Using deep learning to identify inherited retinal diseases based on wide-field retinal imaging data.
The 7 matches
- [1] § 2 Methods › 2.4 Deep learning models ↔ KcrossValidationProcess.py, lines 32–93 · score 0.62 · cross entropy loss, subsets, optimizer, weights, fold, cropping
- [2] § 2 Methods › 2.4 Deep learning models ↔ Augmentations.py, lines 5–16 · score 0.61 · horizontal flips, translations, vertical, probabilistically, augmentation, training
- [3] § 2 Methods › 2.6 Performance evaluation and statistical analysis ↔ MainProcess.py, lines 89–162 · score 0.57 · confusion matrices, F1 score, recall, AUC, precision, accuracy
- [4] § 2 Methods › 2.6 Performance evaluation and statistical analysis ↔ Utils.py, lines 103–121 · score 0.56 · confusion matrices, F1 score, recall, AUC, precision, accuracy
- [5] § 2 Methods › 2.4 Deep learning models ↔ Utils.py, lines 124–133 · score 0.55 · 47.5–72.5 %, center cropping
- [6] § 2 Methods › 2.4 Deep learning models ↔ Main.py, lines 32–38 · score 0.51 · cross entropy loss, weights, cropping, batch, training, class
- [7] § 3 Results ↔ Utils.py, lines 103–121 · score 0.50 · confusion matrices, F1 score, AUC, precision, accuracy, predictive
Paper
Loaded from Europe PMC by your browser, not stored by OSCR: doi.org · Europe PMC
The paper is loaded when this pane is shown.
The authors' code
Python · 416 lines · 15 KB · no license · 3 matches
Utils.py at commit d419615, no license · at the source
Overview
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- School of Computer Science, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel,
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate a novel image-based deep learning method for the automated identification of inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) and to explore the feasibility of predicting selected causative gene groups using a multimodal analysis of wide-field fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and pseudocolor fundus (pCF) images.
Design: The method was evaluated using a retrospective dataset of patient studies containing FAF and pCF images, as well as genetic tests for IRD.
Participants: Patients with confirmed IRD for which both wide-field FAF and pCF images and genetic tests for IRD performed at Hadassah University Medical Center were included. The dataset consisted of 409 patients (330 patients with IRD with the 25 most commonly affected genes in our population and patients without IRD, and 79 patients without IRD).
Methods: Nine EfficientNet-V2-m convolutional neural networks were trained for the following three classification tasks: a binary IRD vs. non-IRD classification, and classification into two groups of five causative genes (Groups 1 and 2). For each task, three models were trained on the FAF images only, the pCF images only, and both the FAF and pCF images. The performance of the models was then evaluated and compared using 5-fold cross-validation.
Main outcome measures: Accuracy, precision, F1 scores, AUC, and confusion matrices.
Results: The multimodal classification models that were trained on both the FAF and pCF images yielded the best results. The binary classification model had a mean (±SD) accuracy of 0.95 ± 0.01, a mean precision of 0.92 ± 0.01, and a mean F1 score of 0.90 ± 0.02. The Group 1 classification model had a mean accuracy of 0.92 ± 0.03, a mean precision of 0.93 ± 0.03, and a mean F1 score of 0.89 ± 0.03. Finally, the Group 2 classification model had a mean accuracy of 0.85 ± 0.03, a mean precision of 0.87 ± 0.04, and a mean F1 score of 0.83 ± 0.04.
Conclusions: Our results indicate that determining whether a patient has IRD can be performed with high accuracy within this retrospective cohort based on FAF and pCF images using image-based deep learning classifiers. This image-based approach may assist clinicians during the patient’s initial visit by providing decision support prior to genetic testing. It may also help prioritize patients for genetic workup, particularly in settings in which genetic testing is not readily available. Further prospective and external validation is required before clinical implementation.
