Zebra Finch Introductory Notes Become Song-Like But Have Different Timing and Acoustic Correlations with the Song That Follows.

Overview

1. Division of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune (IISER Pune), Pune, Maharashtra 411008, India

Abstract

Male zebra finches begin their song bouts by repeating a short sound called an introductory note (IN). As INs repeat, their timing and acoustic properties change, similar to premovement neural preparatory activity seen in primates and rodents. Hence, INs are thought to reflect motor preparation for starting song. However, INs themselves are vocalizations/movements, like the song that follows, suggesting that INs could be part of the song sequence. To determine how similar songs and INs are, we compared their properties in adult, male zebra finches recorded across 3 years. First, song and INs simultaneously changed in the first year post-hatch; as described earlier, songs became faster and we found an increase of 0.58 ± 0.07 in mean IN number. Second, as described earlier, IN properties changed from first to last IN. Here, we found that these changes were driven by the last IN becoming more like the first song syllable in duration, amplitude, and timing. Third, within each bout, first song syllable timing was correlated with last IN timing in only 18% of birds. Amplitude and mean frequency of the first song syllable was correlated not only with the last IN, but also with the first IN and second song syllable in >40% of birds. Finally, the reduction in gaps between successive INs was not seen in other types of repeat syllables. Overall, the acoustic similarities between INs and song suggest that INs are part of the song sequence, but timing differences suggest different mechanisms for controlling IN timing.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper says that its authors' code is available on request: it was not published with the paper, so there is nothing to verify.

The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none (its code is available on request), so it has no map.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data and code accessibility

All data and scripts for analysis are available on request from the corresponding author.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 6 authors, 6 keywords, 7 MeSH terms, 6 funders, 47 references.

Cite

This paper

Rao, D., Kizhakoot, D. B., Kalra, S., Suri, H., Chorol, S., & Rajan, R. (2026). Zebra Finch Introductory Notes Become Song-Like But Have Different Timing and Acoustic Correlations with the Song That Follows. eNeuro, 13(8), ENEURO.0199-25.2026. https://doi.org/10.1523/eneuro.0199-25.2026

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0333158 [code]

Alpha-synuclein overexpression reduces neural activity within a basal ganglia vocal nucleus in a zebra finch model.

Journal: PloS one

In common: other, 3 references

[2] doi:10.3390/biomimetics11080569 [code]

Pretraining of Embodied Recurrent Networks Bridges the Gap Between Artificial and Cortical Neural Activities.

Journal: Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)

In common: 3 references

[3] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10036-y

Drifting population dynamics with transient resets characterize sensorimotor transformation in the monkey superior colliculus.

Journal: Communications biology

In common: 3 references

[4] doi:10.1523/eneuro.0023-26.2026 [code]

Real-Time Segmentation and Classification of Birdsong Syllables for Learning Experiments.

Journal: eNeuro

In common: other, 2 references

[5] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75705-2 [code]

Redundant prefrontal hemispheres adapt storage strategy to working memory demands.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: 2 references

[6] doi:10.7554/elife.111876 [code]

Distinct sensorimotor encoding in tuft dendrites and somata associated with action, correction, and learning.

Journal: eLife

In common: 2 references

[7] doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2026.117419 [code]

Conserved role of primary motor cortex in the control of prehension in mice and macaques.

Journal: Cell reports

In common: 2 references

[8] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003749

Somatosensory input drives membrane potential dynamics in motor cortex during voluntary limb movement.

Journal: PLoS biology

In common: 2 references

[9] doi:10.7554/elife.99611 [code]

Intrinsic properties link a network model to zebra finch song.

Journal: eLife

In common: other, 1 reference

[10] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75347-4 [code]

Sleep reveals dynamics integrating and segregating movement and stimulus representations in V1.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.