Increased Attentive Use Is Linked to More Idiosyncratic Functional Connections.

Overview

1. Civitan International Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294
2. Department of Neurobiology, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233
3. Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02478

Abstract

Experience is thought to modify neural connections to adapt the network to be more optimal for the environment. Given the brain's complexity, multiple network changes could each move the system toward optimality. Standard approaches examine each connection independently; these studies have often shown considerable interindividual variability and modest effects (Marek et al., 2022). Here, we take a different strategy, determining how a whole-brain connection pattern differs from the typical pattern, that is, how “idiosyncratic” the pattern is. We examined how the idiosyncrasy of whole-brain connection patterns varies with frequency of the use of that part of cortex for attention-demanding tasks, focusing on central versus peripheral vision in healthy individuals (who use central vision more frequently for attention-demanding tasks). We found that the whole-brain pattern of functional connections to the cortical representations of central vision is idiosyncratic, whereas patterns of connections to representations of peripheral vision were very similar person to person in healthy vision controls (14 females, 9 males). In a second set of analyses, we examined the brains of people with central vision loss (11 females, 10 males) who use a portion of peripheral vision [the preferred retinal locus (PRL)] more frequently for attention-demanding tasks in their daily lives. The cortical representation of the PRL exhibits more idiosyncratic connections, compared with a control brain region or compared with the same brain region in matched healthy vision controls. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that increased attentive use of a brain area results in idiosyncratic patterns of whole-brain connections.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

• 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
• 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
• no match between paragraphs and code yet;
• neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, issue, pages, dates, 5 authors, 7 keywords, 10 MeSH terms, 7 funders, 80 references.

Cite

This paper

Demirayak, P., Fleming, L. L., Stewart, P., Chua, R., & Visscher, K. M. (2026). Increased Attentive Use Is Linked to More Idiosyncratic Functional Connections. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 46(36), e2178252026. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2178-25.2026

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1523/eneuro.0370-25.2026 [code]

Pretraining for Large-Scale Functional Connectome Fingerprinting Supports Generalization and Transfer Learning in Functional Neuroimaging.

Journal: eNeuro

In common: fMRI, 13 references

[2] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1209

Naturalistic movie viewing is an effective functional localizer of the fusiform face area in adolescents with and without autism.

Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

In common: fMRI, 11 references

[3] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1272 [code]

Building bridges between brain and behavior: An open-source toolbox for joint modeling with fMRI.

Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

In common: fMRI, 11 references

[4] doi:10.1002/hbm.70627 [code]

Investigating the Contribution of Molecular-Enriched Functional Connectivity to Brain-Age Analysis.

Journal: Human brain mapping

In common: fMRI, 10 references

[5] doi:10.7554/elife.103956 [code]

Human brain-wide activation of sleep rhythms.

Journal: eLife

In common: 10 references

[6] doi:10.7554/elife.107955

Multiple event segmentation mechanisms in the human brain.

Journal: eLife

In common: 10 references

[7] doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9326213/v1 [code]

Multi-task fMRI outperforms resting-state fMRI for revealing task-invariant organization of the human brain

Journal: Research Square (preprint)

In common: fMRI, 8 references

[8] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003755 [code]

Action information is integrated into entorhinal representations of conceptual space and is reflected in eye movements.

Journal: PLoS biology

In common: 9 references

[9] doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2026.04.011 [code]

Precision fMRI reveals densely interdigitated network patches with conserved motifs in the lateral prefrontal cortex.

Journal: Neuron

In common: fMRI, 8 references

[10] doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2026.117454 [code]

Model-based and model-free valuation signals in the human brain vary markedly in relation to individual differences in behavioral control.

Journal: Cell reports

In common: 9 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.