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Repository
Its files are read in the Code ↔ Paper reader above, with 7 matches between paragraphs and lines of code.
timshik/Deep-learning-based-identification-of-inherited-retinal-disease-using-wide-field-retina-imaging
d4196159f13abe62b7baba1111d6fd5fac070876, 24 October 2024Availability: 1 check, the latest on 28 September 2026: the link answers
- 28 September 2026: the link answers
18 files, not copied: shown from their source
OSCR keeps no copy of these files: this repository has no license that allows it. The reader above shows each one from its source, fetched by your browser at commit d419615, when its fingerprint is the one OSCR verified. How this works.
- Augmentations.py — Python, 17 lines, 1 match, shown from its source
- Derivative.py — Python, 57 lines, shown from its source
- GradCam.py — Python, 16 lines, shown from its source
- HeatMap.py — Python, 243 lines, shown from its source
- KcrossValidationProcess.
py — Python, 134 lines, 1 match, shown from its source - LabelDictionary.py — Python, 46 lines, shown from its source
- Loss.py — Python, 22 lines, shown from its source
- Main.py — Python, 58 lines, 1 match, shown from its source
- MainKcross.py — Python, 57 lines, shown from its source
- MainProcess.py — Python, 240 lines, 1 match, shown from its source
- Model.py — Python, 233 lines, shown from its source
- MyDataLoader.py — Python, 258 lines, shown from its source
- PlayGround.py — Python, 246 lines, shown from its source
- PreProcessing.py — Python, 274 lines, shown from its source
- Test.py — Python, 63 lines, shown from its source
- Utils.py — Python, 416 lines, 3 matches, shown from its source
- ValidationOfMistakes.py — Python, 3 lines, shown from its source
- README.md — Text, 7 lines, shown from its source
The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.
Tracing map
Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.
What the map holds:
- 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
- 17 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
- 7 matches between paragraphs of the paper and lines of the code (method lexical-v1);
- neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.
Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.
Data
No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.
Data Availability
All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the manuscript and in supplementary materials. Due to patient privacy and ethical restrictions, raw retinal images cannot be made publicly available. However, all aggregated performance metrics, confusion matrices, model architecture details, and hyperparameters are provided within the manuscript and supplementary materials. The code is available at: https://
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 1, 28 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 9 authors, 9 MeSH terms, 29 references.
Cite
This paper
Joskowicz, L., Buchbinder, T., Chodorov, E., Hoogi, A., Matos, K., Rivera, A., Sharon, D., Banin, E., & Levy, J. (2026). Using deep learning to identify inherited retinal diseases based on wide-field retinal imaging data. PloS one, 21(5), e0348866. https://
BibTeX
@article{joskowicz2026us
author = {Joskowicz, Leo and Buchbinder, Tim and Chodorov, Eldan and Hoogi, Assaf and Matos, Katherine and Rivera, Antonio and Sharon, Dror and Banin, Eyal and Levy, Jaime},
title = {{Using deep learning to identify inherited retinal diseases based on wide-field retinal imaging data}},
journal = {PloS one},
year = {2026},
month = may,
volume = {21},
number = {5},
pages = {e0348866},
publisher = {PLOS},
issn = {1932-6203},
doi = {10.1371/
url = {https://
pmid = {42113772},
pmcid = {PMC13160341}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Joskowicz, Leo
AU - Buchbinder, Tim
AU - Chodorov, Eldan
AU - Hoogi, Assaf
AU - Matos, Katherine
AU - Rivera, Antonio
AU - Sharon, Dror
AU - Banin, Eyal
AU - Levy, Jaime
TI - Using deep learning to identify inherited retinal diseases based on wide-field retinal imaging data
T2 - PloS one
J2 - PLoS One
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 21
IS - 5
SP - e0348866
SN - 1932-6203
PB - PLOS
