Synergy-based feedforward with minimal feedback control predicts walking over multiple cycles.
Overview
Abstract
Neural feedback is important for the control of movement, and multiple neurological disorders (e.g., stroke, cerebral palsy, Parkinson’s disease, incomplete spinal cord injury) are characterized by altered neural feedback. Researchers have created numerous computational neuromusculoskeletal models controlled by simulated neural feedback mechanisms, but these models rarely represent actual human subjects and thus have not found practical clinical application. As a step toward designing patient-specific treatments for individuals with neurological disorders, this study used the Neuromusculoskeletal Modeling Pipeline to develop and evaluate a novel synergy-based feedforward (FF)+feedback (FB) control model using a personalized three-dimensional neuromusculoskeletal walking model of an actual human subject post-stroke. Experimental walking data collected from the subject were used to create the subject’s personalized walking model. Then for five calibration walking cycles, personalized synergy-based FF + FB control models were created. First, the personalized model was used to estimate lower body muscle activations, consistent with the subject’s electromyographic, joint motion, and joint moment data. Second, five synergy activations per leg with associated synergy vectors were calculated that closely reconstructed the subject’s muscle activations and joint moments simultaneously. Third, nominal FF synergy activation controls were calculated by averaging the synergy activations for each leg. Fourth, the nominal FF synergy controls were scaled by 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%, and 125%, and the gap in reproducing the subject’s muscle activations was filled by fitting FB synergy activation controls as a function of joint positions, velocities, and moments as surrogates for muscle lengths, muscle velocities, and tendon forces. Next for three testing walking cycles, six synergy-based FF + FB models were used to control the subject’s personalized walking model in predictive simulations. The 100% FF model (which still had minimal FB) reproduced the testing walking cycles the most closely, and only the 75%, 100%, and 125% FF models predicted near-periodic walking motions using initial conditions consistent with experimental values. The 0%, 25%, and 50% FF models could generate near-periodic walking motions only when the initial conditions were allowed to diverge substantially from experimental values. Our findings suggest that predictive simulations of walking may require substantial feedforward control when modeling an actual human subject.
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Code
No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.
simtk.org
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 26 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
- 26 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
simtk.org/projects/synergyfeedback
Availability: 1 check, the latest on 26 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
- 26 September 2026: the link answers (HTTP 200)
The paper's code and data availability statement is in the Data section.
Tracing map
Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.
What the map holds:
- 2 repositories of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
- 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
- no match between paragraphs and code yet;
- neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.
Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.
Data
No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.
Data availability statement
The experimental data, OpenSim and NMSM Pipeline models, NMSM Pipeline settings files, and MATLAB code used to generate the results of this study are available online in the repository below: https://
Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.
Versions
The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.
Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record
Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 3 authors, 8 keywords, 1 funder, 34 references.
Cite
This paper
Williams, S. T., Li, G., & Fregly, B. J. (2026). Synergy-based feedforward with minimal feedback control predicts walking over multiple cycles. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 14, 1824839. https://
BibTeX
@article{williams2026syn
author = {Williams, Spencer T and Li, Geng and Fregly, Benjamin J},
title = {{Synergy-based feedforward with minimal feedback control predicts walking over multiple cycles}},
journal = {Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
volume = {14},
pages = {1824839},
publisher = {Frontiers Media SA},
issn = {2296-4185},
doi = {10.3389/
url = {https://
pmid = {42609400},
pmcid = {PMC13478117}
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
AU - Williams, Spencer T
AU - Li, Geng
AU - Fregly, Benjamin J
TI - Synergy-based feedforward with minimal feedback control predicts walking over multiple cycles
T2 - Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology
J2 - Front Bioeng Biotechnol
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/
VL - 14
SP - 1824839
SN - 2296-4185
PB - Frontiers Media SA
DO - 10.3389/
UR - https://
LA - en
ER -
CSL-JSON
{
"id": "10.3389/
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Synergy-based feedforward with minimal feedback control predicts walking over multiple cycles",
"container-title": "Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology",
"author": [
{
"family": "Williams",
"given": "Spencer T"
},
{
"family": "Li",
"given": "Geng"
},
{
"family": "Fregly",
"given": "Benjamin J"
}
],
"container-title-short":
"volume": "14",
"page": "1824839",
"DOI": "10.3389/
"PMID": "42609400",
"PMCID": "PMC13478117",
"ISSN": "2296-4185",
"publisher": "Frontiers Media SA",
"URL": "https://
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
8,
3
]
]
}
}
The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.
Similar papers
The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.
- [1] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-46419-8 [code]
- Exploring the effect of different neural strategies on the knee joint contact forces during walking in adults.Journal: Scientific reportsIn common: other, 3 references
- [2] doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.116488
- An explicit strategy facilitates adaptation to virtual surgeries by biasing the recruitment of existing synergies.Journal: iScienceIn common: 2 references
- [3] doi:10.1113/ep094110
- Stretch versus shortening contractions subsequently decrease versus increase neural drive to the human tibialis anterior.Journal: Experimental physiologyIn common: 1 reference
- [4] doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000218502
- Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography-Angiography and Longitudinal Changes in Cognition and Cerebral Small Vessel Disease.Journal: NeurologyIn common: stroke, other
- [5] doi:10.1002/alz.71811
- Female vulnerability to microvascular transport dysfunction emerges early across the Alzheimer's disease continuum.Journal: Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's AssociationIn common: stroke, other
- [6] doi:10.3390/biomedicines14081829
- Transvenous Embolisation-Based Strategies for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal: BiomedicinesIn common: stroke, other
- [7] doi:10.1126/sciadv.aeb3579
- Elevating cerebellar theta oscillations boosts noninvasively induced motor plasticity.Journal: Science advancesIn common: stroke, other
- [8] doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2026.106367 [code]
- Linking maternal blood pressure with fetal cerebral haemodynamics and cortical growth in congenital heart disease.Journal: EBioMedicineIn common: stroke, other
- [9] doi:10.1186/s13063-026-09866-2
- Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke urinary incontinence: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Journal: TrialsIn common: stroke, other
- [10] doi:10.1002/hbm.70602 [code]
- Neuroimaging Correlates of Post-Stroke Pain After Ischemic Stroke: Secondary Analysis of the INSPiRE-TMS Trial.Journal: Human brain mappingIn common: stroke, other
Contribute
The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.
Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.
Claim this paper
Correct its record
Say what each link of this record is, remove the ones that are not the paper's, add the ones that are missing. The correction becomes a new version of the record, in its Versions section.
Validate its tracing map
You validate the map as this page shows it: 2 repositories of the authors' code, each at its verified commit and with its license, 0 scripts, and 0 matches between paragraphs and code (see the Code and Map sections). It then receives a DOI on Zenodo, with you (your ORCID iD) and OSCR as its creators; the code itself is not deposited.
The map's fingerprint: sha256:47f9577e9614a8c4…
Add the badge to its README
The badge links the code to this page. Copy one of these into the README of the paper's code: only you decide where it goes, and nothing is changed for you.
Markdown
[.
Discussion, reproductions, activity
Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.
Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.
Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.
