OSCR

Development and validation of the performance evaluation anxiety task: a computerized task to identify functionally significant test anxiety.

Overview

Authors: Kenneth A. Winter1, Timothy M. Dasinger2, Erick A. Bourassa-Price1
  1. Department of Biology, Mississippi College, Clinton, MS, United States
  2. Department of Advanced Biomedical Education, School of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, United States
Institutions: Mississippi College (United States); University of Mississippi Medical Center (United States)
Journal: Frontiers in psychology, volume 17, article 1819517
Dates: received 27 February 2026; accepted 10 July 2026; published online 29 July 2026
Type: Research article · Language: English
License: CC BY
Identifiers: DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1819517 · PMID 42591756 · PMCID PMC13462226 · OpenAlex W7171617005
Open access: gold, a free copy (OpenAlex)
Status: code found, not verified yet
Categories: EEG (modality), human (organism), other condition (population), cognitive (subfield)
Methods: Spectral & time-frequency, Preprocessing, Connectivity, Statistics, Evoked potentials, Physiology & signal measures
Keywords: attentional control theory, EEG, performance anxiety, salivary cortisol, test anxiety, validation study
Topic: Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience), according to OpenAlex
Citations: not cited yet (Europe PMC); 69 references in the paper

Abstract

All currently available instruments for measuring test anxiety are subjective surveys that do not assess functional impairment. Using the attentional control theory of anxiety as its theoretical basis, the Performance Evaluation Anxiety Task (PEAT) was designed as a computerized task to objectively quantify performance disruption induced by negative performance evaluation. Normative scores were determined from a pool of 573 participants. The task was validated using four complementary approaches. Salivary cortisol increased significantly more in individuals classified as highly test anxious (HTA) than low test anxious (LTA), demonstrating physiological sensitivity to evaluation (n = 207). In a dot-probe task with electroencephalography (n = 55), HTA demonstrated altered attentional engagement and disengagement, along with modulation of neural markers of cognitive control (frontal midline theta, theta/beta ratio, posterior theta and alpha power) specifically in response to test-related threat, but not generally threatening items. In a go/no-go task (n = 39), HTA exhibited negative performance feedback-induced increases in commission errors and reductions in post-error slowing without differences in overall accuracy, indicating evaluation-specific executive control disruption rather than global performance deficits. Finally, PEAT classification was unrelated to ADHD diagnosis or medication use (n = 75), supporting discriminant validity. Taken together, these findings provide convergent behavioral, physiological, and neural evidence of the construct and predictive validity of the PEAT as an objective measure of functionally significant test anxiety.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Code

No file of the authors' code could be read here: it is described below, and read at its source.

doi:10.7910/dvn/nxdzma

License: none: the authors keep all their rights
State: unreachable at the last attempt, verified on 29 September 2026
Evidence: found in the paper
Software Heritage: not checked
Found in: the text, “Validation methods”
Not found: README, license file, CITATION.cff, environment file, tests, continuous integration, documentation
Availability: 5 checks, the latest on 29 September 2026: unreachable at the last attempt (HTTP 202)
  • 29 September 2026: unreachable at the last attempt (HTTP 202)
  • 28 September 2026: unreachable at the last attempt (HTTP 202)
  • 28 September 2026: unreachable at the last attempt (HTTP 202)
  • 27 September 2026: unreachable at the last attempt (HTTP 202)
  • 27 September 2026: unreachable at the last attempt (HTTP 202)

Tracing map

Proposed by the machine: these links were found in the paper and verified at the source, without human review. The map will receive a Zenodo DOI once one of the paper's authors has validated it with their ORCID.

What the map holds:

  • 1 repository of the authors' code, each at its verified commit, with its license and how the link was found in the paper;
  • 0 scripts, each with its path and the digest of its content;
  • no match between paragraphs and code yet;
  • neither the text of the paper nor the code itself.

Its JSON (tracing-map.json) is deposited on Zenodo with its DOI once the map is validated.

Data

No dataset and no data link were found in the paper.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/NXDZMA.

Reproduced under the paper's license (CC BY), from the paper cited above.

Versions

The history of this record: each version stored by the harvester or made by a correction of its authors or of the maintainers of its code, and what changed in its facts. The texts of the paper (its abstract, its availability statements) are not part of it; versions that changed only those are not listed.

Version 1, 27 September 2026: the first record

Recorded: type, language, journal, volume, pages, dates, 3 authors, 6 keywords, 58 references.

