Analyzing rescaling, discretization, and linearization in RNNs for neural system modeling.

Overview

1. Escuela Superior de Ingeniería y Tecnología (ESIT), Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR), La Rioja, Spain
2. Fundación I+D Software Libre (FIDESOL), Granada, Spain
3. Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes (UNQ), Bernal, Buenos Aires, Argentina
4. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
5. Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
6. Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibàñez, Santiago, Chile

Abstract

Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) are widely used to model neural activity in Computational Neuroscience. Here, we explore the mathematical foundations of three fundamental procedures that can be implemented: temporal rescaling, discretization, and linearization. These techniques provide crucial tools for characterizing the behavior of RNNs, offering insights into their temporal dynamics, facilitating practical computational implementation, and allowing for linear approximations for analysis. We discuss the flexible order in which these procedures can be applied, emphasizing their importance in modeling and analyzing RNNs for neuroscience and formally prove that these three operations commute pairwise. We also explicitly describe the conditions under which these procedures can be considered interchangeable. Our findings directly inform the design of biologically plausible RNN models for simulating neural dynamics observed in decision-making circuits and motor control, where temporal scaling and stability are critical for matching experimental recordings. Furthermore, we show that this exact commutativity guarantees the structural preservation of the network's controllability, preventing the emergence of inaccessible state-spaces under numerical discretization or temporal rescaling.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

• 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
• 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
• no match between paragraphs and code yet;
• neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 2, 28 September 2026

• Funding: added Universidad Internacional de La Rioja; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 2 authors, 5 keywords, 23 references.

Cite

This paper

Caruso, M., & Jarne, C. (2026). Analyzing rescaling, discretization, and linearization in RNNs for neural system modeling. Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 20, 1760701. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2026.1760701

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75924-7 [code]

Data-driven reduced modeling of neural dynamics.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: 3 references

[2] doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014162 [code]

Exploring neural manifolds across a wide range of intrinsic dimensions.

Journal: PLoS computational biology

In common: computational, 2 references

[3] doi:10.1073/pnas.2616911123 [code]

Cerebellar microcircuits enable robust evidence-based decisions through cortico-cerebellar coupling.

Journal: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

In common: 2 references

[4] doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013448

The speed limit of visual perception: Bidirectional influence of image memorability and processing speed on perceived duration and recognition.

Journal: PLoS computational biology

In common: 2 references

[5] doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2026.07.016 [code]

Inferring brain-wide interactions using data-constrained recurrent neural network models.

Journal: Neuron

In common: 2 references

[6] doi:10.1162/imag.a.1266 [code]

Multimodal subspace independent vector analysis effectively captures latent relationships between brain structure and function.

Journal: Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

In common: 2 references

[7] doi:10.3390/biomimetics11080569 [code]

Pretraining of Embodied Recurrent Networks Bridges the Gap Between Artificial and Cortical Neural Activities.

Journal: Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)

In common: 2 references

[8] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-09938-8 [code]

Representation Transfer via Invariant Input-driven Continuous Attractors for Fast Domain Adaptation.

Journal: Communications biology

In common: computational, 1 reference

[9] doi:10.1098/rstb.2024.0461 [code]

Shallow recurrent decoders for neural and behavioural dynamics.

Journal: Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences

In common: computational, 1 reference

[10] doi:10.1080/26941899.2026.2619222

Neurodatascience: Past, Present, and Future.

Journal: Data science in science

In common: computational, 1 reference

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.