Hippocampal connectivity predicting recognition and categorization abilities.

Overview

1. Brain and Memory Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States

Abstract

Introduction: Flexible use of memory involves both the ability to form detailed memories of individual experiences (specificity) and to generalize across related experiences (generalization). Memory specificity and generalization have been attributed to distinct neocortical regions, such as ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) and ventromedial PFC respectively. The hippocampus has been traditionally associated with memory specificity, but more recent work highlights additional role in generalization. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the hippocampus supports both memory specificity and generalization, but through interactions with distinct cortical regions.

Methods: Fifty-two adults learned to categorize blended face stimuli, enabling both extraction of category structure (generalization) and encoding of item-specific features (specificity). Background functional connectivity was measured using fMRI during passive viewing of the same faces before and after learning.

Results: Participants showed robust category learning, above-chance recognition of studied faces from similar lures, and successful category generalization to novel category members. Recognition and categorization performance were not highly correlated, suggesting distinct processes supporting each memory function. In the brain, we found distinct connectivity profiles of anterior hippocampus, presumed to preferentially contribute to generalization, and posterior hippocampus, presumed to preferentially contribute to specificity. Learning led to increased anterior hippocampal connectivity with default mode regions including ventromedial PFC, and posterior hippocampal connectivity with visual cortex. Increased anterior hippocampal connectivity with ventromedial PFC, somatomotor cortex, and visual cortex predicted better category generalization, whereas increased posterior hippocampal connectivity with ventrolateral PFC predicted more accurate face recognition. Exploratory analyses revealed widespread learning-related changes in cortico-cortical interactions, with changes in connectivity among visual, somatomotor, and default mode networks predicting categorization.

Discussion: Together, these findings support the notion that the hippocampus supports both memory specificity and generalization through interactions with distinct cortical networks. These results advance mechanistic accounts of how the hippocampus and cortex coordinate to balance competing memory demands.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data and to no code of its authors: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

• osf:5h8b7, at OSF; found in the text, “Introduction”

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://osf.io/5h8b7.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 30 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 3 authors, 7 keywords, 1 funder, 115 references, 9 RRIDs.

Cite

This paper

Brannigan, K., Frank, L., & Zeithamova, D. (2026). Hippocampal connectivity predicting recognition and categorization abilities. Frontiers in cognition, 5, 1765217. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcogn.2026.1765217

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36805-5 [code]

Flexible reuse of cortico-hippocampal representations during encoding and recall of naturalistic events.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: 21 references

[2] doi:10.7554/elife.80281 [code]

Representational integration and differentiation in the human hippocampus following goal-directed navigation.

Journal: eLife

In common: 16 references

[3] doi:10.1073/pnas.2503388123

Distinct contributions of hippocampal pathways in learning regularities and exceptions revealed by functional footprints.

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

In common: 14 references

[4] doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33517-0 [code]

Schemas provide a scaffold for neocortical integration of new memories over time.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: 13 references

[5] doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101654

Developmental differences in hippocampal long-axis contributions to memory precision.

Journal: Developmental cognitive neuroscience

In common: 14 references

[6] doi:10.7554/elife.84359

Integration of overlapping sequences emerges with consolidation through medial prefrontal cortex neural ensembles and hippocampal-cortical connectivity.

Journal: eLife

In common: 10 references

[7] doi:10.1002/hipo.70137 [code]

Temporal Interference Modulates Medial Temporal and Frontoparietal Activity During Mnemonic Discrimination: A High-Resolution Whole-Brain fMRI Investigation.

Journal: Hippocampus

In common: 15 references

[8] doi:10.3389/fcogn.2026.1767179 [code]

Adult lifespan effects on functional specialization along the hippocampal long axis.

Journal: Frontiers in cognition

In common: 11 references

[9] doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2026.101767

Neural correlates of learning speed reveal developmental differences in memory.

Journal: Developmental cognitive neuroscience

In common: 13 references

[10] doi:10.1093/cercor/bhae233 [code]

Recalled through this day but forgotten next week?-retrieval activity predicts durability of partly consolidated memories.

Journal: Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)

In common: 15 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: code errors and mismatches between the code and the paper about this paper and its code, from readers and its authors, beside the paper and its tracing map.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code and did not get the paper's result, what they ran, with which environment, commit and data.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.