Cite

This paper

Winter, K. A., Dasinger, T. M., & Bourassa-Price, E. A. (2026). Development and validation of the performance evaluation anxiety task: a computerized task to identify functionally significant test anxiety. Frontiers in psychology, 17, 1819517. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1819517

BibTeX

@article{winter2026development,
author = {Winter, Kenneth A. and Dasinger, Timothy M. and Bourassa-Price, Erick A.},
title = {{Development and validation of the performance evaluation anxiety task: a computerized task to identify functionally significant test anxiety}},
journal = {Frontiers in psychology},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
volume = {17},
pages = {1819517},
publisher = {Frontiers Media SA},
issn = {1664-1078},
doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1819517},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1819517},
pmid = {42591756},
pmcid = {PMC13462226}
}

RIS

TY - JOUR
AU - Winter, Kenneth A.
AU - Dasinger, Timothy M.
AU - Bourassa-Price, Erick A.
TI - Development and validation of the performance evaluation anxiety task: a computerized task to identify functionally significant test anxiety
T2 - Frontiers in psychology
J2 - Front Psychol
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/29
VL - 17
SP - 1819517
SN - 1664-1078
PB - Frontiers Media SA
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1819517
UR - https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1819517
LA - en
ER -

CSL-JSON

{
"id": "10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1819517",
"type": "article-journal",
"title": "Development and validation of the performance evaluation anxiety task: a computerized task to identify functionally significant test anxiety",
"container-title": "Frontiers in psychology",
"author": [
{
"family": "Winter",
"given": "Kenneth A."
},
{
"family": "Dasinger",
"given": "Timothy M."
},
{
"family": "Bourassa-Price",
"given": "Erick A."
}
],
"container-title-short": "Front Psychol",
"volume": "17",
"page": "1819517",
"DOI": "10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1819517",
"PMID": "42591756",
"PMCID": "PMC13462226",
"ISSN": "1664-1078",
"publisher": "Frontiers Media SA",
"URL": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1819517",
"language": "en",
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2026,
7,
29
]
]
}
}

The tracing map gets a citation of its own once an author has validated it and it has a DOI.

Similar papers

The papers with a page that share the most with this one: the tools found in their code, their categories, datasets, cited references and authors, the rarest counting most.

[1] doi:10.3758/s13415-026-01434-0
Neural mechanisms of negative emotionality and cognitive control: The role of frontal midline theta.
Journal: Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience
In common: EEG, cognitive, 9 references
[2] doi:10.1111/ejn.70543 [code]
Neural Oscillations Track Subjective and Pupillary Arousal During Naturalistic Movie Viewing.
Journal: The European journal of neuroscience
In common: EEG, cognitive, 6 references
[3] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0348608
A novel approach for the EEG-driven assessment of divided attention through mutual information theory: A case study at the wheel.
Journal: PloS one
In common: EEG, 6 references
[4] doi:10.1007/s00221-026-07304-y
Anxiety disorders alter cognitive-motor integration during visuomotor adaptation and retention.
Journal: Experimental brain research
In common: EEG, cognitive, other condition, 4 references
[5] doi:10.3389/fnhum.2026.1692628 [code]
The effects of vocal emotions and emotional context on the neural tracking of speech envelopes and listeners' vigilance states.
Journal: Frontiers in human neuroscience
In common: EEG, cognitive, 4 references
[6] doi:10.1038/s41598-026-45966-4 [code]
Changes in visuocortical engagement and oscillatory brain activity during associative learning.
Journal: Scientific reports
In common: EEG, 4 references
[7] doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003979 [code]
Impaired midfrontal‑motor theta phase synchronization characterizes maladaptive motivational behavior in people with obsessive‑compulsive disorder.
Journal: PLoS biology
In common: EEG, other condition, 3 references
[8] doi:10.1186/s11689-026-09706-z [code]
Neural oscillatory dynamics reveal altered top-down and integrative mechanisms during face processing in autistic children and unaffected siblings of autistic children.
Journal: Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders
In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references
[9] doi:10.7554/elife.106050
Cross-modal interaction of human alpha activity does not reflect inhibition of early sensory processing in a frequency-tagging study using EEG and MEG.
Journal: eLife
In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references
[10] doi:10.3390/brainsci16070678
CP5-Centered Parietal HD-tACS Is Associated with Improved Performance in a Smartphone-Based Shopping Task in Older Adults: A Behavioral and EEG Investigation.
Journal: Brain sciences
In common: EEG, cognitive, 3 references

Contribute

The authors of this paper can claim it, correct its record and validate its tracing map, and the maintainers of its code (its owner, or a public member of its organization) correct what it says of their repository; anyone signed in can ask for its removal. Every request goes to OSCR's own machine, which answers it; your account page follows them.

Sign in with ORCID to claim this paper as one of its authors, correct its record or validate its tracing map: when the paper's metadata lists your ORCID iD, you are recognized at once. Maintainers of its code: sign in with GitHub, then claim the repository on your account page.

Request its removal

To ask OSCR to remove this record, the copies of its authors' scripts or its tracing map, use the removal request page: signed in, you say who you are, what to remove and why, then review and confirm the request. Published rules decide every request (how).

Discussion, reproductions, activity

Discussion: questions and error reports about this paper and its code, from signed-in readers and its authors. It opens with sign-in.

Reproductions: reports from readers who ran the authors' code: what they reproduced, with which environment, commit and data. It opens with sign-in.

Activity: what happens around this paper: new versions of its record, its map's validation, discussions and reproductions. It opens with sign-in.