.Journal: Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)In common: cognitive, 1 reference
- [9] doi:10.1038/s44271-026-00524-6 [code]
- Emergent blink rate in early childhood is associated with neural origins of executive function.Journal: Communications psychologyIn common: cognitive, 1 reference
- [10] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71831-z [code]
- Dysfunction of the episodic memory network in the Alzheimer's disease cascade.Journal: Nature communicationsIn common: cognitive, 1 reference
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Request its removal
To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