DO - 10.1371/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.1371/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Using deep learning to identify inherited retinal diseases based on wide-field retinal imaging data",
"container-title": "PloS one",
"author": [
{
"family": "Joskowicz",
"given": "Leo"
},
{
"family": "Buchbinder",
"given": "Tim"
},
{
"family": "Chodorov",
"given": "Eldan"
},
{
"family": "Hoogi",
"given": "Assaf"
},
{
"family": "Matos",
"given": "Katherine"
},
{
"family": "Rivera",
"given": "Antonio"
},
{
"family": "Sharon",
"given": "Dror"
},
{
"family": "Banin",
"given": "Eyal"
},
{
"family": "Levy",
"given": "Jaime"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "21",
"issue": "5",
"page": "e0348866",
"DOI": "10.1371/
"PMID": "42113772",
"PMCID": "PMC13160341",
"ISSN": "1932-6203",
"publisher": "PLOS",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
5,
11
]
]
}
}
The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1771088 [code]
- Few-shot deployment of pretrained MRI transformers in brain imaging tasks.Journal: Frontiers in artificial intelligenceIn common: MONAI, imageio, OpenCV, 9 other tools
- [2] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10957-8 [code]
- Brain defence by the extracellular matrix protein Cochlin.Journal: Communications biologyIn common: imbalanced-learn, Plotly, OpenCV, 9 other tools
- [3] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.116825 [code]
- Social hierarchy shapes behavioral and transcriptional responses to chronic stress and ketamine in male mice.Journal: iScienceIn common: imbalanced-learn, Plotly, OpenCV, 9 other tools
- [4] doi:10.1186/s12880-026-02481-2 [code]
- Deep learning-based neuroanatomical profiling reveals population-specific brain changes in multiple sclerosis: a large-scale Middle Eastern study.Journal: BMC medical imagingIn common: imageio, Plotly, OpenCV, 8 other tools, clinical / translational
- [5] doi:10.3389/fnins.2026.1870124 [code]
- An end-to-end pipeline for automated fetal brain segmentation and biometry from 3D SSFP MRI.Journal: Frontiers in neuroscienceIn common: MONAI, imageio, OpenCV, 8 other tools
- [6] doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013499 [code]
- VesiclePy: A machine learning vesicle analysis toolbox for volume electron microscopy.Journal: PLoS computational biologyIn common: imageio, Plotly, OpenCV, 8 other tools
- [7] doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102766 [code]
- A longitudinal single-cell and spatial multiomic atlas of pediatric high-grade glioma.Journal: Cell reports. MedicineIn common: imageio, Plotly, OpenCV, 8 other tools
- [8] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-57519-w [code]
- Automated segmentation of neurons and spinal cord structures in immunofluorescence images using SpineDL.Journal: Scientific reportsIn common: imageio, Plotly, OpenCV, 8 other tools
- [9] doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014571 [code]
- SynAPSeg: A novel dataset and image analysis framework for deep learning-based synapse detection and quantification.Journal: PLoS computational biologyIn common: imageio, OpenCV, scikit-image, 8 other tools
- [10] doi:10.1038/s41593-026-02388-9 [code]
- Hippocampal CA3 connectomics reveals a gradient of mossy fiber inputs and selective feedforward inhibition onto pyramidal cells.Journal: Nature neuroscienceIn common: imageio, Plotly, OpenCV, 8 other tools
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Validate its tracing map
You validate the map as this page shows it: 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit and with its license, 17 scripts, and 7 matches between paragraphs and code (see the Code and Map sections). It then receives a DOI on Zenodo, with you (your ORCID iD) and OSCR as its creators; the code itself is not deposited.
The map's fingerprint: sha256:aa1f45b620dd9391…
Add the badge to its README
The badge links the code to this page. Copy one of these into the README of the paper's code: only you decide where it goes, and nothing is changed for you.
Markdown
[, paste the snippet at the top, then “Commit changes…” and, to review it first, “Create a new branch and start a pull request”. You open the pull request; OSCR asks for no permission.
Request its removal
To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
