From neuromyths to neuroscience literacy: a cross-domain study of brain misconceptions among educators in Chilean special schools.

Overview

1. Facultad de Comunicaciones y Artes, Universidad de Las Américas, Santiago, Chile
2. Centro de Investigación en Cognición e Inclusión para la Alfabetización Académica en Educación Superior (CIPAES), Universidad de Las Américas, Santiago, Chile
3. Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad de Talca, Linares, Chile
4. Department of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom
5. Centro de Investigación para la Mejora de los Aprendizajes (CIMA), Facultad de Educación, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile

Abstract

Introduction: Neuromyths remain widespread among educators, but their distribution may vary across domains and educational contexts. This study investigated brain-related misconceptions among educators working in Chilean special schools, focusing on three complementary domains: general brain knowledge, neurodevelopmental neuromyths, and educational neuromyths.

Methods: We used a quantitative, cross-sectional survey design and collected data from 142 educators through three questionnaires assessing general brain knowledge and misconceptions related to neurodevelopment and education. We first examined prevalence patterns across domains descriptively and then fitted item-level mixed-effects logistic regression models to test whether general brain knowledge, interest in educational neuroscience, and self-perceived neuroscience knowledge were associated with accuracy in identifying misconceptions.

Results: We found a clear cross-domain gradient: educational neuromyths yielded the highest proportion of incorrect responses, neurodevelopmental neuromyths occupied an intermediate position, and general brain knowledge showed the lowest proportion of incorrect responses. At the broad domain level, we found no significant associations between accuracy and general brain knowledge, interest in educational neuroscience, or self-perceived neuroscience knowledge in either neurodevelopmental or educational neuromyths. At the subgroup level, however, we found a more selective pattern: higher general brain knowledge was associated with lower odds of a correct response in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder items and with greater odds of a correct response in learning styles items, whereas no significant effects emerged for the remaining subgroups.

Discussion: Neuroscience literacy does not operate as a single, domain-general protective factor against neuromyth endorsement. Instead, its relationship with accuracy appears to depend on the specific type of claim being evaluated. These findings provide updated evidence from Chile and highlight the importance of examining neuromyths in special education settings, where brain- and development-related beliefs may directly shape pedagogical expectations and instructional decisions.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

The paper links to its data, not to its authors' code: see the Data section.

Tracing map

A tracing map links a paper to the code its authors published: this paper has none, so it has no map.

Data

Datasets cited

• osf:dbf7r, at OSF; found in “Data availability statement”

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. This data can be found here: https://osf.io/dbf7r/overview?view_only=8aef6a54327c479493d3a5f519703c13.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 29 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 4 authors, 5 keywords, 21 references.

Cite

This paper

von Hausen, F., Carrasco-Manríquez, C., Quiroz-Martinez, D., & Larraín-Valenzuela, M. J. (2026). From neuromyths to neuroscience literacy: a cross-domain study of brain misconceptions among educators in Chilean special schools. Frontiers in psychology, 17, 1768430. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1768430

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.3389/fped.2026.1912111 [code]

Serial amplitude-integrated electroencephalography trajectories and brain-injury-associated functional immaturity in extremely preterm infants.

Journal: Frontiers in pediatrics

In common: developmental, 1 reference

[2] doi:10.1111/desc.70187 [code]

Prenatal Volume in the Bilateral Superior Temporal Gyrus Associates With Children's Expressive Vocabulary at 24-36 Months.

Journal: Developmental science

In common: developmental, 1 reference

[3] doi:10.1038/s41597-026-07809-9 [code]

EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI) dataset for directional word recognition.

Journal: Scientific data

In common: 1 reference

[4] doi:10.1117/1.nph.13.3.035010

Toward comprehensive multimodal neuromonitoring of surrogates of cerebral autoregulation in traumatic brain injury: insights from a hyperventilation protocol.

Journal: Neurophotonics

In common: 1 reference

[5] doi:10.1007/s00221-026-07343-5 [code]

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Journal: Experimental brain research

In common: 1 reference

[6] doi:10.3390/brainsci16070678

CP5-Centered Parietal HD-tACS Is Associated with Improved Performance in a Smartphone-Based Shopping Task in Older Adults: A Behavioral and EEG Investigation.

Journal: Brain sciences

In common: 1 reference

[7] doi:10.1038/s41467-026-72545-y [code]

Personalized machine learning-guided radiation dose escalation in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: prospective pilot study.

Journal: Nature communications

In common: 1 reference

[8] doi:

Tutorial on using EEG microstates to study moment-to-moment large-scale functional brain network dynamics in neurodevelopment

Journal: Frontiers in neuroscience

In common: developmental

[9] doi:10.1039/d6tb01306f

Hyaluronic acid-alginate hydrazone crosslinked hydrogels support the generation and maturation of V2a interneurons.

Journal: Journal of materials chemistry. B

In common: developmental

[10] doi:10.1038/s42003-026-10802-y

Transcriptome of fetal cortex of tree shrew underlying the emergence of outer subventricular zone.

Journal: Communications biology

In common: developmental

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.